Loading…
Generative artificial intelligence and ethical considerations in health care: a scoping review and ethics checklist
The widespread use of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (known as ChatGPT) and other emerging technology that is powered by generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has drawn attention to the potential ethical issues they can cause, especially in high-stakes applications such as health care,...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Lancet. Digital health 2024-11, Vol.6 (11), p.e848-e856 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-9804fc87544f45ff964d3df86e03cc9dfcd76055d386154e8602d18b5253a0af3 |
container_end_page | e856 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | e848 |
container_title | The Lancet. Digital health |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Ning, Yilin Teixayavong, Salinelat Shang, Yuqing Savulescu, Julian Nagaraj, Vaishaanth Miao, Di Mertens, Mayli Ting, Daniel Shu Wei Ong, Jasmine Chiat Ling Liu, Mingxuan Cao, Jiuwen Dunn, Michael Vaughan, Roger Ong, Marcus Eng Hock Sung, Joseph Jao-Yiu Topol, Eric J Liu, Nan |
description | The widespread use of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (known as ChatGPT) and other emerging technology that is powered by generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has drawn attention to the potential ethical issues they can cause, especially in high-stakes applications such as health care, but ethical discussions have not yet been translated into operationalisable solutions. Furthermore, ongoing ethical discussions often neglect other types of GenAI that have been used to synthesise data (eg, images) for research and practical purposes, which resolve some ethical issues and expose others. We did a scoping review of the ethical discussions on GenAI in health care to comprehensively analyse gaps in the research. To reduce the gaps, we have developed a checklist for comprehensive assessment and evaluation of ethical discussions in GenAI research. The checklist can be integrated into peer review and publication systems to enhance GenAI research and might be useful for ethics-related disclosures for GenAI-powered products and health-care applications of such products and beyond. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00143-2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11542614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2589750024001432</els_id><sourcerecordid>3106735904</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-9804fc87544f45ff964d3df86e03cc9dfcd76055d386154e8602d18b5253a0af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1vEzEQtRCIVqE_AeRjOWzx9-5yQahqC1IlDrRny7XH2YHNbrCdIP59nbSk5cTJo5n33ozfI-QtZ2eccfPhu9Bd37SasVOh3jPGlWzEC3J8aL98Vh-Rk5x_MMaE4LJt29fkSPaiV8zwY5KvYILkCm6BulQwokc3UpwKjCMuYfK1PwUKZUBfB36eMoY9o1YVRwdwYxmodwk-Ukezn9c4LWmCLcLvJ26mfgD_c8Rc3pBX0Y0ZTh7fBbm9vLg5_9Jcf7v6ev75uvFSmdL0HVPRd61WKiodY29UkCF2Bpj0vg_Rh9YwrYPsDNcKOsNE4N2dFlo65qJckE8PuuvN3QqCh6kkN9p1wpVLf-zs0P47mXCwy3lreZUTppq6IKePCmn-tYFc7Aqzr864CeZNtpIz00rdsx1UP0B9mnNOEA97OLO70Ow-NLtLxApl96FZUXnvnh95YP2N6OkXUK2qniabPe5yCZjAFxtm_M-Ke8R8qPU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3106735904</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Generative artificial intelligence and ethical considerations in health care: a scoping review and ethics checklist</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ning, Yilin ; Teixayavong, Salinelat ; Shang, Yuqing ; Savulescu, Julian ; Nagaraj, Vaishaanth ; Miao, Di ; Mertens, Mayli ; Ting, Daniel Shu Wei ; Ong, Jasmine Chiat Ling ; Liu, Mingxuan ; Cao, Jiuwen ; Dunn, Michael ; Vaughan, Roger ; Ong, Marcus Eng Hock ; Sung, Joseph Jao-Yiu ; Topol, Eric J ; Liu, Nan</creator><creatorcontrib>Ning, Yilin ; Teixayavong, Salinelat ; Shang, Yuqing ; Savulescu, Julian ; Nagaraj, Vaishaanth ; Miao, Di ; Mertens, Mayli ; Ting, Daniel Shu Wei ; Ong, Jasmine Chiat Ling ; Liu, Mingxuan ; Cao, Jiuwen ; Dunn, Michael ; Vaughan, Roger ; Ong, Marcus Eng Hock ; Sung, Joseph Jao-Yiu ; Topol, Eric J ; Liu, Nan</creatorcontrib><description>The widespread use of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (known as ChatGPT) and other emerging technology that is powered by generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has drawn attention to the potential ethical issues they can cause, especially in high-stakes applications such as health care, but ethical discussions have not yet been translated into operationalisable solutions. Furthermore, ongoing ethical discussions often neglect other types of GenAI that have been used to synthesise data (eg, images) for research and practical purposes, which resolve some ethical issues and expose others. We did a scoping review of the ethical discussions on GenAI in health care to comprehensively analyse gaps in the research. To reduce the gaps, we have developed a checklist for comprehensive assessment and evaluation of ethical discussions in GenAI research. The checklist can be integrated into peer review and publication systems to enhance GenAI research and might be useful for ethics-related disclosures for GenAI-powered products and health-care applications of such products and beyond.