Injectable Contraceptives as an Underutilized Option for Women's Reproductive Health: An Exploratory Qualitative Study

• Published in: Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2024-07, Vol.16 (7), p.e65576
• Main Authors: Subramaniyan, Subalakshmi, Arulmozhi, Madhivanan, Ganapathy, Kalaiselvan, Mohan, Reenaa
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Age; Birth control; Cardiovascular disease; Confidentiality; Consent; Data collection; Epidemiology/Public Health; Family planning; Interviews; Obstetrics/Gynecology; Preventive Medicine; Privacy; Qualitative research; Womens health
• ISSN: 2168-8184; 2168-8184
• DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65576

Injectable contraceptives (IC) provide a highly effective, reversible method of preventing conception, yet discontinuation rates are high. Health workers play a crucial role in the successful implementation of family welfare services. Adding up the basket of choices without knowing the community's needs can lead to poor utilization of services. To explore the facilitators and barriers to the utility of injectable contraceptives among reproductive women from the user's point of view and to understand solutions from the key informants. The study was conducted in the field practice areas among reproductive women attending a primary health center in Puducherry. It was an exploratory qualitative study in which in-depth interviews were conducted among 19 IC users using an interview guide. This was followed by a key informant interview with seven service providers, including doctors, staff nurses, auxiliary nurse midwives, and Anganwadi workers, to explore the solutions for the identified barriers. Purposive, convenient sampling was adopted for the selection of study participants, and the sample size was chosen until the point of saturation. Two investigators trained in qualitative research have performed a manual content analysis of transcripts to ensure credibility. Descriptive codes were derived, and similar codes were merged into categories and themes. The most common facilitators were awareness from service providers and dissatisfaction with previous methods. Fear of side effects, inadequate information, out-of-pocket expenditure, lack of family support, and sociocultural myths were the most common barriers. Key informants suggested counseling on side effects, incentive-based follow-up, universal health insurance, couple-based counseling, training of service providers, and a positive deviance approach. Health workers are pivotal in the successful delivery of family welfare services. The acceptability of IC could be improved by addressing concerns about side effects and its effective management through various targeted interventions.