Loading…
COMPOUND STIMULI IN EMERGENT STIMULUS RELATIONS: EXTENDING THE SCOPE OF STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE
Three experiments were conducted to investigate stimulus relations that might emerge when college students are taught relations between compound sample stimuli and unitary comparison stimuli using match‐to‐sample procedures. In Experiment 1, subjects were taught nine AB‐C stimulus relations, then te...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1993-11, Vol.60 (3), p.529-542 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6057-194e6e19e6b9d152d5ff63c00b17aed9dad995105ba090818d980a7b37257f093 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6057-194e6e19e6b9d152d5ff63c00b17aed9dad995105ba090818d980a7b37257f093 |
container_end_page | 542 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 529 |
container_title | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Markham, Michael R. Dougher, Michael J. |
description | Three experiments were conducted to investigate stimulus relations that might emerge when college students are taught relations between compound sample stimuli and unitary comparison stimuli using match‐to‐sample procedures. In Experiment 1, subjects were taught nine AB‐C stimulus relations, then tested for the emergence of 18 AC‐B and BC‐A relations. All subjects showed the emergence of all tested relations. Twelve subjects participated in Experiment 2. Six subjects were taught nine AB‐C relations and were then tested for symmetrical (C‐AB) relations. Six subjects were taught nine AB‐C and three C‐D relations and were then tested for nine AB‐D (transitive) relations. Five of 6 subjects demonstrated the emergence of symmetrical relations, and 6 subjects showed the emergence of transitivity. In Experiment 3, 5 college students were taught nine AB‐C and three C‐D relations and were then tested for nine equivalence (D‐AB) relations and 18 AD‐B and BD‐A relations. Three subjects demonstrated all tested relations. One subject demonstrated the AD‐B and BD‐A relations but not the D‐AB relations. One subject did not respond systematically during testing. The results of these experiments extend stimulus equivalence research to more complex cases. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-529 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1322163</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1311447676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6057-194e6e19e6b9d152d5ff63c00b17aed9dad995105ba090818d980a7b37257f093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkdFv0zAQxi0EYt3gnScUwcOeMnx2bMc8IHWZ1walyVgThiYky2mckZI2I2mB_fckarUBEuLl7mT_vk93-hB6AfgEJIY3S2vyfpL0hGOXEfkIjUBS36UC4DEaYUyIy_p6gA67btkPkgvyFB0A94EI8Efoc5DMLpIsPnPmaTjLotAJY0fN1OVExen-LZs7lyoap2ESz9866lOq4rMwnjjpVDnzILlQTnL-gKoPWfhxHKk4UM_Qk9LUnX2-70coO1dpMHWjZBIG48hdcMyEC9Kz3IK0PJcFMFKwsuR0gXEOwthCFqaQkgFmucES--AX0sdG5FQQJkos6RF6t_O93eYrWyzsetOaWt-21cq0d7oxlf7zZ1190TfNdw2UEOC0NzjeG7TNt63tNnpVdQtb12Ztm22nBaWeD0B4T776i1w223bdX6cJeD4lmA_Q639BQAE8T3AxUHhHLdqm61pb3i8MWA_x6iFePcSrOdZ9vL3k5e-HPgj2efYA3wE_qtre_ddQv1fjU-KD6IXuTlh1G_vzXmjar5oLKpi-iic6Ok2vrqeU6Wv6CyaOuCI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1311447676</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>COMPOUND STIMULI IN EMERGENT STIMULUS RELATIONS: EXTENDING THE SCOPE OF STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Markham, Michael R. ; Dougher, Michael J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Markham, Michael R. ; Dougher, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><description>Three experiments were conducted to investigate stimulus relations that might emerge when college students are taught relations between compound sample stimuli and unitary comparison stimuli using match‐to‐sample procedures. In Experiment 1, subjects were taught nine AB‐C stimulus relations, then tested for the emergence of 18 AC‐B and BC‐A relations. All subjects showed the emergence of all tested relations. Twelve subjects participated in Experiment 2. Six subjects were taught nine AB‐C relations and were then tested for symmetrical (C‐AB) relations. Six subjects were taught nine AB‐C and three C‐D relations and were then tested for nine AB‐D (transitive) relations. Five of 6 subjects demonstrated the emergence of symmetrical relations, and 6 subjects showed the emergence