Loading…

Home collection of urine specimens--boric acid bottles or Dipslides?

Sterile mid stream specimens of urine (MSSU) were obtained from 84 children in a hospital outpatient department. All 84 children collected urine at home by one of two Dipslide methods and by collection into boric acid within 24 hours of the hospital collected MSSU. The samples collected at home were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archives of disease in childhood 1990-03, Vol.65 (3), p.286-289
Main Authors: Jewkes, F E, McMaster, D J, Napier, W A, Houston, I B, Postlethwaite, R J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b513t-8b4fbef27570a1a8f9ebe142fcab8b63812367284c7c951376741be601f33ef53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b513t-8b4fbef27570a1a8f9ebe142fcab8b63812367284c7c951376741be601f33ef53
container_end_page 289
container_issue 3
container_start_page 286
container_title Archives of disease in childhood
container_volume 65
creator Jewkes, F E
McMaster, D J
Napier, W A
Houston, I B
Postlethwaite, R J
description Sterile mid stream specimens of urine (MSSU) were obtained from 84 children in a hospital outpatient department. All 84 children collected urine at home by one of two Dipslide methods and by collection into boric acid within 24 hours of the hospital collected MSSU. The samples collected at home were posted to the hospital. Thirty six of the Dipslides (43%) and nine of the boric acid samples (10%) were not sterile but none had a pure growth of a single organism of greater than 10(5) organisms/ml. In addition, 17 of the Dipslides (20%) were returned with one or both media detached and therefore could not be relied upon to exclude urinary tract infection. In a second part to the study, 95 urines which showed a significant growth in primary culture were also cultured after storage in boric acid. Inhibition was noted in nine samples after storage in boric acid, seven of which were in underfilled bottles. Transport of specimens in boric acid produced less contamination than Dipslides but may inhibit growth in a small number of specimens. Technical failures with Dipslides were disappointingly high.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/adc.65.3.286
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1792302</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A8926374</galeid><sourcerecordid>A8926374</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b513t-8b4fbef27570a1a8f9ebe142fcab8b63812367284c7c951376741be601f33ef53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2P0zAQxS0EWkrhxhUpEhIcIMUfie1cQKsssMDCggSI28h2J8UliYudIPjvMbSqgAMnH95v3vjNI-Q2oyvGhHxk1m4l65VYcS2vkAWrpC45raqrZEEpFWWjtb5ObqS0pZRxrcUJOeFCVJzWC3J2HgYsXOh7dJMPYxG6Yo5-xCLt0PkBx1SWNkTvCuP8urBhmnpMRYjFmd-l3q8xPblJrnWmT3jr8C7Jh2dP37fn5cXl8xft6UVpayamUtuqs9hxVStqmNFdgxZZxTtnrLZSaMaFVFxXTrkmTyipKmZRUtYJgV0tluTx3nc32wHXDscpmh520Q8m_oBgPPytjP4zbMI3YKrhgvJscO9gEMPXGdMEg08O-96MGOYEqlE1143K4N1_wG2Y45jDgaBKq0rQWmTqwZ7amB7Bjy6ME36ffl9zg5Czt5dwqhsuRZ5Ykod72sWQUsTu-HFG4VeTkJsEWYOA3GTG7_wZ9ggfqst6udd9ykuPsolfQCqhanjzsYVPzeu37Sv6Et5l_v6et8P2_5t_AowStBM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3078743053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Home collection of urine specimens--boric acid bottles or Dipslides?</title><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Jewkes, F E ; McMaster, D J ; Napier, W A ; Houston, I B ; Postlethwaite, R J</creator><creatorcontrib>Jewkes, F E ; McMaster, D J ; Napier, W A ; Houston, I B ; Postlethwaite, R J</creatorcontrib><description>Sterile mid stream specimens of urine (MSSU) were obtained from 84 children in a hospital outpatient department. All 84 children collected urine at home by one of two Dipslide methods and by collection into boric acid within 24 hours of the hospital collected MSSU. The samples collected at home were posted to the hospital. Thirty six of the Dipslides (43%) and nine of the boric acid samples (10%) were not sterile but none had a pure growth of a single organism of greater than 10(5) organisms/ml. In addition, 17 of the Dipslides (20%) were returned with one or both media detached and therefore could not be relied upon to exclude urinary tract infection. In a second part to the study, 95 urines which showed a significant growth in primary culture were also cultured after storage in boric acid. Inhibition was noted in nine samples after storage in boric acid, seven of which were in underfilled bottles. Transport of specimens in boric acid produced less contamination than Dipslides but may inhibit growth in a small number of specimens. Technical failures with Dipslides were disappointingly high.