Loading…
Diagnostic performance of spectroscopic and perfusion MRI for distinction of brain tumours
Objective: To assess the value of spectroscopic and perfusion MRI for glioma grading and for distinguishing glioblastomas from metastases and from CNS lymphomas. Methods: The authors examined 79 consecutive patients with first detection of a brain neoplasm on nonenhanced CT scans and no therapy prio...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cancer imaging 2006-10, Vol.6 (Special Issue A), p.S32-S41 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1946-4eab12e74a922dfcc50203c9200226fa707f40701737d79a80012a891b8b04f43 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | S41 |
container_issue | Special Issue A |
container_start_page | S32 |
container_title | Cancer imaging |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Weber, M. A. |
description | Objective:
To assess the value of spectroscopic and perfusion MRI for glioma grading and for distinguishing glioblastomas from metastases and from CNS lymphomas.
Methods:
The authors examined 79 consecutive patients with first detection of a brain neoplasm on nonenhanced CT scans and no therapy prior to evaluation. Spectroscopic MRI; arterial spin-labeling MRI for measuring cerebral blood flow (CBF); first-pass dynamic, susceptibility-weighted, contrast-enhanced MRI for measuring cerebral blood volume; and T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI were performed. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed, and optimum thresholds for tumor classification and glioma grading were determined.
Results:
Perfusion MRI had a higher diagnostic performance than spectroscopic MRI. Because of a significantly higher tumor blood flow in glioblastomas compared with CNS lymphomas, a threshold value of 1.2 for CBF provided sensitivity of 97%, specificity of 80%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 94%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 89%. Because CBF was significantly higher in peritumoral nonenhancing T2-hyperintense regions of glioblastomas compared with metastases, a threshold value of 0.5 for CBF provided sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 100%, 71%, 94%, and 100%. Glioblastomas had the highest tumor blood flow values among all other glioma grades. For discrimination of glioblastomas from grade 3 gliomas, sensitivity was 97%, specificity was 50%, PPV was 84%, and NPV was 86% (CBF threshold value of 1.4), and for discrimination of glioblastomas from grade 2 gliomas, sensitivity was 94%, specificity was 78%, PPV was 94%, and NPV was 78% (CBF threshold value of 1.6).
Conclusion:
Perfusion MRI is predictive in distinguishing glioblastomas from metastases, CNS lymphomas and other gliomas vs. MRI and magnetic resonance spectroscopy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1102/1470-7330.2006.9096 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1805070</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1805070</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1946-4eab12e74a922dfcc50203c9200226fa707f40701737d79a80012a891b8b04f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkN1KxDAQhYMouK4-gTd9ga6Tn22aG0HWX1gRRG-8CWmarJFtUpJW8O1NXVn0aoYzcw6cD6FzDAuMgVxgxqHklMKCAFQLAaI6QLO9evhnP0YnKX0AEFELPkNv105tfEiD00Vvog2xU16bItgi9UYPMSQd-nxUvv15GJMLvnh8fijyb9G67PR6mLRsaaJyvhjGLowxnaIjq7bJnP3OOXq9vXlZ3Zfrp7uH1dW61FiwqmRGNZgYzpQgpLVaL4EA1SI3IaSyigO3DDhgTnnLhaoBMFG1wE3dALOMztHlLrcfm8602vghqq3so-tU_JJBOfn_4t273IRPiWtY5uAcQHcBOrdN0di9F4Oc-MqJnpzoyYmvnPjSb9Q8b4E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic performance of spectroscopic and perfusion MRI for distinction of brain tumours</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Weber, M. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Weber, M. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective:
To assess the value of spectroscopic and perfusion MRI for glioma grading and for distinguishing glioblastomas from metastases and from CNS lymphomas.
Methods:
The authors examined 79 consecutive patients with first detection of a brain neoplasm on nonenhanced CT scans and no therapy prior to evaluation. Spectroscopic MRI; arterial spin-labeling MRI for measuring cerebral blood flow (CBF); first-pass dynamic, susceptibility-weighted, contrast-enhanced MRI for measuring cerebral blood volume; and T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI were performed. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed, and optimum thresholds for tumor classification and glioma grading were determined.
