Loading…

Bringing home the benefits: do pro-family employee benefits mitigate the risk of depression from competing workplace and domestic labor roles?

Despite significant historical progress toward sex/gender parity in employment status in the United States, women remain more likely to provide domestic labor, creating role competition which may increase depression symptoms. Pro-family employee benefits may minimize the stress of competing roles. W...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of epidemiology 2024-10, Vol.193 (10), p.1362-1371
Main Authors: Platt, Jonathan M, Bates, Lisa, Jager, Justin, McLaughlin, Katie A, Keyes, Katherine M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-27cbda09913860688ef8220f8ca148b58111bf6b23c5fbb6985ec98495e6d83c3
container_end_page 1371
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1362
container_title American journal of epidemiology
container_volume 193
creator Platt, Jonathan M
Bates, Lisa
Jager, Justin
McLaughlin, Katie A
Keyes, Katherine M
description Despite significant historical progress toward sex/gender parity in employment status in the United States, women remain more likely to provide domestic labor, creating role competition which may increase depression symptoms. Pro-family employee benefits may minimize the stress of competing roles. We tested whether depressive symptoms were higher among women with competing roles versus without competing roles and whether this effect was greater among women without (vs with) pro-family benefits. Data included employed women (n = 9884 person-years) surveyed across 4 waves (2010, 2015, 2017, and 2019) of the National Longitudinal Survey 1997. Depression symptoms were measured with the 5-item short version of the Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5). The effect of interaction between competing roles and pro-family employee benefits on depressive symptoms was also compared with that of non-family-related benefits, using marginal structural models to estimate longitudinal effects in the presence of time-varying confounding. MHI-5 scores were 0.56 points higher (95% CI, 0.15-0.97) among women in competing roles (vs not). Among women without pro-family benefits, competing roles increased MHI-5 scores by 6.10 points (95% CI, 1.14-11.1). In contrast, there was no association between competing roles and MHI-5 scores among women with access to these benefits (MHI-5 difference = 0.44; 95% CI, -0.2 to 1.0). Results were similar for non-family-related benefits. Dual workplace and domestic labor role competition increases women's depression symptoms, though broad availability of workplace benefits may attenuate that risk. This article is part of a Special Collection on Mental Health.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/aje/kwae055
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11458195</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3048492844</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-27cbda09913860688ef8220f8ca148b58111bf6b23c5fbb6985ec98495e6d83c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU9vFCEYh4nR2LV68m44mpixwAwseGlq47-kiRc9E2BedunCMMKszX4JP7M0u1ZNSDjw8PzeNz-EXlLylhLVX5hbuNjdGSCcP0IrOqxFJxgXj9GKEMI6xQQ7Q89qvSWEUsXJU3TWS7FWg-Ar9Ot9CdOmHbzNCfCyBWxhAh-W-g6PGc8ld96kEA8Y0hzzAf4COIUlbMxy_FZC3eHs8QhzgVpDnrAvOWGX0wzLfcJdLrs5GgfYTGOTJ6hLcDgamwsuOUK9fI6eeBMrvDjd5-j7xw_frj93N18_fbm-uukcW5OlY2tnR0OUom0TIqQELxkjXjpDB2m5pJRaLyzrHffWCiU5OCUHxUGMsnf9Obo8eue9TTA6mJZiop5LSKYcdDZB__8yha3e5J-a0qHZFW-G1ydDyT_2bROdQnUQo5kg76vuydDymByGhr45oq7kWgv4hxxK9H2FulWoTxU2-tW_oz2wfzrrfwOC-Zyf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3048492844</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bringing home the benefits: do pro-family employee benefits mitigate the risk of depression from competing workplace and domestic labor roles?</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Platt, Jonathan M ; Bates, Lisa ; Jager, Justin ; McLaughlin, Katie A ; Keyes, Katherine M</creator><creatorcontrib>Platt, Jonathan M ; Bates, Lisa ; Jager, Justin ; McLaughlin, Katie A ; Keyes, Katherine M</creatorcontrib><description>Despite significant historical progress toward sex/gender parity in employment status in the United States, women remain more likely to provide domestic labor, creating role competition which may increase depression symptoms. Pro-family employee benefits may minimize the stress of competing roles. We tested whether depressive symptoms were higher among women with competing roles versus without competing roles and whether this effect was greater among women without (vs with) pro-family benefits. Data included employed women (n = 9884 person-years) surveyed across 4 waves (2010, 2015, 2017, and 2019) of the National Longitudinal Survey 1997. Depression symptoms were measured with the 5-item short version of the Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5). The effect of interaction between competing roles and pro-family employee benefits on depressive symptoms was also compared with that of non-family-related benefits, using marginal structural models to estimate longitudinal effects in the presence of time-varying confounding. MHI-5 scores were 0.56 points higher (95% CI, 0.15-0.97) among women in competing roles (vs not). Among women without pro-family benefits, competing roles increased MHI-5 scores by 6.10 points (95% CI, 1.14-11.1). In contrast, there was no association between competing roles and MHI-5 scores among women with access to these benefits (MHI-5 difference = 0.44; 95% CI, -0.2 to 1.0). Results were similar for non-family-related benefits. Dual workplace and domestic labor role competition increases women's depression symptoms, though broad availability of workplace benefits may attenuate that risk. This article is part of a Special Collection on Mental Health.