Loading…

Renal replacement treatment for diabetic patients in Newcastle upon Tyne and the Northern region, 1964-88

OBJECTIVES--To review the experience of renal replacement treatment in diabetic patients treated in Newcastle upon Tyne and the Northern region from 1964 to 1988, and to compare the morbidity and mortality of diabetic patients treated with dialysis or transplantation with those of matched controls o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMJ 1990-09, Vol.301 (6751), p.535-540
Main Authors: Catalano, C, Goodship, T H, Tapson, J S, Venning, M K, Taylor, R M, Proud, G, Tunbridge, W M, Elliot, R W, Ward, M K, Alberti, K G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-71f4421e6d576ab0b915030c31dc7e2545cfc0c0d7a2518bd1ab0dad9b435dfd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-71f4421e6d576ab0b915030c31dc7e2545cfc0c0d7a2518bd1ab0dad9b435dfd3
container_end_page 540
container_issue 6751
container_start_page 535
container_title BMJ
container_volume 301
creator Catalano, C
Goodship, T H
Tapson, J S
Venning, M K
Taylor, R M
Proud, G
Tunbridge, W M
Elliot, R W
Ward, M K
Alberti, K G
description OBJECTIVES--To review the experience of renal replacement treatment in diabetic patients treated in Newcastle upon Tyne and the Northern region from 1964 to 1988, and to compare the morbidity and mortality of diabetic patients treated with dialysis or transplantation with those of matched controls of non-diabetic patients. DESIGN--Retrospective study of clinical case notes. SETTING--Renal units of the Northern region, particularly that in Newcastle upon Tyne. PATIENTS--All 65 diabetic patients treated by renal replacement treatment in Newcastle upon Tyne from 1964 to 1987; 42 diabetic patients were matched with 42 non-diabetic patients according to age, sex, year of starting treatment, and type of treatment (dialysis or transplantation). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Sex, age, renal biopsy findings, blood pressure, history of diabetic treatment, and plasma creatinine concentration at the start of renal replacement treatment. History of renal replacement treatments, suitability for transplantation, history of transplantation, cumulative survival, and cause of death during follow up. Survival of technique, cumulative survival of the first peritoneal catheter and history of peritonitis in patients treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; source of graft, histocompatibility antigens, duration of associated stay in hospital, and graft survival in patients receiving renal or pancreatic transplant. RESULTS--1259 Patients with chronic renal failure were accepted for renal replacement treatment in Newcastle upon Tyne, of whom 65 (5%) had diabetes. The first was accepted in 1974, and between 1974 and 1980 another 15 were treated (mean age 42 years; 4% of new patients). From 1981 to 1987, 49 diabetic patients (mean age 44; 9% of new patients) were treated. Fifty patients (77%) had insulin dependent diabetes and the remaining 15 (23%) non-insulin dependent diabetes. On average, the patients were aged 25 (range 5-57) when diabetes was first diagnosed and 44 (range 24-70) at the start of renal replacement treatment. The mean age at the start of treatment was 40 for patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes and 58 for patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes. Transplantation was performed in 33 of the diabetic patients, whose mean age was lower than that of those who did not receive a transplant (41 v 48 respectively, p less than 0.05). Comparison between the 42 diabetic patients and matched controls showed that the overall survival at five years was 46% a
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmj.301.6751.535
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1663834</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>29708937</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>29708937</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-71f4421e6d576ab0b915030c31dc7e2545cfc0c0d7a2518bd1ab0dad9b435dfd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtvEzEUhUcIVKrSPRskSyA2MMF3_JwNEkQUkKogaGFreWxP6zCxg-0A_fc4TRQeG1a2fL57dK5P0zwEPAMg_MWwWs4IhhkXDGaMsDvNMVAuWyYJudsc4571rQQi7zenOS8xxh0RsufsqDnqOixox48b_8kFPaHk1pM2buVCQSU5XW5vY0zIej244g1a6-LrY0Y-oIX7YXQuk0ObdQzo8iY4pINF5dqhRUz1SKF6XvkYniPoOW2lfNDcG_WU3en-PGk-n725nL9rzz-8fT9_dd4OjNLSChgp7cBxywTXAx56YJhgQ8Aa4TpGmRkNNtgK3TGQg4UKWW37gRJmR0tOmpc73_VmWDlrauakJ7VOfqXTjYraq7-V4K_VVfyugHMiCa0GT_cGKX7buFzUymfjpkkHFzdZSYyBSd5V8PE_4DJuUv3OrEAITgkQ6CuFd5RJMefkxkMUwGrbo6o9qtqj2vaoao915NGfKxwG9q1V_cle19noaUw6GJ8PGBVA-9tF9jbLXGL67dILLHsiqt7udJ-L-3nQdfpaoxDB1OLLXH286MjZ68WFmlf-2Y7fBv7vEr8AGxLMGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1776431319</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Renal replacement treatment