Loading…
Upscaling biodiversity monitoring: Metabarcoding estimates 31,846 insect species from Malaise traps across Germany
Mitigating ongoing losses of insects and their key functions (e.g. pollination) requires tracking large‐scale and long‐term community changes. However, doing so has been hindered by the high diversity of insect species that requires prohibitively high investments of time, funding and taxonomic exper...
Saved in:
Published in: | Molecular ecology resources 2025-01, Vol.25 (1), p.e14023-n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3523-daab99f6d26e92ead73367b63f6832d285adba0fcdb3519f69e5fa65040633b33 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e14023 |
container_title | Molecular ecology resources |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Buchner, Dominik Sinclair, James S. Ayasse, Manfred Beermann, Arne J. Buse, Jörn Dziock, Frank Enss, Julian Frenzel, Mark Hörren, Thomas Li, Yuanheng Monaghan, Michael T. Morkel, Carsten Müller, Jörg Pauls, Steffen U. Richter, Ronny Scharnweber, Tobias Sorg, Martin Stoll, Stefan Twietmeyer, Sönke Weisser, Wolfgang W. Wiggering, Benedikt Wilmking, Martin Zotz, Gerhard Gessner, Mark O. Haase, Peter Leese, Florian |
description | Mitigating ongoing losses of insects and their key functions (e.g. pollination) requires tracking large‐scale and long‐term community changes. However, doing so has been hindered by the high diversity of insect species that requires prohibitively high investments of time, funding and taxonomic expertise when addressed with conventional tools. Here, we show that these concerns can be addressed through a comprehensive, scalable and cost‐efficient DNA metabarcoding workflow. We use 1815 samples from 75 Malaise traps across Germany from 2019 and 2020 to demonstrate how metabarcoding can be incorporated into large‐scale insect monitoring networks for less than 50 € per sample, including supplies, labour and maintenance. We validated the detected species using two publicly available databases (GBOL and GBIF) and the judgement of taxonomic experts. With an average of 1.4 M sequence reads per sample we uncovered 10,803 validated insect species, of which 83.9% were represented by a single Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU). We estimated another 21,043 plausible species, which we argue either lack a reference barcode or are undescribed. The total of 31,846 species is similar to the number of insect species known for Germany (~35,500). Because Malaise traps capture only a subset of insects, our approach identified many species likely unknown from Germany or new to science. Our reproducible workflow (~80% OTU‐similarity among years) provides a blueprint for large‐scale biodiversity monitoring of insects and other biodiversity components in near real time. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1755-0998.14023 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11646302</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3144452340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3523-daab99f6d26e92ead73367b63f6832d285adba0fcdb3519f69e5fa65040633b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EomXhzA1Z4sKBbe2M7Y25VKgqBakLFypxsybOpLhK4mBni_bf4-2WFXDBF1szn5_mzWPspRQnspxTudJ6KaytT6QSFTxix4fK48O7_nbEnuV8K4QRdqWesiOwYJSu1TFL11P22IfxhjchtuGOUg7zlg9xDHNMpf6Or2nGBpMv7YJRnsOAM2UO8m2tDA9jJj_zPJEPpdqlOPA19hgy8TnhlDn6FHPml5QGHLfP2ZMO-0wvHu4Fu_5w8fX84_Lqy-Wn8_dXSw-6gmWL2FjbmbYyZCvCdgVgVo2BztRQtVWtsW1QdL5tQMsCWtIdGi2UMAANwIKd7XWnTTNQ62ks0_RuSmX8tHURg_u7M4bv7ibeOSmNMlDWuWBvHhRS_LEpxt0Qsqe-x5HiJjuQsqqNAFsX9PU_6G3cpLH4K5RSqjhSolCne-p-IYm6wzRSuF2gbheZ28Xn7gMtP179aeLA_06wAHoP_Aw9bf-n59YXn_fCvwDd7qxV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3144452340</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Upscaling biodiversity monitoring: Metabarcoding estimates 31,846 insect species from Malaise traps across Germany</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Buchner, Dominik ; Sinclair, James S. ; Ayasse, Manfred ; Beermann, Arne J. ; Buse, Jörn ; Dziock, Frank ; Enss, Julian ; Frenzel, Mark ; Hörren, Thomas ; Li, Yuanheng ; Monaghan, Michael T. ; Morkel, Carsten ; Müller, Jörg ; Pauls, Steffen U. ; Richter, Ronny ; Scharnweber, Tobias ; Sorg, Martin ; Stoll, Stefan ; Twietmeyer, Sönke ; Weisser, Wolfgang W. ; Wiggering, Benedikt ; Wilmking, Martin ; Zotz, Gerhard ; Gessner, Mark O. ; Haase, Peter ; Leese, Florian</creator><creatorcontrib>Buchner, Dominik ; Sinclair, James S. ; Ayasse, Manfred ; Beermann, Arne J. ; Buse, Jörn ; Dziock, Frank ; Enss, Julian ; Frenzel, Mark ; Hörren, Thomas ; Li, Yuanheng ; Monaghan, Michael T. ; Morkel, Carsten ; Müller, Jörg ; Pauls, Steffen U. ; Richter, Ronny ; Scharnweber, Tobias ; Sorg, Martin ; Stoll, Stefan ; Twietmeyer, Sönke ; Weisser, Wolfgang W. ; Wiggering, Benedikt ; Wilmking, Martin ; Zotz, Gerhard ; Gessner, Mark O. ; Haase, Peter ; Leese, Florian</creatorcontrib><description>Mitigating ongoing losses of insects and their key functions (e.g. pollination) requires tracking large‐scale and long‐term community changes. However, doing so has been hindered by the high diversity of insect species that requires prohibitively high investments of time, funding and taxonomic expertise when addressed with conventional tools. Here, we show