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9262</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1476-6256</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-6256</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwae055</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38679465</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Depression - epidemiology ; Depression - prevention &amp; control ; Employment - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Household Work ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Middle Aged ; Original Contribution ; United States - epidemiology ; Women, Working - psychology ; Women, Working - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Workplace - psychology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>American journal of epidemiology, 2024-10, Vol.193 (10), p.1362-1371</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-27cbda09913860688ef8220f8ca148b58111bf6b23c5fbb6985ec98495e6d83c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5475-0494</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38679465$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Platt, Jonathan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bates, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jager, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Katie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keyes, Katherine M</creatorcontrib><title>Bringing home the benefits: do pro-family employee benefits mitigate the risk of depression from competing workplace and domestic labor roles?</title><title>American journal of epidemiology</title><addtitle>Am J Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Despite significant historical progress toward sex/gender parity in employment status in the United States, women remain more likely to provide domestic labor, creating role competition which may increase depression symptoms. Pro-family employee benefits may minimize the stress of competing roles. We tested whether depressive symptoms were higher among women with competing roles versus without competing roles and whether this effect was greater among women without (vs with) pro-family benefits. Data included employed women (n = 9884 person-years) surveyed across 4 waves (2010, 2015, 2017, and 2019) of the National Longitudinal Survey 1997. Depression symptoms were measured with the 5-item short version of the Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5). The effect of interaction between competing roles and pro-family employee benefits on depressive symptoms was also compared with that of non-family-related benefits, using marginal structural models to estimate longitudinal effects in the presence of time-varying confounding. MHI-5 scores were 0.56 points higher (95% CI, 0.15-0.97) among women in competing roles (vs not). Among women without pro-family benefits, competing roles increased MHI-5 scores by 6.10 points (95% CI, 1.14-11.1). In contrast, there was no association between competing roles and MHI-5 scores among women with access to these benefits (MHI-5 difference = 0.44; 95% CI, -0.2 to 1.0). Results were similar for non-family-related benefits. Dual workplace and domestic labor role competition increases women's depression symptoms, though broad availability of workplace benefits may attenuate that risk. This article is part of a Special Collection on Mental Health.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Depression - epidemiology</subject><subject>Depression - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Employment - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Household Work</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Contribution</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Women, Working - psychology</subject><subject>Women, Working - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Workplace - psychology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0002-9262</issn><issn>1476-6256</issn><issn>1476-6256</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkU9vFCEYh4nR2LV68m44mpixwAwseGlq47-kiRc9E2BedunCMMKszX4JP7M0u1ZNSDjw8PzeNz-EXlLylhLVX5hbuNjdGSCcP0IrOqxFJxgXj9GKEMI6xQQ7Q89qvSWEUsXJU3TWS7FWg-Ar9Ot9CdOmHbzNCfCyBWxhAh-W-g6PGc8ld96kEA8Y0hzzAf4COIUlbMxy_FZC3eHs8QhzgVpDnrAvOWGX0wzLfcJdLrs5GgfYTGOTJ6hLcDgamwsuOUK9fI6eeBMrvDjd5-j7xw_frj93N18_fbm-uukcW5OlY2tnR0OUom0TIqQELxkjXjpDB2m5pJRaLyzrHffWCiU5OCUHxUGMsnf9Obo8eue9TTA6mJZiop5LSKYcdDZB__8yha3e5J-a0qHZFW-G1ydDyT_2bROdQnUQo5kg76vuydDymByGhr45oq7kWgv4hxxK9H2FulWoTxU2-tW_oz2wfzrrfwOC-Zyf</recordid><startdate>20241007</startdate><enddate>20241007</enddate><creator>Platt, Jonathan M</creator><creator>Bates, Lisa</creator><creator>Jager, Justin</creator><creator>McLaughlin, Katie A</creator><creator>Keyes, Katherine M</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5475-0494</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241007</creationdate><title>Bringing home the benefits: do pro-family employee benefits mitigate the risk of depression from competing workplace and domestic labor roles?