Loading…

A Guide to Accurate Fluorescence Microscopy Colocalization Measurements

Biomolecular interactions are fundamental to the vast majority of cellular processes, and identification of the major interacting components is usually the first step toward an understanding of the mechanisms that govern various cell functions. Thus, statistical image analyses that can be performed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biophysical journal 2006-12, Vol.91 (12), p.4611-4622
Main Authors: Comeau, Jonathan W.D., Costantino, Santiago, Wiseman, Paul W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-ae6f16f5136af120664b3a776043f1057abb6bbde138093b921f386c26b81d5d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-ae6f16f5136af120664b3a776043f1057abb6bbde138093b921f386c26b81d5d3
container_end_page 4622
container_issue 12
container_start_page 4611
container_title Biophysical journal
container_volume 91
creator Comeau, Jonathan W.D.
Costantino, Santiago
Wiseman, Paul W.
description Biomolecular interactions are fundamental to the vast majority of cellular processes, and identification of the major interacting components is usually the first step toward an understanding of the mechanisms that govern various cell functions. Thus, statistical image analyses that can be performed on fluorescence microscopy images of fixed or live cells have been routinely applied for biophysical and cell biological studies. These approaches measure the fraction of interacting particles by analyzing dual color fluorescence images for colocalized pixels. Colocalization algorithms have proven to be effective, although the dynamic range and accuracy of these measurements has never been well established. Spatial image cross-correlation spectroscopy (ICCS), which cross-correlates spatial intensity fluctuations recorded in images from two detection channels simultaneously, has also recently been shown to be an effective measure of colocalization as well. Through simulations, imaging of fluorescent antibodies adsorbed on glass and cell measurements, we show that ICCS performs much better than standard colocalization algorithms at moderate to high densities of particles, which are often encountered in cellular systems. Furthermore, it was found that the density ratio between the two labeled species of interest plays a major role in the accuracy of the colocalization analysis. By applying a direct and systematic comparison between the standard, fluorescence microscopy colocalization algorithm and spatial ICCS, we show regimes where each approach is applicable, and more importantly, where they fail to yield accurate results.
doi_str_mv 10.1529/biophysj.106.089441
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1779921</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006349506721737</els_id><sourcerecordid>1222896251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-ae6f16f5136af120664b3a776043f1057abb6bbde138093b921f386c26b81d5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9vEzEQxS0EomnhE1RCKw69bfD43-4eQIqiNq3UigucLds72zrarIO9Wyn99HWUlAIHTrbs37yZN4-Qc6BzkKz5Yn3YPuzSeg5UzWndCAFvyAykYCWltXpLZpRSVXLRyBNymtKaUmCSwntyAlW-cmAzsloUq8m3WIyhWDg3RTNicdVPIWJyODgs7ryLIbmw3RXL0Adnev9kRh-G4g5NmiJucBjTB_KuM33Cj8fzjPy8uvyxvC5vv69ulovb0olajKVB1YHqJHBlOmBUKWG5qSpFBe-AyspYq6xtEXhNG24bBh2vlWPK1tDKlp-Rbwfd7WQ32OYRx2h6vY1-Y-JOB-P13z-Df9D34VFDVTVZLQtcHAVi-DVhGvXGZ6d9bwYMU9KqhlrISmTw8z_gOkxxyOY0A1kBaxqVIX6A9jtKEbvfkwDV-5T0S0r5QelDSrnq058mXmuOsWTg6wHAvMpHj1En5_dptD6iG3Ub_H8bPAPwqaW6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215712996</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Guide to Accurate Fluorescence Microscopy Colocalization Measurements</title><source>NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)</source><creator>Comeau, Jonathan W.D. ; Costantino, Santiago ; Wiseman, Paul W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Comeau, Jonathan W.D. ; Costantino, Santiago ; Wiseman, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><description>Biomolecular interactions are fundamental to the vast majority of cellular processes, and identification of the major interacting components is usually the first step toward an understanding of the mechanisms that govern various cell functions. Thus, statistical image analyses that can be performed on fluorescence microscopy images of fixed or live cells have been routinely applied for biophysical and cell biological studies. These approaches measure the fraction of interacting particles by analyzing dual color fluorescence images for colocalized pixels. Colocalization algorithms have proven to be effective, although the dynamic range and accuracy of these measurements has never been well established. Spatial image cross-correlation spectroscopy (ICCS), which cross-correlates spatial intensity fluctuations recorded in images from two detection channels simultaneously, has also recently been shown to be an effective measure of colocalization as well. Through simulations, imaging of fluorescent antibodies adsorbed on glass and cell measurements, we show that ICCS performs much better than standard colocalization algorithms