Loading…

IUD-associated hospitalization in less developed countries

Data on 11,977 insertions of an intrauterine device (IUD) from 25 collaborating centers in 16 less developed countries (LDCs) were investigated for IUD-associated hospitalizations. These centers maintained regular follow-up and reported at least one hospitalization among their IUD cases. The Lippes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of public health (1971) 1984-04, Vol.74 (4), p.353-357
Main Authors: Chi, I C, Laufe, L, Rogers, S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-5ce6d6d6ee517fb4cc732e48e6c969bf49e013557012cb277912a1d0b6e11f533
container_end_page 357
container_issue 4
container_start_page 353
container_title American journal of public health (1971)
container_volume 74
creator Chi, I C
Laufe, L
Rogers, S
description Data on 11,977 insertions of an intrauterine device (IUD) from 25 collaborating centers in 16 less developed countries (LDCs) were investigated for IUD-associated hospitalizations. These centers maintained regular follow-up and reported at least one hospitalization among their IUD cases. The Lippes Loop, Copper T, Delta Loop, and Delta T were the most commonly used devices, and three-fourths of all devices were inserted in postpartum women. Fifty-five of the 128 reported subsequent hospitalizations were associated with IUD use. Main indications for IUD-associated hospitalizations were pelvic infection, bleeding/pain, and method failure. Statistically significant differences were not detected in the three-month gross cumulative rates for hospitalizations due to IUD complications by age (less than 30 vs 30+), parity (0-1 vs 2+), or device type (Lippes Loop and Copper T vs Delta devices vs others). Three types of IUD-associated hospitalization rates were calculated, each involving a margin of error: 1) a Pearl rate of 8.0 per 1,000 woman-years of IUD use; 2) a one-year life table rate of 6.3 per 1,000 insertions; and 3) crude rates ranging from 3.2 to 4.6 per 1,000 cases.
doi_str_mv 10.2105/AJPH.74.4.353
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1651487</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18563874</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-5ce6d6d6ee517fb4cc732e48e6c969bf49e013557012cb277912a1d0b6e11f533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1rFTEUxYMo9VlduhQeKO7mmTv5mrgQSrW2UtCFXYdM5k4nj7zJmMxU9K83bR-P6kaySOD8ODfnHkJeAt3UQMW7ky_fzjeKb_iGCfaIrEBwqCjlzWOyolTT8mbyKXmW85ZSAC3giBxJRRlItiLvL64-Vjbn6LydsVsPMU9-tsH_trOP49qP64A5rzu8wRCnQri4jHPymJ-TJ70NGV_s72Nydfbp--l5dfn188XpyWXluFBzJRzKrhxEAapvuXOK1cgblE5L3fZcIwUmhKJQu7ZWSkNtoaOtRIBeMHZMPtz7Tku7w85hGW-DmZLf2fTLROvN38roB3MdbwxIAbxRxeDt3iDFHwvm2ex8dhiCHTEu2TRUa92U7f0PhEZI1ihewNf_gNu4pLFswUBdrLhSTVOo6p5yKeacsD_8Gai57c7cdmcUN9ywu6CvHgY90Puyiv5mr9vsbOiTHZ3PB0wDrXn9IO7gr4efPqHJOxtCMQVjt9NwmPcHcKquJg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1298347788</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>IUD-associated hospitalization in less developed countries</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>American Public Health Association</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Chi, I C ; Laufe, L ; Rogers, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Chi, I C ; Laufe, L ; Rogers, S</creatorcontrib><description>Data on 11,977 insertions of an intrauterine device (IUD) from 25 collaborating centers in 16 less developed countries (LDCs) were investigated for IUD-associated hospitalizations. These centers maintained regular follow-up and reported at least one hospitalization among their IUD cases. The Lippes Loop, Copper T, Delta Loop, and Delta T were the most commonly used devices, and three-fourths of all devices were inserted in postpartum women. Fifty-five of the 128 reported subsequent hospitalizations were associated with IUD use. Main indications for IUD-associated hospitalizations were pelvic infection, bleeding/pain, and method failure. Statistically significant differences were not detected in the three-month gross cumulative rates for hospitalizations due to IUD complications by age (less than 30 vs 30+), parity (0-1 vs 2+), or device type (Lippes Loop and Copper T vs Delta devices vs others). Three types of IUD-associated hospitalization rates were calculated, each involving a margin of error: 1) a Pearl rate of 8.0 per 1,000 woman-years of IUD use; 2) a one-year life table rate of 6.3 per 1,000 insertions; and 3) crude rates ranging from 3.2 to 4.6 per 1,000 cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-0036</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0048</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.74.4.353</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6703163</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJPEAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Am Public Health Assoc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Developing Countries ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Hemorrhage - etiology ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Intrauterine Devices - adverse effects ; Medical sciences ; Other methods of contraception. Sterilization ; Parity ; Pelvic Inflammatory Disease - etiology</subject><ispartof>American journal of public health (1971), 1984-04, Vol.74 (4), p.353-357</ispartof><rights>1985 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-5ce6d6d6ee517fb4cc732e48e6c969bf49e013557012cb277912a1d0b6e11f533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1651487/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1651487/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3981,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=9102427$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6703163$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chi, I C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laufe, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, S</creatorcontrib><title>IUD-associated hospitalization in less developed countries</title><title>American journal of public health (1971)</title><addtitle>Am J Public Health</addtitle><description>Data on 11,977 insertions of an intrauterine device (IUD) from 25 collaborating centers in 16 less developed countries (LDCs) were investigated for IUD-associated hospitalizations. These centers maintained regular follow-up and reported at least one hospitalization among their IUD cases. The Lippes Loop, Copper T, Delta Loop, and Delta T were the most commonly used devices, and three-fourths of all devices were inserted in postpartum women. Fifty-five of the 128 reported subsequent hospitalizations were associated with IUD use. Main indications for IUD-associated hospitalizations were pelvic infection, bleeding/pain, and method failure. Statistically significant differences were not detected in the three-month gross cumulative rates for hospitalizations due to IUD complications by age (less than 30 vs 30+), parity (0-1 vs 2+), or device type (Lippes Loop and Copper T vs Delta devices vs others). Three types of IUD-associated hospitalization rates were calculated, each involving a margin of error: 1) a Pearl rate of 8.0 per 1,000 woman-years of IUD use; 2) a one-year life table rate of 6.3 per 1,000 insertions; and 3) crude rates ranging from 3.2 to 4.6 per 1,000 cases.