Results:
Perfusion MRI had a higher diagnostic performance than spectroscopic MRI. Because of a significantly higher tumor blood flow in glioblastomas compared with CNS lymphomas, a threshold value of 1.2 for CBF provided sensitivity of 97%, specificity of 80%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 94%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 89%. Because CBF was significantly higher in peritumoral nonenhancing T2-hyperintense regions of glioblastomas compared with metastases, a threshold value of 0.5 for CBF provided sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 100%, 71%, 94%, and 100%. Glioblastomas had the highest tumor blood flow values among all other glioma grades. For discrimination of glioblastomas from grade 3 gliomas, sensitivity was 97%, specificity was 50%, PPV was 84%, and NPV was 86% (CBF threshold value of 1.4), and for discrimination of glioblastomas from grade 2 gliomas, sensitivity was 94%, specificity was 78%, PPV was 94%, and NPV was 78% (CBF threshold value of 1.6).
Conclusion:
Perfusion MRI is predictive in distinguishing glioblastomas from metastases, CNS lymphomas and other gliomas vs. MRI and magnetic resonance spectroscopy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-7330</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1740-5025</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-7330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1102/1470-7330.2006.9096</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>e-MED</publisher><ispartof>Cancer imaging, 2006-10, Vol.6 (Special Issue A), p.S32-S41</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2006 International Cancer Imaging Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1946-4eab12e74a922dfcc50203c9200226fa707f40701737d79a80012a891b8b04f43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1805070/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1805070/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weber, M. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic performance of spectroscopic and perfusion MRI for distinction of brain tumours</title><title>Cancer imaging</title><description>Objective:
To assess the value of spectroscopic and perfusion MRI for glioma grading and for distinguishing glioblastomas from metastases and from CNS lymphomas.
Methods:
The authors examined 79 consecutive patients with first detection of a brain neoplasm on nonenhanced CT scans and no therapy prior to evaluation. Spectroscopic MRI; arterial spin-labeling MRI for measuring cerebral blood flow (CBF); first-pass dynamic, susceptibility-weighted, contrast-enhanced MRI for measuring cerebral blood volume; and T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI were performed. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed, and optimum thresholds for tumor classification and glioma grading were determined.
Results:
Perfusion MRI had a higher diagnostic performance than spectroscopic MRI. Because of a significantly higher tumor blood flow in glioblastomas compared with CNS lymphomas, a threshold value of 1.2 for CBF provided sensitivity of 97%, specificity of 80%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 94%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 89%. Because CBF was significantly higher in peritumoral nonenhancing T2-hyperintense regions of glioblastomas compared with metastases, a threshold value of 0.5 for CBF provided sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 100%, 71%, 94%, and 100%. Glioblastomas had the highest tumor blood flow values among all other glioma grades. For discrimination of glioblastomas from grade 3 gliomas, sensitivity was 97%, specificity was 50%, PPV was 84%, and NPV was 86% (CBF threshold value of 1.4), and for discrimination of glioblastomas from grade 2 gliomas, sensitivity was 94%, specificity was 78%, PPV was 94%, and NPV was 78% (CBF threshold value of 1.6).
