Loading…
Renal replacement treatment for diabetic patients in Newcastle upon Tyne and the Northern region, 1964-88
OBJECTIVES--To review the experience of renal replacement treatment in diabetic patients treated in Newcastle upon Tyne and the Northern region from 1964 to 1988, and to compare the morbidity and mortality of diabetic patients treated with dialysis or transplantation with those of matched controls o...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMJ 1990-09, Vol.301 (6751), p.535-540 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-71f4421e6d576ab0b915030c31dc7e2545cfc0c0d7a2518bd1ab0dad9b435dfd3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-71f4421e6d576ab0b915030c31dc7e2545cfc0c0d7a2518bd1ab0dad9b435dfd3 |
container_end_page | 540 |
container_issue | 6751 |
container_start_page | 535 |
container_title | BMJ |
container_volume | 301 |
creator | Catalano, C Goodship, T H Tapson, J S Venning, M K Taylor, R M Proud, G Tunbridge, W M Elliot, R W Ward, M K Alberti, K G |
description | OBJECTIVES--To review the experience of renal replacement treatment in diabetic patients treated in Newcastle upon Tyne and the Northern region from 1964 to 1988, and to compare the morbidity and mortality of diabetic patients treated with dialysis or transplantation with those of matched controls of non-diabetic patients. DESIGN--Retrospective study of clinical case notes. SETTING--Renal units of the Northern region, particularly that in Newcastle upon Tyne. PATIENTS--All 65 diabetic patients treated by renal replacement treatment in Newcastle upon Tyne from 1964 to 1987; 42 diabetic patients were matched with 42 non-diabetic patients according to age, sex, year of starting treatment, and type of treatment (dialysis or transplantation). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Sex, age, renal biopsy findings, blood pressure, history of diabetic treatment, and plasma creatinine concentration at the start of renal replacement treatment. History of renal replacement treatments, suitability for transplantation, history of transplantation, cumulative survival, and cause of death during follow up. Survival of technique, cumulative survival of the first peritoneal catheter and history of peritonitis in patients treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; source of graft, histocompatibility antigens, duration of associated stay in hospital, and graft survival in patients receiving renal or pancreatic transplant. RESULTS--1259 Patients with chronic renal failure were accepted for renal replacement treatment in Newcastle upon Tyne, of whom 65 (5%) had diabetes. The first was accepted in 1974, and between 1974 and 1980 another 15 were treated (mean age 42 years; 4% of new patients). From 1981 to 1987, 49 diabetic patients (mean age 44; 9% of new patients) were treated. Fifty patients (77%) had insulin dependent diabetes and the remaining 15 (23%) non-insulin dependent diabetes. On average, the patients were aged 25 (range 5-57) when diabetes was first diagnosed and 44 (range 24-70) at the start of renal replacement treatment. The mean age at the start of treatment was 40 for patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes and 58 for patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes. Transplantation was performed in 33 of the diabetic patients, whose mean age was lower than that of those who did not receive a transplant (41 v 48 respectively, p less than 0.05). Comparison between the 42 diabetic patients and matched controls showed that the overall survival at five years was 46% a |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmj.301.6751.535 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1663834</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>29708937</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>29708937</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-71f4421e6d576ab0b915030c31dc7e2545cfc0c0d7a2518bd1ab0dad9b435dfd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtvEzEUhUcIVKrSPRskSyA2MMF3_JwNEkQUkKogaGFreWxP6zCxg-0A_fc4TRQeG1a2fL57dK5P0zwEPAMg_MWwWs4IhhkXDGaMsDvNMVAuWyYJudsc4571rQQi7zenOS8xxh0RsufsqDnqOixox48b_8kFPaHk1pM2buVCQSU5XW5vY0zIej244g1a6-LrY0Y-oIX7YXQuk0ObdQzo8iY4pINF5dqhRUz1SKF6XvkYniPoOW2lfNDcG_WU3en-PGk-n725nL9rzz-8fT9_dd4OjNLSChgp7cBxywTXAx56YJhgQ8Aa4TpGmRkNNtgK3TGQg4UKWW37gRJmR0tOmpc73_VmWDlrauakJ7VOfqXTjYraq7-V4K_VVfyugHMiCa0GT_cGKX7buFzUymfjpkkHFzdZSYyBSd5V8PE_4DJuUv3OrEAITgkQ6CuFd5RJMefkxkMUwGrbo6o9qtqj2vaoao915NGfKxwG9q1V_cle19noaUw6GJ8PGBVA-9tF9jbLXGL67dILLHsiqt7udJ-L-3nQdfpaoxDB1OLLXH286MjZ68WFmlf-2Y7fBv7vEr8AGxLMGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1776431319</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Renal replacement treatment for diabetic patients in Newcastle upon Tyne and the Northern region, 