that these concerns can be addressed through a comprehensive, scalable and cost‐efficient DNA metabarcoding workflow. We use 1815 samples from 75 Malaise traps across Germany from 2019 and 2020 to demonstrate how metabarcoding can be incorporated into large‐scale insect monitoring networks for less than 50 € per sample, including supplies, labour and maintenance. We validated the detected species using two publicly available databases (GBOL and GBIF) and the judgement of taxonomic experts. With an average of 1.4 M sequence reads per sample we uncovered 10,803 validated insect species, of which 83.9% were represented by a single Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU). We estimated another 21,043 plausible species, which we argue either lack a reference barcode or are undescribed. The total of 31,846 species is similar to the number of insect species known for Germany (~35,500). Because Malaise traps capture only a subset of insects, our approach identified many species likely unknown from Germany or new to science. Our reproducible workflow (~80% OTU‐similarity among years) provides a blueprint for large‐scale biodiversity monitoring of insects and other biodiversity components in near real time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-098X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1755-0998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-0998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.14023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39364584</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biodiversity ; biodiversity monitoring ; DNA barcoding ; DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic - methods ; DNA metabarcoding ; Germany ; insect diversity ; Insecta - classification ; Insecta - genetics ; Insecta - physiology ; Insects ; Malaise trap ; Monitoring ; Pollination ; Resource ; RESOURCE ARTICLE ; Species ; Species diversity ; Taxonomy ; Traps ; Workflow</subject><ispartof>Molecular ecology resources, 2025-01, Vol.25 (1), p.e14023-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). Molecular Ecology Resources published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3523-daab99f6d26e92ead73367b63f6832d285adba0fcdb3519f69e5fa65040633b33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5465-913X ; 0000-0002-8499-5863</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39364584$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buchner, Dominik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, James S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayasse, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beermann, Arne J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buse, Jörn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dziock, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enss, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frenzel, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hörren, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yuanheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monaghan, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morkel, Carsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauls, Steffen U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, Ronny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scharnweber, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorg, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoll, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Twietmeyer, Sönke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisser, Wolfgang W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiggering, Benedikt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilmking, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zotz, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gessner, Mark O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haase, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leese, Florian</creatorcontrib><title>Upscaling biodiversity monitoring: Metabarcoding estimates 31,846 insect species from Malaise traps across Germany</title><title>Molecular ecology resources</title><addtitle>Mol Ecol Resour</addtitle><description>Mitigating ongoing losses of insects and their key functions (e.g. pollination) requires tracking large‐scale and long‐term community changes. However, doing so has been hindered by the high diversity of insect species that requires prohibitively high investments of time, funding and taxonomic expertise when addressed with conventional tools. Here, we show that these concerns can be addressed through a comprehensive, scalable and cost‐efficient DNA metabarcoding workflow. We use 1815 samples from 75 Malaise traps across Germany from 2019 and 2020 to demonstrate how metabarcoding can be incorporated into large‐scale insect monitoring networks for less than 50 € per sample, including supplies, labour and maintenance. We validated the detected species using two publicly available databases (GBOL and GBIF) and the judgement of taxonomic experts. With an average of 1.4 M sequence reads per sample we uncovered 10,803 validated insect species, of which 83.9% were represented by a single Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU). We estimated another 21,043 plausible species, which we argue either lack a reference barcode or are undescribed. The total of 31,846 species is similar to the number of insect species known for Germany (~35,500). Because Malaise traps capture only a subset of insects, our approach identified many species likely unknown from Germany or new to science. Our reproducible workflow (~80% OTU‐similarity among years) provides a blueprint for large‐scale biodiversity monitoring of insects and other biodiversity components in near real time.