Loading…

Normal Saline or Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation for Vital Pulp Therapy? A Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial

criteria were randomized to each irrigant, 65 in the NaOCl and 60 in the NSS groups. ProRoot® MTA was used as a pulp dressing material in both groups and teeth were followed for 12 months. The primary outcome was the success of VPT; requiring both clinical and radiographic success to be considered a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European endodontic journal 2024-08, Vol.9 (3), p.180-190
Main Authors: Machareonsap, Hataichanok, Chompu-Inwai, Papimon, Chaipattanawan, Nattakan, Manmontri, Chanika, Nirunsittirat, Areerat, Phinyo, Phichayut
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 190
container_issue 3
container_start_page 180
container_title European endodontic journal
container_volume 9
creator Machareonsap, Hataichanok
Chompu-Inwai, Papimon
Chaipattanawan, Nattakan
Manmontri, Chanika
Nirunsittirat, Areerat
Phinyo, Phichayut
description criteria were randomized to each irrigant, 65 in the NaOCl and 60 in the NSS groups. ProRoot® MTA was used as a pulp dressing material in both groups and teeth were followed for 12 months. The primary outcome was the success of VPT; requiring both clinical and radiographic success to be considered as success. The hypothesis was that the absolute difference of VPT success in the NSS group was not worse than that in the NaOCl group, by a margin of 5%. The secondary outcome was discoloration; percentages of discolorations between both groups were compared. Results: Using a per protocol analysis, the absolute difference of VPT success between the NSS and NaOCl groups was 2.08% (95% CI: -1.95, 6.1). Perceptible gray discolorations were 80% and 63% in NaOCl and NSS groups (difference -17%; 95% CI: -40.0, 6.2; p=0.15). Conclusions: For MTA-VPT procedure, irrigation with NSS was not worse than that with NaOCl. However, both irrigants caused discoloration. (EEJ-2023-05-065).
doi_str_mv 10.14744/eej.2023.30932
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11413600</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3090949812</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1932-6420383922a11ee10ae5f8ba8fa3cc0a883530cea0028822a2aae0fd825aac023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUcFu2zAMFYYOa5H2vNug4y5OKMlO5VNRBN0SIMiKNe1VYGW6USFbnmwPyL5-SpsV3YkE-N4jHx9jnwVMRX6Z5zOi56kEqaYKSiU_sDNZ5DoDrcqTd_0pu-j7ZwCQl2UOUn5ip6oUotRFccbGTYgNen6H3rXEQ-R3oXJjw5f7LtidD9ENxFcxuiccXGh5nSAPbkiU29F3fLujiN3-il_zTWizVVtTdAfSnv_EtgqN-0MVX4R2iMH71G6jQ3_OPtboe7o41gm7_3azXSyz9Y_vq8X1OrMiGcrmuQSVHEiJQhAJQCpq_Yi6RmUtoNaqUGAJkzetE0oiEtSVlgWiTY-ZsKtX3W58bKiylM5Ab7roGox7E9CZ_yet25mn8NsIkQs1B0gKX48KMfwaqR9M43pL3mNLYexN-jyUeanFYdnsFWpj6PtI9dseAeYlMJMCM4fAzEtgifHl_Xlv-H_xqL8N15M-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3090949812</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Normal Saline or Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation for Vital Pulp Therapy? A Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Machareonsap, Hataichanok ; Chompu-Inwai, Papimon ; Chaipattanawan, Nattakan ; Manmontri, Chanika ; Nirunsittirat, Areerat ; Phinyo, Phichayut</creator><creatorcontrib>Machareonsap, Hataichanok ; Chompu-Inwai, Papimon ; Chaipattanawan, Nattakan ; Manmontri, Chanika ; Nirunsittirat, Areerat ; Phinyo, Phichayut</creatorcontrib><description>criteria were randomized to each irrigant, 65 in the NaOCl and 60 in the NSS groups. ProRoot® MTA was used as a pulp dressing material in both groups and teeth were followed for 12 months. The primary outcome was the success of VPT; requiring both clinical and radiographic success to be considered as success. The hypothesis was that the absolute difference of VPT success in the NSS group was not worse than that in the NaOCl group, by a margin of 5%. The secondary outcome was discoloration; percentages of discolorations between both groups were compared. Results: Using a per protocol analysis, the absolute difference of VPT success between the NSS and NaOCl groups was 2.08% (95% CI: -1.95, 6.1). Perceptible gray discolorations were 80% and 63% in NaOCl and NSS groups (difference -17%; 95% CI: -40.0, 6.2; p=0.15). Conclusions: For MTA-VPT procedure, irrigation with NSS was not worse than that with NaOCl. However, both irrigants caused discoloration. (EEJ-2023-05-065).