Loading…
Computed tomography as a screening exam in patients with suspected blunt aortic injury
Chest computed tomography (CT) screening of patients with blunt trauma for thoracic aortic injury is controversial. This study was undertaken to determine whether CT could exclude aortic injury and be used to select patients for aortography. Computed tomography and aortography were used to evaluate...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annals of surgery 1994-11, Vol.220 (5), p.699-704 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-6ea98ed786a5355123df57b276a56b975b2c39ebe05ebf47b69a59268d7bb0803 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 704 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 699 |
container_title | Annals of surgery |
container_volume | 220 |
creator | DURHAM, R. M ZUCKERMAN, D WOLVERSON, M HEIBERG, E LUCHTEFELD, W. B HERR, D. J SHAPIRO, M. J MAZUSKI, J. E SALLIMI, Z MURALI SUNDARAM |
description | Chest computed tomography (CT) screening of patients with blunt trauma for thoracic aortic injury is controversial. This study was undertaken to determine whether CT could exclude aortic injury and be used to select patients for aortography.
Computed tomography and aortography were used to evaluate 155 patients with blunt trauma. Computed tomography scans were reviewed separately by four attending radiologists who were unaware of the patients' clinical course and angiographic findings.
Eight of 155 patients had aortic injuries requiring operation. Computed tomography scans in five patients were read as positive by all reviewers. One scan was read as positive by three reviewers and as negative by one. Two scans were read as positive by two radiologists and as negative by two. After poor scans were excluded, the combined sensitivity of CT for detecting aortic injury was 88%, specificity was 54%, positive predictive value was 9%, and negative predictive value 99%.
The sensitivity of CT scan for indicating the need for aortography is observer dependent. As CT manifestations of aortic injury are often subtle, CT does not reliably exclude aortic injury. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00000658-199411000-00015 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1234460</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76856482</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-6ea98ed786a5355123df57b276a56b975b2c39ebe05ebf47b69a59268d7bb0803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUVtrFDEUDqLUbfUnCHkQ30Zzv7wIsniDQl9sX0OSyeymzEzGJGPdf2_WrosNHMI53-Uc-ACAGL3HSMsP6PgEVx3WmmHcmq4V5s_ABnPSxpih52DTZrRjmpKX4LKU-8ZgCskLcCG11IKgDbjbpmlZa-hhTVPaZbvsD9AWaGHxOYQ5zjsYftsJxhkutsYw1wIfYt3DspYl-KPSjetcoU25Rt9492s-vAIvBjuW8Pr0X4HbL59_bL911zdfv28_XXeeSVo7EaxWoZdKWE45x4T2A5eOyNYLpyV3xFMdXEA8uIFJJ7TlmgjVS-eQQvQKfHz0XVY3hd6387IdzZLjZPPBJBvNU2SOe7NLv0xbxZg4Grw7GeT0cw2lmikWH8bRziGtxUihuGCKNKJ6JPqcSslhOC_ByBwzMf8yMedMzN9MmvTN_0eehacQGv72hNvi7ThkO_tYzjRKOaFa0D_b3pYE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76856482</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computed tomography as a screening exam in patients with suspected blunt aortic injury</title><source>PubMed</source><creator>DURHAM, R. M ; ZUCKERMAN, D ; WOLVERSON, M ; HEIBERG, E ; LUCHTEFELD, W. B ; HERR, D. J ; SHAPIRO, M. J ; MAZUSKI, J. E ; SALLIMI, Z ; MURALI SUNDARAM</creator><creatorcontrib>DURHAM, R. M ; ZUCKERMAN, D ; WOLVERSON, M ; HEIBERG, E ; LUCHTEFELD, W. B ; HERR, D. J ; SHAPIRO, M. J ; MAZUSKI, J. E ; SALLIMI, Z ; MURALI SUNDARAM</creatorcontrib><description>Chest computed tomography (CT) screening of patients with blunt trauma for thoracic aortic injury is controversial. This study was undertaken to determine whether CT could exclude aortic injury and be used to select patients for aortography.