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Hemorrhage - etiology</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intrauterine Devices - adverse effects</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Other methods of contraception. Sterilization</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Pelvic Inflammatory Disease - etiology</subject><issn>0090-0036</issn><issn>1541-0048</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1rFTEUxYMo9VlduhQeKO7mmTv5mrgQSrW2UtCFXYdM5k4nj7zJmMxU9K83bR-P6kaySOD8ODfnHkJeAt3UQMW7ky_fzjeKb_iGCfaIrEBwqCjlzWOyolTT8mbyKXmW85ZSAC3giBxJRRlItiLvL64-Vjbn6LydsVsPMU9-tsH_trOP49qP64A5rzu8wRCnQri4jHPymJ-TJ70NGV_s72Nydfbp--l5dfn188XpyWXluFBzJRzKrhxEAapvuXOK1cgblE5L3fZcIwUmhKJQu7ZWSkNtoaOtRIBeMHZMPtz7Tku7w85hGW-DmZLf2fTLROvN38roB3MdbwxIAbxRxeDt3iDFHwvm2ex8dhiCHTEu2TRUa92U7f0PhEZI1ihewNf_gNu4pLFswUBdrLhSTVOo6p5yKeacsD_8Gai57c7cdmcUN9ywu6CvHgY90Puyiv5mr9vsbOiTHZ3PB0wDrXn9IO7gr4efPqHJOxtCMQVjt9NwmPcHcKquJg</recordid><startdate>19840401</startdate><enddate>19840401</enddate><creator>Chi, I C</creator><creator>Laufe, L</creator><creator>Rogers, S</creator><general>Am Public Health Assoc</general><general>American Public Health Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HDMVH</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19840401</creationdate><title>IUD-associated hospitalization in less developed countries</title><author>Chi, I C ; Laufe, L ; Rogers, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-5ce6d6d6ee517fb4cc732e48e6c969bf49e013557012cb277912a1d0b6e11f533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Hemorrhage - etiology</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intrauterine Devices - adverse effects</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Other methods of contraception. Sterilization</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Pelvic Inflammatory Disease - etiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chi, I C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laufe, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, S</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 15</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of public health (1971)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chi, I C</au><au>Laufe, L</au><au>Rogers, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>IUD-associated hospitalization in less developed countries</atitle><jtitle>American journal of public health (1971)</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Public Health</addtitle><date>1984-04-01</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>353</spage><epage>357</epage><pages>353-357</pages><issn>0090-0036</issn><eissn>1541-0048</eissn><coden>AJPEAG</coden><abstract>Data on 11,977 insertions of an intrauterine device (IUD) from 25 collaborating centers in 16 less developed countries (LDCs) were investigated for IUD-associated hospitalizations. These centers maintained regular follow-up and reported at least one hospitalization among their IUD cases. The Lippes Loop, Copper T, Delta Loop, and Delta T were the most commonly used devices, and three-fourths of all devices were inserted in postpartum women. Fifty-five of the 128 reported subsequent hospitalizations were associated with IUD use. Main indications for IUD-associated hospitalizations were pelvic infection, bleeding/pain, and method failure. Statistically significant differences were not detected in the three-month gross cumulative rates for hospitalizations due to IUD complications by age (less than 30 vs 30+), parity (0-1 vs 2+), or device type (Lippes Loop and Copper T vs Delta devices vs others). Three types of IUD-associated hospitalization rates were calculated, each involving a margin of error: 1) a Pearl rate of 8.0 per 1,000 woman-years of IUD use; 2) a one-year life table rate of 6.3 per 1,000 insertions; and 3) crude rates ranging from 3.2 to 4.6 per 1,000 cases.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Am Public Health Assoc</pub><pmid>6703163</pmid><doi>10.2105/AJPH.74.4.353</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-0036
ispartof American journal of public health (1971), 1984-04, Vol.74 (4), p.353-357
issn 0090-0036
1541-0048
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1651487
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; American Public Health Association; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Birth control
Developing Countries
Female
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Hemorrhage - etiology
Hospitalization
Humans
Intrauterine Devices - adverse effects
Medical sciences
Other methods of contraception. Sterilization
Parity
Pelvic Inflammatory Disease - etiology
title IUD-associated hospitalization in less developed countries
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T14%3A29%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=IUD-associated%20hospitalization%20in%20less%20developed%20countries&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20public%20health%20(1971)&rft.au=Chi,%20I%20C&rft.date=1984-04-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=353&rft.epage=357&rft.pages=353-357&rft.issn=0090-0036&rft.eissn=1541-0048&rft.coden=AJPEAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.2105/AJPH.74.4.353&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E18563874%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-5ce6d6d6ee517fb4cc732e48e6c969bf49e013557012cb277912a1d0b6e11f533%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1298347788&rft_id=info:pmid/6703163&rfr_iscdi=true