Treating sexually transmitted infections in primary care: a missed opportunity?

Objectives: To explore patterns of primary care attendance, barriers to the use of primary care, and views on services in a population of first time genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinic attenders. Method: A cross sectional survey of new patients attending a mainly walk-in outer London GUM clinic, in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sexually transmitted infections 2003-04, Vol.79 (2), p.134-136
Main Authors: Cassell, J A, Brook, M G, Mercer, C H, Murphy, S, Johnson, A M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
access
Adult
Aged
Ambulatory Care - statistics & numerical data
Beliefs, opinions and attitudes
Biological and medical sciences
Care and treatment
Clinics
Cross-Sectional Studies
Family Practice - statistics & numerical data
Female
General aspects
Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models
Humans
Infectious diseases
London
Male
Medical care
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Missing data
Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data
Patient Satisfaction
Patients
Primary care
Primary Health Care - statistics & numerical data
Questionnaires
Sexual health
Sexually transmitted diseases
Sexually Transmitted Diseases - therapy
sexually transmitted infections
Short Report
STD
Utilization
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives: To explore patterns of primary care attendance, barriers to the use of primary care, and views on services in a population of first time genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinic attenders. Method: A cross sectional survey of new patients attending a mainly walk-in outer London GUM clinic, in which responses were linked to clinical data. Results: 40.5% of all patients and 39.9% of those with an STI had already seen a GP for their current problem. This did not vary with age or symptom status. Duration of symptoms was highly significantly longer in patients who had attended a GP than in patients who attended a GUM clinic in the first instance. When patients who had not seen a GP were asked the reason for this, a third of responses cited the convenience of a GUM clinic or difficulty in accessing primary care services, while only 3% cited embarrassment and only 2% examination or gender issues. Conclusion: Many patients initially attend GP services for STIs, and primary care is therefore already an important setting with potential for STI control. However, delay in treatment through attendance at primary care, and barriers in access to primary care, need to be addressed in the planning of future services.
ISSN:1368-4973
1472-3263
DOI:10.1136/sti.79.2.134