PULPO: A framework for efficient integration of life cycle inventory models into life cycle product optimization

• Published in: Journal of industrial ecology 2024-12, Vol.28 (6), p.1449-1463
• Main Authors: Lechtenberg, Fabian, Istrate, Robert, Tulus, Victor, Espuña, Antonio, Graells, Moisès, Guillén‐Gosálbez, Gonzalo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Carbon dioxide; Decisions; Design optimization; ecoinvent; Feedback loops; Frame analysis; Functionals; Gold; industrial ecology; Inventories; Life cycle analysis; Life cycle assessment; life cycle optimization; Life cycles; Manipulation; methanol; Methods; multi‐scale; Openness; Optimization; Process engineering; Systems engineering; technosphere‐wide
• ISSN: 1088-1980; 1530-9290
• DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13561

This work presents the PULPO (Python‐based user‐defined lifecycle product optimization) framework, developed to efficiently integrate life cycle inventory (LCI) models into life cycle product optimization. Life cycle optimization (LCO), which has found interest in both the process systems engineering and life cycle assessment (LCA) communities, leverages LCA data to go beyond simple assessments of a limited number of alternatives and identify the best possible product systems configuration subject to a manifold of choices, constraints, and objectives. However, typically, aggregated inventories are used to build the optimization problems. Contrary to existing frameworks, PULPO integrates whole LCI databases and user inventories as a backbone for the optimization problem, considering economy‐wide feedback loops between fore‐ and background systems that would otherwise be omitted. The open‐source implementation combines functions from Brightway2 for the manipulation of inventory data and pyomo for the formulation and solution of the optimization problem. The advantages of this approach are demonstrated in a case study focusing on the design of optimal future global green methanol production systems from captured CO2 and electrolytic H2. It is shown that the approach can be used to assess sector‐coupling with multi‐functional processes and prospective background databases that would otherwise be impractical to approach from a standalone LCA perspective. The use of PULPO is particularly appealing when evaluating large‐scale decisions that have a strong impact on socioeconomic systems, resulting in changes in the technosphere on which the background system is based and which is often assumed constant in standard LCO approaches regardless of the decisions taken. This article met the requirements for a gold‐gold JIE data openness badge described at http://jie.click/badges.