Structural stabilization of GTP-binding domains in circularly permuted GTPases: Implications for RNA binding

• Published in: Nucleic acids research 2006-01, Vol.34 (8), p.2196-2205
• Main Authors: Anand, Baskaran, Verma, Sunil Kumar, Prakash, Balaji
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Amino Acid Sequence; Amino Acids - chemistry; Bacterial Proteins - chemistry; Bacterial Proteins - classification; Evolution, Molecular; GTP-Binding Proteins - chemistry; GTP-Binding Proteins - classification; Humans; Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions; Models, Molecular; Molecular Sequence Data; Phylogeny; Protein Structure, Tertiary; ras Proteins - chemistry; ras Proteins - classification; RNA-Binding Proteins - chemistry; RNA-Binding Proteins - classification; Sequence Analysis, Protein
• ISSN: 0305-1048; 1362-4962
• DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkl178

GTP hydrolysis by GTPases requires crucial residues embedded in a conserved G-domain as sequence motifs G1–G5. However, in some of the recently identified GTPases, the motif order is circularly permuted. All possible circular permutations were identified after artificially permuting the classical GTPases and subjecting them to profile Hidden Markov Model searches. This revealed G4–G5–G1–G2–G3 as the only possible circular permutation that can exist in nature. It was also possible to recognize a structural rationale for the absence of other permutations, which either destabilize the invariant GTPase fold or disrupt regions that provide critical residues for GTP binding and hydrolysis, such as Switch-I and Switch-II. The circular permutation relocates Switch-II to the C-terminus and leaves it unfastened, thus affecting GTP binding and hydrolysis. Stabilizing this region would require the presence of an additional domain following Switch-II. Circularly permuted GTPases (cpGTPases) conform to such a requirement and always possess an ‘anchoring’ C-terminal domain. There are four sub-families of cpGTPases, of which three possess an additional domain N-terminal to the G-domain. The biochemical function of these domains, based on available experimental reports and domain recognition analysis carried out here, are suggestive of RNA binding. The features that dictate RNA binding are unique to each subfamily. It is possible that RNA-binding modulates GTP binding or vice versa. In addition, phylogenetic analysis indicates a closer evolutionary relationship between cpGTPases and a set of universally conserved bacterial GTPases that bind the ribosome. It appears that cpGTPases are RNA-binding proteins possessing a means to relate GTP binding to RNA binding.