Loading…
Ultrasonographic evaluation of relative gastrointestinal layer thickness in cats without clinical evidence of gastrointestinal tract disease
The objectives of this study were (1) to measure normal thickness values of the muscularis, submucosal, mucosal and serosal layers in each gastrointestinal (GI) segment (gastric fundus, body and pyloric antrum; duodenum; jejunum; ileum; colon), and (2) to calculate a ratio of muscularis and mucosal...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of feline medicine and surgery 2014-02, Vol.16 (2), p.118-124 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b697450b5d3afae7619f0d24858bb7f1e1608eb68a14b065302cf945b891b58f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b697450b5d3afae7619f0d24858bb7f1e1608eb68a14b065302cf945b891b58f3 |
container_end_page | 124 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 118 |
container_title | Journal of feline medicine and surgery |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Winter, Matthew D Londono, Leonel Berry, Clifford R Hernandez, Jorge A |
description | The objectives of this study were (1) to measure normal thickness values of the muscularis, submucosal, mucosal and serosal layers in each gastrointestinal (GI) segment (gastric fundus, body and pyloric antrum; duodenum; jejunum; ileum; colon), and (2) to calculate a ratio of muscularis and mucosal layer thickness to aortic diameter measured at the level of the celiac artery (Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao) in each GI segment in a sample of healthy cats. Ultrasonographic examination of the GI tract was performed, and measurements of the individual layers in each GI segment were obtained in 38 healthy cats without clinical evidence of disease. The muscularis layer was significantly thickest in the ileum, compared with other segments, and it was thicker than the submucosa in all segments except the colon. The mucosa was the thickest layer in all segments, and was thickest in the duodenum and ileum. Measurements of the submucosal and serosal layers were not significantly different between all segments. Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao in each segment were 0.12 and 0.25 (gastric fundus), 0.12 and 0.18 (gastric body), 0.11 and 0.16 (pyloric antrum), 0.08 and 0.27 (duodenum), 0.08 and 0.22 (jejunum), 0.14 and 0.25 (ileum), and 0.05 and 0.08 (colon), respectively. Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao are clinically relevant values that can be used to objectively identify thickening of the muscularis and mucosal layers in response to GI diseases. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1098612X13499013 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11383122</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1098612X13499013</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1491063718</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b697450b5d3afae7619f0d24858bb7f1e1608eb68a14b065302cf945b891b58f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kT9vFDEQxVeIiIRAT4Vc0mzw2PvHrhCKgCBFokkkOsv2zt45-OzD9l6U78CHxqcLERCl8kjvzW9m_JrmDdAzgHF8D1SKAdh34J2UFPiz5gR6zlo29vR5ravc7vXj5mXON5RSySV70RwzLukw0u6k-XXtS9I5hrhKert2luBO-0UXFwOJM0noa71DstK5pOhCwVxc0J54fYeJlNryI2DOxAVidcnk1pV1XAqx3gVnqxF3bsJgcY97RKnDbSGTy6gzvmqOZu0zvr5_T5vrz5-uzi_ay29fvp5_vGwtl7y0ZpBj11PTT1zPGscB5Ewn1oleGDPOgDBQgWYQGjpDh55TZmfZ9UZIML2Y-Wnz4cDdLmaDk8VQ1_Bqm9xGpzsVtVP_KsGt1SruFAAXHBirhHf3hBR_LvUYtXHZovc6YFyygk4CHfgIolrpwWpTzDnh_DAHqNqnqP5Psba8_Xu_h4Y_sVVDezBkvUJ1E5dU_zI_DfwNYd6qMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1491063718</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultrasonographic evaluation of relative gastrointestinal layer thickness in cats without clinical evidence of gastrointestinal tract disease</title><source>SAGE Open Access</source><creator>Winter, Matthew D ; Londono, Leonel ; Berry, Clifford R ; Hernandez, Jorge A</creator><creatorcontrib>Winter, Matthew D ; Londono, Leonel ; Berry, Clifford R ; Hernandez, Jorge A</creatorcontrib><description>The objectives of this study were (1) to measure normal thickness values of the muscularis, submucosal, mucosal and serosal layers in each gastrointestinal (GI) segment (gastric fundus, body and pyloric antrum; duodenum; jejunum; ileum; colon), and (2) to calculate a ratio of muscularis and mucosal layer thickness to aortic diameter measured at the level of the celiac artery (Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao) in each GI segment in a sample of healthy cats. Ultrasonographic examination of the GI tract was performed, and measurements of the individual layers in each GI segment were obtained in 38 healthy cats without clinical evidence of disease. The muscularis layer was significantly thickest in the ileum, compared with other segments, and it was thicker than the submucosa in all segments except the colon. The mucosa was the thickest layer in all segments, and was thickest in the duodenum and ileum. Measurements of the submucosal and serosal layers were not significantly different between all segments. Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao in each segment were 0.12 and 0.25 (gastric fundus), 0.12 and 0.18 (gastric body), 0.11 and 0.16 (pyloric antrum), 0.08 and 0.27 (duodenum), 0.08 and 0.22 (jejunum), 0.14 and 0.25 (ileum), and 0.05 and 0.08 (colon), respectively. Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao are clinically relevant values that can be used to objectively identify thickening of the muscularis and mucosal layers in response to GI diseases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-612X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-2750</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2750</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1098612X13499013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23906704</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Aging ; Animal Feed ; Animals ; Cats - anatomy & histology ; Conscious Sedation ; Intestines - anatomy & histology ; Intestines - diagnostic imaging ; Original ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2014-02, Vol.16 (2), p.118-124</ispartof><rights>ISFM and AAFP 2013</rights><rights>ISFM and AAFP 2013 2013 International Society of Feline Medicine and American Association of Feline Practitioners</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b697450b5d3afae7619f0d24858bb7f1e1608eb68a14b065302cf945b891b58f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b697450b5d3afae7619f0d24858bb7f1e1608eb68a14b065302cf945b891b58f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11383122/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11383122/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,21966,27853,27924,27925,44945,45333,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1098612X13499013?utm_source=summon&utm_medium=discovery-provider$$EView_record_in_SAGE_Publications$$FView_record_in_$$GSAGE_Publications</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23906704$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Winter, Matthew D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Londono, Leonel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Clifford R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, Jorge A</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrasonographic evaluation of relative gastrointestinal layer thickness in cats without clinical evidence of gastrointestinal tract disease</title><title>Journal of feline medicine and surgery</title><addtitle>J Feline Med Surg</addtitle><description>The objectives of this study were (1) to measure normal thickness values of the muscularis, submucosal, mucosal and serosal layers in each gastrointestinal (GI) segment (gastric fundus, body and pyloric antrum; duodenum; jejunum; ileum; colon), and (2) to calculate a ratio of muscularis and mucosal layer thickness to aortic diameter measured at the level of the celiac artery (Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao) in each GI segment in a sample of healthy cats. Ultrasonographic examination of the GI tract was performed, and measurements of the individual layers in each GI segment were obtained in 38 healthy cats without clinical evidence of disease. The muscularis layer was significantly thickest in the ileum, compared with other segments, and it was thicker than the submucosa in all segments except the colon. The mucosa was the thickest layer in all segments, and was thickest in the duodenum and ileum. Measurements of the submucosal and serosal layers were not significantly different between all segments. Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao in each segment were 0.12 and 0.25 (gastric fundus), 0.12 and 0.18 (gastric body), 0.11 and 0.16 (pyloric antrum), 0.08 and 0.27 (duodenum), 0.08 and 0.22 (jejunum), 0.14 and 0.25 (ileum), and 0.05 and 0.08 (colon), respectively. Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao are clinically relevant values that can be used to objectively identify thickening of the muscularis and mucosal layers in response to GI diseases.</description><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Animal Feed</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cats - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Conscious Sedation</subject><subject>Intestines - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Intestines - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>1098-612X</issn><issn>1532-2750</issn><issn>1532-2750</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kT9vFDEQxVeIiIRAT4Vc0mzw2PvHrhCKgCBFokkkOsv2zt45-OzD9l6U78CHxqcLERCl8kjvzW9m_JrmDdAzgHF8D1SKAdh34J2UFPiz5gR6zlo29vR5ravc7vXj5mXON5RSySV70RwzLukw0u6k-XXtS9I5hrhKert2luBO-0UXFwOJM0noa71DstK5pOhCwVxc0J54fYeJlNryI2DOxAVidcnk1pV1XAqx3gVnqxF3bsJgcY97RKnDbSGTy6gzvmqOZu0zvr5_T5vrz5-uzi_ay29fvp5_vGwtl7y0ZpBj11PTT1zPGscB5Ewn1oleGDPOgDBQgWYQGjpDh55TZmfZ9UZIML2Y-Wnz4cDdLmaDk8VQ1_Bqm9xGpzsVtVP_KsGt1SruFAAXHBirhHf3hBR_LvUYtXHZovc6YFyygk4CHfgIolrpwWpTzDnh_DAHqNqnqP5Psba8_Xu_h4Y_sVVDezBkvUJ1E5dU_zI_DfwNYd6qMw</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Winter, Matthew