Loading…

COMPOUND STIMULI IN EMERGENT STIMULUS RELATIONS: EXTENDING THE SCOPE OF STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE

Three experiments were conducted to investigate stimulus relations that might emerge when college students are taught relations between compound sample stimuli and unitary comparison stimuli using match‐to‐sample procedures. In Experiment 1, subjects were taught nine AB‐C stimulus relations, then te...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1993-11, Vol.60 (3), p.529-542
Main Authors: Markham, Michael R., Dougher, Michael J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6057-194e6e19e6b9d152d5ff63c00b17aed9dad995105ba090818d980a7b37257f093
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6057-194e6e19e6b9d152d5ff63c00b17aed9dad995105ba090818d980a7b37257f093
container_end_page 542
container_issue 3
container_start_page 529
container_title Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
container_volume 60
creator Markham, Michael R.
Dougher, Michael J.
description Three experiments were conducted to investigate stimulus relations that might emerge when college students are taught relations between compound sample stimuli and unitary comparison stimuli using match‐to‐sample procedures. In Experiment 1, subjects were taught nine AB‐C stimulus relations, then tested for the emergence of 18 AC‐B and BC‐A relations. All subjects showed the emergence of all tested relations. Twelve subjects participated in Experiment 2. Six subjects were taught nine AB‐C relations and were then tested for symmetrical (C‐AB) relations. Six subjects were taught nine AB‐C and three C‐D relations and were then tested for nine AB‐D (transitive) relations. Five of 6 subjects demonstrated the emergence of symmetrical relations, and 6 subjects showed the emergence of transitivity. In Experiment 3, 5 college students were taught nine AB‐C and three C‐D relations and were then tested for nine equivalence (D‐AB) relations and 18 AD‐B and BD‐A relations. Three subjects demonstrated all tested relations. One subject demonstrated the AD‐B and BD‐A relations but not the D‐AB relations. One subject did not respond systematically during testing. The results of these experiments extend stimulus equivalence research to more complex cases.
doi_str_mv 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-529
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1322163</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1311447676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6057-194e6e19e6b9d152d5ff63c00b17aed9dad995105ba090818d980a7b37257f093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkdFv0zAQxi0EYt3gnScUwcOeMnx2bMc8IHWZ1walyVgThiYky2mckZI2I2mB_fckarUBEuLl7mT_vk93-hB6AfgEJIY3S2vyfpL0hGOXEfkIjUBS36UC4DEaYUyIy_p6gA67btkPkgvyFB0A94EI8Efoc5DMLpIsPnPmaTjLotAJY0fN1OVExen-LZs7lyoap2ESz9866lOq4rMwnjjpVDnzILlQTnL-gKoPWfhxHKk4UM_Qk9LUnX2-70coO1dpMHWjZBIG48hdcMyEC9Kz3IK0PJcFMFKwsuR0gXEOwthCFqaQkgFmucES--AX0sdG5FQQJkos6RF6t_O93eYrWyzsetOaWt-21cq0d7oxlf7zZ1190TfNdw2UEOC0NzjeG7TNt63tNnpVdQtb12Ztm22nBaWeD0B4T776i1w223bdX6cJeD4lmA_Q639BQAE8T3AxUHhHLdqm61pb3i8MWA_x6iFePcSrOdZ9vL3k5e-HPgj2efYA3wE_qtre_ddQv1fjU-KD6IXuTlh1G_vzXmjar5oLKpi-iic6Ok2vrqeU6Wv6CyaOuCI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1311447676</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>COMPOUND STIMULI IN EMERGENT STIMULUS RELATIONS: EXTENDING THE SCOPE OF STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Markham, Michael R. ; Dougher, Michael J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Markham, Michael R. ; Dougher, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><description>Three experiments were conducted to investigate stimulus relations that might emerge when college students are taught relations between compound sample stimuli and unitary comparison stimuli using match‐to‐sample procedures. In Experiment 1, subjects were taught nine AB‐C stimulus relations, then tested for the emergence of 18 AC‐B and BC‐A relations. All subjects showed the emergence of all tested relations. Twelve subjects participated in Experiment 2. Six subjects were taught nine AB‐C relations and were then tested for symmetrical (C‐AB) relations. Six subjects were taught nine AB‐C and three C‐D relations and were then tested for nine AB‐D (transitive) relations. Five of 6 subjects demonstrated the