Cost-effectiveness analysis of a prediction model for community-based screening of active tuberculosis

Active case finding could effectively detect tuberculosis (TB) patients, but it can be costly. Therefore, a feasible, cost-saving, and efficient algorithm for community-based TB screening is needed. The study population was based on a previous TB prevalence survey conducted in the Zambia/South Afric...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of global health 2024-11, Vol.14, p.04226, Article 04226
Main Authors: Yang, Chih-Chi, Shih, Yun-Ju, Ayles, Helen, Godfrey-Faussett, Peter, Claassens, Mareli, Lin, Hsien-Ho
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acquired immune deficiency syndrome
Adult
AIDS
Algorithms
Body mass index
Community Health Services - economics
Cost analysis
Cost estimates
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Diabetes
Diagnostic tests
Female
Fever
HIV
HIV Infections - diagnosis
HIV Infections - epidemiology
Households
Human immunodeficiency virus
Humans
Laboratories
Male
Mass Screening - economics
Prediction models
South Africa - epidemiology
Sweating
Tuberculosis
Tuberculosis - diagnosis
Tuberculosis - epidemiology
Zambia - epidemiology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Active case finding could effectively detect tuberculosis (TB) patients, but it can be costly. Therefore, a feasible, cost-saving, and efficient algorithm for community-based TB screening is needed. The study population was based on a previous TB prevalence survey conducted in the Zambia/South Africa Tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS Reduction trial. We developed predictive scoring models for HIV-positive and HIV-negative/unknown populations for practical purposes. We compared the cost-effectiveness of our models with that of WHO tools through average cost-effectiveness ratio (ACER) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. The prediction model for HIV-positive population presented higher area under the curve (AUC) = 0.652, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.602-0.701) than WHO-recommended four-symptom screen (AUC = 0.568, 95% CI = 0.524-0.612) among South African participants. The AUC of the model for HIV-negative/unknown population was 0.673 (95% CI = 0.648-0.697), which was higher than that of the WHO tools as well. The ACER of our model can range from 246 to 1670 USD per TB case detected in the South African communities. The scoring system for active TB case finding presented a better performance and showed cost-effectiveness, which can provide new strategies for active TB case finding with multiple options under budget considerations.
ISSN:2047-2978
2047-2986
2047-2986
DOI:10.7189/jogh.14.04226