Loading…
Chrysotile in Water
The problems of quantitating chrysotile in water by fiber count techniques are reviewed briefly and the use of mass quantitation is suggested as a preferable measure. Chrysotile fiber has been found in almost every sample of natural water examined, but generally transmission electron miscroscopy (TE...
Saved in:
Published in: | Environmental health perspectives 1974-12, Vol.9, p.161-163 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3481-4df3f767d4e156a7c353c9cb117a152889e61e3470927c237748da1cba3b7ca03 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 163 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 161 |
container_title | Environmental health perspectives |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Speil, Sidney |
description | The problems of quantitating chrysotile in water by fiber count techniques are reviewed briefly and the use of mass quantitation is suggested as a preferable measure. Chrysotile fiber has been found in almost every sample of natural water examined, but generally transmission electron miscroscopy (TEM) is required because of the small diameters involved. The extreme extrapolation required in mathematically converting a few fibers or fiber fragments under the TEM to the fiber content of a liquid sample casts considerable doubt on the validity of numbers used to compare chrysotile contents of different liquids. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1289/ehp.749161 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1475396</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3428274</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3428274</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3481-4df3f767d4e156a7c353c9cb117a152889e61e3470927c237748da1cba3b7ca03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM9LwzAYhoMoc04vehZ2EA9CZ74kzZdcBBn-goEXxWNI09R1dO1MOmH_vR0dY56-w_vwvB8vIZdAJ8CUvvfz1QSFBglHZAhpyhKtmTgmQ0o1JBJlekrOYlxQSkFJOSADIZBqTofkajoPm9i0ZeXHZT3-sq0P5-SksFX0F7s7Ip_PTx_T12T2_vI2fZwljgsFicgLXqDEXHhIpUXHU-60ywDQQsqU0l6C59smho5xRKFyCy6zPENnKR-Rh967WmdLnztft8FWZhXKpQ0b09jS_E_qcm6-m18DAlOuZSe43QlC87P2sTXLMjpfVbb2zToaQM0UAu_Aux50oYkx-GJfAtRsJzTdhKafsIOvD9_ao7vNuvymzxexbcKhiXGKhgumGAr-B3ezdjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17928713</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chrysotile in Water</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Speil, Sidney</creator><creatorcontrib>Speil, Sidney</creatorcontrib><description>The problems of quantitating chrysotile in water by fiber count techniques are reviewed briefly and the use of mass quantitation is suggested as a preferable measure. Chrysotile fiber has been found in almost every sample of natural water examined, but generally transmission electron miscroscopy (TEM) is required because of the small diameters involved. The extreme extrapolation required in mathematically converting a few fibers or fiber fragments under the TEM to the fiber content of a liquid sample casts considerable doubt on the validity of numbers used to compare chrysotile contents of different liquids.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-6765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-9924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1289/ehp.749161</identifier><identifier>PMID: 4470930</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. National Institutes of Health. Department of Health, Education and Welfare</publisher><subject>Amphiboles ; Asbestos - analysis ; Average linear density ; Biological Effects of Ingested Asbestos: Proceedings of a Joint NIEHS-EPA Conference Durham, North Carolina November 8-20, 1973 ; Freshwater ; Microscopy, Electron ; Potable water ; River water ; Solar fibrils ; Water Pollution, Chemical - analysis ; Water samples ; Water Supply - analysis</subject><ispartof>Environmental health perspectives, 1974-12, Vol.9, p.161-163</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3481-4df3f767d4e156a7c353c9cb117a152889e61e3470927c237748da1cba3b7ca03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3428274$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3428274$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768,58213,58446</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4470930$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Speil, Sidney</creatorcontrib><title>Chrysotile in Water</title><title>Environmental health perspectives</title><addtitle>Environ Health Perspect</addtitle><description>The problems of quantitating chrysotile in water by fiber count techniques are reviewed briefly and the use of mass quantitation is suggested as a preferable measure. Chrysotile fiber has been found in almost every sample of natural water examined, but generally transmission electron miscroscopy (TEM) is required because of the small diameters involved. The extreme extrapolation required in mathematically converting a few fibers or fiber fragments under the TEM to the fiber content of a liquid sample casts considerable doubt on the validity of numbers used to compare chrysotile contents of different liquids.