Loading…

Ultrasonographic evaluation of relative gastrointestinal layer thickness in cats without clinical evidence of gastrointestinal tract disease

The objectives of this study were (1) to measure normal thickness values of the muscularis, submucosal, mucosal and serosal layers in each gastrointestinal (GI) segment (gastric fundus, body and pyloric antrum; duodenum; jejunum; ileum; colon), and (2) to calculate a ratio of muscularis and mucosal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of feline medicine and surgery 2014-02, Vol.16 (2), p.118-124
Main Authors: Winter, Matthew D, Londono, Leonel, Berry, Clifford R, Hernandez, Jorge A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b697450b5d3afae7619f0d24858bb7f1e1608eb68a14b065302cf945b891b58f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b697450b5d3afae7619f0d24858bb7f1e1608eb68a14b065302cf945b891b58f3
container_end_page 124
container_issue 2
container_start_page 118
container_title Journal of feline medicine and surgery
container_volume 16
creator Winter, Matthew D
Londono, Leonel
Berry, Clifford R
Hernandez, Jorge A
description The objectives of this study were (1) to measure normal thickness values of the muscularis, submucosal, mucosal and serosal layers in each gastrointestinal (GI) segment (gastric fundus, body and pyloric antrum; duodenum; jejunum; ileum; colon), and (2) to calculate a ratio of muscularis and mucosal layer thickness to aortic diameter measured at the level of the celiac artery (Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao) in each GI segment in a sample of healthy cats. Ultrasonographic examination of the GI tract was performed, and measurements of the individual layers in each GI segment were obtained in 38 healthy cats without clinical evidence of disease. The muscularis layer was significantly thickest in the ileum, compared with other segments, and it was thicker than the submucosa in all segments except the colon. The mucosa was the thickest layer in all segments, and was thickest in the duodenum and ileum. Measurements of the submucosal and serosal layers were not significantly different between all segments. Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao in each segment were 0.12 and 0.25 (gastric fundus), 0.12 and 0.18 (gastric body), 0.11 and 0.16 (pyloric antrum), 0.08 and 0.27 (duodenum), 0.08 and 0.22 (jejunum), 0.14 and 0.25 (ileum), and 0.05 and 0.08 (colon), respectively. Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao are clinically relevant values that can be used to objectively identify thickening of the muscularis and mucosal layers in response to GI diseases.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1098612X13499013
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11383122</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1098612X13499013</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1491063718</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b697450b5d3afae7619f0d24858bb7f1e1608eb68a14b065302cf945b891b58f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kT9vFDEQxVeIiIRAT4Vc0mzw2PvHrhCKgCBFokkkOsv2zt45-OzD9l6U78CHxqcLERCl8kjvzW9m_JrmDdAzgHF8D1SKAdh34J2UFPiz5gR6zlo29vR5ravc7vXj5mXON5RSySV70RwzLukw0u6k-XXtS9I5hrhKert2luBO-0UXFwOJM0noa71DstK5pOhCwVxc0J54fYeJlNryI2DOxAVidcnk1pV1XAqx3gVnqxF3bsJgcY97RKnDbSGTy6gzvmqOZu0zvr5_T5vrz5-uzi_ay29fvp5_vGwtl7y0ZpBj11PTT1zPGscB5Ewn1oleGDPOgDBQgWYQGjpDh55TZmfZ9UZIML2Y-Wnz4cDdLmaDk8VQ1_Bqm9xGpzsVtVP_KsGt1SruFAAXHBirhHf3hBR_LvUYtXHZovc6YFyygk4CHfgIolrpwWpTzDnh_DAHqNqnqP5Psba8_Xu_h4Y_sVVDezBkvUJ1E5dU_zI_DfwNYd6qMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1491063718</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultrasonographic evaluation of relative gastrointestinal layer thickness in cats without clinical evidence of gastrointestinal tract disease</title><source>SAGE Open Access</source><creator>Winter, Matthew D ; Londono, Leonel ; Berry, Clifford R ; Hernandez, Jorge A</creator><creatorcontrib>Winter, Matthew D ; Londono, Leonel ; Berry, Clifford R ; Hernandez, Jorge A</creatorcontrib><description>The objectives of this study were (1) to measure normal thickness values of the muscularis, submucosal, mucosal and serosal layers in each gastrointestinal (GI) segment (gastric fundus, body and pyloric antrum; duodenum; jejunum; ileum; colon), and (2) to calculate a ratio of muscularis and mucosal layer thickness to aortic diameter measured at the level of the celiac artery (Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao) in each GI segment in a sample of healthy cats. Ultrasonographic examination of the GI tract was performed, and measurements of the individual layers in each GI segment were obtained in 38 healthy cats without clinical evidence of disease. The muscularis layer was significantly thickest in the ileum, compared with other segments, and it was thicker than the submucosa in all segments except the colon. The mucosa was the thickest layer in all segments, and was thickest in the duodenum and ileum. Measurements of the submucosal and serosal layers were not significantly different between all segments. Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao in each segment were 0.12 and 0.25 (gastric fundus), 0.12 and 0.18 (gastric body), 0.11 and 0.16 (pyloric antrum), 0.08 and 0.27 (duodenum), 0.08 and 0.22 (jejunum), 0.14 and 0.25 (ileum), and 0.05 and 0.08 (colon), respectively. Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao are clinically relevant values that can be used to objectively identify thickening of the muscularis and mucosal layers in response to GI diseases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-612X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-2750</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2750</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1098612X13499013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23906704</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Aging ; Animal Feed ; Animals ; Cats - anatomy &amp; histology ; Conscious Sedation ; Intestines - anatomy &amp; histology ; Intestines - diagnostic imaging ; Original ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2014-02, Vol.16 (2), p.118-124</ispartof><rights>ISFM and AAFP 2013</rights><rights>ISFM and AAFP 2013 2013 International Society of Feline Medicine and American Association of Feline Practitioners</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b697450b5d3afae7619f0d24858bb7f1e1608eb68a14b065302cf945b891b58f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b697450b5d3afae7619f0d24858bb7f1e1608eb68a14b065302cf945b891b58f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11383122/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11383122/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,21966,27853,27924,27925,44945,45333,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1098612X13499013?utm_source=summon&amp;utm_medium=discovery-provider$$EView_record_in_SAGE_Publications$$FView_record_in_$$GSAGE_Publications</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23906704$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Winter, Matthew D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Londono, Leonel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Clifford R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, Jorge A</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrasonographic evaluation of relative gastrointestinal layer thickness in cats without clinical evidence of gastrointestinal tract disease</title><title>Journal of feline medicine and surgery</title><addtitle>J Feline Med Surg</addtitle><description>The objectives of this study were (1) to measure normal thickness values of the muscularis, submucosal, mucosal and serosal layers in each gastrointestinal (GI) segment (gastric fundus, body and pyloric antrum; duodenum; jejunum; ileum; colon), and (2) to calculate a ratio of muscularis and mucosal layer thickness to aortic diameter measured at the level of the celiac artery (Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao) in each GI segment in a sample of healthy cats. Ultrasonographic examination of the GI tract was performed, and measurements of the individual layers in each GI segment were obtained in 38 healthy cats without clinical evidence of disease. The muscularis layer was significantly thickest in the ileum, compared with other segments, and it was thicker than the submucosa in all segments except the colon. The mucosa was the thickest layer in all segments, and was thickest in the duodenum and ileum. Measurements of the submucosal and serosal layers were not significantly different between all segments. Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao in each segment were 0.12 and 0.25 (gastric fundus), 0.12 and 0.18 (gastric body), 0.11 and 0.16 (pyloric antrum), 0.08 and 0.27 (duodenum), 0.08 and 0.22 (jejunum), 0.14 and 0.25 (ileum), and 0.05 and 0.08 (colon), respectively. Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao are clinically relevant values that can be used to objectively identify thickening of the muscularis and mucosal layers in response to GI diseases.</description><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Animal Feed</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cats - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Conscious Sedation</subject><subject>Intestines - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Intestines - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>1098-612X</issn><issn>1532-2750</issn><issn>1532-2750</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kT9vFDEQxVeIiIRAT4Vc0mzw2PvHrhCKgCBFokkkOsv2zt45-OzD9l6U78CHxqcLERCl8kjvzW9m_JrmDdAzgHF8D1SKAdh34J2UFPiz5gR6zlo29vR5ravc7vXj5mXON5RSySV70RwzLukw0u6k-XXtS9I5hrhKert2luBO-0UXFwOJM0noa71DstK5pOhCwVxc0J54fYeJlNryI2DOxAVidcnk1pV1XAqx3gVnqxF3bsJgcY97RKnDbSGTy6gzvmqOZu0zvr5_T5vrz5-uzi_ay29fvp5_vGwtl7y0ZpBj11PTT1zPGscB5Ewn1oleGDPOgDBQgWYQGjpDh55TZmfZ9UZIML2Y-Wnz4cDdLmaDk8VQ1_Bqm9xGpzsVtVP_KsGt1SruFAAXHBirhHf3hBR_LvUYtXHZovc6YFyygk4CHfgIolrpwWpTzDnh_DAHqNqnqP5Psba8_Xu_h4Y_sVVDezBkvUJ1E5dU_zI_DfwNYd6qMw</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Winter, Matthew