Loading…

Reliability of Magseed® marking before neoadjuvant systemic therapy with subsequent contrast-enhanced mammography in patients with non-palpable breast cancer lesions after treatment: the MAGMA study

Purpose To assess the reliability of excising residual breast cancer lesions after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) using a previously localized paramagnetic seed (Magseed®) and the subsequent use of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) to evaluate response. Methods Observational, prospe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Breast cancer research and treatment 2024-11, Vol.208 (1), p.133-143
Main Authors: Bravo, Eva Iglesias, Martínez, Antonio Mariscal, Alvà, Helena Peris, Sancho, Diego Riol, López, José Carlos Antela, Sánchez, Joel Aranda, Casa, Pilar Escobar, de las Heras, Cristina Gómez, Venegas, María Antonia Fernández, Vidal, Eduarda García, Begines, Elisabeth Delgado, Mur, Carmen García, Vicente, Isabel, Casamayor, Carmen, Cruz, Silvia, Barrado, Anabel García
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f0cbaef5f6f2a9eaf6aaa70a69c0466fd6e61ca8b6399c1c91927032269e2bad3
container_end_page 143
container_issue 1
container_start_page 133
container_title Breast cancer research and treatment
container_volume 208
creator Bravo, Eva Iglesias
Martínez, Antonio Mariscal
Alvà, Helena Peris
Sancho, Diego Riol
López, José Carlos Antela
Sánchez, Joel Aranda
Casa, Pilar Escobar
de las Heras, Cristina Gómez
Venegas, María Antonia Fernández
Vidal, Eduarda García
Begines, Elisabeth Delgado
Mur, Carmen García
Vicente, Isabel
Casamayor, Carmen
Cruz, Silvia
Barrado, Anabel García
description Purpose To assess the reliability of excising residual breast cancer lesions after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) using a previously localized paramagnetic seed (Magseed®) and the subsequent use of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) to evaluate response. Methods Observational, prospective, multicenter study including adult women (> 18 years) with invasive breast carcinoma undergoing NAST between January 2022 and February 2023 with non-palpable tumor lesions at surgery. Radiologists marked tumors with Magseed® during biopsy before NAST, and surgeons excised tumors guided by the Sentimag® magnetometer. CESMs were performed before and after NAST to evaluate tumor response (Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors [RECIST]). We considered intraoperative, surgical, and CESM-related variables and histological response. Results We analyzed 109 patients (median [IQR] age of 55.0 [46.0, 65.0] years). Magseed® was retrieved from breast tumors in all surgeries (100%; 95% CI 95.47–100.0%) with no displacement and was identified by radiology in 106 patients (97.24%), a median (IQR) of 176.5 (150.0, 216.3) days after marking. Most surgeries (94.49%) were conservative; they lasted a median (IQR) of 22.5 (14.75, 40.0) min (95% CI 23.59–30.11 min). Most dissected tumor margins (93.57%) were negative, and few patients (5.51%) needed reintervention. Magseed® was identified using CESM in all patients (100%); RECIST responses correlated with histopathological evaluations of dissected tumors using the Miller–Payne response grade ( p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10549-024-07407-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11452456</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3112975617</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f0cbaef5f6f2a9eaf6aaa70a69c0466fd6e61ca8b6399c1c91927032269e2bad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhSMEokPhBVggS2y6Cdj5sWM2aFRBQeoICcHaunFuZjwkdrCdorxUH6IbXgsPU8rPgpVl3--c63t1suwpoy8YpeJlYLSuZE6LKqeioiLn97IVq0WZi4KJ-9mKMp4eG8pPskch7CmlUlD5MDspm0Y2Jaer7PtHHAy0ZjBxIa4nG9gGxO7mmozgvxi7JS32ziOx6KDbz1dgIwlLiDgaTeIOPUwL-WbijoS5Dfh1xgRoZ6OHEHO0O7Aau-Q2jm6b4N1CjCUTRJPAcFRaZ_MJhgnaAUnrMSmJPug8GTAYZwOBPqZbTLU4JuGrQ2uyWV9s1iTEuVseZw96GAI-uT1Ps89v33w6f5dffrh4f76-zHVZ85j3VLeAfd3zvgCJ0HMAEBS41LTivO84cqahaXkppWZaMlkIWhYFl1i00JWn2euj7zS3I3YaD4MOavIm7WtRDoz6u2LNTm3dlWKsqouq5snh7NbBu7StENVogsZhgLTiOaiSCtoUNS1ZQp__g-7d7G2aT5WMFVLUnIlEFUdKexeCx_7uN4yqQ1DUMSgqBUX9DIo6_OLZn3PcSX4lIwHlEQipZLfof_f-j-0PV5XRDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3112975617</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability of Magseed® marking before neoadjuvant systemic therapy with subsequent contrast-enhanced mammography in patients with non-palpable breast cancer lesions after treatment: the MAGMA study</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Bravo, Eva Iglesias ; Martínez, Antonio Mariscal ; Alvà, Helena Peris ; Sancho, Diego Riol ; López, José Carlos Antela ; Sánchez, Joel Aranda ; Casa, Pilar Escobar ; de las Heras, Cristina Gómez ; Venegas, María Antonia Fernández ; Vidal, Eduarda García ; Begines, Elisabeth Delgado ; Mur, Carmen García ; Vicente, Isabel ; Casamayor, Carmen ; Cruz, Silvia ; Barrado, Anabel García</creator><creatorcontrib>Bravo, Eva Iglesias ; Martínez, Antonio Mariscal ; Alvà, Helena Peris ; Sancho, Diego Riol ; López, José Carlos Antela ; Sánchez, Joel Aranda ; Casa, Pilar Escobar ; de las Heras, Cristina Gómez ; Venegas, María Antonia Fernández ; Vidal, Eduarda García ; Begines, Elisabeth Delgado ; Mur, Carmen García ; Vicente, Isabel ; Casamayor, Carmen ; Cruz, Silvia ; Barrado, Anabel