Loading…
Screening for amblyopia: a comparison of paediatric letter tests
AIMS/BACKGROUND The measurement of visual acuity is the most widely accepted indicator of amblyopia and is thought by some to be the only effective screening test. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the traditional single optotype Sheridan-Gardiner test (SGT) in the measur...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of ophthalmology 1997-06, Vol.81 (6), p.465-469 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b506t-6d55c53595235b178fc8959619b6fbad06d9e908d9a7e1a0393f96b263ca15093 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 469 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 465 |
container_title | British journal of ophthalmology |
container_volume | 81 |
creator | Simmers, Anita J Gray, Lyle S Spowart, Katherine |
description | AIMS/BACKGROUND The measurement of visual acuity is the most widely accepted indicator of amblyopia and is thought by some to be the only effective screening test. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the traditional single optotype Sheridan-Gardiner test (SGT) in the measurement of visual acuity and the detection of amblyopia, compared with the log based linear format Glasgow acuity cards (GAC). METHODS In the present study visual acuity was measured monocularly in 702 primary 1 schoolchildren using both acuity tests. RESULTS A significant difference was found in the mean (SD) visual acuity measured with GAC (0.9 (0.08) modified logMAR) and SGT (1.13 (0.09) modified logMAR), df=632, t=−59.08, p=0.0001. The majority of children (89.3%) achieved visual acuities better than 6/6 in either eye when using the single optotype test. If the 95% confidence limits for a significant interocular difference in acuity are used as criteria for the detection of unilateral amblyopia, GAC were found to be the most sensitive, correctly identifying 100%, while SGT identified 55% of the children with unilateral amblyopia. CONCLUSION The results of this study highlight several problems with both the test format and testing procedure in the present school screening system. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bjo.81.6.465 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1722216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4012596861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b506t-6d55c53595235b178fc8959619b6fbad06d9e908d9a7e1a0393f96b263ca15093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS1EVaaFHVukSCDYkMGP-MUCgaYUEOUhlcfSunac4iGJUztTtf8eoxmNgAWrq6vz6ejcexC6T_CSECae2XVcKrIUy0bwW2hBGqFqiqW-jRYYY1kTIsgddJTzuqxUEHmIDjWVTUPwAr08d8n7MYwXVRdTBYPtb-IU4HkFlYvDBCnkOFaxqybwbYA5BVf1fp59qmaf53wXHXTQZ39vN4_R19PXX1Zv67NPb96tXp3VlmMx16Ll3HHGNaeMWyJV55TmWhBtRWehxaLVXmPVapCeAGaadVpYKpgDwrFmx-jF1nfa2MG3zo9zgt5MKQyQbkyEYP5WxvDDXMQrQySllIhi8HhnkOLlpkQ3Q8jO9z2MPm6ykZo2qsGqgA__Addxk8ZyXPGSSgtWHlqop1vKpZhz8t0-CsHmdy-m9GIUMcKUXgr-4M_4e3hXRNEf7XTIDvouwehC3mNUYq0EK1i9xUKe_fVehvTTCMkkNx-_rcz3D-fvTz6fMLMq_JMtb4f1_wP-AnYUsMs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778963161</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Screening for amblyopia: a comparison of paediatric letter tests</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><creator>Simmers, Anita J ; Gray, Lyle S ; Spowart, Katherine</creator><creatorcontrib>Simmers, Anita J ; Gray, Lyle S ; Spowart, Katherine</creatorcontrib><description>AIMS/BACKGROUND The measurement of visual acuity is the most widely accepted indicator of amblyopia and is thought by some to be the only effective screening test. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the traditional single optotype Sheridan-Gardiner test (SGT) in the measurement of visual acuity and the detection of amblyopia, compared with the log based linear format Glasgow acuity cards (GAC). METHODS In the present study visual acuity was measured monocularly in 702 primary 1 schoolchildren using both acuity tests. RESULTS A significant difference was found in the mean (SD) visual acuity measured with GAC (0.9 (0.08) modified logMAR) and SGT (1.13 (0.09) modified logMAR), df=632, t=−59.08, p=0.0001. The majority of children (89.3%) achieved visual acuities better than 6/6 in either eye when using the single optotype test. If the 95% confidence limits for a significant interocular difference in acuity are used as criteria for the detection of unilateral amblyopia, GAC were found to be the most sensitive, correctly identifying 100%, while SGT identified 55% of the children with unilateral amblyopia. CONCLUSION The results of this study highlight several problems with both the test format and testing procedure in the present school screening system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2079</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bjo.81.6.465</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9274410</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJOPAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>amblyopia ; Amblyopia - diagnosis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child, Preschool ; Children & youth ; Cooperation ; Design ; Humans ; Letters ; Medical sciences ; Ophthalmology ; Original articles - Clinical science ; Schools ; screening ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Studies ; Vision disorders ; Vision Screening - methods ; Visual Acuity</subject><ispartof>British journal of ophthalmology, 1997-06, Vol.81 (6), p.465-469</ispartof><rights>British Journal of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 1997 British Journal of Ophthalmology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b506t-6d55c53595235b178fc8959619b6fbad06d9e908d9a7e1a0393f96b263ca15093</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1722216/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1722216/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2709863$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9274410$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simmers, Anita J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, Lyle S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spowart, Katherine</creatorcontrib><title>Screening for amblyopia: a comparison of paediatric letter tests</title><title>British journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>AIMS/BACKGROUND The measurement of visual acuity is the most widely accepted indicator of amblyopia and is thought by some to be the only effective screening test. