ON THE ORIGINS OF NAMING AND OTHER SYMBOLIC BEHAVIOR

• Published in: Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1996-01, Vol.65 (1), p.185-241
• Main Authors: Horne, Pauline J., Lowe, C. Fergus
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Behavior; children; consciousness; language; listener behavior; match to sample; Names; Naming; rule governance; Social research; Special; speech for self; stimulus equivalence; symbolic behavior; verbal behavior; Verbal Stimuli
• ISSN: 0022-5002; 1938-3711
• DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-185

We identify naming as the basic unit of verbal behavior, describe the conditions under which it is learned, and outline its crucial role in the development of stimulus classes and, hence, of symbolic behavior. Drawing upon B. F. Skinner's functional analysis and the theoretical work of G. H. Mead and L. S. Vygotsky, we chart how a child, through learning listener behavior and then echoic responding, learns bidirectional relations between classes of objects or events and his or her own speaker‐listener behavior, thus acquiring naming—a higher order behavioral relation. Once established, the bidirectionality incorporated in naming extends across behavior classes such as those identified by Skinner as the mand, tact, and intraverbal so that each becomes a variant of the name relation. We indicate how our account informs the specification of rule‐governed behavior and provides the basis for an experimental analysis of symbolic behavior. Furthermore, because naming is both evoked by, and itself evokes, classes of events it brings about new or emergent behavior such as that reported in studies of stimulus equivalence. This account is supported by data from a wide range of match‐to‐sample studies that also provide evidence that stimulus equivalence in humans is not a unitary phenomenon but the outcome of a number of different types of naming behavior.