Information on response requirements compared with information on food density as a reinforcer of observing in pigeons

• Published in: Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1988-03, Vol.49 (2), p.229-237
• Main Authors: DINSMOOR, J. A, BOWE, C. A, GREEN, L, HANSON, J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal; Biological and medical sciences; Conditioning; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Learning. Memory; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology
• ISSN: 0022-5002; 1938-3711
• DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-229

On a variable-interval schedule, pecking the key to the pigeon's right (observing response) produced red or green displays relating to the delivery of grain and its dependence on pecking the key to the left (food key). During various blocks of sessions, mixed (no stimulus change) schedules including the following pairs of components were temporarily converted by the observing response to their corresponding multiple (correlated stimuli) schedules: variable-interval 60-s, extinction; variable-interval 60-s, variable-time (response-independent) 60-s; extinction, variable-time 60-s. Differences in food delivery maintained substantial rates of responding on the observing key, without regard to pecking requirements on the food key. Although stimuli correlated with differences in the response requirement on the food key maintained higher observing rates than those maintained by uncorrelated stimuli, they were much lower than those based on food. The value of predictive stimuli as reinforcers is determined by the value of the events predicted. In particular, the cost of pecking appears to be low, and this may place limitations on the applicability of energy-based and economic models of behavior.