Loading…

Major colorectal surgery with Hugo™ RAS: initial experience of a German center and a review of the literature

The recently introduced Hugo RAS robotic platform has mostly been used for well standardized urologic and gynaecologic procedures. Experience with this new system in general surgery and especially in major colorectal surgery is very limited. This is a retrospective series of the first 25 consecutive...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Updates in surgery 2024-09, Vol.76 (5), p.1705-1714
Main Authors: Belyaev, Orlin, Fahlbusch, Tim, Slobodkin, Illya, Uhl, Wademar
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-1e4f118a67985556ff318289c4743746ea642964050ac34b8bc96ee868bd80ad3
container_end_page 1714
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1705
container_title Updates in surgery
container_volume 76
creator Belyaev, Orlin
Fahlbusch, Tim
Slobodkin, Illya
Uhl, Wademar
description The recently introduced Hugo RAS robotic platform has mostly been used for well standardized urologic and gynaecologic procedures. Experience with this new system in general surgery and especially in major colorectal surgery is very limited. This is a retrospective series of the first 25 consecutive non-selected colorectal surgeries performed at a single German center. The lessons learned from our initial experience are presented along with a systematic review of the currently available literature on this topic. Ten sigmoid and seven rectal resections, four right and one left hemicolectomies, two Hartmann’s reversals and an abdominoperineal resection were performed in 14 women and 11 men at the median age of 66 years for 12 benign findings and 13 malignancies. All procedures were performed using four robotic ports and a single 12 mm assistant port. Median docking, console and total operative times were 12, 170 and 270 min. Median blood loss was
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13304-024-01939-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11455732</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3077188134</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-1e4f118a67985556ff318289c4743746ea642964050ac34b8bc96ee868bd80ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctOGzEUhq2KqiDKC7BAXnYzYM_xzNhsEEJcKlFVglZiZznOmcTRxA72DJc9T8Kj8SQ4JEV0gyVf5P8_v4_8EbLL2T5nrDlIHICJgpV5cgWqkF_IVslAFgC83FifOfCbTbKT0ozlAWq5fiObIJVklaq3SPhlZiFSG7oQ0famo2mIE4yP9N71U3oxTMLL0zO9Or4-pM673mUHPiwwOvQWaWipoecY58ZTi77HSI0f57uIdw7vl3o_Rdq5rJh-iPidfG1Nl3BnvW-Tv2enf04uisvf5z9Pji8LC6XsC46i5VyaulGyqqq6bYHLUiorGgGNqNHUolS1YBUzFsRIjqyqEWUtR2PJzBi2ydEqdzGM5jhe9hZNpxfRzU181ME4_b_i3VRPwp3mXFRVA2VO-LFOiOF2wNTruUsWu854DEPSwJqGS8lBZGu5stoYUorYvr_DmV7S0itaOtPSb7S0zEV7Hzt8L_nHJhtgZUhZ8pmJnoUh-vxrn8W-Aul-oXQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3077188134</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Major colorectal surgery with Hugo™ RAS: initial experience of a German center and a review of the literature</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Belyaev, Orlin ; Fahlbusch, Tim ; Slobodkin, Illya ; Uhl, Wademar</creator><creatorcontrib>Belyaev, Orlin ; Fahlbusch, Tim ; Slobodkin, Illya ; Uhl, Wademar</creatorcontrib><description>The recently introduced Hugo RAS robotic platform has mostly been used for well standardized urologic and gynaecologic procedures. Experience with this new system in general surgery and especially in major colorectal surgery is very limited. This is a retrospective series of the first 25 consecutive non-selected colorectal surgeries performed at a single German center. The lessons learned from our initial experience are presented along with a systematic review of the currently available literature on this topic. Ten sigmoid and seven rectal resections, four right and one left hemicolectomies, two Hartmann’s reversals and an abdominoperineal resection were performed in 14 women and 11 men at the median age of 66 years for 12 benign findings and 13 malignancies. All procedures were performed using four robotic ports and a single 12 mm assistant port. Median docking, console and total operative times were 12, 170 and 270 min. Median blood loss was &lt; 100 ml, and median stay was 8 days. The literature review identified five case series with a total of 23 colorectal procedures: 9 right and 1 left hemicolectomies, 5 ileocaecal, and 4 rectal and 4 sigmoid resections. Results corresponded to ours despite variations in setup used by different authors. A wide spectrum of major colorectal surgery can be safely and effectively performed with the Hugo RAS, even in a cohort of non-selected patients. Ongoing software and hardware upgrade, introduction