Computed tomography and aortography were used to evaluate 155 patients with blunt trauma. Computed tomography scans were reviewed separately by four attending radiologists who were unaware of the patients' clinical course and angiographic findings.
Eight of 155 patients had aortic injuries requiring operation. Computed tomography scans in five patients were read as positive by all reviewers. One scan was read as positive by three reviewers and as negative by one. Two scans were read as positive by two radiologists and as negative by two. After poor scans were excluded, the combined sensitivity of CT for detecting aortic injury was 88%, specificity was 54%, positive predictive value was 9%, and negative predictive value 99%.
The sensitivity of CT scan for indicating the need for aortography is observer dependent. As CT manifestations of aortic injury are often subtle, CT does not reliably exclude aortic injury.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199411000-00015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7979620</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANSUA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aorta, Thoracic - diagnostic imaging ; Aorta, Thoracic - injuries ; Aortography ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiovascular system ; Female ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Time Factors ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Wounds, Nonpenetrating - diagnostic imaging</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgery, 1994-11, Vol.220 (5), p.699-704</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-6ea98ed786a5355123df57b276a56b975b2c39ebe05ebf47b69a59268d7bb0803</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1234460/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1234460/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3352396$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7979620$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DURHAM, R. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZUCKERMAN, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WOLVERSON, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEIBERG, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LUCHTEFELD, W. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HERR, D. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHAPIRO, M. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAZUSKI, J. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SALLIMI, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MURALI SUNDARAM</creatorcontrib><title>Computed tomography as a screening exam in patients with suspected blunt aortic injury</title><title>Annals of surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><description>Chest computed tomography (CT) screening of patients with blunt trauma for thoracic aortic injury is controversial. This study was undertaken to determine whether CT could exclude aortic injury and be used to select patients for aortography.
Computed tomography and aortography were used to evaluate 155 patients with blunt trauma. Computed tomography scans were reviewed separately by four attending radiologists who were unaware of the patients' clinical course and angiographic findings.
Eight of 155 patients had aortic injuries requiring operation. Computed tomography scans in five patients were read as positive by all reviewers. One scan was read as positive by three reviewers and as negative by one. Two scans were read as positive by two radiologists and as negative by two. After poor scans were excluded, the combined sensitivity of CT for detecting aortic injury was 88%, specificity was 54%, positive predictive value was 9%, and negative predictive value 99%.
The sensitivity of CT scan for indicating the need for aortography is observer dependent. As CT manifestations of aortic injury are often subtle, CT does not reliably exclude aortic injury.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aorta, Thoracic - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aorta, Thoracic - injuries</subject><subject>Aortography</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Wounds, Nonpenetrating - diagnostic imaging</subject><issn>0003-4932</issn><issn>1528-1140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUVtrFDEUDqLUbfUnCHkQ30Zzv7wIsniDQl9sX0OSyeymzEzGJGPdf2_WrosNHMI53-Uc-ACAGL3HSMsP6PgEVx3WmmHcmq4V5s_ABnPSxpih52DTZrRjmpKX4LKU-8ZgCskLcCG11IKgDbjbpmlZa-hhTVPaZbvsD9AWaGHxOYQ5zjsYftsJxhkutsYw1wIfYt3DspYl-KPSjetcoU25Rt9492s-vAIvBjuW8Pr0X4HbL59_bL911zdfv28_XXeeSVo7EaxWoZdKWE45x4T2A5eOyNYLpyV3xFMdXEA8uIFJJ7TlmgjVS-eQQvQKfHz0XVY3hd6387IdzZLjZPPBJBvNU2SOe7NLv0xbxZg4Grw7GeT0cw2lmikWH8bRziGtxUihuGCKNKJ6JPqcSslhOC_ByBwzMf8yMedMzN9MmvTN_0eehacQGv72hNvi7ThkO_tYzjRKOaFa0D_b3pYE</recordid><startdate>19941101</startdate><enddate>19941101</enddate><creator>DURHAM, R. M</creator><creator>ZUCKERMAN, D</creator><creator>WOLVERSON, M</creator><creator>HEIBERG, E</creator><creator>LUCHTEFELD, W. B</creator><creator>HERR, D. J</creator><creator>SHAPIRO, M. J</creator><creator>MAZUSKI, J. E</creator><creator>SALLIMI, Z</creator><creator>MURALI