Loading…

Compliance with OSHA record-keeping requirements

The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 requires employers to maintain records of workplace injuries and illnesses. To assess compliance with the law, data from the National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) were examined. Of the 4,185 companies with 11 or more employees, 75 per cent mainta...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	American journal of public health (1971) 1988-09, Vol.78 (9), p.1218-1219
Main Authors:	Seligman, P J, Sieber, W K, Pedersen, D H, Sundin, D S, Frazier, T M
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Subjects:	Accidents, Occupational Applied sciences Documentation Employees Exact sciences and technology Federal regulation Forms and Records Control Humans Occupational Diseases - epidemiology Occupational health & safety Other techniques and industries Public health Records - standards Records management Regulation Statistics United States United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology
Citations:	Items that this one cites Items that cite this one
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

cited_by	cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-33f4da720785aa403787e303bdff2ba68c87efcc646933a33b6dc82d874abb423
cites	cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-33f4da720785aa403787e303bdff2ba68c87efcc646933a33b6dc82d874abb423
container_end_page	1219
container_issue	9
container_start_page	1218
container_title	American journal of public health (1971)
container_volume	78
creator	Seligman, P J Sieber, W K Pedersen, D H Sundin, D S Frazier, T M
description	The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 requires employers to maintain records of workplace injuries and illnesses. To assess compliance with the law, data from the National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) were examined. Of the 4,185 companies with 11 or more employees, 75 per cent maintained OSHA Form 200 designed for recording illnesses and injuries. The number of employees and the presence of a union were positive determinants in the record maintenance. Of companies with 500 or more employees, 95 per cent kept records compared with 60 per cent of companies with between 11 and 99 employees.
doi_str_mv	10.2105/AJPH.78.9.1218
format	article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1349399</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1298328471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-33f4da720785aa403787e303bdff2ba68c87efcc646933a33b6dc82d874abb423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt2LEzEUxYO4rHX11TehqLhPM-YmmXy8CKXoVllYQX0OmUymkzpfm3Rc_O_N0NJVQRQCyeX-cg6cexF6BjgngIs3q4-fNrmQucqBgHyAFlAwyDBm8iFaYKxwelP-CD2OcYcxgCrgHJ1ThoUkxQLh9dCNrTe9dcs7v2-WN583q2VwdghV9s250ffbVN5OPrjO9fv4BJ3Vpo3u6fG-QF_fv_uy3mTXN1cf1qvrzBaK7TNKa1YZQZJNYQzDVEjhKKZlVdekNFzaVNfWcsYVpYbSkldWkkoKZsqSEXqB3h50x6nsXGWTdzCtHoPvTPihB-P1753eN3o7fNdAmaJKJYHXR4Ew3E4u7nXno3Vta3o3TFETxYngHP8HCPOh_wRBckUYmxVf_AHuhin0KS5NoAAMjBQJevk3KPlJSiQTkKj8QNkwxBhcfUoAsJ4XQM8LoIXUSs8LkD48_zW3E36ceOq_OvZNtKatQxq9jyeMSypwMad3ecAav23u0vB17EzbJlHQZjc294Y_AR6Kw50</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1298328471</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Compliance with OSHA record-keeping requirements</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>NCBI_PubMed Central（免费）</source><source>American Public Health Association</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Seligman, P J ; Sieber, W K ; Pedersen, D H ; Sundin, D S ; Frazier, T M</creator><creatorcontrib>Seligman, P J ; Sieber, W K ; Pedersen, D H ; Sundin, D S ; Frazier, T M</creatorcontrib><description>The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 requires employers to maintain records of workplace injuries and illnesses. To assess compliance with the law, data from the National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) were examined. Of the 4,185 companies with 11 or more employees, 75 per cent maintained OSHA Form 200 designed for recording illnesses and injuries. The number of employees and the presence of a union were positive determinants in the record maintenance. Of companies with 500 or more employees, 95 per cent kept records compared with 60 per cent of companies with between 11 and 99 employees.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-0036</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0048</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.78.9.1218</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3407825</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJPEAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Am Public Health Assoc</publisher><subject>Accidents, Occupational ; Applied sciences ; Documentation ; Employees ; Exact sciences and technology ; Federal regulation ; Forms and Records Control ; Humans ; Occupational Diseases - epidemiology ; Occupational health & safety ; Other techniques and industries ; Public health ; Records - standards ; Records management ; Regulation ; Statistics ; United States ; United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration ; Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>American journal of public health (1971), 1988-09, Vol.78 (9), p.1218-1219</ispartof><rights>1990 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Public Health Association Sep 1988</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-33f4da720785aa403787e303bdff2ba68c87efcc646933a33b6dc82d874abb423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-33f4da720785aa403787e303bdff2ba68c87efcc646933a33b6dc82d874abb423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1349399/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1349399/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3981,27843,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=6837059$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3407825$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seligman, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sieber, W K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedersen, D H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundin, D S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frazier, T M</creatorcontrib><title>Compliance with OSHA record-keeping requirements</title><title>American journal of public health (1971)</title><addtitle>Am J Public Health</addtitle><description>The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 requires employers to maintain records of workplace injuries and illnesses. To assess compliance with the law, data from the National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) were examined. Of the 4,185 companies with 11 or more employees, 75 per cent maintained OSHA Form 200 designed for recording illnesses and injuries. The number of employees and the presence of a union were positive determinants in the record maintenance. Of companies with 500 or more employees, 95 per cent kept records compared with 60 per cent of companies with between 11 and 99 employees.