of transitivity. In Experiment 3, 5 college students were taught nine AB‐C and three C‐D relations and were then tested for nine equivalence (D‐AB) relations and 18 AD‐B and BD‐A relations. Three subjects demonstrated all tested relations. One subject demonstrated the AD‐B and BD‐A relations but not the D‐AB relations. One subject did not respond systematically during testing. The results of these experiments extend stimulus equivalence research to more complex cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5002</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-529</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16812718</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEABAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Cognition & reasoning ; College students ; compound stimuli ; hierarchical stimulus control ; humans ; key press ; Psychology ; Social research ; Stimuli ; stimulus equivalence ; stimulus interchangeability ; stimulus sets</subject><ispartof>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1993-11, Vol.60 (3), p.529-542</ispartof><rights>1993 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</rights><rights>Copyright Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, Incorporated Nov 1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6057-194e6e19e6b9d152d5ff63c00b17aed9dad995105ba090818d980a7b37257f093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6057-194e6e19e6b9d152d5ff63c00b17aed9dad995105ba090818d980a7b37257f093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1322163/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1322163/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16812718$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Markham, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dougher, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><title>COMPOUND STIMULI IN EMERGENT STIMULUS RELATIONS: EXTENDING THE SCOPE OF STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE</title><title>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</title><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><description>Three experiments were conducted to investigate stimulus relations that might emerge when college students are taught relations between compound sample stimuli and unitary comparison stimuli using match‐to‐sample procedures. In Experiment 1, subjects were taught nine AB‐C stimulus relations, then tested for the emergence of 18 AC‐B and BC‐A relations. All subjects showed the emergence of all tested relations. Twelve subjects participated in Experiment 2. Six subjects were taught nine AB‐C relations and were then tested for symmetrical (C‐AB) relations. Six subjects were taught nine AB‐C and three C‐D relations and were then tested for nine AB‐D (transitive) relations. Five of 6 subjects demonstrated the emergence of symmetrical relations, and 6 subjects showed the emergence of transitivity. In Experiment 3, 5 college students were taught nine AB‐C and three C‐D relations and were then tested for nine equivalence (D‐AB) relations and 18 AD‐B and BD‐A relations. Three subjects demonstrated all tested relations. One subject demonstrated the AD‐B and BD‐A relations but not the D‐AB relations. One subject did not respond systematically during testing. The results of these experiments extend stimulus equivalence research to more complex cases.</description><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>compound stimuli</subject><subject>hierarchical stimulus control</subject><subject>humans</subject><subject>key press</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>stimulus equivalence</subject><subject>stimulus interchangeability</subject><subject>stimulus sets</subject><issn>0022-5002</issn><issn>1938-3711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkdFv0zAQxi0EYt3gnScUwcOeMnx2bMc8IHWZ1walyVgThiYky2mckZI2I2mB_fckarUBEuLl7mT_vk93-hB6AfgEJIY3S2vyfpL0hGOXEfkIjUBS36UC4DEaYUyIy_p6gA67btkPkgvyFB0A94EI8Efoc5DMLpIsPnPmaTjLotAJY0fN1OVExen-LZs7lyoap2ESz9866lOq4rMwnjjpVDnzILlQTnL-gKoPWfhxHKk4UM_Qk9LUnX2-70coO1dpMHWjZBIG48hdcMyEC9Kz3IK0PJcFMFKwsuR0gXEOwthCFqaQkgFmucES--AX0sdG5FQQJkos6RF6t_O93eYrWyzsetOaWt-21cq0d7oxlf7zZ1190TfNdw2UEOC0NzjeG7TNt63tNnpVdQtb12Ztm22nBaWeD0B4T776i1w223bdX6cJeD4lmA_Q639BQAE8T3AxUHhHLdqm61pb3i8MWA_x6iFePcSrOdZ9vL3k5e-HPgj2efYA3wE_qtre_ddQv1fjU-KD6IXuTlh1G_vzXmjar5oLKpi-iic6Ok2vrqeU6Wv6CyaOuCI</recordid><startdate>199311</startdate><enddate>199311</enddate><creator>Markham, Michael R.