Efficacy of neutral electrolyzed water vs. common topical antiseptics in the healing of full‑thickness burn: Preclinical trial in a mouse model

Burn injuries impose challenges such as infection risk, pain management, fluid loss, electrolyte imbalance and psychological and emotional impact, on healthcare professionals, requiring effective treatments to enhance wound healing. The present study evaluated the efficacy superoxidized electrolyzed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biomedical reports 2024-12, Vol.21 (6), p.189, Article 189
Main Authors: Delgado-Enciso, Ivan, Aurelien-Cabezas, Nomely S, Meza-Robles, Carmen, Walle-Guillen, Mireya, Hernandez-Fuentes, Gustavo A, Cabrera-Licona, Ariana, Hernandez-Rangel, Alejandra E, Delgado-Machuca, Marina, Rodriguez-Hernandez, Alejandrina, Beas-Guzman, Oscar F, Cardenas-Aguilar, Citlaly B, Rodriguez-Sanchez, Iram P, Martinez-Fierro, Margarita L, Chaviano-Conesa, Daniel, Paz-Michel, Brenda A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Angiogenesis
Antibacterial agents
Antimicrobial agents
Antiseptics
Burns and scalds
Care and treatment
Chlorine
Collagen
Effectiveness
Electrolytic cells
Evaluation
Growth factors
Health aspects
Horizontal orientation
Hydrogels
Infections
Inflammation
Intervention
Ketamine
Laboratory animals
Parameters
Scald
Skin
Sulfadiazine
Tissue engineering
Wound healing
Wounds and injuries
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-93e227d59b376a3d80b7781ea79322f1a11e87d6bdd8e378c7c98bf2eabf6363
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 189
container_title Biomedical reports
container_volume 21
creator Delgado-Enciso, Ivan
Aurelien-Cabezas, Nomely S
Meza-Robles, Carmen
Walle-Guillen, Mireya
Hernandez-Fuentes, Gustavo A
Cabrera-Licona, Ariana
Hernandez-Rangel, Alejandra E
Delgado-Machuca, Marina
Rodriguez-Hernandez, Alejandrina
Beas-Guzman, Oscar F
Cardenas-Aguilar, Citlaly B
Rodriguez-Sanchez, Iram P
Martinez-Fierro, Margarita L
Chaviano-Conesa, Daniel
Paz-Michel, Brenda A
description Burn injuries impose challenges such as infection risk, pain management, fluid loss, electrolyte imbalance and psychological and emotional impact, on healthcare professionals, requiring effective treatments to enhance wound healing. The present study evaluated the efficacy superoxidized electrolyzed solution (SES), with low (SES-low) or high (SES-high) concentrations of active species, alone or in combination with a formulation in gel (G), in comparison with commonly prescribed treatments for burn injury, including nitrofurazone (NF) and silver sulfadiazine (S); normal saline was used as placebo (PI). A scald burn model was established in BALB/c mice. Measurements of the burned area and histological parameters such as inflammatory infiltration state, epithelial regeneration and collagen fibers were evaluated on days 3, 6, 9, 18 and 32 to assess healing score and status. All treatments achieved wound closure at day 32; histopathological parameters indicated that SES-low and SES-low + G performed better than the Pl and S groups (P
doi_str_mv 10.3892/br.2024.1877
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11522847</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A817480160</galeid><sourcerecordid>A817480160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-93e227d59b376a3d80b7781ea79322f1a11e87d6bdd8e378c7c98bf2eabf6363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk1v1DAUjBCIVqU3zsgSFw5s8FdihwuqqhaQKsGhd8txnnddHHuxk6LlxF_oX-wvwaFloQhbsq3nmXmap6mq5wTXTHb0TZ9qiimviRTiUXVIMe9WHef08f7N-EF1nPMVLqsTmDbyaXXAOi461tLD6ubMWme02aFoUYB5Stoj8GCmFP3uOwzom54goetcIxPHMQY0xW1heKTD5DJsJ2cycqW8AbQB7V1YL1p29v72x820ceZLgJxRP6fwFn1OYArkl8CUXDkLVaMxzhnKOYB_Vj2x2mc4vr-Pqsvzs8vTD6uLT-8_np5crAxrxbTqGFAqhqbrmWg1GyTuhZAEdDFGqSWaEJBiaPthkMCENMJ0srcUdG9b1rKj6t2d7HbuRxgMhMW62iY36rRTUTv18Ce4jVrHa0VIQ6nkoii8uldI8esMeVKjywa81wGKHcUIpS1vSLs0e_kP9CqWcRR7C6rBLea8-4Naaw_KBRtLY7OIqhNJBJeYtLig6v-gyh5gdCYGsK7UHxBe3xFMijknsHuTBKslRapPakmRWlJU4C_-Hswe_Dsz7CeaLcSx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3125060449</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of