Loading…
Major colorectal surgery with Hugo™ RAS: initial experience of a German center and a review of the literature
The recently introduced Hugo RAS robotic platform has mostly been used for well standardized urologic and gynaecologic procedures. Experience with this new system in general surgery and especially in major colorectal surgery is very limited. This is a retrospective series of the first 25 consecutive...
Saved in:
Published in: | Updates in surgery 2024-09, Vol.76 (5), p.1705-1714 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-1e4f118a67985556ff318289c4743746ea642964050ac34b8bc96ee868bd80ad3 |
container_end_page | 1714 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1705 |
container_title | Updates in surgery |
container_volume | 76 |
creator | Belyaev, Orlin Fahlbusch, Tim Slobodkin, Illya Uhl, Wademar |
description | The recently introduced Hugo RAS robotic platform has mostly been used for well standardized urologic and gynaecologic procedures. Experience with this new system in general surgery and especially in major colorectal surgery is very limited. This is a retrospective series of the first 25 consecutive non-selected colorectal surgeries performed at a single German center. The lessons learned from our initial experience are presented along with a systematic review of the currently available literature on this topic. Ten sigmoid and seven rectal resections, four right and one left hemicolectomies, two Hartmann’s reversals and an abdominoperineal resection were performed in 14 women and 11 men at the median age of 66 years for 12 benign findings and 13 malignancies. All procedures were performed using four robotic ports and a single 12 mm assistant port. Median docking, console and total operative times were 12, 170 and 270 min. Median blood loss was |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13304-024-01939-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11455732</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3077188134</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-1e4f118a67985556ff318289c4743746ea642964050ac34b8bc96ee868bd80ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctOGzEUhq2KqiDKC7BAXnYzYM_xzNhsEEJcKlFVglZiZznOmcTRxA72DJc9T8Kj8SQ4JEV0gyVf5P8_v4_8EbLL2T5nrDlIHICJgpV5cgWqkF_IVslAFgC83FifOfCbTbKT0ozlAWq5fiObIJVklaq3SPhlZiFSG7oQ0famo2mIE4yP9N71U3oxTMLL0zO9Or4-pM673mUHPiwwOvQWaWipoecY58ZTi77HSI0f57uIdw7vl3o_Rdq5rJh-iPidfG1Nl3BnvW-Tv2enf04uisvf5z9Pji8LC6XsC46i5VyaulGyqqq6bYHLUiorGgGNqNHUolS1YBUzFsRIjqyqEWUtR2PJzBi2ydEqdzGM5jhe9hZNpxfRzU181ME4_b_i3VRPwp3mXFRVA2VO-LFOiOF2wNTruUsWu854DEPSwJqGS8lBZGu5stoYUorYvr_DmV7S0itaOtPSb7S0zEV7Hzt8L_nHJhtgZUhZ8pmJnoUh-vxrn8W-Aul-oXQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3077188134</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Major colorectal surgery with Hugo™ RAS: initial experience of a German center and a review of the literature</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Belyaev, Orlin ; Fahlbusch, Tim ; Slobodkin, Illya ; Uhl, Wademar</creator><creatorcontrib>Belyaev, Orlin ; Fahlbusch, Tim ; Slobodkin, Illya ; Uhl, Wademar</creatorcontrib><description>The recently introduced Hugo RAS robotic platform has mostly been used for well standardized urologic and gynaecologic procedures. Experience with this new system in general surgery and especially in major colorectal surgery is very limited. This is a retrospective series of the first 25 consecutive non-selected colorectal surgeries performed at a single German center. The lessons learned from our initial experience are presented along with a systematic review of the currently available literature on this topic. Ten sigmoid and seven rectal resections, four right and one left hemicolectomies, two Hartmann’s reversals and an abdominoperineal resection were performed in 14 women and 11 men at the median age of 66 years for 12 benign findings and 13 malignancies. All procedures were performed using four robotic ports and a single 12 mm assistant port. Median docking, console and total operative times were 12, 170 and 270 min. Median blood loss was < 100 ml, and median stay was 8 days. The literature review identified five case series with a total of 23 colorectal procedures: 9 right and 1 left hemicolectomies, 5 ileocaecal, and 4 rectal and 4 sigmoid resections. Results corresponded to ours despite variations in setup used by different authors. A wide spectrum of major colorectal surgery can be safely and effectively performed with the Hugo RAS, even in a cohort of non-selected patients. Ongoing software and hardware upgrade, introduction of robotic energy devices and increasing surgical