Loading…

Cholinergic regulation of the evoked quantal release at frog neuromuscular junction

The effects of cholinergic drugs on the quantal contents of the nerve-evoked endplate currents (EPCs) and the parameters of the time course of quantal release (minimal synaptic latency, main modal value of latency histogram and variability of synaptic latencies) were studied at proximal, central and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of physiology 2004-10, Vol.560 (1), p.77-88
Main Authors: Nikolsky, Eugeny E., Vyskočil, František, Bukharaeva, Ella A., Samigullin, Dmitry, Magazanik, Lev G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The effects of cholinergic drugs on the quantal contents of the nerve-evoked endplate currents (EPCs) and the parameters of the time course of quantal release (minimal synaptic latency, main modal value of latency histogram and variability of synaptic latencies) were studied at proximal, central and distal regions of the frog neuromuscular synapse. Acetylcholine (ACh, 5 × 10 −4 m ), carbachol (CCh, 1 × 10 −5 m ) or nicotine (5 × 10 −6 m ) increased the numbers of EPCs with long release latencies mainly in the distal region of the endplate (90–120 μm from the last node of Ranvier), where the synchronization of transmitter release was the most pronounced. The parameters of focally recorded motor nerve action potentials were not changed by either ACh or CCh. The effects of CCh and nicotine on quantal dispersion were reduced substantially by 5 × 10 −7 m (+)tubocurarine (TC). The muscarinic agonists, oxotremorine and the propargyl ester of arecaidine, as well as antagonists such as pirenzepine, AF-DX 116 and methoctramine, alone or in combination, did not affect the dispersion of the release. Muscarinic antagonists did not block the dispersion action of CCh. Cholinergic drugs either decreased the quantal content m o (muscarinic agonist, oxotremorine M, and nicotinic antagonist, TC), or decreased m o and dispersed the release (ACh, CCh and nicotine). The effects on m o were not related either to the endplate region or to the initial level of release dispersion. It follows that the mechanisms regulating the amount and the time course of transmitter release are different and that, among other factors, they are altered by presynaptic nicotinic receptors.
ISSN:0022-3751
1469-7793
DOI:10.1113/jphysiol.2004.065805