neutral electrolyzed water vs. common topical antiseptics in the healing of full‑thickness burn: Preclinical trial in a mouse model</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Delgado-Enciso, Ivan ; Aurelien-Cabezas, Nomely S ; Meza-Robles, Carmen ; Walle-Guillen, Mireya ; Hernandez-Fuentes, Gustavo A ; Cabrera-Licona, Ariana ; Hernandez-Rangel, Alejandra E ; Delgado-Machuca, Marina ; Rodriguez-Hernandez, Alejandrina ; Beas-Guzman, Oscar F ; Cardenas-Aguilar, Citlaly B ; Rodriguez-Sanchez, Iram P ; Martinez-Fierro, Margarita L ; Chaviano-Conesa, Daniel ; Paz-Michel, Brenda A</creator><creatorcontrib>Delgado-Enciso, Ivan ; Aurelien-Cabezas, Nomely S ; Meza-Robles, Carmen ; Walle-Guillen, Mireya ; Hernandez-Fuentes, Gustavo A ; Cabrera-Licona, Ariana ; Hernandez-Rangel, Alejandra E ; Delgado-Machuca, Marina ; Rodriguez-Hernandez, Alejandrina ; Beas-Guzman, Oscar F ; Cardenas-Aguilar, Citlaly B ; Rodriguez-Sanchez, Iram P ; Martinez-Fierro, Margarita L ; Chaviano-Conesa, Daniel ; Paz-Michel, Brenda A</creatorcontrib><description>Burn injuries impose challenges such as infection risk, pain management, fluid loss, electrolyte imbalance and psychological and emotional impact, on healthcare professionals, requiring effective treatments to enhance wound healing. The present study evaluated the efficacy superoxidized electrolyzed solution (SES), with low (SES-low) or high (SES-high) concentrations of active species, alone or in combination with a formulation in gel (G), in comparison with commonly prescribed treatments for burn injury, including nitrofurazone (NF) and silver sulfadiazine (S); normal saline was used as placebo (PI). A scald burn model was established in BALB/c mice. Measurements of the burned area and histological parameters such as inflammatory infiltration state, epithelial regeneration and collagen fibers were evaluated on days 3, 6, 9, 18 and 32 to assess healing score and status. All treatments achieved wound closure at day 32; histopathological parameters indicated that SES-low and SES-low + G performed better than the Pl and S groups (P&lt;0.05). All treatments showed a lower count of inflammatory cells compared with S (P&lt;0.05); for collagen deposition and orientation, SES-low + G showed a more uniform horizontal orientation compared with Pl, SES-high + G, NF and S groups (P&lt;0.05). SES-Low was the most effective substance to induce favorable and organized healing, while S was the worst, inducing disorganized closure of the wound due to a pro-inflammatory effect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-9434</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2049-9442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-9442</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3892/br.2024.1877</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39479362</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Spandidos Publications</publisher><subject>Angiogenesis ; Antibacterial agents ; Antimicrobial agents ; Antiseptics ; Burns and scalds ; Care and treatment ; Chlorine ; Collagen ; Effectiveness ; Electrolytic cells ; Evaluation ; Growth factors ; Health aspects ; Horizontal orientation ; Hydrogels ; Infections ; Inflammation ; Intervention ; Ketamine ; Laboratory animals ; Parameters ; Scald ; Skin ; Sulfadiazine ; Tissue engineering ; Wound healing ; Wounds and injuries</subject><ispartof>Biomedical reports, 2024-12, Vol.21 (6), p.189, Article 189</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2024 Delgado‑Enciso et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Spandidos Publications</rights><rights>Copyright Spandidos Publications UK Ltd. 2024</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2024 Delgado‑Enciso et al. 2024</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-93e227d59b376a3d80b7781ea79322f1a11e87d6bdd8e378c7c98bf2eabf6363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11522847/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11522847/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39479362$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Delgado-Enciso, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aurelien-Cabezas, Nomely