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the traditional single optotype Sheridan-Gardiner test (SGT) in the measurement of visual acuity and the detection of amblyopia, compared with the log based linear format Glasgow acuity cards (GAC). METHODS In the present study visual acuity was measured monocularly in 702 primary 1 schoolchildren using both acuity tests. RESULTS A significant difference was found in the mean (SD) visual acuity measured with GAC (0.9 (0.08) modified logMAR) and SGT (1.13 (0.09) modified logMAR), df=632, t=−59.08, p=0.0001. The majority of children (89.3%) achieved visual acuities better than 6/6 in either eye when using the single optotype test. If the 95% confidence limits for a significant interocular difference in acuity are used as criteria for the detection of unilateral amblyopia, GAC were found to be the most sensitive, correctly identifying 100%, while SGT identified 55% of the children with unilateral amblyopia. CONCLUSION The results of this study highlight several problems with both the test format and testing procedure in the present school screening system.</description><subject>amblyopia</subject><subject>Amblyopia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Letters</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Original articles - Clinical science</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Vision disorders</subject><subject>Vision Screening - methods</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><issn>0007-1161</issn><issn>1468-2079</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS1EVaaFHVukSCDYkMGP-MUCgaYUEOUhlcfSunac4iGJUztTtf8eoxmNgAWrq6vz6ejcexC6T_CSECae2XVcKrIUy0bwW2hBGqFqiqW-jRYYY1kTIsgddJTzuqxUEHmIDjWVTUPwAr08d8n7MYwXVRdTBYPtb-IU4HkFlYvDBCnkOFaxqybwbYA5BVf1fp59qmaf53wXHXTQZ39vN4_R19PXX1Zv67NPb96tXp3VlmMx16Ll3HHGNaeMWyJV55TmWhBtRWehxaLVXmPVapCeAGaadVpYKpgDwrFmx-jF1nfa2MG3zo9zgt5MKQyQbkyEYP5WxvDDXMQrQySllIhi8HhnkOLlpkQ3Q8jO9z2MPm6ykZo2qsGqgA__Addxk8ZyXPGSSgtWHlqop1vKpZhz8t0-CsHmdy-m9GIUMcKUXgr-4M_4e3hXRNEf7XTIDvouwehC3mNUYq0EK1i9xUKe_fVehvTTCMkkNx-_rcz3D-fvTz6fMLMq_JMtb4f1_wP-AnYUsMs</recordid><startdate>19970601</startdate><enddate>19970601</enddate><creator>Simmers, Anita J</creator><creator>Gray, Lyle S</creator><creator>Spowart, Katherine</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Group</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970601</creationdate><title>Screening for amblyopia: a comparison of paediatric letter tests</title><author>Simmers, Anita J ; Gray, Lyle S ; Spowart, Katherine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b506t-6d55c53595235b178fc8959619b6fbad06d9e908d9a7e1a0393f96b263ca15093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>amblyopia</topic><topic>Amblyopia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Letters</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Original articles - Clinical science</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Vision disorders</topic><topic>Vision Screening - methods</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simmers, Anita J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, Lyle S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spowart, Katherine</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simmers, Anita J</au><au>Gray, Lyle S</au><au>Spowart, Katherine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Screening for amblyopia: a comparison of paediatric letter tests</atitle><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>1997-06-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>465</spage><epage>469</epage><pages>465-469</pages><issn>0007-1161</issn><eissn>1468-2079</eissn><coden>BJOPAL</coden><abstract>AIMS/BACKGROUND The measurement of visual acuity is the most widely accepted indicator of amblyopia and is thought by some to be the only effective screening test. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the traditional single optotype Sheridan-Gardiner test (SGT) in the measurement of visual acuity and the detection of amblyopia, compared with the log based linear format Glasgow acuity cards (GAC). METHODS In the present study visual acuity was measured monocularly in 702 primary 1 schoolchildren using both acuity tests. RESULTS A significant difference was found in the mean (SD) visual acuity measured with GAC (0.9 (0.08) modified logMAR) and SGT (1.13 (0.09) modified logMAR), df=632, t=−59.08, p=0.0001. The majority of children (89.3%) achieved visual acuities better than 6/6 in either eye when using the single optotype test. If the 95% confidence limits for a significant interocular difference in acuity are used as criteria for the detection of unilateral amblyopia, GAC were found to be the most sensitive, correctly identifying 100%, while SGT identified 55% of the children with unilateral amblyopia. CONCLUSION The results of this study highlight several problems with both the test format and testing procedure in the present school screening system.</abstract><cop>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>9274410</pmid><doi>10.1136/bjo.81.6.465</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1161 |
ispartof | British journal of ophthalmology, 1997-06, Vol.81 (6), p.465-469 |
issn | 0007-1161 1468-2079 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1722216 |
source | PubMed Central Free |
subjects | amblyopia Amblyopia - diagnosis Biological and medical sciences Child, Preschool Children & youth Cooperation Design Humans Letters Medical sciences Ophthalmology Original articles - Clinical science Schools screening Sensitivity and Specificity Studies Vision disorders Vision Screening - methods Visual Acuity |
title | Screening for amblyopia: a comparison of paediatric letter tests |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A04%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Screening%20for%20amblyopia:%20a%20comparison%20of%20paediatric%20letter%20tests&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Simmers,%20Anita%20J&rft.date=1997-06-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=465&rft.epage=469&rft.pages=465-469&rft.issn=0007-1161&rft.eissn=1468-2079&rft.coden=BJOPAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bjo.81.6.465&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4012596861%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b506t-6d55c53595235b178fc8959619b6fbad06d9e908d9a7e1a0393f96b263ca15093%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778963161&rft_id=info:pmid/9274410&rfr_iscdi=true |