Crystal structure of the complex formed by the membrane type 1-matrix metalloproteinase with the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2, the soluble progelatinase A receptor

• Published in: The EMBO journal 1998-09, Vol.17 (17), p.5238-5248
• Main Authors: Fernandez-Catalan, Carlos, Bode, Wolfram, Huber, Robert, Turk, Dusan, Calvete, Juan J., Lichte, Andrea, Tschesche, Harald, Maskos, Klaus
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Amino Acid Sequence; Animals; Catalytic Domain; Cattle; crystal structure; Crystallography, X-Ray; Enzyme Activation; Enzyme Precursors - metabolism; Gelatinases - metabolism; Humans; matrix metalloproteinase; Matrix Metalloproteinases, Membrane-Associated; Metalloendopeptidases - chemistry; Metalloendopeptidases - metabolism; Models, Molecular; Molecular Sequence Data; progelatinase A activator; Protein Binding; Protein Conformation; proteinase complex; Receptors, Cell Surface - chemistry; Sequence Homology, Amino Acid; Surface Properties; Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-2 - chemistry; tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases
• ISSN: 0261-4189; 1460-2075; 1460-2075
• DOI: 10.1093/emboj/17.17.5238

The proteolytic activity of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) towards extracellular matrix components is held in check by the tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs). The binary complex of TIMP‐2 and membrane‐type‐1 MMP (MT1‐MMP) forms a cell surface located ‘receptor’ involved in pro‐MMP‐2 activation. We have solved the 2.75 Å crystal structure of the complex between the catalytic domain of human MT1‐MMP (cdMT1‐MMP) and bovine TIMP‐2. In comparison with our previously determined MMP‐3–TIMP‐1 complex, both proteins are considerably tilted to one another and show new features. CdMT1‐MMP, apart from exhibiting the classical MMP fold, displays two large insertions remote from the active‐site cleft that might be important for interaction with macromolecular substrates. The TIMP‐2 polypeptide chain, as in TIMP‐1, folds into a continuous wedge; the A‐B edge loop is much more elongated and tilted, however, wrapping around the S‐loop and the β‐sheet rim of the MT1‐MMP. In addition, both C‐terminal edge loops make more interactions with the target enzyme. The C‐terminal acidic tail of TIMP‐2 is disordered but might adopt a defined structure upon binding to pro‐MMP‐2; the Ser2 side‐chain of TIMP‐2 extends into the voluminous S1′ specificity pocket of cdMT1‐MMP, with its Oγ pointing towards the carboxylate of the catalytic Glu240. The lower affinity of TIMP‐1 for MT1‐MMP compared with TIMP‐2 might be explained by a reduced number of favourable interactions.