Loading…

Closed Reduction Percutaneous Pinning Versus Open Reduction With Plate and Screw Fixation in Management of Unstable Proximal Phalangeal Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background: Proximal phalanx fractures are common, with surgical fixation indicated for unstable fractures. Traditionally, closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP) resulted in decreased stiffness and tendon irritation compared to open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). We hypothesized that more...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hand (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2025-01, Vol.20 (1), p.136-142
Main Authors: Gaio, Natalie M., Kruse, Lisa M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-658e7009b3398c8c99e6a471fc6a8bd25f0b1f7a9d2b09b77cc8a9fe1da87ff73
container_end_page 142
container_issue 1
container_start_page 136
container_title Hand (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 20
creator Gaio, Natalie M.
Kruse, Lisa M.
description Background: Proximal phalanx fractures are common, with surgical fixation indicated for unstable fractures. Traditionally, closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP) resulted in decreased stiffness and tendon irritation compared to open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). We hypothesized that more recent studies would have more similar outcomes to CRPP. The purpose of this study was to compare CRPP and ORIF in terms of range of motion, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores, and complications. Methods: Four electronic databases were queried from 2010 to present. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, two independent reviewers performed a two-step review process to identify relevant articles. Patient demographics, total active motion (TAM), DASH, and complications were extracted. The methodological quality of each study included was assessed independently. Meta-analysis was performed for comparative trials. Results: Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria including four comparative studies: Thirteen studies included TAM. The weighted average TAM was 228 ± 34° for CRPP and 223 ± 32° for ORIF (P = .07 with 95% confidence interval (CI), −0.5 to 10.5). Seven studies evaluated DASH scores; weighted average was 8.2 ± 8.9 for CRPP and 11.7 ± 6.5 for ORIF (P < .01 with 95% CI, 1.8-5.2). Two studies directly compared CRPP to ORIF, favoring ORIF for both TAM with d = 1.07 and DASH with d = 0.23. Rates of tenolysis or hardware removal were higher for ORIF (P < .01). Conclusions: New literature suggests more equipoise with regard to treatment of proximal phalanx fracture with CRPP versus ORIF. Type of study/level of evidence: Meta-analysis, Level II.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/15589447231189762
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11653309</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_15589447231189762</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2854346353</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-658e7009b3398c8c99e6a471fc6a8bd25f0b1f7a9d2b09b77cc8a9fe1da87ff73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhiMEou3CA3BBPnJJiWMntrmgasUCUqtGlMLRcpzJriuvvdhO6b5ZHw8vW1ZFSJw89vzzjWf-oniFq1OMGXuLm4YLSllNMOaCtfWT4nj3VgraNE8PMWVHxUmMN1VFW87F8-KIsEYIWvHj4n5ufYQBfYFh0sl4hzoIekrKgZ8i6oxzxi3RNwgxXy834B5Jv5u0Qp1VCZByA7rSAX6ihblTv7PGoQvl1BLW4BLyI7p2ManeAuqCvzNrZVG3Ula5JeRwEZROU4D4Dp2hq21MsM4Ynbvdmkzd8S8gqTIT7Taa-KJ4Niob4eXDOSuuFx--zj-V55cfP8_PzktNKE9l23BgVSV6QgTXXAsBraIMj7pVvB_qZqx6PDIlhrrPKsa05kqMgAfF2TgyMive77mbqV_DoPMsQVm5CXmAsJVeGfl3xpmVXPpbiXHbEFKJTHjzQAj-xwQxybWJGqzd71jWvKGEtiSrZwXeS3XwMQYYD31wJXeWy38szzWvH3_wUPHH4yw43Qti9kLe-CnkFcb_EH8Bjsm5XA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2854346353</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Closed Reduction Percutaneous Pinning Versus Open Reduction With Plate and Screw Fixation in Management of Unstable Proximal Phalangeal Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><source>SAGE</source><creator>Gaio, Natalie M. ; Kruse, Lisa M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gaio, Natalie M. ; Kruse, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Proximal phalanx fractures are common, with surgical fixation indicated for unstable fractures. Traditionally, closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP) resulted in decreased stiffness and tendon irritation compared to open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). We hypothesized that more recent studies would have more similar outcomes to CRPP. The purpose of this study was to compare CRPP and ORIF in terms of range of motion, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores, and complications. Methods: Four electronic databases were queried from 2010 to present. