Loading…

Current status of prepectoral breast reconstruction in Argentina

Breast cancer is among the most common cancers diagnosed in women, affecting one in eight women per year. Immediate implant-based breast reconstruction has emerged as the predominant approach for postmastectomy reconstruction, with a growing preference for the direct-to-implant (DTI) method over the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Gland surgery 2024-08, Vol.13 (8), p.1552-1560
Main Authors: Rancati, Alberto, Angrigiani, Claudio, Lamas, Gonzalo, Rancati, Agustin, Berrino, Valeria, Barbosa, Karen, Dorr, Julio, Irigo, Marcelo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 1560
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1552
container_title Gland surgery
container_volume 13
creator Rancati, Alberto
Angrigiani, Claudio
Lamas, Gonzalo
Rancati, Agustin
Berrino, Valeria
Barbosa, Karen
Dorr, Julio
Irigo, Marcelo
description Breast cancer is among the most common cancers diagnosed in women, affecting one in eight women per year. Immediate implant-based breast reconstruction has emerged as the predominant approach for postmastectomy reconstruction, with a growing preference for the direct-to-implant (DTI) method over the traditional tissue expander technique. While conventionally, implants were typically positioned beneath the pectoralis major muscle, recent advancements have paved the way for implant placement above the muscle, in the prepectoral plane. Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) techniques can be combined with prepectoral breast reconstruction. The presence of sufficient fatty tissue coverage is considered one of the foremost independent factors influencing the success of immediate breast reconstruction and flap viability. DTI is a safe approach for prepectoral implant-based reconstruction with a number of advantages. However, careful patient selection and judicious assessment of flap perfusion help identify an appropriate subset of patients for prepectoral DTI reconstruction. Proposed breast tissue coverage classification (BTCC) and rigorous perfusion assessment techniques will aid to minimize postoperative complications and reconstruction failure. Based on the obtained range of coverage values (distance between the Cooper's ligaments and the skin) of preoperative digital mammogram evaluation, a three-type BTCC is as follows: Type 1: 2 cm (good coverage). Prepectoral DTI reconstruction provides good results with complication rates similar to those of subpectoral techniques, eliminating breast animation. A meticulous surgical technique is essential to preserve the vascular network that guarantees the survival of the skin flap and nipple-areola complex (NAC). In the good coverage group (Type 3), an immediate DTI reconstruction could be safely performed. Aesthetic complications as rippling can occur if prepectoral implants are placed in Type 1 patients. Preoperative planning for prepectoral placement should not depend on breast volume, but on breast tissue coverage. Flap evaluation based on preoperative imaging measurements may be helpful when planning a conservative mastectomy. Patient selection, preoperative and intraoperative mastectomy flap evaluation, and modifications in implant technology play a critical role in this new and rapidly growing method for impl
doi_str_mv 10.21037/gs-23-291
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11398997</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3106038554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-f4d3716cbd383581a9e3eba887aae442e000462aaf441332e0fdc743ce38a0763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE9LxDAQxYMo7rLuxQ8gPYpQTTJpkp50WfwHC14UvIU0TWul26xJKvjtDe666GlmmN-8eTyETgm-pASDuGpDTiGnJTlAU0qpyGUhisNdzyV7naB5CO8YYwKUcU6P0QRKKilmfIpulqP3dohZiDqOIXNNtvF2Y010XvdZ5a0OMfPWuCFEP5rYuSHrhmzh23TVDfoEHTW6D3a-qzP0cnf7vHzIV0_3j8vFKjeUy5g3rAZBuKlqkFBIoksLttJSCq0tY9Qmf4xTrRvGCECam9oIBsaC1FhwmKHrre5mrNa2Nul7Mqg2vltr_6Wc7tT_zdC9qdZ9KkKglGUpksL5TsG7j9GGqNZdMLbv9WDdGBQQzDHIomAJvdiixrsQvG32fwhWP7GrNigKKsWe4LO_zvbob8jwDbd-fqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3106038554</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Current status of prepectoral breast reconstruction in Argentina</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><creator>Rancati, Alberto ; Angrigiani, Claudio ; Lamas, Gonzalo ; Rancati, Agustin ; Berrino, Valeria ; Barbosa, Karen ; Dorr, Julio ; Irigo, Marcelo</creator><creatorcontrib>Rancati, Alberto ; Angrigiani, Claudio ; Lamas, Gonzalo ; Rancati, Agustin ; Berrino, Valeria ; Barbosa, Karen ; Dorr, Julio ; Irigo, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><description>Breast cancer is among the most common cancers diagnosed in women, affecting one in eight women per year. Immediate implant-based breast reconstruction has emerged as the predominant approach for postmastectomy reconstruction, with a growing preference for the direct-to-implant (DTI) method over the traditional tissue expander technique. While conventionally, implants were typically positioned beneath the pectoralis major muscle, recent advancements have paved the way for implant placement above the muscle, in the prepectoral plane. Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) techniques can be combined with prepectoral breast reconstruction. The presence of sufficient fatty tissue coverage is considered one of the foremost independent factors influencing the success of immediate breast reconstruction and flap viability. DTI is a safe approach for prepectoral implant-based reconstruction with a number of advantages. However, careful patient selection and judicious assessment of flap perfusion help identify an appropriate subset of patients for prepectoral DTI reconstruction. Proposed breast tissue coverage classification (BTCC) and rigorous perfusion assessment techniques will aid to minimize postoperative complications and reconstruction failure. Based on the obtained range of coverage values (distance between the Cooper's ligaments and the skin) of preoperative digital mammogram evaluation, a three-type BTCC is as follows: Type 1: &lt;1 cm (poor