Loading…
EFFECTS OF CONSEQUENCES OF ADVICE ON PATTERNS OF RULE CONTROL AND RULE CHOICE
Rules in the form of advice can inaccurately state the effects of recommended responses by overstating or understating size of the consequences. Three experiments investigated the effects of such inaccuracies on patterns of rule control and rule choice with female college students. In Experiment 1,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1998-07, Vol.70 (1), p.1-21 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4976-5f49e5f7ec961f2b0a108cf6eef7c9b7c024a16aefcca1fcecb35e21b03f006c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4976-5f49e5f7ec961f2b0a108cf6eef7c9b7c024a16aefcca1fcecb35e21b03f006c3 |
container_end_page | 21 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | Schmitt, David R. |
description | Rules in the form of advice can inaccurately state the effects of recommended responses by overstating or understating size of the consequences. Three experiments investigated the effects of such inaccuracies on patterns of rule control and rule choice with female college students. In Experiment 1, signaled accurate, overstated, or understated rules specified that a given number of points would be earned by pressing a designated key. For some subjects, rules specified a number of points to be gained; for other subjects, rules specified a number of points to be lost from an amount given earlier. Point totals stated in the inaccurate rules averaged 25% more (overstated) or 25% less (understated) than those received. When subjects could choose either the response specified in the rule or an alternative response that produced an unpredictable number of points, they showed greater sensitivity to the inaccuracy of overstated rules than understated rules. In trials at the end of the experiment in which subjects could choose which rule to see, subjects did not always choose accurate rules and often chose inaccurate rules for which they had shown less sensitivity earlier. Experiment 2 replicated this pattern in which subjects could choose which type of rule to see on a greater number of trials. Some evidence suggested that subjects prefer an improvement from the outcomes promised to those later received. In Experiment 3, rules misstated by averages of 25% and 50% were compared. Evidence suggested that increasing the size of the misstatement reduced the discrimination of inaccurate rules from accurate ones. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1901/jeab.1998.70-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1284670</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>32449112</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4976-5f49e5f7ec961f2b0a108cf6eef7c9b7c024a16aefcca1fcecb35e21b03f006c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1z0zAQxTUMHRoKV46Mhwsnp1rLlqwLM8ZV-kFiQ-rQo0YWEjg4cbESoP89cp0pHxcu0mr1e2925yH0AvAUOIbTtVG1r3g6ZTiER2gCnKQhYQCP0QTjKAoTfx6jp86tfcEpi56gY6ApRGkKE7QQs5nIq-ugnAV5WVyLDytR5OL-nZ19vMxFUBbB-6yqxLK47y5XczGg1bKcB1lxdmhclJ59ho6sap15frhP0GomqvwinJfnl3k2D3XMGQ0TG3OTWGY0p2CjGivAqbbUGMs0r5nGUayAKmO1VmC10TVJTAQ1JhZjqskJejP63u7rjfmkzXbXq1be9s1G9XeyU438-2fbfJGfu-_Sbx1Thr3B64NB333bG7eTm8Zp07Zqa7q9k4yQOAUA6slX_5Drbt9v_XYygjiNgdPBbjpCuu-c6419GAWwHHKSQ05yyEky3_GCl38u8Bs_BOOBeAR-NK25-4-dvBLZWzJOG46yxu3MzweZ6r9KyghL5E1xLnNaXC0W_Ea-I78Amr6n1w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214841960</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EFFECTS OF CONSEQUENCES OF ADVICE ON PATTERNS OF RULE CONTROL AND RULE CHOICE</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Schmitt, David R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, David R.</creatorcontrib><description>Rules in the form of advice can inaccurately state the effects of recommended responses by overstating or understating size of the consequences. Three experiments investigated the effects of such inaccuracies on patterns of rule control and rule choice with female college students. In Experiment 1, signaled accurate, overstated, or understated rules specified that a given number of points would be earned by pressing a designated key. For some subjects, rules specified a number of points to be gained; for other subjects, rules specified a number of points to be lost from an amount given earlier. Point totals stated in the inaccurate rules averaged 25% more (overstated) or 25% less (understated) than those received. When subjects could choose either the response specified in the rule or an alternative response that produced an