Loading…
Reliability of Magseed® marking before neoadjuvant systemic therapy with subsequent contrast-enhanced mammography in patients with non-palpable breast cancer lesions after treatment: the MAGMA study
Purpose To assess the reliability of excising residual breast cancer lesions after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) using a previously localized paramagnetic seed (Magseed®) and the subsequent use of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) to evaluate response. Methods Observational, prospe...
Saved in:
Published in: | Breast cancer research and treatment 2024-11, Vol.208 (1), p.133-143 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f0cbaef5f6f2a9eaf6aaa70a69c0466fd6e61ca8b6399c1c91927032269e2bad3 |
container_end_page | 143 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 133 |
container_title | Breast cancer research and treatment |
container_volume | 208 |
creator | Bravo, Eva Iglesias Martínez, Antonio Mariscal Alvà, Helena Peris Sancho, Diego Riol López, José Carlos Antela Sánchez, Joel Aranda Casa, Pilar Escobar de las Heras, Cristina Gómez Venegas, María Antonia Fernández Vidal, Eduarda García Begines, Elisabeth Delgado Mur, Carmen García Vicente, Isabel Casamayor, Carmen Cruz, Silvia Barrado, Anabel García |
description | Purpose
To assess the reliability of excising residual breast cancer lesions after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) using a previously localized paramagnetic seed (Magseed®) and the subsequent use of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) to evaluate response.
Methods
Observational, prospective, multicenter study including adult women (> 18 years) with invasive breast carcinoma undergoing NAST between January 2022 and February 2023 with non-palpable tumor lesions at surgery. Radiologists marked tumors with Magseed® during biopsy before NAST, and surgeons excised tumors guided by the Sentimag® magnetometer. CESMs were performed before and after NAST to evaluate tumor response (Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors [RECIST]). We considered intraoperative, surgical, and CESM-related variables and histological response.
Results
We analyzed 109 patients (median [IQR] age of 55.0 [46.0, 65.0] years). Magseed® was retrieved from breast tumors in all surgeries (100%; 95% CI 95.47–100.0%) with no displacement and was identified by radiology in 106 patients (97.24%), a median (IQR) of 176.5 (150.0, 216.3) days after marking. Most surgeries (94.49%) were conservative; they lasted a median (IQR) of 22.5 (14.75, 40.0) min (95% CI 23.59–30.11 min). Most dissected tumor margins (93.57%) were negative, and few patients (5.51%) needed reintervention. Magseed® was identified using CESM in all patients (100%); RECIST responses correlated with histopathological evaluations of dissected tumors using the Miller–Payne response grade (
p
|
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10549-024-07407-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11452456</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3112975617</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f0cbaef5f6f2a9eaf6aaa70a69c0466fd6e61ca8b6399c1c91927032269e2bad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhSMEokPhBVggS2y6Cdj5sWM2aFRBQeoICcHaunFuZjwkdrCdorxUH6IbXgsPU8rPgpVl3--c63t1suwpoy8YpeJlYLSuZE6LKqeioiLn97IVq0WZi4KJ-9mKMp4eG8pPskch7CmlUlD5MDspm0Y2Jaer7PtHHAy0ZjBxIa4nG9gGxO7mmozgvxi7JS32ziOx6KDbz1dgIwlLiDgaTeIOPUwL-WbijoS5Dfh1xgRoZ6OHEHO0O7Aau-Q2jm6b4N1CjCUTRJPAcFRaZ_MJhgnaAUnrMSmJPug8GTAYZwOBPqZbTLU4JuGrQ2uyWV9s1iTEuVseZw96GAI-uT1Ps89v33w6f5dffrh4f76-zHVZ85j3VLeAfd3zvgCJ0HMAEBS41LTivO84cqahaXkppWZaMlkIWhYFl1i00JWn2euj7zS3I3YaD4MOavIm7WtRDoz6u2LNTm3dlWKsqouq5snh7NbBu7StENVogsZhgLTiOaiSCtoUNS1ZQp__g-7d7G2aT5WMFVLUnIlEFUdKexeCx_7uN4yqQ1DUMSgqBUX9DIo6_OLZn3PcSX4lIwHlEQipZLfof_f-j-0PV5XRDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3112975617</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability of Magseed® marking before neoadjuvant systemic therapy with subsequent contrast-enhanced mammography in patients with non-palpable breast cancer lesions after treatment: the MAGMA study</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Bravo, Eva Iglesias ; Martínez, Antonio Mariscal ; Alvà, Helena Peris ; Sancho, Diego Riol ; López, José Carlos Antela ; Sánchez, Joel Aranda ; Casa, Pilar Escobar ; de las Heras, Cristina Gómez ; Venegas, María Antonia Fernández ; Vidal, Eduarda García ; Begines, Elisabeth Delgado ; Mur, Carmen García ; Vicente, Isabel ; Casamayor, Carmen ; Cruz, Silvia ; Barrado, Anabel García</creator><creatorcontrib>Bravo, Eva Iglesias ; Martínez, Antonio Mariscal ; Alvà, Helena Peris ; Sancho, Diego Riol ; López, José Carlos Antela ; Sánchez, Joel Aranda ; Casa, Pilar Escobar ; de las Heras, Cristina Gómez ; Venegas, María Antonia Fernández ; Vidal, Eduarda García ; Begines, Elisabeth Delgado ; Mur, Carmen García ; Vicente, Isabel ; Casamayor, Carmen ; Cruz, Silvia ; Barrado, Anabel García</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To assess the reliability of excising residual breast cancer lesions after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) using a previously localized paramagnetic seed (Magseed®) and the subsequent use of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) to evaluate response.
