Loading…

Control of ion flux and selectivity by negatively charged residues in the outer mouth of rat sodium channels

1. The sodium channel has a ring of negatively charged amino acids on its external face. This common structural feature of cation-selective channels has been proposed to optimize conduction by electrostatic attraction of permeant cations into the channel mouth. We tested this idea by mutagenesis of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of physiology 1996-02, Vol.491 (Pt 1), p.51-59
Main Authors: Chiamvimonvat, N, Pérez-García, M T, Tomaselli, G F, Marban, E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:1. The sodium channel has a ring of negatively charged amino acids on its external face. This common structural feature of cation-selective channels has been proposed to optimize conduction by electrostatic attraction of permeant cations into the channel mouth. We tested this idea by mutagenesis of mu1 rat skeletal sodium channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes. 2. Replacement of the external glutamate residue in domain II by cysteine reduces sodium current by decreasing single-channel conductance. While this effect can be reversed by the negatively charged sulfhydryl modifying reagent methanethiosulphonate ethylsulphonate (MTSES), the flux saturation behaviour cannot be rationalized simply by changes in the surface charge. 3. The analogous mutations in domains I, III and IV affect not only conductance but also selectivity. These changes in selectivity are only partially reversed by exposure to MTSES. 4. Our findings necessitate revision of prevailing concepts regarding the role of superficial negatively charged residues in the process of ion permeation. These residues do not act solely by electrostatic attraction of permeant ions, but instead may help to form ion-specific binding sites within the pore.
ISSN:0022-3751
1469-7793
DOI:10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021195