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>biodiversity monitoring</subject><subject>DNA barcoding</subject><subject>DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic - methods</subject><subject>DNA metabarcoding</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>insect diversity</subject><subject>Insecta - classification</subject><subject>Insecta - genetics</subject><subject>Insecta - physiology</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Malaise trap</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>Resource</subject><subject>RESOURCE ARTICLE</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Traps</subject><subject>Workflow</subject><issn>1755-098X</issn><issn>1755-0998</issn><issn>1755-0998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EomXhzA1Z4sKBbe2M7Y25VKgqBakLFypxsybOpLhK4mBni_bf4-2WFXDBF1szn5_mzWPspRQnspxTudJ6KaytT6QSFTxix4fK48O7_nbEnuV8K4QRdqWesiOwYJSu1TFL11P22IfxhjchtuGOUg7zlg9xDHNMpf6Or2nGBpMv7YJRnsOAM2UO8m2tDA9jJj_zPJEPpdqlOPA19hgy8TnhlDn6FHPml5QGHLfP2ZMO-0wvHu4Fu_5w8fX84_Lqy-Wn8_dXSw-6gmWL2FjbmbYyZCvCdgVgVo2BztRQtVWtsW1QdL5tQMsCWtIdGi2UMAANwIKd7XWnTTNQ62ks0_RuSmX8tHURg_u7M4bv7ibeOSmNMlDWuWBvHhRS_LEpxt0Qsqe-x5HiJjuQsqqNAFsX9PU_6G3cpLH4K5RSqjhSolCne-p-IYm6wzRSuF2gbheZ28Xn7gMtP179aeLA_06wAHoP_Aw9bf-n59YXn_fCvwDd7qxV</recordid><startdate>202501</startdate><enddate>202501</enddate><creator>Buchner, Dominik</creator><creator>Sinclair, James S.</creator><creator>Ayasse, Manfred</creator><creator>Beermann, Arne J.</creator><creator>Buse, Jörn</creator><creator>Dziock, Frank</creator><creator>Enss, Julian</creator><creator>Frenzel, Mark</creator><creator>Hörren, Thomas</creator><creator>Li, Yuanheng</creator><creator>Monaghan, Michael T.</creator><creator>Morkel, Carsten</creator><creator>Müller, Jörg</creator><creator>Pauls, Steffen U.</creator><creator>Richter, Ronny</creator><creator>Scharnweber, Tobias</creator><creator>Sorg, Martin</creator><creator>Stoll, Stefan</creator><creator>Twietmeyer, Sönke</creator><creator>Weisser, Wolfgang W.</creator><creator>Wiggering, Benedikt</creator><creator>Wilmking, Martin</creator><creator>Zotz, Gerhard</creator><creator>Gessner, Mark O.</creator><creator>Haase, Peter</creator><creator>Leese, Florian</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5465-913X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8499-5863</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202501</creationdate><title>Upscaling biodiversity monitoring: Metabarcoding estimates 31,846 insect species from Malaise traps across Germany</title><author>Buchner, Dominik ; Sinclair, James S. ; Ayasse, Manfred ; Beermann, Arne J. ; Buse, Jörn ; Dziock, Frank ; Enss, Julian ; Frenzel, Mark ; Hörren, Thomas ; Li, Yuanheng ; Monaghan, Michael T. ; Morkel, Carsten ; Müller, Jörg ; Pauls, Steffen U. ; Richter, Ronny ; Scharnweber, Tobias ; Sorg, Martin ; Stoll, Stefan ; Twietmeyer, Sönke ; Weisser, Wolfgang W. ; Wiggering, Benedikt ; Wilmking, Martin ; Zotz, Gerhard ; Gessner, Mark O. ; Haase, Peter ; Leese, Florian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3523-daab99f6d26e92ead73367b63f6832d285adba0fcdb3519f69e5fa65040633b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>biodiversity monitoring</topic><topic>DNA barcoding</topic><topic>DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic - methods</topic><topic>DNA metabarcoding</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>insect diversity</topic><topic>Insecta - classification</topic><topic>Insecta - genetics</topic><topic>Insecta - physiology</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Malaise trap</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>Resource</topic><topic>RESOURCE ARTICLE</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Traps</topic><topic>Workflow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buchner, Dominik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, James S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayasse, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beermann, Arne J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buse, Jörn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dziock, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enss, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frenzel, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hörren, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yuanheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monaghan, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morkel, Carsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauls, Steffen U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, Ronny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scharnweber, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorg, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoll, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Twietmeyer, Sönke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisser, Wolfgang