Loading…
Quantitative Pupillometry for Intracranial Pressure (ICP) Monitoring in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review
The neurological examination has remained key for the detection of worsening in neurocritical care patients, particularly after traumatic brain injury (TBI). New-onset, unreactive anisocoria frequently occurs in such situations, triggering aggressive diagnostic and therapeutic measures to address li...
Saved in:
Published in: | Neurocritical care 2024-08, Vol.41 (1), p.255-271 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-25bcc4060a414a5f6242430f6f0697db795bdc841124c97733666b081716b2293 |
container_end_page | 271 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 255 |
container_title | Neurocritical care |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Martínez-Palacios, Karol Vásquez-García, Sebastián Fariyike, Olubunmi A. Robba, Chiara Rubiano, Andrés M. |
description | The neurological examination has remained key for the detection of worsening in neurocritical care patients, particularly after traumatic brain injury (TBI). New-onset, unreactive anisocoria frequently occurs in such situations, triggering aggressive diagnostic and therapeutic measures to address life-threatening elevations in intracranial pressure (ICP). As such, the field needs objective, unbiased, portable, and reliable methods for quickly assessing such pupillary changes. In this area, quantitative pupillometry (QP) proves promising, leveraging the analysis of different pupillary variables to indirectly estimate ICP. Thus, this scoping review seeks to describe the existing evidence for the use of QP in estimating ICP in adult patients with TBI as compared with invasive methods, which are considered the standard practice. This review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews, with a main search of PubMed and EMBASE. The search was limited to studies of adult patients with TBI published in any language between 2012 and 2022. Eight studies were included for analysis, with the vast majority being prospective studies conducted in high-income countries. Among QP variables, serial rather than isolated measurements of neurologic pupillary index, constriction velocity, and maximal constriction velocity demonstrated the best correlation with invasive ICP measurement values, particularly in predicting refractory intracranial hypertension. Neurologic pupillary index and ICP also showed an inverse relationship when trends were simultaneously compared. As such, QP, when used repetitively, seems to be a promising tool for noninvasive ICP monitoring in patients with TBI, especially when used in conjunction with other clinical and neuromonitoring data. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12028-023-01927-7 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11335905</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3094929083</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-25bcc4060a414a5f6242430f6f0697db795bdc841124c97733666b081716b2293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9vFCEYhydGY2vrF_BgSLzUwyj_Gbw0dVN1k5quWs-EYZnKZgZGGLbZby_jtrV68ASE5_29vDxV9QLBNwhC8TYhDHFTQ0xqiCQWtXhUHSLGeA0lR4_nPUU1l4QcVM9S2kCIhRTsaXVAGsIQls1hNX7J2k9u0pPbWrDKo-v7MNgp7kAXIlj6KWoTtXe6B6toU8rRgpPlYvUafA7eTSE6fw2cB1dR56GkGPA-6nJe-k2Ou3fgDHwzYZyhr3br7M1x9aTTfbLPb9ej6vuH86vFp_ri8uNycXZRG4r5VGPWGkMhh5oiqlnHMcWUwI53kEuxboVk7do0FCFMjRSCEM55CxskEG8xluSoOt3njrkd7NrYeZJejdENOu5U0E79fePdD3UdtgohQpiErCSc3CbE8DPbNKnBJWP7XnsbclJYYs6QLH9c0Ff_oJuQoy_zKQIllVjChhQK7ykTQ0rRdvevQVDNRtXeqCpG1W-jSpSilw_nuC-5U1gAsgfSOLuw8U_v_8T-AsNtq44</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3094929083</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative Pupillometry for Intracranial Pressure (ICP) Monitoring in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Martínez-Palacios, Karol ; Vásquez-García, Sebastián ; Fariyike, Olubunmi A. ; Robba, Chiara ; Rubiano, Andrés M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Palacios, Karol ; Vásquez-García, Sebastián ; Fariyike, Olubunmi A. ; Robba, Chiara ; Rubiano, Andrés M. ; noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring international consensus group ; on behalf of the noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring international consensus group</creatorcontrib><description>The neurological examination has remained key for the detection of worsening in neurocritical care patients, particularly after traumatic brain injury (TBI). New-onset, unreactive anisocoria frequently occurs in such situations, triggering aggressive diagnostic and therapeutic measures to address life-threatening elevations in intracranial pressure (ICP). As such, the field needs objective, unbiased, portable, and reliable methods for quickly assessing such pupillary changes. In this area, quantitative pupillometry (QP) proves promising, leveraging the analysis