Education for fatigue management in people with multiple sclerosis: Systematic review and meta‐analysis

• Published in: European journal of neurology 2024-12, Vol.31 (12), p.e16452-n/a
• Main Authors: Wendebourg, Maria Janina, Poettgen, Jana, Finlayson, Marcia, Gonzalez‐Lorenzo, Marien, Heesen, Christoph, Köpke, Sascha, Giordano, Andrea
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Clinical trials; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy - methods; Education; Energy conservation; Fatigue; Fatigue - etiology; Fatigue - therapy; Humans; Intervention; Meta-analysis; Multiple Sclerosis; Multiple Sclerosis - complications; Patient education; Patient Education as Topic - methods; Quality of life; Review; Subgroups; Systematic review
• ISSN: 1351-5101; 1468-1331; 1468-1331
• DOI: 10.1111/ene.16452

Background and Purpose Fatigue is a common and disabling symptom in multiple sclerosis (MS). Educational interventions have shown potential to reduce fatigue. The aim was to systematically review the current best evidence on patient education programmes for MS‐related fatigue. Methods This was a systematic review and meta‐analysis following Cochrane methodology. A systematic search was conducted in eight databases (September 2023). Moreover, reference lists and trial registers were searched and experts in the field were contacted. Randomized controlled trials were included evaluating patient education programmes for people with MS with the primary aim of reducing fatigue. Results In total, 1176 studies were identified and assessed by two independent reviewers; 15 studies (1473 participants) were included. All interventions provided information and education about different aspects of MS‐related fatigue with different forms of application, some with components of psychological interventions. Amongst those, the most frequently applied were cognitive behavioural therapy (n = 5) and energy‐conservation‐based approaches (n = 4). Studies differed considerably concerning mode of intervention delivery, number of participants and length of follow‐up. Interventions reduced fatigue severity (eight studies, n = 878, standardized mean difference −0.28; 95% confidence interval −0.53 to −0.03; low certainty) and fatigue impact (nine studies, n = 824, standardized mean difference −0.21; 95% confidence interval −0.42 to 0.00; moderate certainty) directly after the intervention. Mixed results were found for long‐term effects on fatigue, for secondary endpoints (depressive symptoms, quality of life, coping) and for subgroup analyses. Conclusion Educational interventions for people with MS‐related fatigue may be effective in reducing fatigue in the short term. More research is needed on long‐term effects and the importance of specific intervention components, delivery and context.