W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiggering, Benedikt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilmking, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zotz, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gessner, Mark O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haase, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leese, Florian</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Backfiles (Open Access)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Molecular ecology resources</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buchner, Dominik</au><au>Sinclair, James S.</au><au>Ayasse, Manfred</au><au>Beermann, Arne J.</au><au>Buse, Jörn</au><au>Dziock, Frank</au><au>Enss, Julian</au><au>Frenzel, Mark</au><au>Hörren, Thomas</au><au>Li, Yuanheng</au><au>Monaghan, Michael T.</au><au>Morkel, Carsten</au><au>Müller, Jörg</au><au>Pauls, Steffen U.</au><au>Richter, Ronny</au><au>Scharnweber, Tobias</au><au>Sorg, Martin</au><au>Stoll, Stefan</au><au>Twietmeyer, Sönke</au><au>Weisser, Wolfgang W.</au><au>Wiggering, Benedikt</au><au>Wilmking, Martin</au><au>Zotz, Gerhard</au><au>Gessner, Mark O.</au><au>Haase, Peter</au><au>Leese, Florian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Upscaling biodiversity monitoring: Metabarcoding estimates 31,846 insect species from Malaise traps across Germany</atitle><jtitle>Molecular ecology resources</jtitle><addtitle>Mol Ecol Resour</addtitle><date>2025-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e14023</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e14023-n/a</pages><issn>1755-098X</issn><issn>1755-0998</issn><eissn>1755-0998</eissn><abstract>Mitigating ongoing losses of insects and their key functions (e.g. pollination) requires tracking large‐scale and long‐term community changes. However, doing so has been hindered by the high diversity of insect species that requires prohibitively high investments of time, funding and taxonomic expertise when addressed with conventional tools. Here, we show that these concerns can be addressed through a comprehensive, scalable and cost‐efficient DNA metabarcoding workflow. We use 1815 samples from 75 Malaise traps across Germany from 2019 and 2020 to demonstrate how metabarcoding can be incorporated into large‐scale insect monitoring networks for less than 50 € per sample, including supplies, labour and maintenance. We validated the detected species using two publicly available databases (GBOL and GBIF) and the judgement of taxonomic experts. With an average of 1.4 M sequence reads per sample we uncovered 10,803 validated insect species, of which 83.9% were represented by a single Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU). We estimated another 21,043 plausible species, which we argue either lack a reference barcode or are undescribed. The total of 31,846 species is similar to the number of insect species known for Germany (~35,500). Because Malaise traps capture only a subset of insects, our approach identified many species likely unknown from Germany or new to science. Our reproducible workflow (~80% OTU‐similarity among years) provides a blueprint for large‐scale biodiversity monitoring of insects and other biodiversity components in near real time.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>39364584</pmid><doi>10.1111/1755-0998.14023</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5465-913X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8499-5863</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1755-098X |
ispartof | Molecular ecology resources, 2025-01, Vol.25 (1), p.e14023-n/a |
issn | 1755-098X 1755-0998 1755-0998 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11646302 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Animals Biodiversity biodiversity monitoring DNA barcoding DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic - methods DNA metabarcoding Germany insect diversity Insecta - classification Insecta - genetics Insecta - physiology Insects Malaise trap Monitoring Pollination Resource RESOURCE ARTICLE Species Species diversity Taxonomy Traps Workflow |
title | Upscaling biodiversity monitoring: Metabarcoding estimates 31,846 insect species from Malaise traps across Germany |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A03%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Upscaling%20biodiversity%20monitoring:%20Metabarcoding%20estimates%2031,846%20insect%20species%20from%20Malaise%20traps%20across%20Germany&rft.jtitle=Molecular%20ecology%20resources&rft.au=Buchner,%20Dominik&rft.date=2025-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e14023&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e14023-n/a&rft.issn=1755-098X&rft.eissn=1755-0998&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1755-0998.14023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3144452340%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3523-daab99f6d26e92ead73367b63f6832d285adba0fcdb3519f69e5fa65040633b33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3144452340&rft_id=info:pmid/39364584&rfr_iscdi=true |