1964-88</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>BMJ Journals</source><creator>Catalano, C ; Goodship, T H ; Tapson, J S ; Venning, M K ; Taylor, R M ; Proud, G ; Tunbridge, W M ; Elliot, R W ; Ward, M K ; Alberti, K G</creator><creatorcontrib>Catalano, C ; Goodship, T H ; Tapson, J S ; Venning, M K ; Taylor, R M ; Proud, G ; Tunbridge, W M ; Elliot, R W ; Ward, M K ; Alberti, K G</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES--To review the experience of renal replacement treatment in diabetic patients treated in Newcastle upon Tyne and the Northern region from 1964 to 1988, and to compare the morbidity and mortality of diabetic patients treated with dialysis or transplantation with those of matched controls of non-diabetic patients. DESIGN--Retrospective study of clinical case notes. SETTING--Renal units of the Northern region, particularly that in Newcastle upon Tyne. PATIENTS--All 65 diabetic patients treated by renal replacement treatment in Newcastle upon Tyne from 1964 to 1987; 42 diabetic patients were matched with 42 non-diabetic patients according to age, sex, year of starting treatment, and type of treatment (dialysis or transplantation). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Sex, age, renal biopsy findings, blood pressure, history of diabetic treatment, and plasma creatinine concentration at the start of renal replacement treatment. History of renal replacement treatments, suitability for transplantation, history of transplantation, cumulative survival, and cause of death during follow up. Survival of technique, cumulative survival of the first peritoneal catheter and history of peritonitis in patients treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; source of graft, histocompatibility antigens, duration of associated stay in hospital, and graft survival in patients receiving renal or pancreatic transplant. RESULTS--1259 Patients with chronic renal failure were accepted for renal replacement treatment in Newcastle upon Tyne, of whom 65 (5%) had diabetes. The first was accepted in 1974, and between 1974 and 1980 another 15 were treated (mean age 42 years; 4% of new patients). From 1981 to 1987, 49 diabetic patients (mean age 44; 9% of new patients) were treated. Fifty patients (77%) had insulin dependent diabetes and the remaining 15 (23%) non-insulin dependent diabetes. On average, the patients were aged 25 (range 5-57) when diabetes was first diagnosed and 44 (range 24-70) at the start of renal replacement treatment. The mean age at the start of treatment was 40 for patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes and 58 for patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes. Transplantation was performed in 33 of the diabetic patients, whose mean age was lower than that of those who did not receive a transplant (41 v 48 respectively, p less than 0.05). Comparison between the 42 diabetic patients and matched controls showed that the overall survival at five years was 46% and 77% respectively. The three year survival of the diabetic patients who did not receive a transplant was poor (41% v 79% respectively). Of patients transplanted, survival at five years was 73% in the diabetic patients and 90% in the controls. However, there was no significant difference in the five year graft survival (64% v 46% respectively). CONCLUSIONS--Diabetes adversely affects morbidity and mortality in patients having renal replacement treatment, but renal transplantation seems to be the best option for treating diabetic patients with end stage renal failure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8138</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8146</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.301.6751.535</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2207426</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis ; Diabetes ; Diabetes complications ; Diabetes mellitus ; Diabetes Mellitus - mortality ; Diabetic nephropathies ; Diabetic Neuropathies - mortality ; Diabetic Neuropathies - therapy ; Dialysis ; England - epidemiology ; Graft Survival ; Humans ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - mortality ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy ; Kidney Transplantation ; Kidneys ; Medical sciences ; Metabolic diseases ; Middle Aged ; Middles ; Pancreas Transplantation ; Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory ; Peritonitis ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Transplantation ; Type 1 diabetes mellitus</subject><ispartof>BMJ, 1990-09, Vol.301 (6751), p.535-540</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1990 British Medical Journal</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group LTD Sep 15, 1990</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-71f4421e6d576ab0b915030c31dc7e2545cfc0c0d7a2518bd1ab0dad9b435dfd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-71f4421e6d576ab0b915030c31dc7e2545cfc0c0d7a2518bd1ab0dad9b435dfd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/301/6751/535.