Loading…

POLIOMYELITIS AND PARENTERAL INJECTIONS—A Review of Recent Literature

Data presented in the literature as to the relationship of poliomyelitis and recent prior injections include several aspects. the coincidence of paralysis in the same site as a recent injection has been considered the most definitive evidence. The fact of an inordinately large number of cases of par...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:California Medicine 1952-07, Vol.77 (1), p.22-28
Main Author: DRAKE, R M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 28
container_issue 1
container_start_page 22
container_title California Medicine
container_volume 77
creator DRAKE, R M
description Data presented in the literature as to the relationship of poliomyelitis and recent prior injections include several aspects. the coincidence of paralysis in the same site as a recent injection has been considered the most definitive evidence. The fact of an inordinately large number of cases of paralysis of an arm where a recent previous antigen injection was recorded offered less specific corroboration. The larger number of cases among persons who had had an injection in the month preceding onset than among persons with injections in more distant months was noted. This observation was supported when similar information was obtained in a comparison of injection histories for persons who had the disease with the histories of persons who did not have it. The interval between injection and onset among persons who had the disease within a month of injection suggested something other than chance relationship. There is limited information indicating increased severity of paralysis in the injected limb. Evidence is divided on whether or not there is more paralytic disease among patients with recent injections. Similarly, the evidence is no more than suggestive with regard to increased severity of spinal paralytic disease. The mechanism or nature of such a phenomenon is unexplained. However, as Anderson and Skaar said, “considerable attention must be attached to the fact of uniformity of results in a series of independent observations even though each may be small.”
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1521636</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3993588321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i245t-bd6e87978239a57fdf113c18b8bce9c90d4e07653d03de3328799d3c730cbe63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkN1Kw0AQhYMotlZfQQKCd4H9SbK7N0KIaY3EpKRB8GrJz0ZT06Zukqp3PoRP6JO4pbWoVzNwvjlzZg60IcIUGIyZ7FAbAgCoAZFtDrSTtp0DYBKL0mNtABEjlFI81CbTKPCjuwcv8BN_pjvhtT51Yi9MvNgJdD-89dzEj8LZ18eno8diXYlXvSlVl4tlpwdVJ2Ta9VKcakdlWrfibFdHWjL2EvfGCKKJ7zqBUSHT6oyssAUlajnCLLVIWZQQ4hzSjGa5YDkDhSkAsS1cAFwIjJGCWYFzgkGeCRuPtKut7arPFqLYhJBpzVeyWqTynTdpxf8qy-qJPzZrDi0EbbwxuNwZyOalF23HF1Wbi7pOl6LpW04swDCBTIEX_8B508uluo1DoiiAgE0Udf47zz7Iz4MVYGyBqu3E215P5TNX48Ti4b3LbRRYYBwTjvE3YeWEbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1775002067</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>POLIOMYELITIS AND PARENTERAL INJECTIONS—A Review of Recent Literature</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>DRAKE, R M</creator><creatorcontrib>DRAKE, R M</creatorcontrib><description>Data presented in the literature as to the relationship of poliomyelitis and recent prior injections include several aspects. the coincidence of paralysis in the same site as a recent injection has been considered the most definitive evidence. The fact of an inordinately large number of cases of paralysis of an arm where a recent previous antigen injection was recorded offered less specific corroboration. The larger number of cases among persons who had had an injection in the month preceding onset than among persons with injections in more distant months was noted. This observation was supported when similar information was obtained in a comparison of injection histories for persons who had the disease with the histories of persons who did not have it. The interval between injection and onset among persons who had the disease within a month of injection suggested something other than chance relationship. There is limited information indicating increased severity of paralysis in the injected limb. Evidence is divided on whether or not there is more paralytic disease among patients with recent injections. Similarly, the evidence is no more than suggestive with regard to increased severity of spinal paralytic disease. The mechanism or nature of such a phenomenon is unexplained. However, as Anderson and Skaar said, “considerable attention must be attached to the fact of uniformity of results in a series of independent observations even though each may be small.”</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-1264</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2380-9949</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12978883</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Humans ; Infusions, Parenteral ; Injections ; Old Medline ; Paralysis ; Poliomyelitis - etiology ; Symposium on Poliomyelitis</subject><ispartof>California Medicine, 1952-07, Vol.77 (1), p.22-28</ispartof><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group LTD Jul 1952</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1521636/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1521636/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,309,310,314,723,776,780,785,786,881,23910,23911,25119,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12978883$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DRAKE, R M</creatorcontrib><title>POLIOMYELITIS AND PARENTERAL INJECTIONS—A Review of Recent Literature</title><title>California Medicine</title><addtitle>Calif Med</addtitle><description>Data presented in the literature as to the relationship of poliomyelitis and recent prior injections include several aspects. the coincidence of paralysis in the same site as a recent injection has been considered the most definitive evidence. The fact of an inordinately large number