unpredictable number of points, they showed greater sensitivity to the inaccuracy of overstated rules than understated rules. In trials at the end of the experiment in which subjects could choose which rule to see, subjects did not always choose accurate rules and often chose inaccurate rules for which they had shown less sensitivity earlier. Experiment 2 replicated this pattern in which subjects could choose which type of rule to see on a greater number of trials. Some evidence suggested that subjects prefer an improvement from the outcomes promised to those later received. In Experiment 3, rules misstated by averages of 25% and 50% were compared. Evidence suggested that increasing the size of the misstatement reduced the discrimination of inaccurate rules from accurate ones.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5002</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1998.70-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16812881</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEABAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>advice ; Behavior ; button press ; College students ; Experiments ; Females ; Psychology ; rule choice ; rule control ; rule following ; rule-governed behavior ; Rules</subject><ispartof>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1998-07, Vol.70 (1), p.1-21</ispartof><rights>1998 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</rights><rights>Copyright Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, Incorporated Jul 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4976-5f49e5f7ec961f2b0a108cf6eef7c9b7c024a16aefcca1fcecb35e21b03f006c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4976-5f49e5f7ec961f2b0a108cf6eef7c9b7c024a16aefcca1fcecb35e21b03f006c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1284670/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1284670/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16812881$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, David R.</creatorcontrib><title>EFFECTS OF CONSEQUENCES OF ADVICE ON PATTERNS OF RULE CONTROL AND RULE CHOICE</title><title>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</title><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><description>Rules in the form of advice can inaccurately state the effects of recommended responses by overstating or understating size of the consequences. Three experiments investigated the effects of such inaccuracies on patterns of rule control and rule choice with female college students. In Experiment 1, signaled accurate, overstated, or understated rules specified that a given number of points would be earned by pressing a designated key. For some subjects, rules specified a number of points to be gained; for other subjects, rules specified a number of points to be lost from an amount given earlier. Point totals stated in the inaccurate rules averaged 25% more (overstated) or 25% less (understated) than those received. When subjects could choose either the response specified in the rule or an alternative response that produced an unpredictable number of points, they showed greater sensitivity to the inaccuracy of overstated rules than understated rules. In trials at the end of the experiment in which subjects could choose which rule to see, subjects did not always choose accurate rules and often chose inaccurate rules for which they had shown less sensitivity earlier. Experiment 2 replicated this pattern in which subjects could choose which type of rule to see on a greater number of trials. Some evidence suggested that subjects prefer an improvement from the outcomes promised to those later received. In Experiment 3, rules misstated by averages of 25% and 50% were compared. Evidence suggested that increasing the size of the misstatement reduced the discrimination of inaccurate rules from accurate ones.