for diabetic patients in Newcastle upon Tyne and the Northern region, 1964-88</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>BMJ Journals</source><creator>Catalano, C ; Goodship, T H ; Tapson, J S ; Venning, M K ; Taylor, R M ; Proud, G ; Tunbridge, W M ; Elliot, R W ; Ward, M K ; Alberti, K G</creator><creatorcontrib>Catalano, C ; Goodship, T H ; Tapson, J S ; Venning, M K ; Taylor, R M ; Proud, G ; Tunbridge, W M ; Elliot, R W ; Ward, M K ; Alberti, K G</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES--To review the experience of renal replacement treatment in diabetic patients treated in Newcastle upon Tyne and the Northern region from 1964 to 1988, and to compare the morbidity and mortality of diabetic patients treated with dialysis or transplantation with those of matched controls of non-diabetic patients. DESIGN--Retrospective study of clinical case notes. SETTING--Renal units of the Northern region, particularly that in Newcastle upon Tyne. PATIENTS--All 65 diabetic patients treated by renal replacement treatment in Newcastle upon Tyne from 1964 to 1987; 42 diabetic patients were matched with 42 non-diabetic patients according to age, sex, year of starting treatment, and type of treatment (dialysis or transplantation). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Sex, age, renal biopsy findings, blood pressure, history of diabetic treatment, and plasma creatinine concentration at the start of renal replacement treatment. History of renal replacement treatments, suitability for transplantation, history of transplantation, cumulative survival, and cause of death during follow up. Survival of technique, cumulative survival of the first peritoneal catheter and history of peritonitis in patients treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; source of graft, histocompatibility antigens, duration of associated stay in hospital, and graft survival in patients receiving renal or pancreatic transplant. RESULTS--1259 Patients with chronic renal failure were accepted for renal replacement treatment in Newcastle upon Tyne, of whom 65 (5%) had diabetes. The first was accepted in 1974, and between 1974 and 1980 another 15 were treated (mean age 42 years; 4% of new patients). From 1981 to 1987, 49 diabetic patients (mean age 44; 9% of new patients) were treated. Fifty patients (77%) had insulin dependent diabetes and the remaining 15 (23%) non-insulin dependent diabetes. On average, the patients were aged 25 (range 5-57) when diabetes was first diagnosed and 44 (range 24-70) at the start of renal replacement treatment. The mean age at the start of treatment was 40 for patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes and 58 for patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes. Transplantation was performed in 33 of the diabetic patients, whose mean age was lower than that of those who did not receive a transplant (41 v 48 respectively, p less than 0.05). Comparison between the 42 diabetic patients and matched controls showed that the overall survival at five years was 46% and 77% respectively. The three year survival of the diabetic patients who did not receive a transplant was poor (41% v 79% respectively). Of patients transplanted, survival at five years was 73% in the diabetic patients and 90% in the controls. However, there was no significant difference in the five year graft survival (64% v 46% respectively). CONCLUSIONS--Diabetes adversely affects morbidity and mortality in patients having renal replacement treatment, but renal transplantation seems to be the best option for treating diabetic patients with end stage renal failure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8138</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8146</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.301.6751.535</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2207426</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis ; Diabetes ; Diabetes complications ; Diabetes mellitus ; Diabetes Mellitus - mortality ; Diabetic nephropathies ; Diabetic Neuropathies - mortality ; Diabetic Neuropathies - therapy ; Dialysis ; England - epidemiology ; Graft Survival ; Humans ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - mortality ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy ; Kidney Transplantation ; Kidneys ; Medical sciences ; Metabolic diseases ; Middle Aged ; Middles ; Pancreas Transplantation ; Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory ; Peritonitis ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Transplantation ; Type 1 diabetes mellitus</subject><ispartof>BMJ, 1990-09, Vol.301 (6751), p.535-540</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1990 British Medical Journal</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group LTD Sep 15, 1990</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-71f4421e6d576ab0b915030c31dc7e2545cfc0c0d7a2518bd1ab0dad9b435dfd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-71f4421e6d576ab0b915030c31dc7e2545cfc0c0d7a2518bd1ab0dad9b435dfd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/301/6751/535.