</description><identifier>ISSN: 2548-0839</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2548-0839</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14744/eej.2023.30932</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39119855</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Turkey: Kare Publishing</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aluminum Compounds ; Calcium Compounds - administration &amp; dosage ; Drug Combinations ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Original ; Oxides ; Root Canal Irrigants ; Root Canal Therapy - methods ; Saline Solution - administration &amp; dosage ; Silicates ; Sodium Hypochlorite - pharmacology ; Therapeutic Irrigation - methods ; Tooth Discoloration ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>European endodontic journal, 2024-08, Vol.9 (3), p.180-190</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11413600/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11413600/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,36990,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39119855$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Machareonsap, Hataichanok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chompu-Inwai, Papimon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaipattanawan, Nattakan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manmontri, Chanika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nirunsittirat, Areerat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phinyo, Phichayut</creatorcontrib><title>Normal Saline or Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation for Vital Pulp Therapy? A Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>European endodontic journal</title><addtitle>Eur Endod J</addtitle><description>criteria were randomized to each irrigant, 65 in the NaOCl and 60 in the NSS groups. ProRoot® MTA was used as a pulp dressing material in both groups and teeth were followed for 12 months. The primary outcome was the success of VPT; requiring both clinical and radiographic success to be considered as success. The hypothesis was that the absolute difference of VPT success in the NSS group was not worse than that in the NaOCl group, by a margin of 5%. The secondary outcome was discoloration; percentages of discolorations between both groups were compared. Results: Using a per protocol analysis, the absolute difference of VPT success between the NSS and NaOCl groups was 2.08% (95% CI: -1.95, 6.1). Perceptible gray discolorations were 80% and 63% in NaOCl and NSS groups (difference -17%; 95% CI: -40.0, 6.2; p=0.15). Conclusions: For MTA-VPT procedure, irrigation with NSS was not worse than that with NaOCl. However, both irrigants caused discoloration. (EEJ-2023-05-065).</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aluminum Compounds</subject><subject>Calcium Compounds - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Drug Combinations</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Oxides</subject><subject>Root Canal Irrigants</subject><subject>Root Canal Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Saline Solution - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Silicates</subject><subject>Sodium Hypochlorite - pharmacology</subject><subject>Therapeutic Irrigation - methods</subject><subject>Tooth Discoloration</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>2548-0839</issn><issn>2548-0839</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUcFu2zAMFYYOa5H2vNug4y5OKMlO5VNRBN0SIMiKNe1VYGW6USFbnmwPyL5-SpsV3YkE-N4jHx9jnwVMRX6Z5zOi56kEqaYKSiU_sDNZ5DoDrcqTd_0pu-j7ZwCQl2UOUn5ip6oUotRFccbGTYgNen6H3rXEQ-R3oXJjw5f7LtidD9ENxFcxuiccXGh5nSAPbkiU29F3fLujiN3-il_zTWizVVtTdAfSnv_EtgqN-0MVX4R2iMH71G6jQ3_OPtboe7o41gm7_3azXSyz9Y_vq8X1OrMiGcrmuQSVHEiJQhAJQCpq_Yi6RmUtoNaqUGAJkzetE0oiEtSVlgWiTY-ZsKtX3W58bKiylM5Ab7roGox7E9CZ_yet25mn8NsIkQs1B0gKX48KMfwaqR9M43pL3mNLYexN-jyUeanFYdnsFWpj6PtI9dseAeYlMJMCM4fAzEtgifHl_Xlv-H_xqL8N15M-</recordid><startdate>20240822</startdate><enddate>20240822</enddate><creator>Machareonsap, Hataichanok</creator><creator>Chompu-Inwai, Papimon</creator><creator>Chaipattanawan, Nattakan</creator><creator>Manmontri, Chanika</creator><creator>Nirunsittirat, Areerat</creator><creator>Phinyo, Phichayut</creator><general>Kare Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240822</creationdate><title>Normal Saline or Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation for Vital Pulp Therapy? A Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>Machareonsap, Hataichanok ; Chompu-Inwai, Papimon ; Chaipattanawan, Nattakan ; Manmontri, Chanika ; Nirunsittirat, Areerat ; Phinyo, Phichayut</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1932-6420383922a11ee10ae5f8ba8fa3cc0a883530cea0028822a2aae0fd825aac023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aluminum Compounds</topic><topic>Calcium Compounds - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Drug Combinations</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Oxides</topic><topic>Root Canal Irrigants</topic><topic>Root Canal Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Saline Solution - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Silicates</topic><topic>Sodium Hypochlorite - pharmacology</topic><topic>Therapeutic Irrigation - methods</topic><topic>Tooth Discoloration</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Machareonsap, Hataichanok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chompu-Inwai, Papimon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaipattanawan, Nattakan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manmontri, Chanika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nirunsittirat, Areerat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phinyo, Phichayut</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European endodontic journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Machareonsap, Hataichanok</au><au>Chompu-Inwai, Papimon</au><au>Chaipattanawan, Nattakan</au><au>Manmontri, Chanika</au><au>Nirunsittirat, Areerat</au><au>Phinyo, Phichayut</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Normal Saline or Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation for Vital Pulp Therapy? A Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>European endodontic journal</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Endod J</addtitle><date>2024-08-22</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>180</spage><epage>190</epage><pages>180-190</pages><issn>2548-0839</issn><eissn>2548-0839</eissn><abstract>criteria were randomized to each irrigant, 65 in the NaOCl and 60 in the NSS groups. ProRoot® MTA was used as a pulp dressing material in both groups and teeth were followed for 12 months. The primary outcome was the success of VPT; requiring both clinical and radiographic success to be considered as success. The hypothesis was that the absolute difference of VPT success in the NSS group was not worse than that in the NaOCl group, by a margin of 5%. The secondary outcome was discoloration; percentages of discolorations between both groups were compared. Results: Using a per protocol analysis, the absolute difference of VPT success between the NSS and NaOCl groups was 2.08% (95% CI: -1.95, 6.1). Perceptible gray discolorations were 80% and 63% in NaOCl and NSS groups (difference -17%; 95% CI: -40.0, 6.2; p=0.15). Conclusions: For MTA-VPT procedure, irrigation with NSS was not worse than that with NaOCl. However, both irrigants caused discoloration. (EEJ-2023-05-065).</abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pub>Kare Publishing</pub><pmid>39119855</pmid><doi>10.14744/eej.2023.30932</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2548-0839
ispartof European endodontic journal, 2024-08, Vol.9 (3), p.180-190
issn 2548-0839
2548-0839
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11413600
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Aluminum Compounds
Calcium Compounds - administration & dosage
Drug Combinations
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Original
Oxides
Root Canal Irrigants
Root Canal Therapy - methods
Saline Solution - administration & dosage
Silicates
Sodium Hypochlorite - pharmacology
Therapeutic Irrigation - methods
Tooth Discoloration
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title Normal Saline or Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation for Vital Pulp Therapy? A Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T14%3A03%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Normal%20Saline%20or%20Sodium%20Hypochlorite%20Irrigation%20for%20Vital%20Pulp%20Therapy?%20A%20Non-Inferiority%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=European%20endodontic%20journal&rft.au=Machareonsap,%20Hataichanok&rft.date=2024-08-22&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=180&rft.epage=190&rft.pages=180-190&rft.issn=2548-0839&rft.eissn=2548-0839&rft_id=info:doi/10.14744/eej.2023.30932&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3090949812%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1932-6420383922a11ee10ae5f8ba8fa3cc0a883530cea0028822a2aae0fd825aac023%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3090949812&rft_id=info:pmid/39119855&rfr_iscdi=true