S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meza-Robles, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walle-Guillen, Mireya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez-Fuentes, Gustavo A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabrera-Licona, Ariana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez-Rangel, Alejandra E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delgado-Machuca, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Hernandez, Alejandrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beas-Guzman, Oscar F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardenas-Aguilar, Citlaly B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Sanchez, Iram P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez-Fierro, Margarita L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaviano-Conesa, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paz-Michel, Brenda A</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of neutral electrolyzed water vs. common topical antiseptics in the healing of full‑thickness burn: Preclinical trial in a mouse model</title><title>Biomedical reports</title><addtitle>Biomed Rep</addtitle><description>Burn injuries impose challenges such as infection risk, pain management, fluid loss, electrolyte imbalance and psychological and emotional impact, on healthcare professionals, requiring effective treatments to enhance wound healing. The present study evaluated the efficacy superoxidized electrolyzed solution (SES), with low (SES-low) or high (SES-high) concentrations of active species, alone or in combination with a formulation in gel (G), in comparison with commonly prescribed treatments for burn injury, including nitrofurazone (NF) and silver sulfadiazine (S); normal saline was used as placebo (PI). A scald burn model was established in BALB/c mice. Measurements of the burned area and histological parameters such as inflammatory infiltration state, epithelial regeneration and collagen fibers were evaluated on days 3, 6, 9, 18 and 32 to assess healing score and status. All treatments achieved wound closure at day 32; histopathological parameters indicated that SES-low and SES-low + G performed better than the Pl and S groups (P&lt;0.05). All treatments showed a lower count of inflammatory cells compared with S (P&lt;0.05); for collagen deposition and orientation, SES-low + G showed a more uniform horizontal orientation compared with Pl, SES-high + G, NF and S groups (P&lt;0.05). SES-Low was the most effective substance to induce favorable and organized healing, while S was the worst, inducing disorganized closure of the wound due to a pro-inflammatory effect.</description><subject>Angiogenesis</subject><subject>Antibacterial agents</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Antiseptics</subject><subject>Burns and scalds</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Chlorine</subject><subject>Collagen</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Electrolytic cells</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Growth factors</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Horizontal orientation</subject><subject>Hydrogels</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Ketamine</subject><subject>Laboratory animals</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Scald</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Sulfadiazine</subject><subject>Tissue engineering</subject><subject>Wound healing</subject><subject>Wounds and