Loading…
Limitations of silencing at native yeast telomeres
Silencing at native yeast telomeres, in which the subtelomeric elements are intact, is different from silencing at terminal truncations. The repression of URA3 inserted in different subtelomeric positions at several chromosome ends was investigated. Many ends exhibit very little silencing close to t...
Saved in:
Published in: | The EMBO journal 1999-05, Vol.18 (9), p.2538-2550 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Silencing at native yeast telomeres, in which the subtelomeric elements are intact, is different from silencing at terminal truncations. The repression of
URA3
inserted in different subtelomeric positions at several chromosome ends was investigated. Many ends exhibit very little silencing close to the telomere, while others exhibit substantial repression in limited domains. Silencing at native ends is discontinuous, with maximal repression found adjacent to the ARS consensus sequence in the subtelomeric core X element. The level of repression declines precipitously towards the centromere. Mutation of the ARS sequence or an adjacent Abf1p‐binding site significantly reduces silencing. The subtelomeric Y′ elements are resistant to silencing along their whole length, yet silencing can be re‐established at the proximal X element. Deletion of
PPR1
, the transactivator of
URA3
, and
SIR3
overexpression do not increase repression or extend spreading of silencing to the same extent as with terminally truncated ends.
sir1Δ
causes partial derepression at X‐ACS, in contrast to the lack of effect seen at terminal truncations.
orc2‐1
and
orc5‐1
have no effect on natural silencing yet cause derepression at truncated ends. X‐ACS silencing requires the proximity of the telomere and is dependent on
SIR2
,
SIR3
,
SIR4
and
HDF1
. The structures found at native yeast telomeres appear to limit the potential of repressive chromatin. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0261-4189 1460-2075 |
DOI: | 10.1093/emboj/18.9.2538 |