García</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To assess the reliability of excising residual breast cancer lesions after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) using a previously localized paramagnetic seed (Magseed®) and the subsequent use of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) to evaluate response. Methods Observational, prospective, multicenter study including adult women (&gt; 18 years) with invasive breast carcinoma undergoing NAST between January 2022 and February 2023 with non-palpable tumor lesions at surgery. Radiologists marked tumors with Magseed® during biopsy before NAST, and surgeons excised tumors guided by the Sentimag® magnetometer. CESMs were performed before and after NAST to evaluate tumor response (Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors [RECIST]). We considered intraoperative, surgical, and CESM-related variables and histological response. Results We analyzed 109 patients (median [IQR] age of 55.0 [46.0, 65.0] years). Magseed® was retrieved from breast tumors in all surgeries (100%; 95% CI 95.47–100.0%) with no displacement and was identified by radiology in 106 patients (97.24%), a median (IQR) of 176.5 (150.0, 216.3) days after marking. Most surgeries (94.49%) were conservative; they lasted a median (IQR) of 22.5 (14.75, 40.0) min (95% CI 23.59–30.11 min). Most dissected tumor margins (93.57%) were negative, and few patients (5.51%) needed reintervention. Magseed® was identified using CESM in all patients (100%); RECIST responses correlated with histopathological evaluations of dissected tumors using the Miller–Payne response grade ( p  &lt; 0.0001) and residual lesion diameter ( p  &lt; 0.0001). Also 69 patients (63.3%) answered a patient’s satisfaction survey and 98.8% of them felt very satisfied with the entire procedure. Conclusion Long-term marking of breast cancer lesions with Magseed® is a reliable and feasible method in patients undergoing NAST and may be used with subsequent CESM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6806</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1573-7217</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7217</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07407-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38898360</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biopsy ; Breast cancer ; Breast carcinoma ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Breast Neoplasms - therapy ; Contrast Media - administration &amp; dosage ; Female ; Humans ; Lesions ; Lumpectomy ; Mammography ; Mammography - methods ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods ; Neoplasm, Residual - diagnostic imaging ; Neoplasm, Residual - pathology ; Oncology ; Patients ; Prospective Studies ; Radiology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Solid tumors ; Surgery ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Breast cancer research and treatment, 2024-11, Vol.208 (1), p.133-143</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f0cbaef5f6f2a9eaf6aaa70a69c0466fd6e61ca8b6399c1c91927032269e2bad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38898360$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bravo, Eva Iglesias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez, Antonio Mariscal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvà, Helena Peris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sancho, Diego Riol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López, José Carlos Antela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Joel Aranda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casa, Pilar Escobar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de las Heras, Cristina Gómez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venegas, María Antonia Fernández</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidal, Eduarda García</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Begines, Elisabeth Delgado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mur, Carmen García</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicente, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casamayor, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruz, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrado, Anabel García</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability of Magseed® marking before neoadjuvant systemic therapy with subsequent contrast-enhanced mammography in patients with non-palpable breast cancer lesions after treatment: the MAGMA study</title><title>Breast cancer research and treatment</title><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><description>Purpose To assess the reliability of excising residual breast cancer lesions after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) using a previously localized paramagnetic seed (Magseed®) and the subsequent use of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) to evaluate response. Methods Observational, prospective, multicenter study including adult women (&gt; 18 years) with invasive breast carcinoma undergoing NAST between January 2022 and February 2023 with non-palpable tumor lesions at surgery. Radiologists marked tumors with Magseed® during biopsy before NAST, and surgeons excised tumors guided by the Sentimag® magnetometer. CESMs were