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/301/6751/535.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>112,113,230,314,780,784,885,3194,27924,27925,58238,58471,77594,77595</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4714934$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2207426$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Catalano, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodship, T H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tapson, J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venning, M K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, R M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proud, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tunbridge, W M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliot, R W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, M K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alberti, K G</creatorcontrib><title>Renal replacement treatment for diabetic patients in Newcastle upon Tyne and the Northern region, 1964-88</title><title>BMJ</title><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVES--To review the experience of renal replacement treatment in diabetic patients treated in Newcastle upon Tyne and the Northern region from 1964 to 1988, and to compare the morbidity and mortality of diabetic patients treated with dialysis or transplantation with those of matched controls of non-diabetic patients. DESIGN--Retrospective study of clinical case notes. SETTING--Renal units of the Northern region, particularly that in Newcastle upon Tyne. PATIENTS--All 65 diabetic patients treated by renal replacement treatment in Newcastle upon Tyne from 1964 to 1987; 42 diabetic patients were matched with 42 non-diabetic patients according to age, sex, year of starting treatment, and type of treatment (dialysis or transplantation). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Sex, age, renal biopsy findings, blood pressure, history of diabetic treatment, and plasma creatinine concentration at the start of renal replacement treatment. History of renal replacement treatments, suitability for transplantation, history of transplantation, cumulative survival, and cause of death during follow up. Survival of technique, cumulative survival of the first peritoneal catheter and history of peritonitis in patients treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; source of graft, histocompatibility antigens, duration of associated stay in hospital, and graft survival in patients receiving renal or pancreatic transplant. RESULTS--1259 Patients with chronic renal failure were accepted for renal replacement treatment in Newcastle upon Tyne, of whom 65 (5%) had diabetes. The first was accepted in 1974, and between 1974 and 1980 another 15 were treated (mean age 42 years; 4% of new patients). From 1981 to 1987, 49 diabetic patients (mean age 44; 9% of new patients) were treated. Fifty patients (77%) had insulin dependent diabetes and the remaining 15 (23%) non-insulin dependent diabetes. On average, the patients were aged 25 (range 5-57) when diabetes was first diagnosed and 44 (range 24-70) at the start of renal replacement treatment. The mean age at the start of treatment was 40 for patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes and 58 for patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes. Transplantation was performed in 33 of the diabetic patients, whose mean age was lower than that of those who did not receive a transplant (41 v 48 respectively, p less than 0.05). Comparison between the 42 diabetic patients and matched controls showed that the overall survival at five years was 46% and 77% respectively. The three year survival of the diabetic patients who did not receive a transplant was poor (41% v 79% respectively). Of patients transplanted, survival at five years was 73% in the diabetic patients and 90% in the controls. However, there was no significant difference in the five year graft survival (64% v 46% respectively). CONCLUSIONS--Diabetes adversely affects morbidity and mortality in patients having renal replacement treatment, but renal transplantation seems to be the best option for treating diabetic patients with end stage renal failure.