Exploring tradeoffs among diet quality and environmental impacts in self-selected diets: a population-based study

• Published in: European journal of nutrition 2024-08, Vol.63 (5), p.1663-1678
• Main Authors: Mazac, Rachel, Hyyrynen, Matti, Kaartinen, Niina E., Männistö, Satu, Irz, Xavier, Hyytiäinen, Kari, Tuomisto, Hanna L., Lombardini, Chiara
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Chemistry; Chemistry and Materials Science; Cluster Analysis; Diet; Diet - methods; Diet - standards; Diet - statistics & numerical data; Diet, Healthy - methods; Diet, Healthy - statistics & numerical data; Environment; Environmental impact; Eutrophication; Factor analysis; Female; Food quality; Food selection; Food sources; Global warming; Greenhouse gases; Humans; Land use; Male; Middle Aged; Nutrition; Original Contribution; Population studies
• ISSN: 1436-6207; 1436-6215; 1436-6215
• DOI: 10.1007/s00394-024-03366-2

Purpose Proposed sustainable diets often deviate dramatically from currently consumed diets, excluding or drastically reducing entire food groups. Moreover, their environmental sustainability tends to be measured only in terms of greenhouse gases emissions. The aim of this study was to overcome these limitations and identify a cluster of already adopted, relatively healthy diets with substantially lower environmental impacts than the average diet. We also aimed to estimate the reduction in multiple environmental impacts that could be achieved by shifting to this diet cluster and highlight possible tradeoffs among environmental impacts. Methods The diet clusters were identified by applying energy-adjusted multiple factor analysis and hierarchical clustering to the dietary data of the National FinHealth 2017 Study (n = 5125) harmonized with life cycle assessment data on food products from Agribalyse 3.0 and Agri-Footprint using nutrient intakes and global warming potential, land use, and eutrophication of marine and freshwater systems as the active variables. Results We identified five diet clusters , none of which had the highest overall diet quality and lowest impact for all four environmental indicators. One cluster, including twenty percent of the individuals in the sample was identified as a “best compromise” diet with the highest diet quality and the second lowest environmental impacts of all clusters, except for freshwater eutrophication. The cluster did not exclude any food groups, but included more fruits, vegetables, and fish and less of all other animal-source foods than average. Shifting to this cluster diet could raise diet quality while achieving significant reductions in most but not all environmental impacts. Conclusion There are tradeoffs among the environmental impacts of diets. Thus, future dietary analyses should consider multiple sustainability indicators simultaneously. Cluster analysis is a useful tool to help design tailored, socio-culturally acceptable dietary transition paths towards high diet quality and lower environmental impact.