performed before and after NAST to evaluate tumor response (Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors [RECIST]). We considered intraoperative, surgical, and CESM-related variables and histological response. Results We analyzed 109 patients (median [IQR] age of 55.0 [46.0, 65.0] years). Magseed® was retrieved from breast tumors in all surgeries (100%; 95% CI 95.47–100.0%) with no displacement and was identified by radiology in 106 patients (97.24%), a median (IQR) of 176.5 (150.0, 216.3) days after marking. Most surgeries (94.49%) were conservative; they lasted a median (IQR) of 22.5 (14.75, 40.0) min (95% CI 23.59–30.11 min). Most dissected tumor margins (93.57%) were negative, and few patients (5.51%) needed reintervention. Magseed® was identified using CESM in all patients (100%); RECIST responses correlated with histopathological evaluations of dissected tumors using the Miller–Payne response grade ( p  &lt; 0.0001) and residual lesion diameter ( p  &lt; 0.0001). Also 69 patients (63.3%) answered a patient’s satisfaction survey and 98.8% of them felt very satisfied with the entire procedure. Conclusion Long-term marking of breast cancer lesions with Magseed® is a reliable and feasible method in patients undergoing NAST and may be used with subsequent CESM.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast carcinoma</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Contrast Media - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Lumpectomy</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Mammography - methods</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual - pathology</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Solid tumors</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0167-6806</issn><issn>1573-7217</issn><issn>1573-7217</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhSMEokPhBVggS2y6Cdj5sWM2aFRBQeoICcHaunFuZjwkdrCdorxUH6IbXgsPU8rPgpVl3--c63t1suwpoy8YpeJlYLSuZE6LKqeioiLn97IVq0WZi4KJ-9mKMp4eG8pPskch7CmlUlD5MDspm0Y2Jaer7PtHHAy0ZjBxIa4nG9gGxO7mmozgvxi7JS32ziOx6KDbz1dgIwlLiDgaTeIOPUwL-WbijoS5Dfh1xgRoZ6OHEHO0O7Aau-Q2jm6b4N1CjCUTRJPAcFRaZ_MJhgnaAUnrMSmJPug8GTAYZwOBPqZbTLU4JuGrQ2uyWV9s1iTEuVseZw96GAI-uT1Ps89v33w6f5dffrh4f76-zHVZ85j3VLeAfd3zvgCJ0HMAEBS41LTivO84cqahaXkppWZaMlkIWhYFl1i00JWn2euj7zS3I3YaD4MOavIm7WtRDoz6u2LNTm3dlWKsqouq5snh7NbBu7StENVogsZhgLTiOaiSCtoUNS1ZQp__g-7d7G2aT5WMFVLUnIlEFUdKexeCx_7uN4yqQ1DUMSgqBUX9DIo6_OLZn3PcSX4lIwHlEQipZLfof_f-j-0PV5XRDA</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Bravo, Eva Iglesias</creator><creator>Martínez, Antonio Mariscal</creator><creator>Alvà, Helena Peris</creator><creator>Sancho, Diego Riol</creator><creator>López, José Carlos Antela</creator><creator>Sánchez, Joel Aranda</creator><creator>Casa, Pilar Escobar</creator><creator>de las Heras, Cristina Gómez</creator><creator>Venegas, María Antonia Fernández</creator><creator>Vidal, Eduarda García</creator><creator>Begines, Elisabeth Delgado</creator><creator>Mur, Carmen García</creator><creator>Vicente, Isabel</creator><creator>Casamayor, Carmen</creator><creator>Cruz, Silvia</creator><creator>Barrado, Anabel García</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>Reliability of Magseed® marking before neoadjuvant systemic therapy with subsequent contrast-enhanced mammography in patients with non-palpable breast cancer lesions after treatment: the MAGMA study</title><author>Bravo, Eva Iglesias ; Martínez, Antonio Mariscal ; Alvà, Helena Peris ; Sancho, Diego Riol ; López, José Carlos Antela ; Sánchez, Joel Aranda ; Casa, Pilar Escobar ; de las Heras, Cristina Gómez ; Venegas, María Antonia Fernández ; Vidal, Eduarda García ; Begines, Elisabeth Delgado ; Mur, Carmen García ; Vicente, Isabel ; Casamayor, Carmen ; Cruz, Silvia ; Barrado, Anabel García</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f0cbaef5f6f2a9eaf6aaa70a69c0466fd6e61ca8b6399c1c91927032269e2bad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast carcinoma</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Contrast Media - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Lumpectomy</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Mammography - methods</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual - pathology</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Solid tumors</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bravo, Eva Iglesias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez, Antonio Mariscal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvà, Helena Peris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sancho, Diego Riol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López, José Carlos Antela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Joel Aranda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casa, Pilar Escobar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de las Heras, Cristina Gómez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venegas, María Antonia Fernández</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidal, Eduarda García</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Begines, Elisabeth Delgado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mur, Carmen García</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicente, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casamayor, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruz, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrado, Anabel