D</creator><creator>Londono, Leonel</creator><creator>Berry, Clifford R</creator><creator>Hernandez, Jorge A</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Ultrasonographic evaluation of relative gastrointestinal layer thickness in cats without clinical evidence of gastrointestinal tract disease</title><author>Winter, Matthew D ; Londono, Leonel ; Berry, Clifford R ; Hernandez, Jorge A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b697450b5d3afae7619f0d24858bb7f1e1608eb68a14b065302cf945b891b58f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Animal Feed</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cats - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Conscious Sedation</topic><topic>Intestines - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Intestines - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Winter, Matthew D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Londono, Leonel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Clifford R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, Jorge A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of feline medicine and surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Winter, Matthew D</au><au>Londono, Leonel</au><au>Berry, Clifford R</au><au>Hernandez, Jorge A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultrasonographic evaluation of relative gastrointestinal layer thickness in cats without clinical evidence of gastrointestinal tract disease</atitle><jtitle>Journal of feline medicine and surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Feline Med Surg</addtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>118</spage><epage>124</epage><pages>118-124</pages><issn>1098-612X</issn><issn>1532-2750</issn><eissn>1532-2750</eissn><abstract>The objectives of this study were (1) to measure normal thickness values of the muscularis, submucosal, mucosal and serosal layers in each gastrointestinal (GI) segment (gastric fundus, body and pyloric antrum; duodenum; jejunum; ileum; colon), and (2) to calculate a ratio of muscularis and mucosal layer thickness to aortic diameter measured at the level of the celiac artery (Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao) in each GI segment in a sample of healthy cats. Ultrasonographic examination of the GI tract was performed, and measurements of the individual layers in each GI segment were obtained in 38 healthy cats without clinical evidence of disease. The muscularis layer was significantly thickest in the ileum, compared with other segments, and it was thicker than the submucosa in all segments except the colon. The mucosa was the thickest layer in all segments, and was thickest in the duodenum and ileum. Measurements of the submucosal and serosal layers were not significantly different between all segments. Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao in each segment were 0.12 and 0.25 (gastric fundus), 0.12 and 0.18 (gastric body), 0.11 and 0.16 (pyloric antrum), 0.08 and 0.27 (duodenum), 0.08 and 0.22 (jejunum), 0.14 and 0.25 (ileum), and 0.05 and 0.08 (colon), respectively. Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao are clinically relevant values that can be used to objectively identify thickening of the muscularis and mucosal layers in response to GI diseases.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>23906704</pmid><doi>10.1177/1098612X13499013</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1098-612X |
ispartof | Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2014-02, Vol.16 (2), p.118-124 |
issn | 1098-612X 1532-2750 1532-2750 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11383122 |
source | SAGE Open Access |
subjects | Aging Animal Feed Animals Cats - anatomy & histology Conscious Sedation Intestines - anatomy & histology Intestines - diagnostic imaging Original Ultrasonography |
title | Ultrasonographic evaluation of relative gastrointestinal layer thickness in cats without clinical evidence of gastrointestinal tract disease |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A24%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_AFRWT&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultrasonographic%20evaluation%20of%20relative%20gastrointestinal%20layer%20thickness%20in%20cats%20without%20clinical%20evidence%20of%20gastrointestinal%20tract%20disease&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20feline%20medicine%20and%20surgery&rft.au=Winter,%20Matthew%20D&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=118&rft.epage=124&rft.pages=118-124&rft.issn=1098-612X&rft.eissn=1532-2750&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1098612X13499013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_AFRWT%3E1491063718%3C/proquest_AFRWT%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b697450b5d3afae7619f0d24858bb7f1e1608eb68a14b065302cf945b891b58f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1491063718&rft_id=info:pmid/23906704&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1098612X13499013&rfr_iscdi=true |