</description><subject>advice</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>button press</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>rule choice</subject><subject>rule control</subject><subject>rule following</subject><subject>rule-governed behavior</subject><subject>Rules</subject><issn>0022-5002</issn><issn>1938-3711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1z0zAQxTUMHRoKV46Mhwsnp1rLlqwLM8ZV-kFiQ-rQo0YWEjg4cbESoP89cp0pHxcu0mr1e2925yH0AvAUOIbTtVG1r3g6ZTiER2gCnKQhYQCP0QTjKAoTfx6jp86tfcEpi56gY6ApRGkKE7QQs5nIq-ugnAV5WVyLDytR5OL-nZ19vMxFUBbB-6yqxLK47y5XczGg1bKcB1lxdmhclJ59ho6sap15frhP0GomqvwinJfnl3k2D3XMGQ0TG3OTWGY0p2CjGivAqbbUGMs0r5nGUayAKmO1VmC10TVJTAQ1JhZjqskJejP63u7rjfmkzXbXq1be9s1G9XeyU438-2fbfJGfu-_Sbx1Thr3B64NB333bG7eTm8Zp07Zqa7q9k4yQOAUA6slX_5Drbt9v_XYygjiNgdPBbjpCuu-c6419GAWwHHKSQ05yyEky3_GCl38u8Bs_BOOBeAR-NK25-4-dvBLZWzJOG46yxu3MzweZ6r9KyghL5E1xLnNaXC0W_Ea-I78Amr6n1w</recordid><startdate>199807</startdate><enddate>199807</enddate><creator>Schmitt, David R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199807</creationdate><title>EFFECTS OF CONSEQUENCES OF ADVICE ON PATTERNS OF RULE CONTROL AND RULE CHOICE</title><author>Schmitt, David R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4976-5f49e5f7ec961f2b0a108cf6eef7c9b7c024a16aefcca1fcecb35e21b03f006c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>advice</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>button press</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>rule choice</topic><topic>rule control</topic><topic>rule following</topic><topic>rule-governed behavior</topic><topic>Rules</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, David R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schmitt, David R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EFFECTS OF CONSEQUENCES OF ADVICE ON PATTERNS OF RULE CONTROL AND RULE CHOICE</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><date>1998-07</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>1-21</pages><issn>0022-5002</issn><eissn>1938-3711</eissn><coden>JEABAU</coden><abstract>Rules in the form of advice can inaccurately state the effects of recommended responses by overstating or understating size of the consequences. Three experiments investigated the effects of such inaccuracies on patterns of rule control and rule choice with female college students. In Experiment 1, signaled accurate, overstated, or understated rules specified that a given number of points would be earned by pressing a designated key. For some subjects, rules specified a number of points to be gained; for other subjects, rules specified a number of points to be lost from an amount given earlier. Point totals stated in the inaccurate rules averaged 25% more (overstated) or 25% less (understated) than those received. When subjects could choose either the response specified in the rule or an alternative response that produced an unpredictable number of points, they showed greater sensitivity to the inaccuracy of overstated rules than understated rules. In trials at the end of the experiment in which subjects could choose which rule to see, subjects did not always choose accurate rules and often chose inaccurate rules for which they had shown less sensitivity earlier. Experiment 2 replicated this pattern in which subjects could choose which type of rule to see on a greater number of trials. Some evidence suggested that subjects prefer an improvement from the outcomes promised to those later received. In Experiment 3, rules misstated by averages of 25% and 50% were compared. Evidence suggested that increasing the size of the misstatement reduced the discrimination of inaccurate rules from accurate ones.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>16812881</pmid><doi>10.1901/jeab.1998.70-1</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-5002 |
ispartof | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1998-07, Vol.70 (1), p.1-21 |
issn | 0022-5002 1938-3711 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1284670 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; PubMed Central |
subjects | advice Behavior button press College students Experiments Females Psychology rule choice rule control rule following rule-governed behavior Rules |
title | EFFECTS OF CONSEQUENCES OF ADVICE ON PATTERNS OF RULE CONTROL AND RULE CHOICE |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T09%3A10%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EFFECTS%20OF%20CONSEQUENCES%20OF%20ADVICE%20ON%20PATTERNS%20OF%20RULE%20CONTROL%20AND%20RULE%20CHOICE&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20experimental%20analysis%20of%20behavior&rft.au=Schmitt,%20David%20R.&rft.date=1998-07&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=1-21&rft.issn=0022-5002&rft.eissn=1938-3711&rft.coden=JEABAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1901/jeab.1998.70-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E32449112%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4976-5f49e5f7ec961f2b0a108cf6eef7c9b7c024a16aefcca1fcecb35e21b03f006c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214841960&rft_id=info:pmid/16812881&rfr_iscdi=true |