García</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer_OA刊</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Breast cancer research and treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bravo, Eva Iglesias</au><au>Martínez, Antonio Mariscal</au><au>Alvà, Helena Peris</au><au>Sancho, Diego Riol</au><au>López, José Carlos Antela</au><au>Sánchez, Joel Aranda</au><au>Casa, Pilar Escobar</au><au>de las Heras, Cristina Gómez</au><au>Venegas, María Antonia Fernández</au><au>Vidal, Eduarda García</au><au>Begines, Elisabeth Delgado</au><au>Mur, Carmen García</au><au>Vicente, Isabel</au><au>Casamayor, Carmen</au><au>Cruz, Silvia</au><au>Barrado, Anabel García</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability of Magseed® marking before neoadjuvant systemic therapy with subsequent contrast-enhanced mammography in patients with non-palpable breast cancer lesions after treatment: the MAGMA study</atitle><jtitle>Breast cancer research and treatment</jtitle><stitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</stitle><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>208</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>143</epage><pages>133-143</pages><issn>0167-6806</issn><issn>1573-7217</issn><eissn>1573-7217</eissn><abstract>Purpose To assess the reliability of excising residual breast cancer lesions after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) using a previously localized paramagnetic seed (Magseed®) and the subsequent use of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) to evaluate response. Methods Observational, prospective, multicenter study including adult women (&gt; 18 years) with invasive breast carcinoma undergoing NAST between January 2022 and February 2023 with non-palpable tumor lesions at surgery. Radiologists marked tumors with Magseed® during biopsy before NAST, and surgeons excised tumors guided by the Sentimag® magnetometer. CESMs were performed before and after NAST to evaluate tumor response (Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors [RECIST]). We considered intraoperative, surgical, and CESM-related variables and histological response. Results We analyzed 109 patients (median [IQR] age of 55.0 [46.0, 65.0] years). Magseed® was retrieved from breast tumors in all surgeries (100%; 95% CI 95.47–100.0%) with no displacement and was identified by radiology in 106 patients (97.24%), a median (IQR) of 176.5 (150.0, 216.3) days after marking. Most surgeries (94.49%) were conservative; they lasted a median (IQR) of 22.5 (14.75, 40.0) min (95% CI 23.59–30.11 min). Most dissected tumor margins (93.57%) were negative, and few patients (5.51%) needed reintervention. Magseed® was identified using CESM in all patients (100%); RECIST responses correlated with histopathological evaluations of dissected tumors using the Miller–Payne response grade ( p  &lt; 0.0001) and residual lesion diameter ( p  &lt; 0.0001). Also 69 patients (63.3%) answered a patient’s satisfaction survey and 98.8% of them felt very satisfied with the entire procedure. Conclusion Long-term marking of breast cancer lesions with Magseed® is a reliable and feasible method in patients undergoing NAST and may be used with subsequent CESM.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>38898360</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10549-024-07407-6</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-6806
ispartof Breast cancer research and treatment, 2024-11, Vol.208 (1), p.133-143
issn 0167-6806
1573-7217
1573-7217
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11452456
source Springer Link
subjects Adult
Aged
Biopsy
Breast cancer
Breast carcinoma
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Breast Neoplasms - therapy
Contrast Media - administration & dosage
Female
Humans
Lesions
Lumpectomy
Mammography
Mammography - methods
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods
Neoplasm, Residual - diagnostic imaging
Neoplasm, Residual - pathology
Oncology
Patients
Prospective Studies
Radiology
Reproducibility of Results
Solid tumors
Surgery
Tumors
title Reliability of Magseed® marking before neoadjuvant systemic therapy with subsequent contrast-enhanced mammography in patients with non-palpable breast cancer lesions after treatment: the MAGMA study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T13%3A50%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20of%20Magseed%C2%AE%20marking%20before%20neoadjuvant%20systemic%20therapy%20with%20subsequent%20contrast-enhanced%20mammography%20in%20patients%20with%20non-palpable%20breast%20cancer%20lesions%20after%20treatment:%20the%20MAGMA%20study&rft.jtitle=Breast%20cancer%20research%20and%20treatment&rft.au=Bravo,%20Eva%20Iglesias&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=208&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=143&rft.pages=133-143&rft.issn=0167-6806&rft.eissn=1573-7217&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10549-024-07407-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3112975617%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f0cbaef5f6f2a9eaf6aaa70a69c0466fd6e61ca8b6399c1c91927032269e2bad3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3112975617&rft_id=info:pmid/38898360&rfr_iscdi=true