of different pupillary variables to indirectly estimate ICP. Thus, this scoping review seeks to describe the existing evidence for the use of QP in estimating ICP in adult patients with TBI as compared with invasive methods, which are considered the standard practice. This review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews, with a main search of PubMed and EMBASE. The search was limited to studies of adult patients with TBI published in any language between 2012 and 2022. Eight studies were included for analysis, with the vast majority being prospective studies conducted in high-income countries. Among QP variables, serial rather than isolated measurements of neurologic pupillary index, constriction velocity, and maximal constriction velocity demonstrated the best correlation with invasive ICP measurement values, particularly in predicting refractory intracranial hypertension. Neurologic pupillary index and ICP also showed an inverse relationship when trends were simultaneously compared. As such, QP, when used repetitively, seems to be a promising tool for noninvasive ICP monitoring in patients with TBI, especially when used in conjunction with other clinical and neuromonitoring data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1541-6933</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1556-0961</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-0961</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12028-023-01927-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38351298</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Brain Injuries, Traumatic - complications ; Brain Injuries, Traumatic - diagnosis ; Brain Injuries, Traumatic - physiopathology ; Catheters ; Critical Care - methods ; Critical Care Medicine ; Cross-sectional studies ; Glasgow Coma Scale ; Humans ; Intensive ; Internal Medicine ; Intracranial Hypertension - diagnosis ; Intracranial Hypertension - etiology ; Intracranial Hypertension - physiopathology ; Intracranial pressure ; Intracranial Pressure - physiology ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Methods ; Monitoring, Physiologic - methods ; Mortality ; Neurology ; Neurophysiological Monitoring - methods ; Neurosurgery ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Pupil - physiology ; Reflex, Pupillary - physiology ; Review ; Review Article ; Traumatic brain injury</subject><ispartof>Neurocritical care, 2024-08, Vol.41 (1), p.255-271</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-25bcc4060a414a5f6242430f6f0697db795bdc841124c97733666b081716b2293</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2572-1763 ; 0000-0001-8931-3254 ; 0000-0003-1628-3845 ; 0000-0003-1967-4761 ; 0000-0001-9626-3144</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38351298$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Palacios, Karol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vásquez-García, Sebastián</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fariyike, Olubunmi A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robba, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubiano, Andrés M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring international consensus group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring international consensus group</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative Pupillometry for Intracranial Pressure (ICP) Monitoring in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review</title><title>Neurocritical care</title><addtitle>Neurocrit Care</addtitle><addtitle>Neurocrit Care</addtitle><description>The neurological examination has remained key for the detection of worsening in neurocritical care patients, particularly after traumatic brain injury (TBI). New-onset, unreactive anisocoria frequently occurs in such situations, triggering aggressive diagnostic and therapeutic measures to address life-threatening elevations in intracranial pressure (ICP). As such, the field needs objective, unbiased, portable, and reliable methods for quickly assessing such pupillary changes. In this area, quantitative pupillometry (QP) proves promising, leveraging the analysis of different pupillary variables to indirectly estimate ICP. Thus, this scoping review seeks to describe the existing evidence for the use of QP in estimating ICP in adult patients with TBI as compared with invasive methods, which are considered the standard practice. This review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews, with a main search of PubMed and EMBASE. The search was limited to studies of adult patients with TBI published in any language between 2012 and 2022. Eight studies were included for analysis, with the vast majority being prospective studies conducted in high-income countries. Among QP variables, serial rather than isolated measurements of neurologic pupillary index, constriction velocity, and maximal constriction velocity demonstrated the best correlation with invasive ICP measurement values, particularly in predicting refractory intracranial hypertension. Neurologic pupillary index and ICP also showed an inverse relationship when trends were simultaneously compared. As such, QP, when used repetitively, seems to be a promising tool for noninvasive ICP monitoring in patients with TBI, especially when used in conjunction with other clinical and neuromonitoring data.