Methods
Observational, prospective, multicenter study including adult women (> 18 years) with invasive breast carcinoma undergoing NAST between January 2022 and February 2023 with non-palpable tumor lesions at surgery. Radiologists marked tumors with Magseed® during biopsy before NAST, and surgeons excised tumors guided by the Sentimag® magnetometer. CESMs were performed before and after NAST to evaluate tumor response (Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors [RECIST]). We considered intraoperative, surgical, and CESM-related variables and histological response.
Results
We analyzed 109 patients (median [IQR] age of 55.0 [46.0, 65.0] years). Magseed® was retrieved from breast tumors in all surgeries (100%; 95% CI 95.47–100.0%) with no displacement and was identified by radiology in 106 patients (97.24%), a median (IQR) of 176.5 (150.0, 216.3) days after marking. Most surgeries (94.49%) were conservative; they lasted a median (IQR) of 22.5 (14.75, 40.0) min (95% CI 23.59–30.11 min). Most dissected tumor margins (93.57%) were negative, and few patients (5.51%) needed reintervention. Magseed® was identified using CESM in all patients (100%); RECIST responses correlated with histopathological evaluations of dissected tumors using the Miller–Payne response grade (
p
< 0.0001) and residual lesion diameter (
p
< 0.0001). Also 69 patients (63.3%) answered a patient’s satisfaction survey and 98.8% of them felt very satisfied with the entire procedure.
Conclusion
Long-term marking of breast cancer lesions with Magseed® is a reliable and feasible method in patients undergoing NAST and may be used with subsequent CESM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6806</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1573-7217</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7217</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07407-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38898360</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biopsy ; Breast cancer ; Breast carcinoma ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Breast Neoplasms - therapy ; Contrast Media - administration & dosage ; Female ; Humans ; Lesions ; Lumpectomy ; Mammography ; Mammography - methods ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods ; Neoplasm, Residual - diagnostic imaging ; Neoplasm, Residual - pathology ; Oncology ; Patients ; Prospective Studies ; Radiology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Solid tumors ; Surgery ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Breast cancer research and treatment, 2024-11, Vol.208 (1), p.133-143</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f0cbaef5f6f2a9eaf6aaa70a69c0466fd6e61ca8b6399c1c91927032269e2bad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38898360$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bravo, Eva Iglesias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez, Antonio Mariscal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvà, Helena Peris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sancho, Diego Riol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López, José Carlos Antela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Joel Aranda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casa, Pilar Escobar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de las Heras, Cristina Gómez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venegas, María Antonia Fernández</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidal, Eduarda García</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Begines, Elisabeth Delgado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mur, Carmen García</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicente, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casamayor, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruz, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrado, Anabel García</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability of Magseed® marking before neoadjuvant systemic therapy with subsequent contrast-enhanced mammography in patients with non-palpable breast cancer lesions after treatment: the MAGMA study</title><title>Breast cancer research and treatment</title><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><description>Purpose
To assess the reliability of excising residual breast cancer lesions after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) using a previously localized paramagnetic seed (Magseed®) and the subsequent use of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) to evaluate response.
Methods
Observational, prospective, multicenter study including adult women (> 18 years) with invasive breast carcinoma undergoing NAST between January 2022 and February 2023 with non-palpable tumor lesions at surgery. Radiologists marked tumors with Magseed® during biopsy before NAST, and surgeons excised tumors guided by the Sentimag® magnetometer. CESMs were performed before and after NAST to evaluate tumor response (Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors [RECIST]). We considered intraoperative, surgical, and CESM-related variables and histological response.