</description><subject>Amphiboles</subject><subject>Asbestos - analysis</subject><subject>Average linear density</subject><subject>Biological Effects of Ingested Asbestos: Proceedings of a Joint NIEHS-EPA Conference Durham, North Carolina November 8-20, 1973</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron</subject><subject>Potable water</subject><subject>River water</subject><subject>Solar fibrils</subject><subject>Water Pollution, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water samples</subject><subject>Water Supply - analysis</subject><issn>0091-6765</issn><issn>1552-9924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1974</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkM9LwzAYhoMoc04vehZ2EA9CZ74kzZdcBBn-goEXxWNI09R1dO1MOmH_vR0dY56-w_vwvB8vIZdAJ8CUvvfz1QSFBglHZAhpyhKtmTgmQ0o1JBJlekrOYlxQSkFJOSADIZBqTofkajoPm9i0ZeXHZT3-sq0P5-SksFX0F7s7Ip_PTx_T12T2_vI2fZwljgsFicgLXqDEXHhIpUXHU-60ywDQQsqU0l6C59smho5xRKFyCy6zPENnKR-Rh967WmdLnztft8FWZhXKpQ0b09jS_E_qcm6-m18DAlOuZSe43QlC87P2sTXLMjpfVbb2zToaQM0UAu_Aux50oYkx-GJfAtRsJzTdhKafsIOvD9_ao7vNuvymzxexbcKhiXGKhgumGAr-B3ezdjA</recordid><startdate>19741201</startdate><enddate>19741201</enddate><creator>Speil, Sidney</creator><general>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. National Institutes of Health. Department of Health, Education and Welfare</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19741201</creationdate><title>Chrysotile in Water</title><author>Speil, Sidney</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3481-4df3f767d4e156a7c353c9cb117a152889e61e3470927c237748da1cba3b7ca03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1974</creationdate><topic>Amphiboles</topic><topic>Asbestos - analysis</topic><topic>Average linear density</topic><topic>Biological Effects of Ingested Asbestos: Proceedings of a Joint NIEHS-EPA Conference Durham, North Carolina November 8-20, 1973</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron</topic><topic>Potable water</topic><topic>River water</topic><topic>Solar fibrils</topic><topic>Water Pollution, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water samples</topic><topic>Water Supply - analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Speil, Sidney</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Environmental health perspectives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Speil, Sidney</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chrysotile in Water</atitle><jtitle>Environmental health perspectives</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Health Perspect</addtitle><date>1974-12-01</date><risdate>1974</risdate><volume>9</volume><spage>161</spage><epage>163</epage><pages>161-163</pages><issn>0091-6765</issn><eissn>1552-9924</eissn><abstract>The problems of quantitating chrysotile in water by fiber count techniques are reviewed briefly and the use of mass quantitation is suggested as a preferable measure. Chrysotile fiber has been found in almost every sample of natural water examined, but generally transmission electron miscroscopy (TEM) is required because of the small diameters involved. The extreme extrapolation required in mathematically converting a few fibers or fiber fragments under the TEM to the fiber content of a liquid sample casts considerable doubt on the validity of numbers used to compare chrysotile contents of different liquids.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. National Institutes of Health. Department of Health, Education and Welfare</pub><pmid>4470930</pmid><doi>10.1289/ehp.749161</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0091-6765 |
ispartof | Environmental health perspectives, 1974-12, Vol.9, p.161-163 |
issn | 0091-6765 1552-9924 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1475396 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Amphiboles Asbestos - analysis Average linear density Biological Effects of Ingested Asbestos: Proceedings of a Joint NIEHS-EPA Conference Durham, North Carolina November 8-20, 1973 Freshwater Microscopy, Electron Potable water River water Solar fibrils Water Pollution, Chemical - analysis Water samples Water Supply - analysis |
title | Chrysotile in Water |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T02%3A45%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chrysotile%20in%20Water&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20health%20perspectives&rft.au=Speil,%20Sidney&rft.date=1974-12-01&rft.volume=9&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=163&rft.pages=161-163&rft.issn=0091-6765&rft.eissn=1552-9924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1289/ehp.749161&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E3428274%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3481-4df3f767d4e156a7c353c9cb117a152889e61e3470927c237748da1cba3b7ca03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17928713&rft_id=info:pmid/4470930&rft_jstor_id=3428274&rfr_iscdi=true |