Common fragile sites are conserved features of human and mouse chromosomes and relate to large active genes

• Published in: Genome Research 2006-10, Vol.16 (10), p.1222-1230
• Main Authors: Helmrich, Anne, Stout-Weider, Karen, Hermann, Klaus, Schrock, Evelin, Heiden, Thomas
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Chromosome Fragile Sites - genetics; Chromosome Mapping; Chromosomes, Artificial, Bacterial; Computational Biology; Conserved Sequence - genetics; DNA - chemistry; Gene Expression Profiling; Humans; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; Letter; Mice - genetics; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Species Specificity
• ISSN: 1088-9051; 1549-5469; 1549-5477
• DOI: 10.1101/gr.5335506

Common fragile sites (CFSs) are seen as chromosomal gaps and breaks brought about by inhibition of replication, and it is thought that they cluster with tumor breakpoints. This study presents a comprehensive analysis using conventional and molecular cytogenetic mapping of CFSs and their expression frequencies in two mouse strains, BALB/c and C57BL/6, and in human probands. Here we show that induced mouse CFSs relate to sites of spontaneous gaps and breaks and that CFS expression levels in chromosome bands are conserved between the two mouse strains and between syntenic mouse and human DNA segments. Furthermore, four additional mouse CFSs were found to be homologous to human CFSs on the molecular cytogenetic level (Fra2D-FRA2G, Fra4C2-FRA9E, Fra6A3.1-FRA7G, and Fra6B1-FRA7H), increasing the number of such CFSs already described in the literature to eight. Contrary to previous reports, DNA helix flexibility is not increased in the 15 human and eight mouse CFSs molecularly defined so far, compared to large nonfragile control regions. Our findings suggest that the mechanisms that provoke instability at CFSs are evolutionarily conserved. The role that large transcriptionally active genes may play in CFS expression is discussed.