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/301/6751/535.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>112,113,230,314,780,784,885,3194,27924,27925,58238,58471,77594,77595</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4714934$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2207426$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Catalano, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodship, T H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tapson, J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venning, M K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, R M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proud, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tunbridge, W M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliot, R W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, M K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alberti, K G</creatorcontrib><title>Renal replacement treatment for diabetic patients in Newcastle upon Tyne and the Northern region, 1964-88</title><title>BMJ</title><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVES--To review the experience of renal replacement treatment in diabetic patients treated in Newcastle upon Tyne and the Northern region from 1964 to 1988, and to compare the morbidity and mortality of diabetic patients treated with dialysis or transplantation with those of matched controls of non-diabetic patients. DESIGN--Retrospective study of clinical case notes. SETTING--Renal units of the Northern region, particularly that in Newcastle upon Tyne. PATIENTS--All 65 diabetic patients treated by renal replacement treatment in Newcastle upon Tyne from 1964 to 1987; 42 diabetic patients were matched with 42 non-diabetic patients according to age, sex, year of starting treatment, and type of treatment (dialysis or transplantation). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Sex, age, renal biopsy findings, blood pressure, history of diabetic treatment, and plasma creatinine concentration at the start of renal replacement treatment. History of renal replacement treatments, suitability for transplantation, history of transplantation, cumulative survival, and cause of death during follow up. Survival of technique, cumulative survival of the first peritoneal catheter and history of peritonitis in patients treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; source of graft, histocompatibility antigens, duration of associated stay in hospital, and graft survival in patients receiving renal or pancreatic transplant. RESULTS--1259 Patients with chronic renal failure were accepted for renal replacement treatment in Newcastle upon Tyne, of whom 65 (5%) had diabetes. The first was accepted in 1974, and between 1974 and 1980 another 15 were treated (mean age 42 years; 4% of new patients). From 1981 to 1987, 49 diabetic patients (mean age 44; 9% of new patients) were treated. Fifty patients (77%) had insulin dependent diabetes and the remaining 15 (23%) non-insulin dependent diabetes. On average, the patients were aged 25 (range 5-57) when diabetes was first diagnosed and 44 (range 24-70) at the start of renal replacement treatment. The mean age at the start of treatment was 40 for patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes and 58 for patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes. Transplantation was performed in 33 of the diabetic patients, whose mean age was lower than that of those who did not receive a transplant (41 v 48 respectively, p less than 0.05). Comparison between the 42 diabetic patients and matched controls showed that the overall survival at five years was 46% and 77% respectively. The three year survival of the diabetic patients who did not receive a transplant was poor (41% v 79% respectively). Of patients transplanted, survival at five years was 73% in the diabetic patients and 90% in the controls. However, there was no significant difference in the five year graft survival (64% v 46% respectively). CONCLUSIONS--Diabetes adversely affects morbidity and mortality in patients having renal replacement treatment, but renal transplantation seems to be the best option for treating diabetic patients with end stage renal failure.