SUNDARAM</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19941101</creationdate><title>Computed tomography as a screening exam in patients with suspected blunt aortic injury</title><author>DURHAM, R. M ; ZUCKERMAN, D ; WOLVERSON, M ; HEIBERG, E ; LUCHTEFELD, W. B ; HERR, D. J ; SHAPIRO, M. J ; MAZUSKI, J. E ; SALLIMI, Z ; MURALI SUNDARAM</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-6ea98ed786a5355123df57b276a56b975b2c39ebe05ebf47b69a59268d7bb0803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aorta, Thoracic - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aorta, Thoracic - injuries</topic><topic>Aortography</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Wounds, Nonpenetrating - diagnostic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DURHAM, R. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZUCKERMAN, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WOLVERSON, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEIBERG, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LUCHTEFELD, W. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HERR, D. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHAPIRO, M. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAZUSKI, J. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SALLIMI, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MURALI SUNDARAM</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DURHAM, R. M</au><au>ZUCKERMAN, D</au><au>WOLVERSON, M</au><au>HEIBERG, E</au><au>LUCHTEFELD, W. B</au><au>HERR, D. J</au><au>SHAPIRO, M. J</au><au>MAZUSKI, J. E</au><au>SALLIMI, Z</au><au>MURALI SUNDARAM</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computed tomography as a screening exam in patients with suspected blunt aortic injury</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><date>1994-11-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>220</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>699</spage><epage>704</epage><pages>699-704</pages><issn>0003-4932</issn><eissn>1528-1140</eissn><coden>ANSUA5</coden><abstract>Chest computed tomography (CT) screening of patients with blunt trauma for thoracic aortic injury is controversial. This study was undertaken to determine whether CT could exclude aortic injury and be used to select patients for aortography.
Computed tomography and aortography were used to evaluate 155 patients with blunt trauma. Computed tomography scans were reviewed separately by four attending radiologists who were unaware of the patients' clinical course and angiographic findings.
Eight of 155 patients had aortic injuries requiring operation. Computed tomography scans in five patients were read as positive by all reviewers. One scan was read as positive by three reviewers and as negative by one. Two scans were read as positive by two radiologists and as negative by two. After poor scans were excluded, the combined sensitivity of CT for detecting aortic injury was 88%, specificity was 54%, positive predictive value was 9%, and negative predictive value 99%.
The sensitivity of CT scan for indicating the need for aortography is observer dependent. As CT manifestations of aortic injury are often subtle, CT does not reliably exclude aortic injury.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>7979620</pmid><doi>10.1097/00000658-199411000-00015</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-4932 |
ispartof | Annals of surgery, 1994-11, Vol.220 (5), p.699-704 |
issn | 0003-4932 1528-1140 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1234460 |
source | PubMed |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aorta, Thoracic - diagnostic imaging Aorta, Thoracic - injuries Aortography Biological and medical sciences Cardiovascular system Female Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Predictive Value of Tests Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry Sensitivity and Specificity Time Factors Tomography, X-Ray Computed Wounds, Nonpenetrating - diagnostic imaging |
title | Computed tomography as a screening exam in patients with suspected blunt aortic injury |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T10%3A21%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computed%20tomography%20as%20a%20screening%20exam%20in%20patients%20with%20suspected%20blunt%20aortic%20injury&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgery&rft.au=DURHAM,%20R.%20M&rft.date=1994-11-01&rft.volume=220&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=699&rft.epage=704&rft.pages=699-704&rft.issn=0003-4932&rft.eissn=1528-1140&rft.coden=ANSUA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00000658-199411000-00015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E76856482%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-6ea98ed786a5355123df57b276a56b975b2c39ebe05ebf47b69a59268d7bb0803%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76856482&rft_id=info:pmid/7979620&rfr_iscdi=true |