of robotic energy devices and increasing surgical experience are expected to facilitate procedures and reduce duration of surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2038-131X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2038-3312</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2038-3312</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01939-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38980596</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Colectomy - methods ; Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Colorectal Surgery - methods ; Female ; Germany ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Original ; Original Article ; Rectum - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Updates in surgery, 2024-09, Vol.76 (5), p.1705-1714</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-1e4f118a67985556ff318289c4743746ea642964050ac34b8bc96ee868bd80ad3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7719-3192 ; 0000-0002-0595-2292 ; 0000-0002-2178-6685</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38980596$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Belyaev, Orlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fahlbusch, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slobodkin, Illya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uhl, Wademar</creatorcontrib><title>Major colorectal surgery with Hugo™ RAS: initial experience of a German center and a review of the literature</title><title>Updates in surgery</title><addtitle>Updates Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Updates Surg</addtitle><description>The recently introduced Hugo RAS robotic platform has mostly been used for well standardized urologic and gynaecologic procedures. Experience with this new system in general surgery and especially in major colorectal surgery is very limited. This is a retrospective series of the first 25 consecutive non-selected colorectal surgeries performed at a single German center. The lessons learned from our initial experience are presented along with a systematic review of the currently available literature on this topic. Ten sigmoid and seven rectal resections, four right and one left hemicolectomies, two Hartmann’s reversals and an abdominoperineal resection were performed in 14 women and 11 men at the median age of 66 years for 12 benign findings and 13 malignancies. All procedures were performed using four robotic ports and a single 12 mm assistant port. Median docking, console and total operative times were 12, 170 and 270 min. Median blood loss was &lt; 100 ml, and median stay was 8 days. The literature review identified five case series with a total of 23 colorectal procedures: 9 right and 1 left hemicolectomies, 5 ileocaecal, and 4 rectal and 4 sigmoid resections. Results corresponded to ours despite variations in setup used by different authors. A wide spectrum of major colorectal surgery can be safely and effectively performed with the Hugo RAS, even in a cohort of non-selected patients. Ongoing software and hardware upgrade, introduction of robotic energy devices and increasing surgical experience are expected to facilitate procedures and reduce duration of surgery.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Colectomy - methods</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Colorectal Surgery - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Rectum - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>2038-131X</issn><issn>2038-3312</issn><issn>2038-3312</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctOGzEUhq2KqiDKC7BAXnYzYM_xzNhsEEJcKlFVglZiZznOmcTRxA72DJc9T8Kj8SQ4JEV0gyVf5P8_v4_8EbLL2T5nrDlIHICJgpV5cgWqkF_IVslAFgC83FifOfCbTbKT0ozlAWq5fiObIJVklaq3SPhlZiFSG7oQ0famo2mIE4yP9N71U3oxTMLL0zO9Or4-pM673mUHPiwwOvQWaWipoecY58ZTi77HSI0f57uIdw7vl3o_Rdq5rJh-iPidfG1Nl3BnvW-Tv2enf04uisvf5z9Pji8LC6XsC46i5VyaulGyqqq6bYHLUiorGgGNqNHUolS1YBUzFsRIjqyqEWUtR2PJzBi2ydEqdzGM5jhe9hZNpxfRzU181ME4_b_i3VRPwp3mXFRVA2VO-LFOiOF2wNTruUsWu854DEPSwJqGS8lBZGu5stoYUorYvr_DmV7S0itaOtPSb7S0zEV7Hzt8L_nHJhtgZUhZ8pmJnoUh-vxrn8W-Aul-oXQ</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Belyaev, Orlin</creator><creator>Fahlbusch, Tim</creator><creator>Slobodkin, Illya</creator><creator>Uhl, Wademar</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7719-3192</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0595-2292</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2178-6685</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Major colorectal surgery with Hugo™ RAS: initial experience of a German center and a review of the literature</title><author>Belyaev, Orlin ; Fahlbusch, Tim ; Slobodkin, Illya ; Uhl, Wademar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-1e4f118a67985556ff318289c4743746ea642964050ac34b8bc96ee868bd80ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Colectomy - methods</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Colorectal Surgery - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Rectum - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Belyaev, Orlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fahlbusch, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slobodkin, Illya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uhl, Wademar</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Updates in surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Belyaev, Orlin</au><au>Fahlbusch, Tim</au><au>Slobodkin, Illya</au><au>Uhl, Wademar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Major colorectal surgery with Hugo™ RAS: initial experience of a German center and a review of the literature</atitle><jtitle>Updates in surgery</jtitle><stitle>Updates Surg</stitle><addtitle>Updates Surg</addtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1705</spage><epage>1714</epage><pages>1705-1714</pages><issn>2038-131X</issn><issn>2038-3312</issn><eissn>2038-3312</eissn><abstract>The recently introduced Hugo RAS robotic platform has mostly been used for well standardized urologic and gynaecologic procedures. Experience with this new system in general surgery and especially in major colorectal surgery is very limited. This is a retrospective series of the first 25 consecutive non-selected colorectal surgeries performed at a single German center. The lessons learned from our initial experience are presented along with a systematic review of the currently available literature on this topic. Ten sigmoid and seven rectal resections, four right and one left hemicolectomies, two Hartmann’s reversals and an abdominoperineal resection were performed in 14 women and 11 men at the median age of 66 years for 12 benign findings and 13 malignancies. All procedures were performed using four robotic ports and a single 12 mm assistant port. Median docking, console and total operative times were 12, 170 and 270 min. Median blood loss was &lt; 100 ml, and median stay was 8 days. The literature review identified five case series with a total of 23 colorectal procedures: 9 right and 1 left hemicolectomies, 5 ileocaecal, and 4 rectal and 4 sigmoid resections. Results corresponded to ours despite variations in setup used by different authors. A wide spectrum of major colorectal surgery can be safely and effectively performed with the Hugo RAS, even in a cohort of non-selected patients. Ongoing software and hardware upgrade, introduction of robotic energy devices and increasing surgical experience are expected to facilitate procedures and reduce duration of surgery.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>38980596</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13304-024-01939-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7719-3192</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0595-2292</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2178-6685</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2038-131X
ispartof Updates in surgery, 2024-09, Vol.76 (5), p.1705-1714
issn 2038-131X
2038-3312
2038-3312
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11455732
source Springer Nature
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Colectomy - methods
Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery
Colorectal Surgery - methods
Female
Germany
Humans
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Original
Original Article
Rectum - surgery
Retrospective Studies
Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods
Surgery
title Major colorectal surgery with Hugo™ RAS: initial experience of a German center and a review of the literature
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A50%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Major%20colorectal%20surgery%20with%20Hugo%E2%84%A2%20RAS:%20initial%20experience%20of%20a%20German%20center%20and%20a%20review%20of%20the%20literature&rft.jtitle=Updates%20in%20surgery&rft.au=Belyaev,%20Orlin&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1705&rft.epage=1714&rft.pages=1705-1714&rft.issn=2038-131X&rft.eissn=2038-3312&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13304-024-01939-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3077188134%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-1e4f118a67985556ff318289c4743746ea642964050ac34b8bc96ee868bd80ad3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3077188134&rft_id=info:pmid/38980596&rfr_iscdi=true