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes complications</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus - mortality</subject><subject>Diabetic nephropathies</subject><subject>Diabetic Neuropathies - mortality</subject><subject>Diabetic Neuropathies - therapy</subject><subject>Dialysis</subject><subject>England - epidemiology</subject><subject>Graft Survival</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - mortality</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation</subject><subject>Kidneys</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Metabolic diseases</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Middles</subject><subject>Pancreas Transplantation</subject><subject>Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory</subject><subject>Peritonitis</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><subject>Type 1 diabetes mellitus</subject><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>0959-8146</issn><issn>1468-5833</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtvEzEUhUcIVKrSPRskSyA2MMF3_JwNEkQUkKogaGFreWxP6zCxg-0A_fc4TRQeG1a2fL57dK5P0zwEPAMg_MWwWs4IhhkXDGaMsDvNMVAuWyYJudsc4571rQQi7zenOS8xxh0RsufsqDnqOixox48b_8kFPaHk1pM2buVCQSU5XW5vY0zIej244g1a6-LrY0Y-oIX7YXQuk0ObdQzo8iY4pINF5dqhRUz1SKF6XvkYniPoOW2lfNDcG_WU3en-PGk-n725nL9rzz-8fT9_dd4OjNLSChgp7cBxywTXAx56YJhgQ8Aa4TpGmRkNNtgK3TGQg4UKWW37gRJmR0tOmpc73_VmWDlrauakJ7VOfqXTjYraq7-V4K_VVfyugHMiCa0GT_cGKX7buFzUymfjpkkHFzdZSYyBSd5V8PE_4DJuUv3OrEAITgkQ6CuFd5RJMefkxkMUwGrbo6o9qtqj2vaoao915NGfKxwG9q1V_cle19noaUw6GJ8PGBVA-9tF9jbLXGL67dILLHsiqt7udJ-L-3nQdfpaoxDB1OLLXH286MjZ68WFmlf-2Y7fBv7vEr8AGxLMGg</recordid><startdate>19900915</startdate><enddate>19900915</enddate><creator>Catalano, C</creator><creator>Goodship, T H</creator><creator>Tapson, J S</creator><creator>Venning, M K</creator><creator>Taylor, R M</creator><creator>Proud, G</creator><creator>Tunbridge, W M</creator><creator>Elliot, R W</creator><creator>Ward, M K</creator><creator>Alberti, K G</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>British Medical Association</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900915</creationdate><title>Renal replacement treatment for diabetic patients in Newcastle upon Tyne and the Northern region, 1964-88</title><author>Catalano, C ; Goodship, T H ; Tapson, J S ; Venning, M K ; Taylor, R M ; Proud, G ; Tunbridge, W M ; Elliot, R W ; Ward, M K ; Alberti, K G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-71f4421e6d576ab0b915030c31dc7e2545cfc0c0d7a2518bd1ab0dad9b435dfd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes complications</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus - mortality</topic><topic>Diabetic nephropathies</topic><topic>Diabetic Neuropathies - mortality</topic><topic>Diabetic Neuropathies - therapy</topic><topic>Dialysis</topic><topic>England - epidemiology</topic><topic>Graft Survival</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - mortality</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation</topic><topic>Kidneys</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Metabolic diseases</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Middles</topic><topic>Pancreas Transplantation</topic><topic>Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory</topic><topic>Peritonitis</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><topic>Type 1 diabetes mellitus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Catalano, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodship, T H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tapson, J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venning, M K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, R M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proud, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tunbridge, W M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliot, R W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, M K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alberti, K G</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Catalano, C</au><au>Goodship, T H</au><au>Tapson, J S</au><au>Venning, M K</au><au>Taylor, R M</au><au>Proud, G</au><au>Tunbridge, W M</au><au>Elliot, R W</au><au>Ward, M K</au><au>Alberti, K G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Renal replacement treatment for diabetic patients in Newcastle upon Tyne and the Northern region, 1964-88</atitle><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><date>1990-09-15</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>301</volume><issue>6751</issue><spage>535</spage><epage>540</epage><pages>535-540</pages><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>0959-8146</issn><eissn>1468-5833</eissn><eissn>1756-1833</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVES--To review the experience of renal replacement treatment in diabetic patients treated in Newcastle upon Tyne and the Northern region from 1964 to 1988, and to compare the morbidity and mortality of diabetic patients treated with dialysis or transplantation with those of matched controls of non-diabetic patients. DESIGN--Retrospective study of clinical case notes. SETTING--Renal units of the Northern region, particularly that in Newcastle upon Tyne. PATIENTS--All 65 diabetic patients treated by renal replacement treatment in Newcastle upon Tyne from 1964 to 1987; 42 diabetic patients were matched with 42 non-diabetic patients according to age, sex, year of starting treatment, and type of treatment (dialysis or transplantation). