Loading…
DRO CONTINGENCIES: AN ANALYSIS OF VARIABLE-MOMENTARY SCHEDULES
We conducted several comparative analyses to determine the relative effectiveness of variable‐momentary differential‐reinforcement‐of‐other‐behavior (VM DRO) schedules. Three individuals who had been diagnosed with mental retardation participated. Results of functional analyses indicated that their...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of applied behavior analysis 1999, Vol.32 (2), p.123-136 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We conducted several comparative analyses to determine the relative effectiveness of variable‐momentary differential‐reinforcement‐of‐other‐behavior (VM DRO) schedules. Three individuals who had been diagnosed with mental retardation participated. Results of functional analyses indicated that their self‐injurious behavior (SIB) was maintained by social‐positive reinforcement. Two individuals participated in a two‐stage comparative analysis within multielement and multiple baseline designs. Fixed‐interval (FI) and variable‐interval (VI) DRO were compared in the first stage; VI DRO and VM DRO were compared in the second. All three schedules effectively reduced the participants' SIB. Treatment for the 3rd individual was conducted in a reversal design to examine the effects of VM DRO when it was implemented in isolation, and results indicated that the procedure was effective in reducing SIB. These findings suggest that VM DRO schedules may represent attractive alternatives to traditional FI schedules because momentary schedules do not require continuous monitoring and may result in higher rates of reinforcement. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0021-8855 1938-3703 |
DOI: | 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-123 |