Results
We analyzed 109 patients (median [IQR] age of 55.0 [46.0, 65.0] years). Magseed® was retrieved from breast tumors in all surgeries (100%; 95% CI 95.47–100.0%) with no displacement and was identified by radiology in 106 patients (97.24%), a median (IQR) of 176.5 (150.0, 216.3) days after marking. Most surgeries (94.49%) were conservative; they lasted a median (IQR) of 22.5 (14.75, 40.0) min (95% CI 23.59–30.11 min). Most dissected tumor margins (93.57%) were negative, and few patients (5.51%) needed reintervention. Magseed® was identified using CESM in all patients (100%); RECIST responses correlated with histopathological evaluations of dissected tumors using the Miller–Payne response grade (
p
< 0.0001) and residual lesion diameter (
p
< 0.0001). Also 69 patients (63.3%) answered a patient’s satisfaction survey and 98.8% of them felt very satisfied with the entire procedure.
Conclusion
Long-term marking of breast cancer lesions with Magseed® is a reliable and feasible method in patients undergoing NAST and may be used with subsequent CESM.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast carcinoma</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Contrast Media - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Lumpectomy</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Mammography - methods</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual - pathology</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Solid tumors</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0167-6806</issn><issn>1573-7217</issn><issn>1573-7217</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhSMEokPhBVggS2y6Cdj5sWM2aFRBQeoICcHaunFuZjwkdrCdorxUH6IbXgsPU8rPgpVl3--c63t1suwpoy8YpeJlYLSuZE6LKqeioiLn97IVq0WZi4KJ-9mKMp4eG8pPskch7CmlUlD5MDspm0Y2Jaer7PtHHAy0ZjBxIa4nG9gGxO7mmozgvxi7JS32ziOx6KDbz1dgIwlLiDgaTeIOPUwL-WbijoS5Dfh1xgRoZ6OHEHO0O7Aau-Q2jm6b4N1CjCUTRJPAcFRaZ_MJhgnaAUnrMSmJPug8GTAYZwOBPqZbTLU4JuGrQ2uyWV9s1iTEuVseZw96GAI-uT1Ps89v33w6f5dffrh4f76-zHVZ85j3VLeAfd3zvgCJ0HMAEBS41LTivO84cqahaXkppWZaMlkIWhYFl1i00JWn2euj7zS3I3YaD4MOavIm7WtRDoz6u2LNTm3dlWKsqouq5snh7NbBu7StENVogsZhgLTiOaiSCtoUNS1ZQp__g-7d7G2aT5WMFVLUnIlEFUdKexeCx_7uN4yqQ1DUMSgqBUX9DIo6_OLZn3PcSX4lIwHlEQipZLfof_f-j-0PV5XRDA</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Bravo, Eva Iglesias</creator><creator>Martínez, Antonio Mariscal</creator><creator>Alvà, Helena Peris</creator><creator>Sancho, Diego Riol</creator><creator>López, José Carlos Antela</creator><creator>Sánchez, Joel Aranda</creator><creator>Casa, Pilar Escobar</creator><creator>de las Heras, Cristina Gómez</creator><creator>Venegas, María Antonia Fernández</creator><creator>Vidal, Eduarda García</creator><creator>Begines, Elisabeth Delgado</creator><creator>Mur, Carmen García</creator><creator>Vicente, Isabel</creator><creator>Casamayor, Carmen</creator><creator>Cruz, Silvia</creator><creator>Barrado, Anabel García</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>Reliability of Magseed® marking before neoadjuvant systemic therapy with subsequent contrast-enhanced mammography in patients with non-palpable breast cancer lesions after treatment: the MAGMA study</title><author>Bravo, Eva Iglesias ; Martínez, Antonio Mariscal ; Alvà, Helena Peris ; Sancho, Diego Riol ; López, José Carlos Antela ; Sánchez, Joel Aranda ; Casa, Pilar Escobar ; de las Heras, Cristina Gómez ; Venegas, María Antonia Fernández ; Vidal, Eduarda García ; Begines, Elisabeth Delgado ; Mur, Carmen García ; Vicente, Isabel ; Casamayor, Carmen ; Cruz, Silvia ; Barrado, Anabel García</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f0cbaef5f6f2a9eaf6aaa70a69c0466fd6e61ca8b6399c1c91927032269e2bad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast carcinoma</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Contrast Media - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Lumpectomy</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Mammography - methods</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual - pathology</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Solid tumors</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bravo, Eva Iglesias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez, Antonio Mariscal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvà, Helena Peris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sancho, Diego Riol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López, José Carlos Antela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Joel Aranda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casa, Pilar Escobar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de las Heras, Cristina Gómez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venegas, María Antonia Fernández</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidal, Eduarda García</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Begines, Elisabeth Delgado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mur, Carmen García</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicente, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casamayor, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruz, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrado, Anabel García</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer_OA刊</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Breast