coverage), Type 2: between 1 and 2 cm (medium coverage), Type 3: &gt;2 cm (good coverage). Prepectoral DTI reconstruction provides good results with complication rates similar to those of subpectoral techniques, eliminating breast animation. A meticulous surgical technique is essential to preserve the vascular network that guarantees the survival of the skin flap and nipple-areola complex (NAC). In the good coverage group (Type 3), an immediate DTI reconstruction could be safely performed. Aesthetic complications as rippling can occur if prepectoral implants are placed in Type 1 patients. Preoperative planning for prepectoral placement should not depend on breast volume, but on breast tissue coverage. Flap evaluation based on preoperative imaging measurements may be helpful when planning a conservative mastectomy. Patient selection, preoperative and intraoperative mastectomy flap evaluation, and modifications in implant technology play a critical role in this new and rapidly growing method for implant-based breast reconstruction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2227-684X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2227-8575</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21037/gs-23-291</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39282046</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>China (Republic : 1949- ): AME Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Review</subject><ispartof>Gland surgery, 2024-08, Vol.13 (8), p.1552-1560</ispartof><rights>2024 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2024 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved. 2024 Gland Surgery.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-3671-3438 ; 0000-0002-4333-7311 ; 0009-0002-4296-3860 ; 0000-0003-3506-8120 ; 0009-0004-4998-3033 ; 0009-0006-0086-8303 ; 0000-0003-2793-4164</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11398997/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11398997/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39282046$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rancati, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angrigiani, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamas, Gonzalo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rancati, Agustin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berrino, Valeria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorr, Julio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irigo, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><title>Current status of prepectoral breast reconstruction in Argentina</title><title>Gland surgery</title><addtitle>Gland Surg</addtitle><description>Breast cancer is among the most common cancers diagnosed in women, affecting one in eight women per year. Immediate implant-based breast reconstruction has emerged as the predominant approach for postmastectomy reconstruction, with a growing preference for the direct-to-implant (DTI) method over the traditional tissue expander technique. While conventionally, implants were typically positioned beneath the pectoralis major muscle, recent advancements have paved the way for implant placement above the muscle, in the prepectoral plane. Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) techniques can be combined with prepectoral breast reconstruction. The presence of sufficient fatty tissue coverage is considered one of the foremost independent factors influencing the success of immediate breast reconstruction and flap viability. DTI is a safe approach for prepectoral implant-based reconstruction with a number of advantages. However, careful patient selection and judicious assessment of flap perfusion help identify an appropriate subset of patients for prepectoral DTI reconstruction. Proposed breast tissue coverage classification (BTCC) and rigorous perfusion assessment techniques will aid to minimize postoperative complications and reconstruction failure. Based on the obtained range of coverage values (distance between the Cooper's ligaments and the skin) of preoperative digital mammogram evaluation, a three-type BTCC is as follows: Type 1: &lt;1 cm (poor coverage), Type 2: between 1 and 2 cm (medium coverage), Type 3: &gt;2 cm (good coverage). Prepectoral DTI reconstruction provides good results with complication rates similar to those of subpectoral techniques, eliminating breast animation. A meticulous surgical technique is essential to preserve the vascular network that guarantees the survival of the skin flap and nipple-areola complex (NAC). In the good coverage group (Type 3), an immediate DTI reconstruction could be safely performed. Aesthetic complications as rippling can occur if prepectoral implants are placed in Type 1 patients. Preoperative planning for prepectoral placement should not depend on breast volume, but on breast tissue coverage. Flap evaluation based on preoperative imaging measurements may be helpful when planning a conservative mastectomy. Patient selection, preoperative and intraoperative mastectomy flap evaluation, and modifications in implant technology play a critical role in this new and rapidly growing method for implant-based breast reconstruction.</description><subject>Review</subject><issn>2227-684X</issn><issn>2227-8575</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkE9LxDAQxYMo7rLuxQ8gPYpQTTJpkp50WfwHC14UvIU0TWul26xJKvjtDe666GlmmN-8eTyETgm-pASDuGpDTiGnJTlAU0qpyGUhisNdzyV7naB5CO8YYwKUcU6P0QRKKilmfIpulqP3dohZiDqOIXNNtvF2Y010XvdZ5a0OMfPWuCFEP5rYuSHrhmzh23TVDfoEHTW6D3a-qzP0cnf7vHzIV0_3j8vFKjeUy5g3rAZBuKlqkFBIoksLttJSCq0tY9Qmf4xTrRvGCECam9oIBsaC1FhwmKHrre5mrNa2Nul7Mqg2vltr_6Wc7tT_zdC9qdZ9KkKglGUpksL5TsG7j9GGqNZdMLbv9WDdGBQQzDHIomAJvdiixrsQvG32fwhWP7GrNigKKsWe4LO_zvbob8jwDbd-fqA</recordid><startdate>20240831</startdate><enddate>20240831</enddate><creator>Rancati, Alberto</creator><creator>Angrigiani, Claudio</creator><creator>Lamas, Gonzalo</creator><creator>Rancati, Agustin</creator><creator>Berrino, Valeria</creator><creator>Barbosa, Karen</creator><creator>Dorr, Julio</creator><creator>Irigo, Marcelo</creator><general>AME Publishing