</creator><creator>Dougher, Michael J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JTYFY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199311</creationdate><title>COMPOUND STIMULI IN EMERGENT STIMULUS RELATIONS: EXTENDING THE SCOPE OF STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE</title><author>Markham, Michael R. ; Dougher, Michael J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6057-194e6e19e6b9d152d5ff63c00b17aed9dad995105ba090818d980a7b37257f093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>compound stimuli</topic><topic>hierarchical stimulus control</topic><topic>humans</topic><topic>key press</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>stimulus equivalence</topic><topic>stimulus interchangeability</topic><topic>stimulus sets</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Markham, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dougher, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 37</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Markham, Michael R.</au><au>Dougher, Michael J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>COMPOUND STIMULI IN EMERGENT STIMULUS RELATIONS: EXTENDING THE SCOPE OF STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><date>1993-11</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>529</spage><epage>542</epage><pages>529-542</pages><issn>0022-5002</issn><eissn>1938-3711</eissn><coden>JEABAU</coden><abstract>Three experiments were conducted to investigate stimulus relations that might emerge when college students are taught relations between compound sample stimuli and unitary comparison stimuli using match‐to‐sample procedures. In Experiment 1, subjects were taught nine AB‐C stimulus relations, then tested for the emergence of 18 AC‐B and BC‐A relations. All subjects showed the emergence of all tested relations. Twelve subjects participated in Experiment 2. Six subjects were taught nine AB‐C relations and were then tested for symmetrical (C‐AB) relations. Six subjects were taught nine AB‐C and three C‐D relations and were then tested for nine AB‐D (transitive) relations. Five of 6 subjects demonstrated the emergence of symmetrical relations, and 6 subjects showed the emergence of transitivity. In Experiment 3, 5 college students were taught nine AB‐C and three C‐D relations and were then tested for nine equivalence (D‐AB) relations and 18 AD‐B and BD‐A relations. Three subjects demonstrated all tested relations. One subject demonstrated the AD‐B and BD‐A relations but not the D‐AB relations. One subject did not respond systematically during testing. The results of these experiments extend stimulus equivalence research to more complex cases.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>16812718</pmid><doi>10.1901/jeab.1993.60-529</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-5002 |
ispartof | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1993-11, Vol.60 (3), p.529-542 |
issn | 0022-5002 1938-3711 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1322163 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | Cognition & reasoning College students compound stimuli hierarchical stimulus control humans key press Psychology Social research Stimuli stimulus equivalence stimulus interchangeability stimulus sets |
title | COMPOUND STIMULI IN EMERGENT STIMULUS RELATIONS: EXTENDING THE SCOPE OF STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A35%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=COMPOUND%20STIMULI%20IN%20EMERGENT%20STIMULUS%20RELATIONS:%20EXTENDING%20THE%20SCOPE%20OF%20STIMULUS%20EQUIVALENCE&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20experimental%20analysis%20of%20behavior&rft.au=Markham,%20Michael%20R.&rft.date=1993-11&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=529&rft.epage=542&rft.pages=529-542&rft.issn=0022-5002&rft.eissn=1938-3711&rft.coden=JEABAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1901/jeab.1993.60-529&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1311447676%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6057-194e6e19e6b9d152d5ff63c00b17aed9dad995105ba090818d980a7b37257f093%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1311447676&rft_id=info:pmid/16812718&rfr_iscdi=true |