cancer research and treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bravo, Eva Iglesias</au><au>Martínez, Antonio Mariscal</au><au>Alvà, Helena Peris</au><au>Sancho, Diego Riol</au><au>López, José Carlos Antela</au><au>Sánchez, Joel Aranda</au><au>Casa, Pilar Escobar</au><au>de las Heras, Cristina Gómez</au><au>Venegas, María Antonia Fernández</au><au>Vidal, Eduarda García</au><au>Begines, Elisabeth Delgado</au><au>Mur, Carmen García</au><au>Vicente, Isabel</au><au>Casamayor, Carmen</au><au>Cruz, Silvia</au><au>Barrado, Anabel García</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability of Magseed® marking before neoadjuvant systemic therapy with subsequent contrast-enhanced mammography in patients with non-palpable breast cancer lesions after treatment: the MAGMA study</atitle><jtitle>Breast cancer research and treatment</jtitle><stitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</stitle><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>208</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>143</epage><pages>133-143</pages><issn>0167-6806</issn><issn>1573-7217</issn><eissn>1573-7217</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To assess the reliability of excising residual breast cancer lesions after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) using a previously localized paramagnetic seed (Magseed®) and the subsequent use of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) to evaluate response.
Methods
Observational, prospective, multicenter study including adult women (> 18 years) with invasive breast carcinoma undergoing NAST between January 2022 and February 2023 with non-palpable tumor lesions at surgery. Radiologists marked tumors with Magseed® during biopsy before NAST, and surgeons excised tumors guided by the Sentimag® magnetometer. CESMs were performed before and after NAST to evaluate tumor response (Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors [RECIST]). We considered intraoperative, surgical, and CESM-related variables and histological response.
Results
We analyzed 109 patients (median [IQR] age of 55.0 [46.0, 65.0] years). Magseed® was retrieved from breast tumors in all surgeries (100%; 95% CI 95.47–100.0%) with no displacement and was identified by radiology in 106 patients (97.24%), a median (IQR) of 176.5 (150.0, 216.3) days after marking. Most surgeries (94.49%) were conservative; they lasted a median (IQR) of 22.5 (14.75, 40.0) min (95% CI 23.59–30.11 min). Most dissected tumor margins (93.57%) were negative, and few patients (5.51%) needed reintervention. Magseed® was identified using CESM in all patients (100%); RECIST responses correlated with histopathological evaluations of dissected tumors using the Miller–Payne response grade (
p
< 0.0001) and residual lesion diameter (
p
< 0.0001). Also 69 patients (63.3%) answered a patient’s satisfaction survey and 98.8% of them felt very satisfied with the entire procedure.
Conclusion
Long-term marking of breast cancer lesions with Magseed® is a reliable and feasible method in patients undergoing NAST and may be used with subsequent CESM.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>38898360</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10549-024-07407-6</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-6806 |
ispartof | Breast cancer research and treatment, 2024-11, Vol.208 (1), p.133-143 |
issn | 0167-6806 1573-7217 1573-7217 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11452456 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Adult Aged Biopsy Breast cancer Breast carcinoma Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Breast Neoplasms - pathology Breast Neoplasms - surgery Breast Neoplasms - therapy Contrast Media - administration & dosage Female Humans Lesions Lumpectomy Mammography Mammography - methods Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods Neoplasm, Residual - diagnostic imaging Neoplasm, Residual - pathology Oncology Patients Prospective Studies Radiology Reproducibility of Results Solid tumors Surgery Tumors |
title | Reliability of Magseed® marking before neoadjuvant systemic therapy with subsequent contrast-enhanced mammography in patients with non-palpable breast cancer lesions after treatment: the MAGMA study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T13%3A50%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20of%20Magseed%C2%AE%20marking%20before%20neoadjuvant%20systemic%20therapy%20with%20subsequent%20contrast-enhanced%20mammography%20in%20patients%20with%20non-palpable%20breast%20cancer%20lesions%20after%20treatment:%20the%20MAGMA%20study&rft.jtitle=Breast%20cancer%20research%20and%20treatment&rft.au=Bravo,%20Eva%20Iglesias&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=208&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=143&rft.pages=133-143&rft.issn=0167-6806&rft.eissn=1573-7217&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10549-024-07407-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3112975617%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f0cbaef5f6f2a9eaf6aaa70a69c0466fd6e61ca8b6399c1c91927032269e2bad3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3112975617&rft_id=info:pmid/38898360&rfr_iscdi=true |