D</creator><creator>Londono, Leonel</creator><creator>Berry, Clifford R</creator><creator>Hernandez, Jorge A</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Ultrasonographic evaluation of relative gastrointestinal layer thickness in cats without clinical evidence of gastrointestinal tract disease</title><author>Winter, Matthew D ; Londono, Leonel ; Berry, Clifford R ; Hernandez, Jorge A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b697450b5d3afae7619f0d24858bb7f1e1608eb68a14b065302cf945b891b58f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Animal Feed</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cats - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Conscious Sedation</topic><topic>Intestines - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Intestines - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Winter, Matthew D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Londono, Leonel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Clifford R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, Jorge A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of feline medicine and surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Winter, Matthew D</au><au>Londono, Leonel</au><au>Berry, Clifford R</au><au>Hernandez, Jorge A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultrasonographic evaluation of relative gastrointestinal layer thickness in cats without clinical evidence of gastrointestinal tract disease</atitle><jtitle>Journal of feline medicine and surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Feline Med Surg</addtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>118</spage><epage>124</epage><pages>118-124</pages><issn>1098-612X</issn><issn>1532-2750</issn><eissn>1532-2750</eissn><abstract>The objectives of this study were (1) to measure normal thickness values of the muscularis, submucosal, mucosal and serosal layers in each gastrointestinal (GI) segment (gastric fundus, body and pyloric antrum; duodenum; jejunum; ileum; colon), and (2) to calculate a ratio of muscularis and mucosal layer thickness to aortic diameter measured at the level of the celiac artery (Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao) in each GI segment in a sample of healthy cats. Ultrasonographic examination of the GI tract was performed, and measurements of the individual layers in each GI segment were obtained in 38 healthy cats without clinical evidence of disease. The muscularis layer was significantly thickest in the ileum, compared with other segments, and it was thicker than the submucosa in all segments except the colon. The mucosa was the thickest layer in all segments, and was thickest in the duodenum and ileum. Measurements of the submucosal and serosal layers were not significantly different between all segments. Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao in each segment were 0.12 and 0.25 (gastric fundus), 0.12 and 0.18 (gastric body), 0.11 and 0.16 (pyloric antrum), 0.08 and 0.27 (duodenum), 0.08 and 0.22 (jejunum), 0.14 and 0.25 (ileum), and 0.05 and 0.08 (colon), respectively. Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao are clinically relevant values that can be used to objectively identify thickening of the muscularis and mucosal layers in response to GI diseases.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>23906704</pmid><doi>10.1177/1098612X13499013</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1098-612X
ispartof Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2014-02, Vol.16 (2), p.118-124
issn 1098-612X
1532-2750
1532-2750
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11383122
source SAGE Open Access
subjects Aging
Animal Feed
Animals
Cats - anatomy & histology
Conscious Sedation
Intestines - anatomy & histology
Intestines - diagnostic imaging
Original
Ultrasonography
title Ultrasonographic evaluation of relative gastrointestinal layer thickness in cats without clinical evidence of gastrointestinal tract disease
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A24%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_AFRWT&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultrasonographic%20evaluation%20of%20relative%20gastrointestinal%20layer%20thickness%20in%20cats%20without%20clinical%20evidence%20of%20gastrointestinal%20tract%20disease&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20feline%20medicine%20and%20surgery&rft.au=Winter,%20Matthew%20D&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=118&rft.epage=124&rft.pages=118-124&rft.issn=1098-612X&rft.eissn=1532-2750&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1098612X13499013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_AFRWT%3E1491063718%3C/proquest_AFRWT%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b697450b5d3afae7619f0d24858bb7f1e1608eb68a14b065302cf945b891b58f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1491063718&rft_id=info:pmid/23906704&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1098612X13499013&rfr_iscdi=true