</description><subject>Brain Injuries, Traumatic - complications</subject><subject>Brain Injuries, Traumatic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Brain Injuries, Traumatic - physiopathology</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Critical Care - methods</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Glasgow Coma Scale</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Intracranial Hypertension - diagnosis</subject><subject>Intracranial Hypertension - etiology</subject><subject>Intracranial Hypertension - physiopathology</subject><subject>Intracranial pressure</subject><subject>Intracranial Pressure - physiology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic - methods</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurophysiological Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pupil - physiology</subject><subject>Reflex, Pupillary - physiology</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Traumatic brain injury</subject><issn>1541-6933</issn><issn>1556-0961</issn><issn>1556-0961</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU9vFCEYhydGY2vrF_BgSLzUwyj_Gbw0dVN1k5quWs-EYZnKZgZGGLbZby_jtrV68ASE5_29vDxV9QLBNwhC8TYhDHFTQ0xqiCQWtXhUHSLGeA0lR4_nPUU1l4QcVM9S2kCIhRTsaXVAGsIQls1hNX7J2k9u0pPbWrDKo-v7MNgp7kAXIlj6KWoTtXe6B6toU8rRgpPlYvUafA7eTSE6fw2cB1dR56GkGPA-6nJe-k2Ou3fgDHwzYZyhr3br7M1x9aTTfbLPb9ej6vuH86vFp_ri8uNycXZRG4r5VGPWGkMhh5oiqlnHMcWUwI53kEuxboVk7do0FCFMjRSCEM55CxskEG8xluSoOt3njrkd7NrYeZJejdENOu5U0E79fePdD3UdtgohQpiErCSc3CbE8DPbNKnBJWP7XnsbclJYYs6QLH9c0Ff_oJuQoy_zKQIllVjChhQK7ykTQ0rRdvevQVDNRtXeqCpG1W-jSpSilw_nuC-5U1gAsgfSOLuw8U_v_8T-AsNtq44</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>Martínez-Palacios, Karol</creator><creator>Vásquez-García, Sebastián</creator><creator>Fariyike, Olubunmi A.</creator><creator>Robba, Chiara</creator><creator>Rubiano, Andrés M.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2572-1763</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8931-3254</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1628-3845</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1967-4761</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9626-3144</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Quantitative Pupillometry for Intracranial Pressure (ICP) Monitoring in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review</title><author>Martínez-Palacios, Karol ; Vásquez-García, Sebastián ; Fariyike, Olubunmi A. ; Robba, Chiara ; Rubiano, Andrés M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-25bcc4060a414a5f6242430f6f0697db795bdc841124c97733666b081716b2293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Brain Injuries, Traumatic - complications</topic><topic>Brain Injuries, Traumatic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Brain Injuries, Traumatic - physiopathology</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Critical Care - methods</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Glasgow Coma Scale</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Intracranial Hypertension - diagnosis</topic><topic>Intracranial Hypertension - etiology</topic><topic>Intracranial Hypertension - physiopathology</topic><topic>Intracranial pressure</topic><topic>Intracranial Pressure - physiology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic - methods</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurophysiological Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pupil - physiology</topic><topic>Reflex, Pupillary - physiology</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Traumatic brain injury</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Palacios, Karol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vásquez-García, Sebastián</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fariyike, Olubunmi A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robba, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubiano, Andrés M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring international consensus group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring international consensus group</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer_OA刊</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Neurocritical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martínez-Palacios, Karol</au><au>Vásquez-García, Sebastián</au><au>Fariyike, Olubunmi A.