emergence of symmetrical relations, and 6 subjects showed the emergence of transitivity. In Experiment 3, 5 college students were taught nine AB‐C and three C‐D relations and were then tested for nine equivalence (D‐AB) relations and 18 AD‐B and BD‐A relations. Three subjects demonstrated all tested relations. One subject demonstrated the AD‐B and BD‐A relations but not the D‐AB relations. One subject did not respond systematically during testing. The results of these experiments extend stimulus equivalence research to more complex cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5002</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-529</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16812718</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEABAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning ; College students ; compound stimuli ; hierarchical stimulus control ; humans ; key press ; Psychology ; Social research ; Stimuli ; stimulus equivalence ; stimulus interchangeability ; stimulus sets</subject><ispartof>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1993-11, Vol.60 (3), p.529-542</ispartof><rights>1993 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</rights><rights>Copyright Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, Incorporated Nov 1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6057-194e6e19e6b9d152d5ff63c00b17aed9dad995105ba090818d980a7b37257f093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6057-194e6e19e6b9d152d5ff63c00b17aed9dad995105ba090818d980a7b37257f093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1322163/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1322163/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16812718$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Markham, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dougher, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><title>COMPOUND STIMULI IN EMERGENT STIMULUS RELATIONS: EXTENDING THE SCOPE OF STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE</title><title>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</title><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><description>Three experiments were conducted to investigate stimulus relations that might emerge when college students are taught relations between compound sample stimuli and unitary comparison stimuli using match‐to‐sample procedures. In Experiment 1, subjects were taught nine AB‐C stimulus relations, then tested for the emergence of 18 AC‐B and BC‐A relations. All subjects showed the emergence of all tested relations. Twelve subjects participated in Experiment 2. Six subjects were taught nine AB‐C relations and were then tested for symmetrical (C‐AB) relations. Six subjects were taught nine AB‐C and three C‐D relations and were then tested for nine AB‐D (transitive) relations. Five of 6 subjects demonstrated the emergence of symmetrical relations, and 6 subjects showed the emergence of transitivity. In Experiment 3, 5 college students were taught nine AB‐C and three C‐D relations and were then tested for nine equivalence (D‐AB) relations and 18 AD‐B and BD‐A relations. Three subjects demonstrated all tested relations. One subject demonstrated the AD‐B and BD‐A relations but not the D‐AB relations. One subject did not respond systematically during testing. The results of these experiments extend stimulus equivalence research to more complex cases.</description><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>compound stimuli</subject><subject>hierarchical stimulus control</subject><subject>humans</subject><subject>key press</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>stimulus equivalence</subject><subject>stimulus interchangeability</subject><subject>stimulus sets</subject><issn>0022-5002</issn><issn>1938-3711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkdFv0zAQxi0EYt3gnScUwcOeMnx2bMc8IHWZ1walyVgThiYky2mckZI2I2mB_fckarUBEuLl7mT_vk93-hB6AfgEJIY3S2vyfpL0hGOXEfkIjUBS36UC4DEaYUyIy_p6gA67btkPkgvyFB0A94EI8Efoc5DMLpIsPnPmaTjLotAJY0fN1OVExen-LZs7lyoap2ESz9866lOq4rMwnjjpVDnzILlQTnL-gKoPWfhxHKk4UM_Qk9LUnX2-70coO1dpMHWjZBIG48hdcMyEC9Kz3IK0PJcFMFKwsuR0gXEOwthCFqaQkgFmucES--AX0sdG5FQQJkos6RF6t_O93eYrWyzsetOaWt-21cq0d7oxlf7zZ1190TfNdw2UEOC0NzjeG7TNt63tNnpVdQtb12Ztm22nBaWeD0B4T776i1w223bdX6cJeD4lmA_Q639BQAE8T3AxUHhHLdqm61pb3i8MWA_x6iFePcSrOdZ9vL3k5e-HPgj2efYA3wE_qtre_ddQv1fjU-KD6IXuTlh1G_vzXmjar5oLKpi-iic6Ok2vrqeU6Wv6CyaOuCI</recordid><startdate>199311</startdate><enddate>199311</enddate><creator>Markham, Michael R.