injuries</subject><issn>2049-9434</issn><issn>2049-9442</issn><issn>2049-9442</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptUk1v1DAUjBCIVqU3zsgSFw5s8FdihwuqqhaQKsGhd8txnnddHHuxk6LlxF_oX-wvwaFloQhbsq3nmXmap6mq5wTXTHb0TZ9qiimviRTiUXVIMe9WHef08f7N-EF1nPMVLqsTmDbyaXXAOi461tLD6ubMWme02aFoUYB5Stoj8GCmFP3uOwzom54goetcIxPHMQY0xW1heKTD5DJsJ2cycqW8AbQB7V1YL1p29v72x820ceZLgJxRP6fwFn1OYArkl8CUXDkLVaMxzhnKOYB_Vj2x2mc4vr-Pqsvzs8vTD6uLT-8_np5crAxrxbTqGFAqhqbrmWg1GyTuhZAEdDFGqSWaEJBiaPthkMCENMJ0srcUdG9b1rKj6t2d7HbuRxgMhMW62iY36rRTUTv18Ce4jVrHa0VIQ6nkoii8uldI8esMeVKjywa81wGKHcUIpS1vSLs0e_kP9CqWcRR7C6rBLea8-4Naaw_KBRtLY7OIqhNJBJeYtLig6v-gyh5gdCYGsK7UHxBe3xFMijknsHuTBKslRapPakmRWlJU4C_-Hswe_Dsz7CeaLcSx</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Delgado-Enciso, Ivan</creator><creator>Aurelien-Cabezas, Nomely S</creator><creator>Meza-Robles, Carmen</creator><creator>Walle-Guillen, Mireya</creator><creator>Hernandez-Fuentes, Gustavo A</creator><creator>Cabrera-Licona, Ariana</creator><creator>Hernandez-Rangel, Alejandra E</creator><creator>Delgado-Machuca, Marina</creator><creator>Rodriguez-Hernandez, Alejandrina</creator><creator>Beas-Guzman, Oscar F</creator><creator>Cardenas-Aguilar, Citlaly B</creator><creator>Rodriguez-Sanchez, Iram P</creator><creator>Martinez-Fierro, Margarita L</creator><creator>Chaviano-Conesa, Daniel</creator><creator>Paz-Michel, Brenda A</creator><general>Spandidos Publications</general><general>Spandidos Publications UK Ltd</general><general>D.A. Spandidos</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Efficacy of neutral electrolyzed water vs. common topical antiseptics in the healing of full‑thickness burn: Preclinical trial in a mouse model</title><author>Delgado-Enciso, Ivan ; Aurelien-Cabezas, Nomely S ; Meza-Robles, Carmen ; Walle-Guillen, Mireya ; Hernandez-Fuentes, Gustavo A ; Cabrera-Licona, Ariana ; Hernandez-Rangel, Alejandra E ; Delgado-Machuca, Marina ; Rodriguez-Hernandez, Alejandrina ; Beas-Guzman, Oscar F ; Cardenas-Aguilar, Citlaly B ; Rodriguez-Sanchez, Iram P ; Martinez-Fierro, Margarita L ; Chaviano-Conesa, Daniel ; Paz-Michel, Brenda A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-93e227d59b376a3d80b7781ea79322f1a11e87d6bdd8e378c7c98bf2eabf6363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Angiogenesis</topic><topic>Antibacterial agents</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Antiseptics</topic><topic>Burns and scalds</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Chlorine</topic><topic>Collagen</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Electrolytic cells</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Growth factors</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Horizontal orientation</topic><topic>Hydrogels</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Ketamine</topic><topic>Laboratory animals</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Scald</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Sulfadiazine</topic><topic>Tissue engineering</topic><topic>Wound healing</topic><topic>Wounds and injuries</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Delgado-Enciso, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aurelien-Cabezas, Nomely S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meza-Robles, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walle-Guillen, Mireya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez-Fuentes, Gustavo A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabrera-Licona, Ariana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez-Rangel, Alejandra E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delgado-Machuca, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Hernandez, Alejandrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beas-Guzman, Oscar F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardenas-Aguilar, Citlaly B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Sanchez, Iram P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez-Fierro, Margarita L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaviano-Conesa, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paz-Michel, Brenda A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Biomedical reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Delgado-Enciso, Ivan</au><au>Aurelien-Cabezas, Nomely