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Sex, age, renal biopsy findings, blood pressure, history of diabetic treatment, and plasma creatinine concentration at the start of renal replacement treatment. History of renal replacement treatments, suitability for transplantation, history of transplantation, cumulative survival, and cause of death during follow up. Survival of technique, cumulative survival of the first peritoneal catheter and history of peritonitis in patients treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; source of graft, histocompatibility antigens, duration of associated stay in hospital, and graft survival in patients receiving renal or pancreatic transplant. RESULTS--1259 Patients with chronic renal failure were accepted for renal replacement treatment in Newcastle upon Tyne, of whom 65 (5%) had diabetes. The first was accepted in 1974, and between 1974 and 1980 another 15 were treated (mean age 42 years; 4% of new patients). From 1981 to 1987, 49 diabetic patients (mean age 44; 9% of new patients) were treated. Fifty patients (77%) had insulin dependent diabetes and the remaining 15 (23%) non-insulin dependent diabetes. On average, the patients were aged 25 (range 5-57) when diabetes was first diagnosed and 44 (range 24-70) at the start of renal replacement treatment. The mean age at the start of treatment was 40 for patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes and 58 for patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes. Transplantation was performed in 33 of the diabetic patients, whose mean age was lower than that of those who did not receive a transplant (41 v 48 respectively, p less than 0.05). Comparison between the 42 diabetic patients and matched controls showed that the overall survival at five years was 46% and 77% respectively. The three year survival of the diabetic patients who did not receive a transplant was poor (41% v 79% respectively). Of patients transplanted, survival at five years was 73% in the diabetic patients and 90% in the controls. However, there was no significant difference in the five year graft survival (64% v 46% respectively). CONCLUSIONS--Diabetes adversely affects morbidity and mortality in patients having renal replacement treatment, but renal transplantation seems to be the best option for treating diabetic patients with end stage renal failure.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><pmid>2207426</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmj.301.6751.535</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-8138
ispartof BMJ, 1990-09, Vol.301 (6751), p.535-540
issn 0959-8138
0959-8146
1468-5833
1756-1833
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1663834
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; BMJ Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Child
Child, Preschool
Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis
Diabetes
Diabetes complications
Diabetes mellitus
Diabetes Mellitus - mortality
Diabetic nephropathies
Diabetic Neuropathies - mortality
Diabetic Neuropathies - therapy
Dialysis
England - epidemiology
Graft Survival
Humans
Kidney Failure, Chronic - mortality
Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy
Kidney Transplantation
Kidneys
Medical sciences
Metabolic diseases
Middle Aged
Middles
Pancreas Transplantation
Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory
Peritonitis
Postoperative Complications
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Transplantation
Type 1 diabetes mellitus
title Renal replacement treatment for diabetic patients in Newcastle upon Tyne and the Northern region, 1964-88
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T14%3A43%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Renal%20replacement%20treatment%20for%20diabetic%20patients%20in%20Newcastle%20upon%20Tyne%20and%20the%20Northern%20region,%201964-88&rft.jtitle=BMJ&rft.au=Catalano,%20C&rft.date=1990-09-15&rft.volume=301&rft.issue=6751&rft.spage=535&rft.epage=540&rft.pages=535-540&rft.issn=0959-8138&rft.eissn=1468-5833&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.301.6751.535&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E29708937%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-71f4421e6d576ab0b915030c31dc7e2545cfc0c0d7a2518bd1ab0dad9b435dfd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1776431319&rft_id=info:pmid/2207426&rft_jstor_id=29708937&rfr_iscdi=true