of cases of paralysis of an arm where a recent previous antigen injection was recorded offered less specific corroboration. The larger number of cases among persons who had had an injection in the month preceding onset than among persons with injections in more distant months was noted. This observation was supported when similar information was obtained in a comparison of injection histories for persons who had the disease with the histories of persons who did not have it. The interval between injection and onset among persons who had the disease within a month of injection suggested something other than chance relationship. There is limited information indicating increased severity of paralysis in the injected limb. Evidence is divided on whether or not there is more paralytic disease among patients with recent injections. Similarly, the evidence is no more than suggestive with regard to increased severity of spinal paralytic disease. The mechanism or nature of such a phenomenon is unexplained. However, as Anderson and Skaar said, “considerable attention must be attached to the fact of uniformity of results in a series of independent observations even though each may be small.”</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infusions, Parenteral</subject><subject>Injections</subject><subject>Old Medline</subject><subject>Paralysis</subject><subject>Poliomyelitis - etiology</subject><subject>Symposium on Poliomyelitis</subject><issn>0008-1264</issn><issn>2380-9949</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1952</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkN1Kw0AQhYMotlZfQQKCd4H9SbK7N0KIaY3EpKRB8GrJz0ZT06Zukqp3PoRP6JO4pbWoVzNwvjlzZg60IcIUGIyZ7FAbAgCoAZFtDrSTtp0DYBKL0mNtABEjlFI81CbTKPCjuwcv8BN_pjvhtT51Yi9MvNgJdD-89dzEj8LZ18eno8diXYlXvSlVl4tlpwdVJ2Ta9VKcakdlWrfibFdHWjL2EvfGCKKJ7zqBUSHT6oyssAUlajnCLLVIWZQQ4hzSjGa5YDkDhSkAsS1cAFwIjJGCWYFzgkGeCRuPtKut7arPFqLYhJBpzVeyWqTynTdpxf8qy-qJPzZrDi0EbbwxuNwZyOalF23HF1Wbi7pOl6LpW04swDCBTIEX_8B508uluo1DoiiAgE0Udf47zz7Iz4MVYGyBqu3E215P5TNX48Ti4b3LbRRYYBwTjvE3YeWEbQ</recordid><startdate>195207</startdate><enddate>195207</enddate><creator>DRAKE, R M</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>195207</creationdate><title>POLIOMYELITIS AND PARENTERAL INJECTIONS—A Review of Recent Literature</title><author>DRAKE, R M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i245t-bd6e87978239a57fdf113c18b8bce9c90d4e07653d03de3328799d3c730cbe63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1952</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infusions, Parenteral</topic><topic>Injections</topic><topic>Old Medline</topic><topic>Paralysis</topic><topic>Poliomyelitis - etiology</topic><topic>Symposium on Poliomyelitis</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DRAKE, R M</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>California Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DRAKE, R M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>POLIOMYELITIS AND PARENTERAL INJECTIONS—A Review of Recent Literature</atitle><jtitle>California Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Calif Med</addtitle><date>1952-07</date><risdate>1952</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>22</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>22-28</pages><issn>0008-1264</issn><eissn>2380-9949</eissn><abstract>Data presented in the literature as to the relationship of poliomyelitis and recent prior injections include several aspects. the coincidence of paralysis in the same site as a recent injection has been considered the most definitive evidence. The fact of an inordinately large number of cases of paralysis of an arm where a recent previous antigen injection was recorded offered less specific corroboration. The larger number of cases among persons who had had an injection in the month preceding onset than among persons with injections in more distant months was noted. This observation was supported when similar information was obtained in a comparison of injection histories for persons who had the disease with the histories of persons who did not have it. The interval between injection and onset among persons who had the disease within a month of injection suggested something other than chance relationship. There is limited information indicating increased severity of paralysis in the injected limb. Evidence is divided on whether or not there is more paralytic disease among patients with recent injections. Similarly, the evidence is no more than suggestive with regard to increased severity of spinal paralytic disease. The mechanism or nature of such a phenomenon is unexplained. However, as Anderson and Skaar said, “considerable attention must be attached to the fact of uniformity of results in a series of independent observations even though each may be small.”</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>12978883</pmid><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-1264
ispartof California Medicine, 1952-07, Vol.77 (1), p.22-28
issn 0008-1264
2380-9949
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1521636
source PubMed Central
subjects Humans
Infusions, Parenteral
Injections
Old Medline
Paralysis
Poliomyelitis - etiology
Symposium on Poliomyelitis
title POLIOMYELITIS AND PARENTERAL INJECTIONS—A Review of Recent Literature
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T06%3A24%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=POLIOMYELITIS%20AND%20PARENTERAL%20INJECTIONS%E2%80%94A%20Review%20of%20Recent%20Literature&rft.jtitle=California%20Medicine&rft.au=DRAKE,%20R%20M&rft.date=1952-07&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=22&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=22-28&rft.issn=0008-1264&rft.eissn=2380-9949&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3993588321%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i245t-bd6e87978239a57fdf113c18b8bce9c90d4e07653d03de3328799d3c730cbe63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1775002067&rft_id=info:pmid/12978883&rfr_iscdi=true