Completeness and accuracy of morbidity and repeat prescribing records held on general practice computers in Scotland

• Published in: British journal of general practice 1996-03, Vol.46 (404), p.181-186
• Main Authors: Whitelaw, F G, Nevin, S L, Milne, R M, Taylor, R J, Taylor, M W, Watt, A H
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Drug Prescriptions; Family Practice; Humans; Medical Records - standards; Medical Records Systems, Computerized - standards; Middle Aged; Morbidity; Practice Patterns, Physicians; Scotland; Sensitivity and Specificity
• ISSN: 0960-1643

A high proportion of Scottish general practices use a standard computer software package (GPASS, general practice administration system for Scotland), and thus, Scotland is uniquely placed to amalgamate primary care data on a national scale. Practices, however, vary widely in the nature and extent of data entered on computer and a major limitation on the use of the collected data is the absence of information on the completeness and accuracy of the computer database. This study set out to assess the quality of morbidity and repeat prescribing records held on computer by general practices in Scotland. Forty-one practices, with above average levels of morbidity data recorded on computer, were selected on a geographic basis in relation to the national population distribution. Within each practice, 250 patients aged 45-64 years were selected at random. Data relating to 19 diagnoses, six surgical procedures and 40 repeat prescription drugs were extracted from the computer records of these patients and compared with information held on patients' paper records and supplied by patients in response to a postal questionnaire. The completeness and accuracy of computer entries were assessed in terms of sensitivity and positive predictive value, respectively. For the 5567 patients for whom all three sources of data (validated computer records, paper records and questionnaire responses) were available, sensitivity (completeness) of morbidity recording had median values of 0.67 for diagnoses, 0.93 for surgical procedures and 0.75 over all conditions examined. Practices varied both in the completeness of recording of each condition and in their overall performance. The predictive value (accuracy) of morbidity data was uniformly high for all conditions examined (median 1.00). For repeat prescription drugs, recording on GPASS was both complete and accurate. The recording of morbidity data on GPASS for 45-64-year-old patients in a selected group of 41 highly-computerized practices is about 75% complete and highly accurate. For national morbidity studies, it seems likely that amalgamated data from the best GPASS practices will be as complete and accurate as the morbidity statistics currently derived from hospital-based activities in Scotland.