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2589-7500</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2589-7500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00143-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39294061</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Artificial Intelligence - ethics ; Checklist ; Delivery of Health Care - ethics ; Humans</subject><ispartof>The Lancet. Digital health, 2024-11, Vol.6 (11), p.e848-e856</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-9804fc87544f45ff964d3df86e03cc9dfcd76055d386154e8602d18b5253a0af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750024001432$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39294061$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ning, Yilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixayavong, Salinelat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shang, Yuqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savulescu, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagaraj, Vaishaanth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miao, Di</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mertens, Mayli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ting, Daniel Shu Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ong, Jasmine Chiat Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Mingxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Jiuwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaughan, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ong, Marcus Eng Hock</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Joseph Jao-Yiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topol, Eric J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Nan</creatorcontrib><title>Generative artificial intelligence and ethical considerations in health care: a scoping review and ethics checklist</title><title>The Lancet. Digital health</title><addtitle>Lancet Digit Health</addtitle><description>The widespread use of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (known as ChatGPT) and other emerging technology that is powered by generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has drawn attention to the potential ethical issues they can cause, especially in high-stakes applications such as health care, but ethical discussions have not yet been translated into operationalisable solutions. Furthermore, ongoing ethical discussions often neglect other types of GenAI that have been used to synthesise data (eg, images) for research and practical purposes, which resolve some ethical issues and expose others. We did a scoping review of the ethical discussions on GenAI in health care to comprehensively analyse gaps in the research. To reduce the gaps, we have developed a checklist for comprehensive assessment and evaluation of ethical discussions in GenAI research. The checklist can be integrated into peer review and publication systems to enhance GenAI research and might be useful for ethics-related disclosures for GenAI-powered products and health-care applications of such products and beyond.</description><subject>Artificial Intelligence - ethics</subject><subject>Checklist</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care - ethics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><issn>2589-7500</issn><issn>2589-7500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUU1vEzEQtRCIVqE_AeRjOWzx9-5yQahqC1IlDrRny7XH2YHNbrCdIP59nbSk5cTJo5n33ozfI-QtZ2eccfPhu9Bd37SasVOh3jPGlWzEC3J8aL98Vh-Rk5x_MMaE4LJt29fkSPaiV8zwY5KvYILkCm6BulQwokc3UpwKjCMuYfK1PwUKZUBfB36eMoY9o1YVRwdwYxmodwk-Ukezn9c4LWmCLcLvJ26mfgD_c8Rc3pBX0Y0ZTh7fBbm9vLg5_9Jcf7v6ev75uvFSmdL0HVPRd61WKiodY29UkCF2Bpj0vg_Rh9YwrYPsDNcKOsNE4N2dFlo65qJckE8PuuvN3QqCh6kkN9p1wpVLf-zs0P47mXCwy3lreZUTppq6IKePCmn-tYFc7Aqzr864CeZNtpIz00rdsx1UP0B9mnNOEA97OLO70Ow-NLtLxApl96FZUXnvnh95YP2N6OkXUK2qniabPe5yCZjAFxtm_M-Ke8R8qPU</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Ning, Yilin</creator><creator>Teixayavong, Salinelat</creator><creator>Shang, Yuqing</creator><creator>Savulescu, Julian</creator><creator>Nagaraj, Vaishaanth</creator><creator>Miao, Di</creator><creator>Mertens, Mayli</creator><creator>Ting, Daniel Shu Wei</creator><creator>Ong, Jasmine Chiat Ling</creator><creator>Liu, Mingxuan</creator><creator>Cao, Jiuwen</creator><creator>Dunn, Michael</creator><creator>Vaughan, Roger</creator><creator>Ong, Marcus Eng Hock</creator><creator>Sung, Joseph Jao-Yiu</creator><creator>Topol, Eric J</creator><creator>Liu, Nan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>Generative artificial intelligence and ethical considerations in health care: a scoping review and ethics checklist</title><author>Ning, Yilin ; Teixayavong, Salinelat ; Shang, Yuqing ; Savulescu, Julian ; Nagaraj, Vaishaanth ; Miao, Di ; Mertens, Mayli ; Ting, Daniel Shu Wei ; Ong, Jasmine Chiat