S</au><au>Meza-Robles, Carmen</au><au>Walle-Guillen, Mireya</au><au>Hernandez-Fuentes, Gustavo A</au><au>Cabrera-Licona, Ariana</au><au>Hernandez-Rangel, Alejandra E</au><au>Delgado-Machuca, Marina</au><au>Rodriguez-Hernandez, Alejandrina</au><au>Beas-Guzman, Oscar F</au><au>Cardenas-Aguilar, Citlaly B</au><au>Rodriguez-Sanchez, Iram P</au><au>Martinez-Fierro, Margarita L</au><au>Chaviano-Conesa, Daniel</au><au>Paz-Michel, Brenda A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of neutral electrolyzed water vs. common topical antiseptics in the healing of full‑thickness burn: Preclinical trial in a mouse model</atitle><jtitle>Biomedical reports</jtitle><addtitle>Biomed Rep</addtitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>189</spage><pages>189-</pages><artnum>189</artnum><issn>2049-9434</issn><issn>2049-9442</issn><eissn>2049-9442</eissn><abstract>Burn injuries impose challenges such as infection risk, pain management, fluid loss, electrolyte imbalance and psychological and emotional impact, on healthcare professionals, requiring effective treatments to enhance wound healing. The present study evaluated the efficacy superoxidized electrolyzed solution (SES), with low (SES-low) or high (SES-high) concentrations of active species, alone or in combination with a formulation in gel (G), in comparison with commonly prescribed treatments for burn injury, including nitrofurazone (NF) and silver sulfadiazine (S); normal saline was used as placebo (PI). A scald burn model was established in BALB/c mice. Measurements of the burned area and histological parameters such as inflammatory infiltration state, epithelial regeneration and collagen fibers were evaluated on days 3, 6, 9, 18 and 32 to assess healing score and status. All treatments achieved wound closure at day 32; histopathological parameters indicated that SES-low and SES-low + G performed better than the Pl and S groups (P&lt;0.05). All treatments showed a lower count of inflammatory cells compared with S (P&lt;0.05); for collagen deposition and orientation, SES-low + G showed a more uniform horizontal orientation compared with Pl, SES-high + G, NF and S groups (P&lt;0.05). SES-Low was the most effective substance to induce favorable and organized healing, while S was the worst, inducing disorganized closure of the wound due to a pro-inflammatory effect.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Spandidos Publications</pub><pmid>39479362</pmid><doi>10.3892/br.2024.1877</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2049-9434
ispartof Biomedical reports, 2024-12, Vol.21 (6), p.189, Article 189
issn 2049-9434
2049-9442
2049-9442
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11522847
source PubMed Central
subjects Angiogenesis
Antibacterial agents
Antimicrobial agents
Antiseptics
Burns and scalds
Care and treatment
Chlorine
Collagen
Effectiveness
Electrolytic cells
Evaluation
Growth factors
Health aspects
Horizontal orientation
Hydrogels
Infections
Inflammation
Intervention
Ketamine
Laboratory animals
Parameters
Scald
Skin
Sulfadiazine
Tissue engineering
Wound healing
Wounds and injuries
title Efficacy of neutral electrolyzed water vs. common topical antiseptics in the healing of full‑thickness burn: Preclinical trial in a mouse model
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T18%3A26%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20neutral%20electrolyzed%20water%20vs.%20common%20topical%20antiseptics%20in%20the%20healing%20of%20full%E2%80%91thickness%20burn:%20Preclinical%20trial%20in%20a%20mouse%20model&rft.jtitle=Biomedical%20reports&rft.au=Delgado-Enciso,%20Ivan&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=189&rft.pages=189-&rft.artnum=189&rft.issn=2049-9434&rft.eissn=2049-9442&rft_id=info:doi/10.3892/br.2024.1877&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA817480160%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-93e227d59b376a3d80b7781ea79322f1a11e87d6bdd8e378c7c98bf2eabf6363%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3125060449&rft_id=info:pmid/39479362&rft_galeid=A817480160&rfr_iscdi=true