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9888</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/adc.65.3.286</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2334205</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</publisher><subject>Acids ; Adolescent ; Analysis ; Boric acid ; Boric Acids ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Collections and collecting ; Culture media ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic specimens ; Female ; Home Nursing ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Male ; Medical examination ; Pediatric diseases ; Pediatrics ; Specimen Handling - methods ; Urinalysis ; Urinary tract ; Urinary tract infections ; Urinary Tract Infections - diagnosis ; Urinary tract infections in children ; Urine ; Urine - microbiology</subject><ispartof>Archives of disease in childhood, 1990-03, Vol.65 (3), p.286-289</ispartof><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group LTD Mar 1990</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b513t-8b4fbef27570a1a8f9ebe142fcab8b63812367284c7c951376741be601f33ef53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b513t-8b4fbef27570a1a8f9ebe142fcab8b63812367284c7c951376741be601f33ef53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3078743053/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3078743053?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,21378,21394,27924,27925,33611,33612,33877,33878,43733,43880,53791,53793,74221,74397</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2334205$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jewkes, F E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMaster, D J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Napier, W A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houston, I B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Postlethwaite, R J</creatorcontrib><title>Home collection of urine specimens--boric acid bottles or Dipslides?</title><title>Archives of disease in childhood</title><addtitle>Arch Dis Child</addtitle><description>Sterile mid stream specimens of urine (MSSU) were obtained from 84 children in a hospital outpatient department. All 84 children collected urine at home by one of two Dipslide methods and by collection into boric acid within 24 hours of the hospital collected MSSU. The samples collected at home were posted to the hospital. Thirty six of the Dipslides (43%) and nine of the boric acid samples (10%) were not sterile but none had a pure growth of a single organism of greater than 10(5) organisms/ml. In addition, 17 of the Dipslides (20%) were returned with one or both media detached and therefore could not be relied upon to exclude urinary tract infection. In a second part to the study, 95 urines which showed a significant growth in primary culture were also cultured after storage in boric acid. Inhibition was noted in nine samples after storage in boric acid, seven of which were in underfilled bottles. Transport of specimens in boric acid produced less contamination than Dipslides but may inhibit growth in a small number of specimens. Technical failures with Dipslides were disappointingly high.</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Boric acid</subject><subject>Boric Acids</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Collections and collecting</subject><subject>Culture media</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic specimens</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Home Nursing</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical examination</subject><subject>Pediatric diseases</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Specimen Handling - methods</subject><subject>Urinalysis</subject><subject>Urinary tract</subject><subject>Urinary tract infections</subject><subject>Urinary Tract Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Urinary tract infections in children</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>Urine - microbiology</subject><issn>0003-9888</issn><issn>1468-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2P0zAQxS0EWkrhxhUpEhIcIMUfie1cQKsssMDCggSI28h2J8UliYudIPjvMbSqgAMnH95v3vjNI-Q2oyvGhHxk1m4l65VYcS2vkAWrpC45raqrZEEpFWWjtb5ObqS0pZRxrcUJOeFCVJzWC3J2HgYsXOh7dJMPYxG6Yo5-xCLt0PkBx1SWNkTvCuP8urBhmnpMRYjFmd-l3q8xPblJrnWmT3jr8C7Jh2dP37fn5cXl8xft6UVpayamUtuqs9hxVStqmNFdgxZZxTtnrLZSaMaFVFxXTrkmTyipKmZRUtYJgV0tluTx3nc32wHXDscpmh520Q8m_oBgPPytjP4zbMI3YKrhgvJscO9gEMPXGdMEg08O-96MGOYEqlE1143K4N1_wG2Y45jDgaBKq0rQWmTqwZ7amB7Bjy6ME36ffl9zg5Czt5dwqhsuRZ5Ykod72sWQUsTu-HFG4VeTkJsEWYOA3GTG7_wZ9ggfqst6udd9ykuPsolfQCqhanjzsYVPzeu37Sv6Et5l_v6et8P2_5t_AowStBM</recordid><startdate>19900301</startdate><enddate>19900301</enddate><creator>Jewkes, F E</creator><creator>McMaster, D J</creator><creator>Napier, W A</creator><creator>Houston, I B</creator><creator>Postlethwaite, R J</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900301</creationdate><title>Home collection of urine specimens--boric acid bottles or Dipslides?