</au><au>Robba, Chiara</au><au>Rubiano, Andrés M.</au><aucorp>noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring international consensus group</aucorp><aucorp>on behalf of the noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring international consensus group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative Pupillometry for Intracranial Pressure (ICP) Monitoring in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review</atitle><jtitle>Neurocritical care</jtitle><stitle>Neurocrit Care</stitle><addtitle>Neurocrit Care</addtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>255</spage><epage>271</epage><pages>255-271</pages><issn>1541-6933</issn><issn>1556-0961</issn><eissn>1556-0961</eissn><abstract>The neurological examination has remained key for the detection of worsening in neurocritical care patients, particularly after traumatic brain injury (TBI). New-onset, unreactive anisocoria frequently occurs in such situations, triggering aggressive diagnostic and therapeutic measures to address life-threatening elevations in intracranial pressure (ICP). As such, the field needs objective, unbiased, portable, and reliable methods for quickly assessing such pupillary changes. In this area, quantitative pupillometry (QP) proves promising, leveraging the analysis of different pupillary variables to indirectly estimate ICP. Thus, this scoping review seeks to describe the existing evidence for the use of QP in estimating ICP in adult patients with TBI as compared with invasive methods, which are considered the standard practice. This review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews, with a main search of PubMed and EMBASE. The search was limited to studies of adult patients with TBI published in any language between 2012 and 2022. Eight studies were included for analysis, with the vast majority being prospective studies conducted in high-income countries. Among QP variables, serial rather than isolated measurements of neurologic pupillary index, constriction velocity, and maximal constriction velocity demonstrated the best correlation with invasive ICP measurement values, particularly in predicting refractory intracranial hypertension. Neurologic pupillary index and ICP also showed an inverse relationship when trends were simultaneously compared. As such, QP, when used repetitively, seems to be a promising tool for noninvasive ICP monitoring in patients with TBI, especially when used in conjunction with other clinical and neuromonitoring data.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>38351298</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12028-023-01927-7</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2572-1763</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8931-3254</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1628-3845</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1967-4761</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9626-3144</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1541-6933 |
ispartof | Neurocritical care, 2024-08, Vol.41 (1), p.255-271 |
issn | 1541-6933 1556-0961 1556-0961 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11335905 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Brain Injuries, Traumatic - complications Brain Injuries, Traumatic - diagnosis Brain Injuries, Traumatic - physiopathology Catheters Critical Care - methods Critical Care Medicine Cross-sectional studies Glasgow Coma Scale Humans Intensive Internal Medicine Intracranial Hypertension - diagnosis Intracranial Hypertension - etiology Intracranial Hypertension - physiopathology Intracranial pressure Intracranial Pressure - physiology Medicine Medicine & Public Health Methods Monitoring, Physiologic - methods Mortality Neurology Neurophysiological Monitoring - methods Neurosurgery Patients Pediatrics Pupil - physiology Reflex, Pupillary - physiology Review Review Article Traumatic brain injury |
title | Quantitative Pupillometry for Intracranial Pressure (ICP) Monitoring in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T09%3A44%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20Pupillometry%20for%20Intracranial%20Pressure%20(ICP)%20Monitoring%20in%20Traumatic%20Brain%20Injury:%20A%20Scoping%20Review&rft.jtitle=Neurocritical%20care&rft.au=Mart%C3%ADnez-Palacios,%20Karol&rft.aucorp=noninvasive%20intracranial%20pressure%20monitoring%20international%20consensus%20group&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=255&rft.epage=271&rft.pages=255-271&rft.issn=1541-6933&rft.eissn=1556-0961&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12028-023-01927-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3094929083%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-25bcc4060a414a5f6242430f6f0697db795bdc841124c97733666b081716b2293%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3094929083&rft_id=info:pmid/38351298&rfr_iscdi=true |