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, two independent reviewers performed a two-step review process to identify relevant articles. Patient demographics, total active motion (TAM), DASH, and complications were extracted. The methodological quality of each study included was assessed independently. Meta-analysis was performed for comparative trials. Results: Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria including four comparative studies: Thirteen studies included TAM. The weighted average TAM was 228 ± 34° for CRPP and 223 ± 32° for ORIF (P = .07 with 95% confidence interval (CI), −0.5 to 10.5). Seven studies evaluated DASH scores; weighted average was 8.2 ± 8.9 for CRPP and 11.7 ± 6.5 for ORIF (P &lt; .01 with 95% CI, 1.8-5.2). Two studies directly compared CRPP to ORIF, favoring ORIF for both TAM with d = 1.07 and DASH with d = 0.23. Rates of tenolysis or hardware removal were higher for ORIF (P &lt; .01). Conclusions: New literature suggests more equipoise with regard to treatment of proximal phalanx fracture with CRPP versus ORIF. Type of study/level of evidence: Meta-analysis, Level II.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1558-9447</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1558-9455</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/15589447231189762</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37599408</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Bone Nails ; Bone Plates ; Bone Screws ; Closed Fracture Reduction - methods ; Disability Evaluation ; Finger Phalanges - injuries ; Finger Phalanges - surgery ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods ; Fractures, Bone - surgery ; Humans ; Open Fracture Reduction - methods ; Original Research ; Range of Motion, Articular</subject><ispartof>Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2025-01, Vol.20 (1), p.136-142</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023 2023 American Association for Hand Surgery</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-658e7009b3398c8c99e6a471fc6a8bd25f0b1f7a9d2b09b77cc8a9fe1da87ff73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0251-625X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37599408$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gaio, Natalie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruse, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><title>Closed Reduction Percutaneous Pinning Versus Open Reduction With Plate and Screw Fixation in Management of Unstable Proximal Phalangeal Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><title>Hand (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Hand (N Y)</addtitle><description>Background: Proximal phalanx fractures are common, with surgical fixation indicated for unstable fractures. Traditionally, closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP) resulted in decreased stiffness and tendon irritation compared to open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). We hypothesized that more recent studies would have more similar outcomes to CRPP. The purpose of this study was to compare CRPP and ORIF in terms of range of motion, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores, and complications. Methods: Four electronic databases were queried from 2010 to present. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, two independent reviewers performed a two-step review process to identify relevant articles. Patient demographics, total active motion (TAM), DASH, and complications were extracted. The methodological quality of each study included was assessed independently. Meta-analysis was performed for comparative trials. Results: Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria including four comparative studies: Thirteen studies included TAM. The weighted average TAM was 228 ± 34° for CRPP and 223 ± 32° for ORIF (P = .07 with 95% confidence interval (CI), −0.5 to 10.5). Seven studies evaluated DASH scores; weighted average was 8.2 ± 8.9 for CRPP and 11.7 ± 6.5 for ORIF (P &lt; .01 with 95% CI, 1.8-5.2). Two studies directly compared CRPP to ORIF, favoring ORIF for both TAM with d = 1.07 and DASH with d = 0.23. Rates of tenolysis or hardware removal were higher for ORIF (P &lt; .01). Conclusions: New literature suggests more equipoise with regard to treatment of proximal phalanx fracture with CRPP versus ORIF. Type of study/level of evidence: Meta-analysis, Level II.</description><subject>Bone Nails</subject><subject>Bone Plates</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Closed Fracture Reduction - methods</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Finger Phalanges - injuries</subject><subject>Finger Phalanges - surgery</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Open Fracture Reduction - methods</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><issn>1558-9447</issn><issn>1558-9455</issn><issn>1558-9455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhiMEou3CA3BBPnJJiWMntrmgasUCUqtGlMLRcpzJriuvvdhO6b5ZHw8vW1ZFSJw89vzzjWf-oniFq1OMGXuLm4YLSllNMOaCtfWT4nj3VgraNE8PMWVHxUmMN1VFW87F8-KIsEYIWvHj4n5ufYQBfYFh0sl4hzoIekrKgZ8i6oxzxi3RNwgxXy834B5Jv5u0Qp1VCZByA7rSAX6ihblTv7PGoQvl1BLW4BLyI7p2ManeAuqCvzNrZVG3Ula5JeRwEZROU4D4Dp2hq21MsM4Ynbvdmkzd8S8gqTIT7Taa-KJ4Niob4eXDOSuuFx--zj-V55cfP8_PzktNKE9l23BgVSV6QgTXXAsBraIMj7pVvB_qZqx6PDIlhrrPKsa05kqMgAfF2TgyMive77mbqV_DoPMsQVm5CXmAsJVeGfl3xpmVXPpbiXHbEFKJTHjzQAj-xwQxybWJGqzd71jWvKGEtiSrZwXeS3XwMQYYD31wJXeWy38szzWvH3_wUPHH4yw43Qti9kLe-CnkFcb_EH8Bjsm5XA</recordid><startdate>20250101</startdate><enddate>20250101</enddate><creator>Gaio, Natalie M.