at moderate to high densities of particles, which are often encountered in cellular systems. Furthermore, it was found that the density ratio between the two labeled species of interest plays a major role in the accuracy of the colocalization analysis. By applying a direct and systematic comparison between the standard, fluorescence microscopy colocalization algorithm and spatial ICCS, we show regimes where each approach is applicable, and more importantly, where they fail to yield accurate results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3495</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-0086</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.089441</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17012312</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Animals ; Antibodies, Monoclonal - metabolism ; Biophysics ; Cell Line ; Cells ; Computer Simulation ; Fibroblasts - metabolism ; Fluorescence ; Fluorescent Dyes ; Humans ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted ; Mice ; Microscopy ; Microscopy, Fluorescence - methods ; Receptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor beta - immunology ; Spectrometry, Fluorescence ; Spectroscopy, Imaging, Other Techniques</subject><ispartof>Biophysical journal, 2006-12, Vol.91 (12), p.4611-4622</ispartof><rights>2006 The Biophysical Society</rights><rights>Copyright Biophysical Society Dec 15, 2006</rights><rights>Copyright © 2006, Biophysical Society 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-ae6f16f5136af120664b3a776043f1057abb6bbde138093b921f386c26b81d5d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-ae6f16f5136af120664b3a776043f1057abb6bbde138093b921f386c26b81d5d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1779921/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1779921/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17012312$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Comeau, Jonathan W.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costantino, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiseman, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><title>A Guide to Accurate Fluorescence Microscopy Colocalization Measurements</title><title>Biophysical journal</title><addtitle>Biophys J</addtitle><description>Biomolecular interactions are fundamental to the vast majority of cellular processes, and identification of the major interacting components is usually the first step toward an understanding of the mechanisms that govern various cell functions. Thus, statistical image analyses that can be performed on fluorescence microscopy images of fixed or live cells have been routinely applied for biophysical and cell biological studies. These approaches measure the fraction of interacting particles by analyzing dual color fluorescence images for colocalized pixels. Colocalization algorithms have proven to be effective, although the dynamic range and accuracy of these measurements has never been well established. Spatial image cross-correlation spectroscopy (ICCS), which cross-correlates spatial intensity fluctuations recorded in images from two detection channels simultaneously, has also recently been shown to be an effective measure of colocalization as well. Through simulations, imaging of fluorescent antibodies adsorbed on glass and cell measurements, we show that ICCS performs much better than standard colocalization algorithms at moderate to high densities of particles, which are often encountered in cellular systems. Furthermore, it was found that the density ratio between the two labeled species of interest plays a major role in the accuracy of the colocalization analysis. By applying a direct and systematic comparison between the standard, fluorescence microscopy colocalization algorithm and spatial ICCS, we show regimes where each approach is applicable, and more importantly, where they fail to yield accurate results.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal - metabolism</subject><subject>Biophysics</subject><subject>Cell Line</subject><subject>Cells</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Fibroblasts - metabolism</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Fluorescent Dyes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Microscopy, Fluorescence - methods</subject><subject>Receptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor beta - immunology</subject><subject>Spectrometry, Fluorescence</subject><subject>Spectroscopy, Imaging, Other Techniques</subject><issn>0006-3495</issn><issn>1542-0086</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU9vEzEQxS0EomnhE1RCKw69bfD43-4eQIqiNq3UigucLds72zrarIO9Wyn99HWUlAIHTrbs37yZN4-Qc6BzkKz5Yn3YPuzSeg5UzWndCAFvyAykYCWltXpLZpRSVXLRyBNymtKaUmCSwntyAlW-cmAzsloUq8m3WIyhWDg3RTNicdVPIWJyODgs7ryLIbmw3RXL0Adnev9kRh-G4g5NmiJucBjTB_KuM33Cj8fzjPy8uvyxvC5vv69ulovb0olajKVB1YHqJHBlOmBUKWG5qSpFBe-AyspYq6xtEXhNG24bBh2vlWPK1tDKlp-Rbwfd7WQ32OYRx2h6vY1-Y-JOB-P13z-Df9D34VFDVTVZLQtcHAVi-DVhGvXGZ6d9bwYMU9KqhlrISmTw8z_gOkxxyOY0A1kBaxqVIX6A9jtKEbvfkwDV-5T0S0r5QelDSrnq058mXmuOsWTg6wHAvMpHj1En5_dptD6iG3Ub_H8bPAPwqaW6</recordid><startdate>20061215</startdate><enddate>20061215</enddate><creator>Comeau, Jonathan W.D.