</creator><creator>Dougher, Michael J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JTYFY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199311</creationdate><title>COMPOUND STIMULI IN EMERGENT STIMULUS RELATIONS: EXTENDING THE SCOPE OF STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE</title><author>Markham, Michael R. ; Dougher, Michael J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6057-194e6e19e6b9d152d5ff63c00b17aed9dad995105ba090818d980a7b37257f093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>compound stimuli</topic><topic>hierarchical stimulus control</topic><topic>humans</topic><topic>key press</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>stimulus equivalence</topic><topic>stimulus interchangeability</topic><topic>stimulus sets</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Markham, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dougher, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 37</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Markham, Michael R.</au><au>Dougher, Michael J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>COMPOUND STIMULI IN EMERGENT STIMULUS RELATIONS: EXTENDING THE SCOPE OF STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><date>1993-11</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>529</spage><epage>542</epage><pages>529-542</pages><issn>0022-5002</issn><eissn>1938-3711</eissn><coden>JEABAU</coden><abstract>Three experiments were conducted to investigate stimulus relations that might emerge when college students are taught relations between compound sample stimuli and unitary comparison stimuli using match‐to‐sample procedures. In Experiment 1, subjects were taught nine AB‐C stimulus relations, then tested for the emergence of 18 AC‐B and BC‐A relations. All subjects showed the emergence of all tested relations. Twelve subjects participated in Experiment 2. Six subjects were taught nine AB‐C relations and were then tested for symmetrical (C‐AB) relations. Six subjects were taught nine AB‐C and three C‐D relations and were then tested for nine AB‐D (transitive) relations. Five of 6 subjects demonstrated the emergence of symmetrical relations, and 6 subjects showed the emergence of transitivity. In Experiment 3, 5 college students were taught nine AB‐C and three C‐D relations and were then tested for nine equivalence (D‐AB) relations and 18 AD‐B and BD‐A relations. Three subjects demonstrated all tested relations. One subject demonstrated the AD‐B and BD‐A relations but not the D‐AB relations. One subject did not respond systematically during testing. The results of these experiments extend stimulus equivalence research to more complex cases.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>16812718</pmid><doi>10.1901/jeab.1993.60-529</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5002
ispartof Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1993-11, Vol.60 (3), p.529-542
issn 0022-5002
1938-3711
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1322163
source PubMed Central
subjects Cognition & reasoning
College students
compound stimuli
hierarchical stimulus control
humans
key press
Psychology
Social research
Stimuli
stimulus equivalence
stimulus interchangeability
stimulus sets
title COMPOUND STIMULI IN EMERGENT STIMULUS RELATIONS: EXTENDING THE SCOPE OF STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A35%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=COMPOUND%20STIMULI%20IN%20EMERGENT%20STIMULUS%20RELATIONS:%20EXTENDING%20THE%20SCOPE%20OF%20STIMULUS%20EQUIVALENCE&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20experimental%20analysis%20of%20behavior&rft.au=Markham,%20Michael%20R.&rft.date=1993-11&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=529&rft.epage=542&rft.pages=529-542&rft.issn=0022-5002&rft.eissn=1938-3711&rft.coden=JEABAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1901/jeab.1993.60-529&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1311447676%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6057-194e6e19e6b9d152d5ff63c00b17aed9dad995105ba090818d980a7b37257f093%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1311447676&rft_id=info:pmid/16812718&rfr_iscdi=true