Company</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3671-3438</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4333-7311</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4296-3860</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3506-8120</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4998-3033</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0086-8303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2793-4164</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240831</creationdate><title>Current status of prepectoral breast reconstruction in Argentina</title><author>Rancati, Alberto ; Angrigiani, Claudio ; Lamas, Gonzalo ; Rancati, Agustin ; Berrino, Valeria ; Barbosa, Karen ; Dorr, Julio ; Irigo, Marcelo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-f4d3716cbd383581a9e3eba887aae442e000462aaf441332e0fdc743ce38a0763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Review</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rancati, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angrigiani, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamas, Gonzalo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rancati, Agustin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berrino, Valeria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorr, Julio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irigo, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Gland surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rancati, Alberto</au><au>Angrigiani, Claudio</au><au>Lamas, Gonzalo</au><au>Rancati, Agustin</au><au>Berrino, Valeria</au><au>Barbosa, Karen</au><au>Dorr, Julio</au><au>Irigo, Marcelo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Current status of prepectoral breast reconstruction in Argentina</atitle><jtitle>Gland surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Gland Surg</addtitle><date>2024-08-31</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1552</spage><epage>1560</epage><pages>1552-1560</pages><issn>2227-684X</issn><eissn>2227-8575</eissn><abstract>Breast cancer is among the most common cancers diagnosed in women, affecting one in eight women per year. Immediate implant-based breast reconstruction has emerged as the predominant approach for postmastectomy reconstruction, with a growing preference for the direct-to-implant (DTI) method over the traditional tissue expander technique. While conventionally, implants were typically positioned beneath the pectoralis major muscle, recent advancements have paved the way for implant placement above the muscle, in the prepectoral plane. Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) techniques can be combined with prepectoral breast reconstruction. The presence of sufficient fatty tissue coverage is considered one of the foremost independent factors influencing the success of immediate breast reconstruction and flap viability. DTI is a safe approach for prepectoral implant-based reconstruction with a number of advantages. However, careful patient selection and judicious assessment of flap perfusion help identify an appropriate subset of patients for prepectoral DTI reconstruction. Proposed breast tissue coverage classification (BTCC) and rigorous perfusion assessment techniques will aid to minimize postoperative complications and reconstruction failure. Based on the obtained range of coverage values (distance between the Cooper's ligaments and the skin) of preoperative digital mammogram evaluation, a three-type BTCC is as follows: Type 1: &lt;1 cm (poor coverage), Type 2: between 1 and 2 cm (medium coverage), Type 3: &gt;2 cm (good coverage). Prepectoral DTI reconstruction provides good results with complication rates similar to those of subpectoral techniques, eliminating breast animation. A meticulous surgical technique is essential to preserve the vascular network that guarantees the survival of the skin flap and nipple-areola complex (NAC). In the good coverage group (Type 3), an immediate DTI reconstruction could be safely performed. Aesthetic complications as rippling can occur if prepectoral implants are placed in Type 1 patients. Preoperative planning for prepectoral placement should not depend on breast volume, but on breast tissue coverage. Flap evaluation based on preoperative imaging measurements may be helpful when planning a conservative mastectomy. Patient selection, preoperative and intraoperative mastectomy flap evaluation, and modifications in implant technology play a critical role in this new and rapidly growing method for implant-based breast reconstruction.</abstract><cop>China (Republic : 1949- )</cop><pub>AME Publishing Company</pub><pmid>39282046</pmid><doi>10.21037/gs-23-291</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3671-3438</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4333-7311</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4296-3860</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3506-8120</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4998-3033</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0086-8303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2793-4164</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2227-684X
ispartof Gland surgery, 2024-08, Vol.13 (8), p.1552-1560
issn 2227-684X
2227-8575
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11398997
source Open Access: PubMed Central
subjects Review
title Current status of prepectoral breast reconstruction in Argentina
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T00%3A05%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Current%20status%20of%20prepectoral%20breast%20reconstruction%20in%20Argentina&rft.jtitle=Gland%20surgery&rft.au=Rancati,%20Alberto&rft.date=2024-08-31&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1552&rft.epage=1560&rft.pages=1552-1560&rft.issn=2227-684X&rft.eissn=2227-8575&rft_id=info:doi/10.21037/gs-23-291&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3106038554%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-f4d3716cbd383581a9e3eba887aae442e000462aaf441332e0fdc743ce38a0763%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3106038554&rft_id=info:pmid/39282046&rfr_iscdi=true