Loading…

Privacy, confidentiality, and electronic medical records

The enhanced availability of health information in an electronic format is strategic for industry-wide efforts to improve the quality and reduce the cost of health care, yet it brings a concomitant concern of greater risk for loss of privacy among health care participants. The authors review the con...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA 1996-03, Vol.3 (2), p.139-148
Main Authors: Barrows, Jr, R C, Clayton, P D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-dfb363954d0c555c44593cefbc2e33784abb8e990a439081b19554ff815fd8d3
cites
container_end_page 148
container_issue 2
container_start_page 139
container_title Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
container_volume 3
creator Barrows, Jr, R C
Clayton, P D
description The enhanced availability of health information in an electronic format is strategic for industry-wide efforts to improve the quality and reduce the cost of health care, yet it brings a concomitant concern of greater risk for loss of privacy among health care participants. The authors review the conflicting goals of accessibility and security for electronic medical records and discuss nontechnical and technical aspects that constitute a reasonable security solution. It is argued that with guiding policy and current technology, an electronic medical record may offer better security than a traditional paper record.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/jamia.1996.96236282
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_116296</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78077187</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-dfb363954d0c555c44593cefbc2e33784abb8e990a439081b19554ff815fd8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkEtPAyEUhYnR1Fr9BcakK1dOhQEGWLgwja-kiS66cEcYHkozM1SYNum_l9ra6Iob7jn3nvsBcIngBCFc3S5U69UECVFNRFXiquTlERgiWrJCMPJ-nGtYsYLCkp2Cs5QWEKKsowMw4BXFhMIh4G_Rr5Xe3Ix16Jw3tuu9anyfP1Rnxraxuo-h83rcWuO1asbR6hBNOgcnTjXJXuzfEZg_Psynz8Xs9ellej8rNMG4L4yrcYUFJQZqSqkmhAqsrat1aTFmnKi65lYIqAgWkKMaCUqJcxxRZ7jBI3C3G7tc1TmBzvmiauQy-lbFjQzKy_-dzn_Kj7CWKJ8qquy_3vtj-FrZ1MvWJ22bRnU2rJJkHDKGOMtCvBPqGFKK1h12ICi3uOUPbrnFLX9xZ9fV33gHz54v_gbOUn3j</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78077187</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Privacy, confidentiality, and electronic medical records</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Barrows, Jr, R C ; Clayton, P D</creator><creatorcontrib>Barrows, Jr, R C ; Clayton, P D</creatorcontrib><description>The enhanced availability of health information in an electronic format is strategic for industry-wide efforts to improve the quality and reduce the cost of health care, yet it brings a concomitant concern of greater risk for loss of privacy among health care participants. The authors review the conflicting goals of accessibility and security for electronic medical records and discuss nontechnical and technical aspects that constitute a reasonable security solution. It is argued that with guiding policy and current technology, an electronic medical record may offer better security than a traditional paper record.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1067-5027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-974X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1996.96236282</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8653450</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Computer Security ; Confidentiality ; Databases, Factual - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Databases, Factual - standards ; Informed Consent ; Medical Records - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Medical Records - standards</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 1996-03, Vol.3 (2), p.139-148</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-dfb363954d0c555c44593cefbc2e33784abb8e990a439081b19554ff815fd8d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC116296/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC116296/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8653450$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barrows, Jr, R C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clayton, P D</creatorcontrib><title>Privacy, confidentiality, and electronic medical records</title><title>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA</title><addtitle>J Am Med Inform Assoc</addtitle><description>The enhanced availability of health information in an electronic format is strategic for industry-wide efforts to improve the quality and reduce the cost of health care, yet it brings a concomitant concern of greater risk for loss of privacy among health care participants. The authors review the conflicting goals of accessibility and security for electronic medical records and discuss nontechnical and technical aspects that constitute a reasonable security solution. It is argued that with guiding policy and current technology, an electronic medical record may offer better security than a traditional paper record.</description><subject>Computer Security</subject><subject>Confidentiality</subject><subject>Databases, Factual - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Databases, Factual - standards</subject><subject>Informed Consent</subject><subject>Medical Records - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Medical Records - standards</subject><issn>1067-5027</issn><issn>1527-974X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkEtPAyEUhYnR1Fr9BcakK1dOhQEGWLgwja-kiS66cEcYHkozM1SYNum_l9ra6Iob7jn3nvsBcIngBCFc3S5U69UECVFNRFXiquTlERgiWrJCMPJ-nGtYsYLCkp2Cs5QWEKKsowMw4BXFhMIh4G_Rr5Xe3Ix16Jw3tuu9anyfP1Rnxraxuo-h83rcWuO1asbR6hBNOgcnTjXJXuzfEZg_Psynz8Xs9ellej8rNMG4L4yrcYUFJQZqSqkmhAqsrat1aTFmnKi65lYIqAgWkKMaCUqJcxxRZ7jBI3C3G7tc1TmBzvmiauQy-lbFjQzKy_-dzn_Kj7CWKJ8qquy_3vtj-FrZ1MvWJ22bRnU2rJJkHDKGOMtCvBPqGFKK1h12ICi3uOUPbrnFLX9xZ9fV33gHz54v_gbOUn3j</recordid><startdate>19960301</startdate><enddate>19960301</enddate><creator>Barrows, Jr, R C</creator><creator>Clayton, P D</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960301</creationdate><title>Privacy, confidentiality, and electronic medical records</title><author>Barrows, Jr, R C ; Clayton, P D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-dfb363954d0c555c44593cefbc2e33784abb8e990a439081b19554ff815fd8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Computer Security</topic><topic>Confidentiality</topic><topic>Databases, Factual - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Databases, Factual - standards</topic><topic>Informed Consent</topic><topic>Medical Records - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Medical Records - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barrows, Jr, R C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clayton, P D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barrows, Jr, R C</au><au>Clayton, P D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Privacy, confidentiality, and electronic medical records</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Med Inform Assoc</addtitle><date>1996-03-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>148</epage><pages>139-148</pages><issn>1067-5027</issn><eissn>1527-974X</eissn><abstract>The enhanced availability of health information in an electronic format is strategic for industry-wide efforts to improve the quality and reduce the cost of health care, yet it brings a concomitant concern of greater risk for loss of privacy among health care participants. The authors review the conflicting goals of accessibility and security for electronic medical records and discuss nontechnical and technical aspects that constitute a reasonable security solution. It is argued that with guiding policy and current technology, an electronic medical record may offer better security than a traditional paper record.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>8653450</pmid><doi>10.1136/jamia.1996.96236282</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1067-5027
ispartof Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 1996-03, Vol.3 (2), p.139-148
issn 1067-5027
1527-974X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_116296
source Oxford Journals Online; PubMed Central
subjects Computer Security
Confidentiality
Databases, Factual - legislation & jurisprudence
Databases, Factual - standards
Informed Consent
Medical Records - legislation & jurisprudence
Medical Records - standards
title Privacy, confidentiality, and electronic medical records
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A52%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Privacy,%20confidentiality,%20and%20electronic%20medical%20records&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Medical%20Informatics%20Association%20:%20JAMIA&rft.au=Barrows,%20Jr,%20R%20C&rft.date=1996-03-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=148&rft.pages=139-148&rft.issn=1067-5027&rft.eissn=1527-974X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/jamia.1996.96236282&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E78077187%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-dfb363954d0c555c44593cefbc2e33784abb8e990a439081b19554ff815fd8d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78077187&rft_id=info:pmid/8653450&rfr_iscdi=true