</description><subject>Accidents, Occupational</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Documentation</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Federal regulation</subject><subject>Forms and Records Control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Occupational Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Occupational health & safety</subject><subject>Other techniques and industries</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Records - standards</subject><subject>Records management</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology</subject><issn>0090-0036</issn><issn>1541-0048</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt2LEzEUxYO4rHX11TehqLhPM-YmmXy8CKXoVllYQX0OmUymkzpfm3Rc_O_N0NJVQRQCyeX-cg6cexF6BjgngIs3q4-fNrmQucqBgHyAFlAwyDBm8iFaYKxwelP-CD2OcYcxgCrgHJ1ThoUkxQLh9dCNrTe9dcs7v2-WN583q2VwdghV9s250ffbVN5OPrjO9fv4BJ3Vpo3u6fG-QF_fv_uy3mTXN1cf1qvrzBaK7TNKa1YZQZJNYQzDVEjhKKZlVdekNFzaVNfWcsYVpYbSkldWkkoKZsqSEXqB3h50x6nsXGWTdzCtHoPvTPihB-P1753eN3o7fNdAmaJKJYHXR4Ew3E4u7nXno3Vta3o3TFETxYngHP8HCPOh_wRBckUYmxVf_AHuhin0KS5NoAAMjBQJevk3KPlJSiQTkKj8QNkwxBhcfUoAsJ4XQM8LoIXUSs8LkD48_zW3E36ceOq_OvZNtKatQxq9jyeMSypwMad3ecAav23u0vB17EzbJlHQZjc294Y_AR6Kw50</recordid><startdate>19880901</startdate><enddate>19880901</enddate><creator>Seligman, P J</creator><creator>Sieber, W K</creator><creator>Pedersen, D H</creator><creator>Sundin, D S</creator><creator>Frazier, T M</creator><general>Am Public Health Assoc</general><general>American Public Health Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HDMVH</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880901</creationdate><title>Compliance with OSHA record-keeping requirements</title><author>Seligman, P J ; Sieber, W K ; Pedersen, D H ; Sundin, D S ; Frazier, T M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-33f4da720785aa403787e303bdff2ba68c87efcc646933a33b6dc82d874abb423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Accidents, Occupational</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Documentation</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Federal regulation</topic><topic>Forms and Records Control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Occupational Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Occupational health & safety</topic><topic>Other techniques and industries</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Records - standards</topic><topic>Records management</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seligman, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sieber, W K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedersen, D H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundin, D S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frazier, T M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 15</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of public health (1971)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seligman, P J</au><au>Sieber, W K</au><au>Pedersen, D H</au><au>Sundin, D S</au><au>Frazier, T M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Compliance with OSHA record-keeping requirements</atitle><jtitle>American journal of public health (1971)</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Public Health</addtitle><date>1988-09-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1218</spage><epage>1219</epage><pages>1218-1219</pages><issn>0090-0036</issn><eissn>1541-0048</eissn><coden>AJPEAG</coden><abstract>The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 requires employers to maintain records of workplace injuries and illnesses. To assess compliance with the law, data from the National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) were examined. Of the 4,185 companies with 11 or more employees, 75 per cent maintained OSHA Form 200 designed for recording illnesses and injuries. The number of employees and the presence of a union were positive determinants in the record maintenance. Of companies with 500 or more employees, 95 per cent kept records compared with 60 per cent of companies with between 11 and 99 employees.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Am Public Health Assoc</pub><pmid>3407825</pmid><doi>10.2105/AJPH.78.9.1218</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0090-0036
ispartof	American journal of public health (1971), 1988-09, Vol.78 (9), p.1218-1219
issn	0090-0036 1541-0048
language	eng
recordid	cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1349399
source	EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; NCBI_PubMed Central（免费）; American Public Health Association; PAIS Index
subjects	Accidents, Occupational Applied sciences Documentation Employees Exact sciences and technology Federal regulation Forms and Records Control Humans Occupational Diseases - epidemiology Occupational health & safety Other techniques and industries Public health Records - standards Records management Regulation Statistics United States United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology
title	Compliance with OSHA record-keeping requirements
url	http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T03%3A12%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Compliance%20with%20OSHA%20record-keeping%20requirements&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20public%20health%20(1971)&rft.au=Seligman,%20P%20J&rft.date=1988-09-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1218&rft.epage=1219&rft.pages=1218-1219&rft.issn=0090-0036&rft.eissn=1541-0048&rft.coden=AJPEAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.2105/AJPH.78.9.1218&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1298328471%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-33f4da720785aa403787e303bdff2ba68c87efcc646933a33b6dc82d874abb423%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1298328471&rft_id=info:pmid/3407825&rfr_iscdi=true