Loading…
A Guide to Accurate Fluorescence Microscopy Colocalization Measurements
Biomolecular interactions are fundamental to the vast majority of cellular processes, and identification of the major interacting components is usually the first step toward an understanding of the mechanisms that govern various cell functions. Thus, statistical image analyses that can be performed...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biophysical journal 2006-12, Vol.91 (12), p.4611-4622 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-ae6f16f5136af120664b3a776043f1057abb6bbde138093b921f386c26b81d5d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-ae6f16f5136af120664b3a776043f1057abb6bbde138093b921f386c26b81d5d3 |
container_end_page | 4622 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 4611 |
container_title | Biophysical journal |
container_volume | 91 |
creator | Comeau, Jonathan W.D. Costantino, Santiago Wiseman, Paul W. |
description | Biomolecular interactions are fundamental to the vast majority of cellular processes, and identification of the major interacting components is usually the first step toward an understanding of the mechanisms that govern various cell functions. Thus, statistical image analyses that can be performed on fluorescence microscopy images of fixed or live cells have been routinely applied for biophysical and cell biological studies. These approaches measure the fraction of interacting particles by analyzing dual color fluorescence images for colocalized pixels. Colocalization algorithms have proven to be effective, although the dynamic range and accuracy of these measurements has never been well established. Spatial image cross-correlation spectroscopy (ICCS), which cross-correlates spatial intensity fluctuations recorded in images from two detection channels simultaneously, has also recently been shown to be an effective measure of colocalization as well. Through simulations, imaging of fluorescent antibodies adsorbed on glass and cell measurements, we show that ICCS performs much better than standard colocalization algorithms at moderate to high densities of particles, which are often encountered in cellular systems. Furthermore, it was found that the density ratio between the two labeled species of interest plays a major role in the accuracy of the colocalization analysis. By applying a direct and systematic comparison between the standard, fluorescence microscopy colocalization algorithm and spatial ICCS, we show regimes where each approach is applicable, and more importantly, where they fail to yield accurate results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1529/biophysj.106.089441 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1779921</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006349506721737</els_id><sourcerecordid>1222896251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-ae6f16f5136af120664b3a776043f1057abb6bbde138093b921f386c26b81d5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9vEzEQxS0EomnhE1RCKw69bfD43-4eQIqiNq3UigucLds72zrarIO9Wyn99HWUlAIHTrbs37yZN4-Qc6BzkKz5Yn3YPuzSeg5UzWndCAFvyAykYCWltXpLZpRSVXLRyBNymtKaUmCSwntyAlW-cmAzsloUq8m3WIyhWDg3RTNicdVPIWJyODgs7ryLIbmw3RXL0Adnev9kRh-G4g5NmiJucBjTB_KuM33Cj8fzjPy8uvyxvC5vv69ulovb0olajKVB1YHqJHBlOmBUKWG5qSpFBe-AyspYq6xtEXhNG24bBh2vlWPK1tDKlp-Rbwfd7WQ32OYRx2h6vY1-Y-JOB-P13z-Df9D34VFDVTVZLQtcHAVi-DVhGvXGZ6d9bwYMU9KqhlrISmTw8z_gOkxxyOY0A1kBaxqVIX6A9jtKEbvfkwDV-5T0S0r5QelDSrnq058mXmuOsWTg6wHAvMpHj1En5_dptD6iG3Ub_H8bPAPwqaW6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215712996</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Guide to Accurate Fluorescence Microscopy Colocalization Measurements</title><source>NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)</source><creator>Comeau, Jonathan W.D. ; Costantino, Santiago ; Wiseman, Paul W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Comeau, Jonathan W.D. ; Costantino, Santiago ; Wiseman, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><description>Biomolecular interactions are fundamental to the vast majority of cellular processes, and identification of the major interacting components is usually the first step toward an understanding of the mechanisms that govern various cell functions. Thus, statistical image analyses that can be performed on fluorescence microscopy images of fixed or live cells have been routinely applied for biophysical and cell biological studies. These approaches measure the fraction of interacting particles by analyzing dual color fluorescence images for colocalized pixels. Colocalization algorithms have proven to be effective, although the dynamic range and accuracy of these measurements has never been well established. Spatial image cross-correlation spectroscopy (ICCS), which cross-correlates spatial intensity fluctuations recorded in images from two detection channels simultaneously, has also recently been shown to be an effective measure of colocalization as well. Through simulations, imaging of fluorescent antibodies adsorbed on glass and cell measurements, we show that ICCS performs much better than standard colocalization algorithms at