</title><author>Jewkes, F E ; McMaster, D J ; Napier, W A ; Houston, I B ; Postlethwaite, R J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b513t-8b4fbef27570a1a8f9ebe142fcab8b63812367284c7c951376741be601f33ef53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Boric acid</topic><topic>Boric Acids</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Collections and collecting</topic><topic>Culture media</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic specimens</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Home Nursing</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical examination</topic><topic>Pediatric diseases</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Specimen Handling - methods</topic><topic>Urinalysis</topic><topic>Urinary tract</topic><topic>Urinary tract infections</topic><topic>Urinary Tract Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Urinary tract infections in children</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>Urine - microbiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jewkes, F E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMaster, D J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Napier, W A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houston, I B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Postlethwaite, R J</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jewkes, F E</au><au>McMaster, D J</au><au>Napier, W A</au><au>Houston, I B</au><au>Postlethwaite, R J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Home collection of urine specimens--boric acid bottles or Dipslides?</atitle><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Dis Child</addtitle><date>1990-03-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>286</spage><epage>289</epage><pages>286-289</pages><issn>0003-9888</issn><eissn>1468-2044</eissn><abstract>Sterile mid stream specimens of urine (MSSU) were obtained from 84 children in a hospital outpatient department. All 84 children collected urine at home by one of two Dipslide methods and by collection into boric acid within 24 hours of the hospital collected MSSU. The samples collected at home were posted to the hospital. Thirty six of the Dipslides (43%) and nine of the boric acid samples (10%) were not sterile but none had a pure growth of a single organism of greater than 10(5) organisms/ml. In addition, 17 of the Dipslides (20%) were returned with one or both media detached and therefore could not be relied upon to exclude urinary tract infection. In a second part to the study, 95 urines which showed a significant growth in primary culture were also cultured after storage in boric acid. Inhibition was noted in nine samples after storage in boric acid, seven of which were in underfilled bottles. Transport of specimens in boric acid produced less contamination than Dipslides but may inhibit growth in a small number of specimens. Technical failures with Dipslides were disappointingly high.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</pub><pmid>2334205</pmid><doi>10.1136/adc.65.3.286</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-9888
ispartof Archives of disease in childhood, 1990-03, Vol.65 (3), p.286-289
issn 0003-9888
1468-2044
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1792302
source Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Social Science Premium Collection; PubMed Central
subjects Acids
Adolescent
Analysis
Boric acid
Boric Acids
Child
Child, Preschool
Collections and collecting
Culture media
Diagnosis
Diagnostic specimens
Female
Home Nursing
Hospitals
Humans
Male
Medical examination
Pediatric diseases
Pediatrics
Specimen Handling - methods
Urinalysis
Urinary tract
Urinary tract infections
Urinary Tract Infections - diagnosis
Urinary tract infections in children
Urine
Urine - microbiology
title Home collection of urine specimens--boric acid bottles or Dipslides?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T09%3A13%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Home%20collection%20of%20urine%20specimens--boric%20acid%20bottles%20or%20Dipslides?&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20disease%20in%20childhood&rft.au=Jewkes,%20F%20E&rft.date=1990-03-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=286&rft.epage=289&rft.pages=286-289&rft.issn=0003-9888&rft.eissn=1468-2044&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/adc.65.3.286&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA8926374%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b513t-8b4fbef27570a1a8f9ebe142fcab8b63812367284c7c951376741be601f33ef53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3078743053&rft_id=info:pmid/2334205&rft_galeid=A8926374&rfr_iscdi=true