</title><author>Platt, Jonathan M ; Bates, Lisa ; Jager, Justin ; McLaughlin, Katie A ; Keyes, Katherine M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-27cbda09913860688ef8220f8ca148b58111bf6b23c5fbb6985ec98495e6d83c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Depression - epidemiology</topic><topic>Depression - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Employment - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Household Work</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Contribution</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Women, Working - psychology</topic><topic>Women, Working - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Workplace - psychology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Platt, Jonathan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bates, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jager, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Katie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keyes, Katherine M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Platt, Jonathan M</au><au>Bates, Lisa</au><au>Jager, Justin</au><au>McLaughlin, Katie A</au><au>Keyes, Katherine M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bringing home the benefits: do pro-family employee benefits mitigate the risk of depression from competing workplace and domestic labor roles?</atitle><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2024-10-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>193</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1362</spage><epage>1371</epage><pages>1362-1371</pages><issn>0002-9262</issn><issn>1476-6256</issn><eissn>1476-6256</eissn><abstract>Despite significant historical progress toward sex/gender parity in employment status in the United States, women remain more likely to provide domestic labor, creating role competition which may increase depression symptoms. Pro-family employee benefits may minimize the stress of competing roles. We tested whether depressive symptoms were higher among women with competing roles versus without competing roles and whether this effect was greater among women without (vs with) pro-family benefits. Data included employed women (n = 9884 person-years) surveyed across 4 waves (2010, 2015, 2017, and 2019) of the National Longitudinal Survey 1997. Depression symptoms were measured with the 5-item short version of the Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5). The effect of interaction between competing roles and pro-family employee benefits on depressive symptoms was also compared with that of non-family-related benefits, using marginal structural models to estimate longitudinal effects in the presence of time-varying confounding. MHI-5 scores were 0.56 points higher (95% CI, 0.15-0.97) among women in competing roles (vs not). Among women without pro-family benefits, competing roles increased MHI-5 scores by 6.10 points (95% CI, 1.14-11.1). In contrast, there was no association between competing roles and MHI-5 scores among women with access to these benefits (MHI-5 difference = 0.44; 95% CI, -0.2 to 1.0). Results were similar for non-family-related benefits. Dual workplace and domestic labor role competition increases women's depression symptoms, though broad availability of workplace benefits may attenuate that risk. This article is part of a Special Collection on Mental Health.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>38679465</pmid><doi>10.1093/aje/kwae055</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5475-0494</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9262
ispartof American journal of epidemiology, 2024-10, Vol.193 (10), p.1362-1371
issn 0002-9262
1476-6256
1476-6256
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11458195
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Adult
Depression - epidemiology
Depression - prevention & control
Employment - statistics & numerical data
Female
Household Work
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Middle Aged
Original Contribution
United States - epidemiology
Women, Working - psychology
Women, Working - statistics & numerical data
Workplace - psychology
Young Adult
title Bringing home the benefits: do pro-family employee benefits mitigate the risk of depression from competing workplace and domestic labor roles?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A31%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bringing%20home%20the%20benefits:%20do%20pro-family%20employee%20benefits%20mitigate%20the%20risk%20of%20depression%20from%20competing%20workplace%20and%20domestic%20labor%20roles?&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20epidemiology&rft.au=Platt,%20Jonathan%20M&rft.date=2024-10-07&rft.volume=193&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1362&rft.epage=1371&rft.pages=1362-1371&rft.issn=0002-9262&rft.eissn=1476-6256&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/aje/kwae055&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3048492844%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-27cbda09913860688ef8220f8ca148b58111bf6b23c5fbb6985ec98495e6d83c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3048492844&rft_id=info:pmid/38679465&rfr_iscdi=true