moderate to high densities of particles, which are often encountered in cellular systems. Furthermore, it was found that the density ratio between the two labeled species of interest plays a major role in the accuracy of the colocalization analysis. By applying a direct and systematic comparison between the standard, fluorescence microscopy colocalization algorithm and spatial ICCS, we show regimes where each approach is applicable, and more importantly, where they fail to yield accurate results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3495</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-0086</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.089441</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17012312</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Animals ; Antibodies, Monoclonal - metabolism ; Biophysics ; Cell Line ; Cells ; Computer Simulation ; Fibroblasts - metabolism ; Fluorescence ; Fluorescent Dyes ; Humans ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted ; Mice ; Microscopy ; Microscopy, Fluorescence - methods ; Receptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor beta - immunology ; Spectrometry, Fluorescence ; Spectroscopy, Imaging, Other Techniques</subject><ispartof>Biophysical journal, 2006-12, Vol.91 (12), p.4611-4622</ispartof><rights>2006 The Biophysical Society</rights><rights>Copyright Biophysical Society Dec 15, 2006</rights><rights>Copyright © 2006, Biophysical Society 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-ae6f16f5136af120664b3a776043f1057abb6bbde138093b921f386c26b81d5d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-ae6f16f5136af120664b3a776043f1057abb6bbde138093b921f386c26b81d5d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1779921/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1779921/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17012312$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Comeau, Jonathan W.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costantino, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiseman, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><title>A Guide to Accurate Fluorescence Microscopy Colocalization Measurements</title><title>Biophysical journal</title><addtitle>Biophys J</addtitle><description>Biomolecular interactions are fundamental to the vast majority of cellular processes, and identification of the major interacting components is usually the first step toward an understanding of the mechanisms that govern various cell functions. Thus, statistical image analyses that can be performed on fluorescence microscopy images of fixed or live cells have been routinely applied for biophysical and cell biological studies. These approaches measure the fraction of interacting particles by analyzing dual color fluorescence images for colocalized pixels. Colocalization algorithms have proven to be effective, although the dynamic range and accuracy of these measurements has never been well established. Spatial image cross-correlation spectroscopy (ICCS), which cross-correlates spatial intensity fluctuations recorded in images from two detection channels simultaneously, has also recently been shown to be an effective measure of colocalization as well. Through simulations, imaging of fluorescent antibodies adsorbed on glass and cell measurements, we show that ICCS performs much better than standard colocalization algorithms at moderate to high densities of particles, which are often encountered in cellular systems. Furthermore, it was found that the density ratio between the two labeled species of interest plays a major role in the accuracy of the colocalization analysis. By applying a direct and systematic comparison between the standard, fluorescence microscopy colocalization algorithm and spatial ICCS, we show regimes where each approach is applicable, and more importantly, where they fail to yield accurate results.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal - metabolism</subject><subject>Biophysics</subject><subject>Cell Line</subject><subject>Cells</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Fibroblasts - metabolism</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Fluorescent Dyes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Microscopy, Fluorescence - methods</subject><subject>Receptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor beta - immunology</subject><subject>Spectrometry, Fluorescence</subject><subject>Spectroscopy, Imaging, Other Techniques</subject><issn>0006-3495</issn><issn>1542-0086</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU9vEzEQxS0EomnhE1RCKw69bfD43-4eQIqiNq3UigucLds72zrarIO9Wyn99HWUlAIHTrbs37yZN4-Qc6BzkKz5Yn3YPuzSeg5UzWndCAFvyAykYCWltXpLZpRSVXLRyBNymtKaUmCSwntyAlW-cmAzsloUq8m3WIyhWDg3RTNicdVPIWJyODgs7ryLIbmw3RXL0Adnev9kRh-G4g5NmiJucBjTB_KuM33Cj8fzjPy8uvyxvC5vv69ulovb0olajKVB1YHqJHBlOmBUKWG5qSpFBe-AyspYq6xtEXhNG24bBh2vlWPK1tDKlp-Rbwfd7WQ32OYRx2h6vY1-Y-JOB-P13z-Df9D34VFDVTVZLQtcHAVi-DVhGvXGZ6d9bwYMU9KqhlrISmTw8z_gOkxxyOY0A1kBaxqVIX6A9jtKEbvfkwDV-5T0S0r5QelDSrnq058mXmuOsWTg6wHAvMpHj1En5_dptD6iG3Ub_H8bPAPwqaW6</recordid><startdate>20061215</startdate><enddate>20061215</enddate><creator>Comeau, Jonathan W.D.