Loading…

Prognostic value of AFP-L3 and Des-γ-carboxy prothrombin in advanced primary liver cancer treated with Sorafenib and transarterial chemoembolization

To evaluate the prognostic value of serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP-L3) and Des-γ-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) in advanced primary liver cancer (PLC) undergoing combined treatment with Sorafenib and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). This retrospective analysis included 82 patients with advanced PLC...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of translational research 2024-01, Vol.16 (9), p.5004-5010
Main Authors: Tang, Shiwen, Liu, Hao, Chen, Peiyang, He, Jiaqing, Chen, Haiwei, Chen, Jingqi, Liu, Yanli
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To evaluate the prognostic value of serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP-L3) and Des-γ-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) in advanced primary liver cancer (PLC) undergoing combined treatment with Sorafenib and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). This retrospective analysis included 82 patients with advanced PLC treated at the Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University from January 2018 to January 2020. The patients were divided into an observation group (41 cases) and a control group (41 cases) based on their treatment method. The control group received TACE, while the observation group received a combination of Sorafenib and TACE. Both groups were evaluated after 12 weeks of treatment. Serum AFP-L3 and DCP levels were measured using a chemiluminescence immunoassay with magnetic particles. Short-term efficacy was compared between the two groups after 12 weeks of treatment. Additionally, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scores, serum AFP-L3 and DCP levels before and after 12 weeks of treatment, and the survival rate after 2 years of follow-up were recorded. Serum AFP-L3 and DCP levels were compared between surviving and deceased patients. The objective response rate in the observation group (68.29%) was higher than in the control group (46.34%) (P
ISSN:1943-8141
1943-8141
DOI:10.62347/PMYP4404