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes complications</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus - mortality</subject><subject>Diabetic nephropathies</subject><subject>Diabetic Neuropathies - mortality</subject><subject>Diabetic Neuropathies - therapy</subject><subject>Dialysis</subject><subject>England - epidemiology</subject><subject>Graft Survival</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - mortality</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation</subject><subject>Kidneys</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Metabolic diseases</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Middles</subject><subject>Pancreas Transplantation</subject><subject>Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory</subject><subject>Peritonitis</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><subject>Type 1 diabetes mellitus</subject><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>0959-8146</issn><issn>1468-5833</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtvEzEUhUcIVKrSPRskSyA2MMF3_JwNEkQUkKogaGFreWxP6zCxg-0A_fc4TRQeG1a2fL57dK5P0zwEPAMg_MWwWs4IhhkXDGaMsDvNMVAuWyYJudsc4571rQQi7zenOS8xxh0RsufsqDnqOixox48b_8kFPaHk1pM2buVCQSU5XW5vY0zIej244g1a6-LrY0Y-oIX7YXQuk0ObdQzo8iY4pINF5dqhRUz1SKF6XvkYniPoOW2lfNDcG_WU3en-PGk-n725nL9rzz-8fT9_dd4OjNLSChgp7cBxywTXAx56YJhgQ8Aa4TpGmRkNNtgK3TGQg4UKWW37gRJmR0tOmpc73_VmWDlrauakJ7VOfqXTjYraq7-V4K_VVfyugHMiCa0GT_cGKX7buFzUymfjpkkHFzdZSYyBSd5V8PE_4DJuUv3OrEAITgkQ6CuFd5RJMefkxkMUwGrbo6o9qtqj2vaoao915NGfKxwG9q1V_cle19noaUw6GJ8PGBVA-9tF9jbLXGL67dILLHsiqt7udJ-L-3nQdfpaoxDB1OLLXH286MjZ68WFmlf-2Y7fBv7vEr8AGxLMGg</recordid><startdate>19900915</startdate><enddate>19900915</enddate><creator>Catalano, C</creator><creator>Goodship, T H</creator><creator>Tapson, J S</creator><creator>Venning, M K</creator><creator>Taylor, R M</creator><creator>Proud, G</creator><creator>Tunbridge, W M</creator><creator>Elliot, R W</creator><creator>Ward, M K</creator><creator>Alberti, K G</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>British Medical Association</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900915</creationdate><title>Renal replacement treatment for diabetic patients in Newcastle upon Tyne and the Northern region, 1964-88</title><author>Catalano, C ; Goodship, T H ; Tapson, J S ; Venning, M K ; Taylor, R M ; Proud, G ; Tunbridge, W M ; Elliot, R W ; Ward, M K ; Alberti, K G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-71f4421e6d576ab0b915030c31dc7e2545cfc0c0d7a2518bd1ab0dad9b435dfd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes complications</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus - mortality</topic><topic>Diabetic nephropathies</topic><topic>Diabetic Neuropathies - mortality</topic><topic>Diabetic Neuropathies - therapy</topic><topic>Dialysis</topic><topic>England - epidemiology</topic><topic>Graft Survival</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - mortality</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation</topic><topic>Kidneys</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Metabolic diseases</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Middles</topic><topic>Pancreas Transplantation</topic><topic>Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory</topic><topic>Peritonitis</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><topic>Type 1 diabetes mellitus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Catalano, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodship, T H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tapson, J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venning, M K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, R M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proud, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tunbridge, W M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliot, R W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, M K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alberti, K G</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Catalano, C</au><au>Goodship, T H</au><au>Tapson, J S</au><au>Venning, M K</au><au>Taylor, R M</au><au>Proud, G</au><au>Tunbridge, W M</au><au>Elliot, R W</au><au>Ward, M K</au><au>Alberti, K G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Renal replacement treatment for diabetic patients in Newcastle upon Tyne and the Northern region, 1964-88</atitle><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><date>1990-09-15</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>301</volume><issue>6751</issue><spage>535</spage><epage>540</epage><pages>535-540</pages><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>0959-8146</issn><eissn>1468-5833</eissn><eissn>1756-1833</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVES--To review the experience of renal replacement treatment in diabetic patients treated in Newcastle upon Tyne and the Northern region from 1964 to 1988, and to compare the morbidity and mortality of diabetic patients treated with dialysis or transplantation with those of matched controls of non-diabetic patients. DESIGN--Retrospective study of clinical case notes. SETTING--Renal units of the Northern region, particularly that in Newcastle upon Tyne. PATIENTS--All 65 diabetic patients treated by renal replacement treatment in Newcastle upon Tyne from 1964 to 1987; 42 diabetic patients were matched with 42 non-diabetic patients according to age, sex, year of starting treatment, and type of treatment (dialysis or transplantation). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Sex, age, renal biopsy findings, blood pressure, history of diabetic treatment, and plasma creatinine concentration at the start of renal replacement treatment. History of renal replacement treatments, suitability for transplantation, history of transplantation, cumulative survival, and cause of death during follow up. Survival of technique, cumulative survival of the first peritoneal catheter and history of peritonitis in patients treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; source of graft, histocompatibility antigens, duration of associated stay in hospital, and graft survival in patients receiving renal or pancreatic transplant. RESULTS--1259 Patients with chronic renal failure were accepted for renal replacement treatment in Newcastle upon Tyne, of whom 65 (5%) had diabetes. The first was accepted in 1974, and between 1974 and 1980 another 15 were treated (mean age 42 years; 4% of new patients). From 1981 to 1987, 49 diabetic patients (mean age 44; 9% of new patients) were treated. Fifty patients (77%) had insulin dependent diabetes and the remaining 15 (23%) non-insulin dependent diabetes. On average, the patients were aged 25 (range 5-57) when diabetes was first diagnosed and 44 (range 24-70) at the start of renal replacement treatment. The mean age at the start of treatment was 40 for patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes and 58 for patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes. Transplantation was performed in 33 of the diabetic patients, whose mean age was lower than that of those who did not receive a transplant (41 v 48 respectively, p less than 0.05). Comparison between the 42 diabetic patients and matched controls showed that the overall survival at five years was 46% and 77% respectively. The three year survival of the diabetic patients who did not receive a transplant was poor (41% v 79% respectively). Of patients transplanted, survival at five years was 73% in the diabetic patients and 90% in the controls. However, there was no significant difference in the five year graft survival (64% v 46% respectively). CONCLUSIONS--Diabetes adversely affects morbidity and mortality in patients having renal replacement treatment, but renal transplantation seems to be the best option for treating diabetic patients with end stage renal failure.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><pmid>2207426</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmj.301.6751.535</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-8138 |
ispartof | BMJ, 1990-09, Vol.301 (6751), p.535-540 |
issn | 0959-8138 0959-8146 1468-5833 1756-1833 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1663834 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; BMJ Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Biological and medical sciences Child Child, Preschool Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis Diabetes Diabetes complications Diabetes mellitus Diabetes Mellitus - mortality Diabetic nephropathies Diabetic Neuropathies - mortality Diabetic Neuropathies - therapy Dialysis England - epidemiology Graft Survival Humans Kidney Failure, Chronic - mortality Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy Kidney Transplantation Kidneys Medical sciences Metabolic diseases Middle Aged Middles Pancreas Transplantation Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory Peritonitis Postoperative Complications Retrospective Studies Survival Rate Transplantation Type 1 diabetes mellitus |
title | Renal replacement treatment for diabetic patients in Newcastle upon Tyne and the Northern region, 1964-88 |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T14%3A43%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Renal%20replacement%20treatment%20for%20diabetic%20patients%20in%20Newcastle%20upon%20Tyne%20and%20the%20Northern%20region,%201964-88&rft.jtitle=BMJ&rft.au=Catalano,%20C&rft.date=1990-09-15&rft.volume=301&rft.issue=6751&rft.spage=535&rft.epage=540&rft.pages=535-540&rft.issn=0959-8138&rft.eissn=1468-5833&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.301.6751.535&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E29708937%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-71f4421e6d576ab0b915030c31dc7e2545cfc0c0d7a2518bd1ab0dad9b435dfd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1776431319&rft_id=info:pmid/2207426&rft_jstor_id=29708937&rfr_iscdi=true |