</creator><creator>Costantino, Santiago</creator><creator>Wiseman, Paul W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Biophysical Society</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061215</creationdate><title>A Guide to Accurate Fluorescence Microscopy Colocalization Measurements</title><author>Comeau, Jonathan W.D. ; Costantino, Santiago ; Wiseman, Paul W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-ae6f16f5136af120664b3a776043f1057abb6bbde138093b921f386c26b81d5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal - metabolism</topic><topic>Biophysics</topic><topic>Cell Line</topic><topic>Cells</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Fibroblasts - metabolism</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Fluorescent Dyes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Microscopy, Fluorescence - methods</topic><topic>Receptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor beta - immunology</topic><topic>Spectrometry, Fluorescence</topic><topic>Spectroscopy, Imaging, Other Techniques</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Comeau, Jonathan W.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costantino, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiseman, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Biophysical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Comeau, Jonathan W.D.</au><au>Costantino, Santiago</au><au>Wiseman, Paul W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Guide to Accurate Fluorescence Microscopy Colocalization Measurements</atitle><jtitle>Biophysical journal</jtitle><addtitle>Biophys J</addtitle><date>2006-12-15</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>4611</spage><epage>4622</epage><pages>4611-4622</pages><issn>0006-3495</issn><eissn>1542-0086</eissn><abstract>Biomolecular interactions are fundamental to the vast majority of cellular processes, and identification of the major interacting components is usually the first step toward an understanding of the mechanisms that govern various cell functions. Thus, statistical image analyses that can be performed on fluorescence microscopy images of fixed or live cells have been routinely applied for biophysical and cell biological studies. These approaches measure the fraction of interacting particles by analyzing dual color fluorescence images for colocalized pixels. Colocalization algorithms have proven to be effective, although the dynamic range and accuracy of these measurements has never been well established. Spatial image cross-correlation spectroscopy (ICCS), which cross-correlates spatial intensity fluctuations recorded in images from two detection channels simultaneously, has also recently been shown to be an effective measure of colocalization as well. Through simulations, imaging of fluorescent antibodies adsorbed on glass and cell measurements, we show that ICCS performs much better than standard colocalization algorithms at moderate to high densities of particles, which are often encountered in cellular systems. Furthermore, it was found that the density ratio between the two labeled species of interest plays a major role in the accuracy of the colocalization analysis. By applying a direct and systematic comparison between the standard, fluorescence microscopy colocalization algorithm and spatial ICCS, we show regimes where each approach is applicable, and more importantly, where they fail to yield accurate results.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>17012312</pmid><doi>10.1529/biophysj.106.089441</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-3495 |
ispartof | Biophysical journal, 2006-12, Vol.91 (12), p.4611-4622 |
issn | 0006-3495 1542-0086 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1779921 |
source | NCBI_PubMed Central(免费) |
subjects | Accuracy Algorithms Animals Antibodies, Monoclonal - metabolism Biophysics Cell Line Cells Computer Simulation Fibroblasts - metabolism Fluorescence Fluorescent Dyes Humans Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted Mice Microscopy Microscopy, Fluorescence - methods Receptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor beta - immunology Spectrometry, Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Imaging, Other Techniques |
title | A Guide to Accurate Fluorescence Microscopy Colocalization Measurements |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T07%3A47%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Guide%20to%20Accurate%20Fluorescence%20Microscopy%20Colocalization%20Measurements&rft.jtitle=Biophysical%20journal&rft.au=Comeau,%20Jonathan%20W.D.&rft.date=2006-12-15&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=4611&rft.epage=4622&rft.pages=4611-4622&rft.issn=0006-3495&rft.eissn=1542-0086&rft_id=info:doi/10.1529/biophysj.106.089441&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1222896251%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-ae6f16f5136af120664b3a776043f1057abb6bbde138093b921f386c26b81d5d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215712996&rft_id=info:pmid/17012312&rfr_iscdi=true |