</creator><creator>Costantino, Santiago</creator><creator>Wiseman, Paul W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Biophysical Society</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061215</creationdate><title>A Guide to Accurate Fluorescence Microscopy Colocalization Measurements</title><author>Comeau, Jonathan W.D. ; Costantino, Santiago ; Wiseman, Paul W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-ae6f16f5136af120664b3a776043f1057abb6bbde138093b921f386c26b81d5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal - metabolism</topic><topic>Biophysics</topic><topic>Cell Line</topic><topic>Cells</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Fibroblasts - metabolism</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Fluorescent Dyes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Microscopy, Fluorescence - methods</topic><topic>Receptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor beta - immunology</topic><topic>Spectrometry, Fluorescence</topic><topic>Spectroscopy, Imaging, Other Techniques</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Comeau, Jonathan W.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costantino, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiseman, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Biophysical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Comeau, Jonathan W.D.</au><au>Costantino, Santiago</au><au>Wiseman, Paul W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Guide to Accurate Fluorescence Microscopy Colocalization Measurements</atitle><jtitle>Biophysical journal</jtitle><addtitle>Biophys J</addtitle><date>2006-12-15</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>4611</spage><epage>4622</epage><pages>4611-4622</pages><issn>0006-3495</issn><eissn>1542-0086</eissn><abstract>Biomolecular interactions are fundamental to the vast majority of cellular processes, and identification of the major interacting components is usually the first step toward an understanding of the mechanisms that govern various cell functions. Thus, statistical image analyses that can be performed on fluorescence microscopy images of fixed or live cells have been routinely applied for biophysical and cell biological studies. These approaches measure the fraction of interacting particles by analyzing dual color fluorescence images for colocalized pixels. Colocalization algorithms have proven to be effective, although the dynamic range and accuracy of these measurements has never been well established. Spatial image cross-correlation spectroscopy (ICCS), which cross-correlates spatial intensity fluctuations recorded in images from two detection channels simultaneously, has also recently been shown to be an effective measure of colocalization as well. Through simulations, imaging of fluorescent antibodies adsorbed on glass and cell measurements, we show that ICCS performs much better than standard colocalization algorithms at moderate to high densities of particles, which are often encountered in cellular systems. Furthermore, it was found that the density ratio between the two labeled species of interest plays a major role in the accuracy of the colocalization analysis. By applying a direct and systematic comparison between the standard, fluorescence microscopy colocalization algorithm and spatial ICCS, we show regimes where each approach is applicable, and more importantly, where they fail to yield accurate results.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>17012312</pmid><doi>10.1529/biophysj.106.089441</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3495
ispartof Biophysical journal, 2006-12, Vol.91 (12), p.4611-4622
issn 0006-3495
1542-0086
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1779921
source NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)
subjects Accuracy
Algorithms
Animals
Antibodies, Monoclonal - metabolism
Biophysics
Cell Line
Cells
Computer Simulation
Fibroblasts - metabolism
Fluorescence
Fluorescent Dyes
Humans
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Mice
Microscopy
Microscopy, Fluorescence - methods
Receptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor beta - immunology
Spectrometry, Fluorescence
Spectroscopy, Imaging, Other Techniques
title A Guide to Accurate Fluorescence Microscopy Colocalization Measurements
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T07%3A47%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Guide%20to%20Accurate%20Fluorescence%20Microscopy%20Colocalization%20Measurements&rft.jtitle=Biophysical%20journal&rft.au=Comeau,%20Jonathan%20W.D.&rft.date=2006-12-15&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=4611&rft.epage=4622&rft.pages=4611-4622&rft.issn=0006-3495&rft.eissn=1542-0086&rft_id=info:doi/10.1529/biophysj.106.089441&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1222896251%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-ae6f16f5136af120664b3a776043f1057abb6bbde138093b921f386c26b81d5d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215712996&rft_id=info:pmid/17012312&rfr_iscdi=true