</creator><creator>Kruse, Lisa M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0251-625X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20250101</creationdate><title>Closed Reduction Percutaneous Pinning Versus Open Reduction With Plate and Screw Fixation in Management of Unstable Proximal Phalangeal Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><author>Gaio, Natalie M. ; Kruse, Lisa M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-658e7009b3398c8c99e6a471fc6a8bd25f0b1f7a9d2b09b77cc8a9fe1da87ff73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Bone Nails</topic><topic>Bone Plates</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Closed Fracture Reduction - methods</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Finger Phalanges - injuries</topic><topic>Finger Phalanges - surgery</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Open Fracture Reduction - methods</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gaio, Natalie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruse, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Hand (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gaio, Natalie M.</au><au>Kruse, Lisa M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Closed Reduction Percutaneous Pinning Versus Open Reduction With Plate and Screw Fixation in Management of Unstable Proximal Phalangeal Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Hand (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Hand (N Y)</addtitle><date>2025-01-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>136</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>136-142</pages><issn>1558-9447</issn><issn>1558-9455</issn><eissn>1558-9455</eissn><abstract>Background: Proximal phalanx fractures are common, with surgical fixation indicated for unstable fractures. Traditionally, closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP) resulted in decreased stiffness and tendon irritation compared to open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). We hypothesized that more recent studies would have more similar outcomes to CRPP. The purpose of this study was to compare CRPP and ORIF in terms of range of motion, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores, and complications. Methods: Four electronic databases were queried from 2010 to present. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, two independent reviewers performed a two-step review process to identify relevant articles. Patient demographics, total active motion (TAM), DASH, and complications were extracted. The methodological quality of each study included was assessed independently. Meta-analysis was performed for comparative trials. Results: Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria including four comparative studies: Thirteen studies included TAM. The weighted average TAM was 228 ± 34° for CRPP and 223 ± 32° for ORIF (P = .07 with 95% confidence interval (CI), −0.5 to 10.5). Seven studies evaluated DASH scores; weighted average was 8.2 ± 8.9 for CRPP and 11.7 ± 6.5 for ORIF (P &lt; .01 with 95% CI, 1.8-5.2). Two studies directly compared CRPP to ORIF, favoring ORIF for both TAM with d = 1.07 and DASH with d = 0.23. Rates of tenolysis or hardware removal were higher for ORIF (P &lt; .01). Conclusions: New literature suggests more equipoise with regard to treatment of proximal phalanx fracture with CRPP versus ORIF. Type of study/level of evidence: Meta-analysis, Level II.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>37599408</pmid><doi>10.1177/15589447231189762</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0251-625X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1558-9447
ispartof Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2025-01, Vol.20 (1), p.136-142
issn 1558-9447
1558-9455
1558-9455
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11653309
source SAGE
subjects Bone Nails
Bone Plates
Bone Screws
Closed Fracture Reduction - methods
Disability Evaluation
Finger Phalanges - injuries
Finger Phalanges - surgery
Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation
Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods
Fractures, Bone - surgery
Humans
Open Fracture Reduction - methods
Original Research
Range of Motion, Articular
title Closed Reduction Percutaneous Pinning Versus Open Reduction With Plate and Screw Fixation in Management of Unstable Proximal Phalangeal Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A34%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Closed%20Reduction%20Percutaneous%20Pinning%20Versus%20Open%20Reduction%20With%20Plate%20and%20Screw%20Fixation%20in%20Management%20of%20Unstable%20Proximal%20Phalangeal%20Fractures:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Hand%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Gaio,%20Natalie%20M.&rft.date=2025-01-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=136&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=136-142&rft.issn=1558-9447&rft.eissn=1558-9455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/15589447231189762&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2854346353%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-658e7009b3398c8c99e6a471fc6a8bd25f0b1f7a9d2b09b77cc8a9fe1da87ff73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2854346353&rft_id=info:pmid/37599408&rft_sage_id=10.1177_15589447231189762&rfr_iscdi=true