experience are expected to facilitate procedures and reduce duration of surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2038-131X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2038-3312</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2038-3312</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01939-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38980596</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Colectomy - methods ; Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Colorectal Surgery - methods ; Female ; Germany ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Original ; Original Article ; Rectum - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Updates in surgery, 2024-09, Vol.76 (5), p.1705-1714</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-1e4f118a67985556ff318289c4743746ea642964050ac34b8bc96ee868bd80ad3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7719-3192 ; 0000-0002-0595-2292 ; 0000-0002-2178-6685</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38980596$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Belyaev, Orlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fahlbusch, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slobodkin, Illya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uhl, Wademar</creatorcontrib><title>Major colorectal surgery with Hugo™ RAS: initial experience of a German center and a review of the literature</title><title>Updates in surgery</title><addtitle>Updates Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Updates Surg</addtitle><description>The recently introduced Hugo RAS robotic platform has mostly been used for well standardized urologic and gynaecologic procedures. Experience with this new system in general surgery and especially in major colorectal surgery is very limited. This is a retrospective series of the first 25 consecutive non-selected colorectal surgeries performed at a single German center. The lessons learned from our initial experience are presented along with a systematic review of the currently available literature on this topic. Ten sigmoid and seven rectal resections, four right and one left hemicolectomies, two Hartmann’s reversals and an abdominoperineal resection were performed in 14 women and 11 men at the median age of 66 years for 12 benign findings and 13 malignancies. All procedures were performed using four robotic ports and a single 12 mm assistant port. Median docking, console and total operative times were 12, 170 and 270 min. Median blood loss was < 100 ml, and median stay was 8 days. The literature review identified five case series with a total of 23 colorectal procedures: 9 right and 1 left hemicolectomies, 5 ileocaecal, and 4 rectal and 4 sigmoid resections. Results corresponded to ours despite variations in setup used by different authors. A wide spectrum of major colorectal surgery can be safely and effectively performed with the Hugo RAS, even in a cohort of non-selected patients. Ongoing software and hardware upgrade, introduction of robotic energy devices and increasing surgical experience are expected to facilitate procedures and reduce duration of surgery.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Colectomy - methods</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Colorectal Surgery - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Rectum - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>2038-131X</issn><issn>2038-3312</issn><issn>2038-3312</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctOGzEUhq2KqiDKC7BAXnYzYM_xzNhsEEJcKlFVglZiZznOmcTRxA72DJc9T8Kj8SQ4JEV0gyVf5P8_v4_8EbLL2T5nrDlIHICJgpV5cgWqkF_IVslAFgC83FifOfCbTbKT0ozlAWq5fiObIJVklaq3SPhlZiFSG7oQ0famo2mIE4yP9N71U3oxTMLL0zO9Or4-pM673mUHPiwwOvQWaWipoecY58ZTi77HSI0f57uIdw7vl3o_Rdq5rJh-iPidfG1Nl3BnvW-Tv2enf04uisvf5z9Pji8LC6XsC46i5VyaulGyqqq6bYHLUiorGgGNqNHUolS1YBUzFsRIjqyqEWUtR2PJzBi2ydEqdzGM5jhe9hZNpxfRzU181ME4_b_i3VRPwp3mXFRVA2VO-LFOiOF2wNTruUsWu854DEPSwJqGS8lBZGu5stoYUorYvr_DmV7S0itaOtPSb7S0zEV7Hzt8L_nHJhtgZUhZ8pmJnoUh-vxrn8W-Aul-oXQ</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Belyaev, Orlin</creator><creator>Fahlbusch, Tim</creator><creator>Slobodkin, Illya</creator><creator>Uhl, Wademar</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7719-3192</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0595-2292</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2178-6685</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Major colorectal surgery with Hugo™ RAS: initial experience of a German center and a review of the literature</title><author>Belyaev, Orlin ; Fahlbusch, Tim ; Slobodkin, Illya ; Uhl, Wademar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-1e4f118a67985556ff318289c4743746ea642964050ac34b8bc96ee868bd80ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Colectomy - methods</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Colorectal Surgery - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Rectum - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Belyaev, Orlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fahlbusch, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slobodkin, Illya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uhl, Wademar</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Updates in surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Belyaev, Orlin</au><au>Fahlbusch, Tim</au><au>Slobodkin, Illya</au><au>Uhl, Wademar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Major colorectal surgery with Hugo™ RAS: initial experience of a German center and a review of the literature</atitle><jtitle>Updates in surgery</jtitle><stitle>Updates Surg</stitle><addtitle>Updates Surg</addtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1705</spage><epage>1714</epage><pages>1705-1714</pages><issn>2038-131X</issn><issn>2038-3312</issn><eissn>2038-3312</eissn><abstract>The recently introduced Hugo RAS robotic platform has mostly been used for well standardized urologic and gynaecologic procedures. Experience with this new system in general surgery and especially in major colorectal surgery is very limited. This is a retrospective series of the first 25 consecutive non-selected colorectal surgeries performed at a single German center. The lessons learned from our initial experience are presented along with a systematic review of the currently available literature on this topic. Ten sigmoid and seven rectal resections, four right and one left hemicolectomies, two Hartmann’s reversals and an abdominoperineal resection were performed in 14 women and 11 men at the median age of 66 years for 12 benign findings and 13 malignancies. All procedures were performed using four robotic ports and a single 12 mm assistant port. Median docking, console and total operative times were 12, 170 and 270 min. Median blood loss was < 100 ml, and median stay was 8 days. The literature review identified five case series with a total of 23 colorectal procedures: 9 right and 1 left hemicolectomies, 5 ileocaecal, and 4 rectal and 4 sigmoid resections. Results corresponded to ours despite variations in setup used by different authors. A wide spectrum of major colorectal surgery can be safely and effectively performed with the Hugo RAS, even in a cohort of non-selected patients. Ongoing software and hardware upgrade, introduction of robotic energy devices and increasing surgical experience are expected to facilitate procedures and reduce duration of surgery.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>38980596</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13304-024-01939-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7719-3192</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0595-2292</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2178-6685</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2038-131X |
ispartof | Updates in surgery, 2024-09, Vol.76 (5), p.1705-1714 |
issn | 2038-131X 2038-3312 2038-3312 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11455732 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Colectomy - methods Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery Colorectal Surgery - methods Female Germany Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Operative Time Original Original Article Rectum - surgery Retrospective Studies Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods Surgery |
title | Major colorectal surgery with Hugo™ RAS: initial experience of a German center and a review of the literature |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A50%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Major%20colorectal%20surgery%20with%20Hugo%E2%84%A2%20RAS:%20initial%20experience%20of%20a%20German%20center%20and%20a%20review%20of%20the%20literature&rft.jtitle=Updates%20in%20surgery&rft.au=Belyaev,%20Orlin&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1705&rft.epage=1714&rft.pages=1705-1714&rft.issn=2038-131X&rft.eissn=2038-3312&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13304-024-01939-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3077188134%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-1e4f118a67985556ff318289c4743746ea642964050ac34b8bc96ee868bd80ad3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3077188134&rft_id=info:pmid/38980596&rfr_iscdi=true |