Ling ; Liu, Mingxuan ; Cao, Jiuwen ; Dunn, Michael ; Vaughan, Roger ; Ong, Marcus Eng Hock ; Sung, Joseph Jao-Yiu ; Topol, Eric J ; Liu, Nan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-9804fc87544f45ff964d3df86e03cc9dfcd76055d386154e8602d18b5253a0af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Artificial Intelligence - ethics</topic><topic>Checklist</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care - ethics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ning, Yilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixayavong, Salinelat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shang, Yuqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savulescu, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagaraj, Vaishaanth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miao, Di</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mertens, Mayli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ting, Daniel Shu Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ong, Jasmine Chiat Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Mingxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Jiuwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaughan, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ong, Marcus Eng Hock</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Joseph Jao-Yiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topol, Eric J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Nan</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Lancet. Digital health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ning, Yilin</au><au>Teixayavong, Salinelat</au><au>Shang, Yuqing</au><au>Savulescu, Julian</au><au>Nagaraj, Vaishaanth</au><au>Miao, Di</au><au>Mertens, Mayli</au><au>Ting, Daniel Shu Wei</au><au>Ong, Jasmine Chiat Ling</au><au>Liu, Mingxuan</au><au>Cao, Jiuwen</au><au>Dunn, Michael</au><au>Vaughan, Roger</au><au>Ong, Marcus Eng Hock</au><au>Sung, Joseph Jao-Yiu</au><au>Topol, Eric J</au><au>Liu, Nan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Generative artificial intelligence and ethical considerations in health care: a scoping review and ethics checklist</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet. Digital health</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet Digit Health</addtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e848</spage><epage>e856</epage><pages>e848-e856</pages><issn>2589-7500</issn><eissn>2589-7500</eissn><abstract>The widespread use of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (known as ChatGPT) and other emerging technology that is powered by generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has drawn attention to the potential ethical issues they can cause, especially in high-stakes applications such as health care, but ethical discussions have not yet been translated into operationalisable solutions. Furthermore, ongoing ethical discussions often neglect other types of GenAI that have been used to synthesise data (eg, images) for research and practical purposes, which resolve some ethical issues and expose others. We did a scoping review of the ethical discussions on GenAI in health care to comprehensively analyse gaps in the research. To reduce the gaps, we have developed a checklist for comprehensive assessment and evaluation of ethical discussions in GenAI research. The checklist can be integrated into peer review and publication systems to enhance GenAI research and might be useful for ethics-related disclosures for GenAI-powered products and health-care applications of such products and beyond.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39294061</pmid><doi>10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00143-2</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2589-7500 |
ispartof | The Lancet. Digital health, 2024-11, Vol.6 (11), p.e848-e856 |
issn | 2589-7500 2589-7500 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11542614 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Artificial Intelligence - ethics Checklist Delivery of Health Care - ethics Humans |
title | Generative artificial intelligence and ethical considerations in health care: a scoping review and ethics checklist |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A46%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Generative%20artificial%20intelligence%20and%20ethical%20considerations%20in%20health%20care:%20a%20scoping%20review%20and%20ethics%20checklist&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet.%20Digital%20health&rft.au=Ning,%20Yilin&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e848&rft.epage=e856&rft.pages=e848-e856&rft.issn=2589-7500&rft.eissn=2589-7500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00143-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3106735904%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-9804fc87544f45ff964d3df86e03cc9dfcd76055d386154e8602d18b5253a0af3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3106735904&rft_id=info:pmid/39294061&rfr_iscdi=true |