Conclusion:
Perfusion MRI is predictive in distinguishing glioblastomas from metastases, CNS lymphomas and other gliomas vs. MRI and magnetic resonance spectroscopy.</description><issn>1470-7330</issn><issn>1740-5025</issn><issn>1470-7330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkN1KxDAQhYMouK4-gTd9ga6Tn22aG0HWX1gRRG-8CWmarJFtUpJW8O1NXVn0aoYzcw6cD6FzDAuMgVxgxqHklMKCAFQLAaI6QLO9evhnP0YnKX0AEFELPkNv105tfEiD00Vvog2xU16bItgi9UYPMSQd-nxUvv15GJMLvnh8fijyb9G67PR6mLRsaaJyvhjGLowxnaIjq7bJnP3OOXq9vXlZ3Zfrp7uH1dW61FiwqmRGNZgYzpQgpLVaL4EA1SI3IaSyigO3DDhgTnnLhaoBMFG1wE3dALOMztHlLrcfm8602vghqq3so-tU_JJBOfn_4t273IRPiWtY5uAcQHcBOrdN0di9F4Oc-MqJnpzoyYmvnPjSb9Q8b4E</recordid><startdate>20061031</startdate><enddate>20061031</enddate><creator>Weber, M. A.</creator><general>e-MED</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061031</creationdate><title>Diagnostic performance of spectroscopic and perfusion MRI for distinction of brain tumours</title><author>Weber, M. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1946-4eab12e74a922dfcc50203c9200226fa707f40701737d79a80012a891b8b04f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weber, M. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancer imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weber, M. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic performance of spectroscopic and perfusion MRI for distinction of brain tumours</atitle><jtitle>Cancer imaging</jtitle><date>2006-10-31</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>Special Issue A</issue><spage>S32</spage><epage>S41</epage><pages>S32-S41</pages><issn>1470-7330</issn><issn>1740-5025</issn><eissn>1470-7330</eissn><abstract>Objective:
To assess the value of spectroscopic and perfusion MRI for glioma grading and for distinguishing glioblastomas from metastases and from CNS lymphomas.
Methods:
The authors examined 79 consecutive patients with first detection of a brain neoplasm on nonenhanced CT scans and no therapy prior to evaluation. Spectroscopic MRI; arterial spin-labeling MRI for measuring cerebral blood flow (CBF); first-pass dynamic, susceptibility-weighted, contrast-enhanced MRI for measuring cerebral blood volume; and T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI were performed. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed, and optimum thresholds for tumor classification and glioma grading were determined.
Results:
Perfusion MRI had a higher diagnostic performance than spectroscopic MRI. Because of a significantly higher tumor blood flow in glioblastomas compared with CNS lymphomas, a threshold value of 1.2 for CBF provided sensitivity of 97%, specificity of 80%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 94%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 89%. Because CBF was significantly higher in peritumoral nonenhancing T2-hyperintense regions of glioblastomas compared with metastases, a threshold value of 0.5 for CBF provided sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 100%, 71%, 94%, and 100%. Glioblastomas had the highest tumor blood flow values among all other glioma grades. For discrimination of glioblastomas from grade 3 gliomas, sensitivity was 97%, specificity was 50%, PPV was 84%, and NPV was 86% (CBF threshold value of 1.4), and for discrimination of glioblastomas from grade 2 gliomas, sensitivity was 94%, specificity was 78%, PPV was 94%, and NPV was 78% (CBF threshold value of 1.6).
Conclusion:
Perfusion MRI is predictive in distinguishing glioblastomas from metastases, CNS lymphomas and other gliomas vs. MRI and magnetic resonance spectroscopy.</abstract><pub>e-MED</pub><doi>10.1102/1470-7330.2006.9096</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1470-7330 |
ispartof | Cancer imaging, 2006-10, Vol.6 (Special Issue A), p.S32-S41 |
issn | 1470-7330 1740-5025 1470-7330 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1805070 |
source | PubMed Central |
title | Diagnostic performance of spectroscopic and perfusion MRI for distinction of brain tumours |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A50%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20performance%20of%20spectroscopic%20and%20perfusion%20MRI%20for%20distinction%20of%20brain%20tumours&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20imaging&rft.au=Weber,%20M.%20A.&rft.date=2006-10-31&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=Special%20Issue%20A&rft.spage=S32&rft.epage=S41&rft.pages=S32-S41&rft.issn=1470-7330&rft.eissn=1470-7330&rft_id=info:doi/10.1102/1470-7330.2006.9096&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral_cross%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1805070%3C/pubmedcentral_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1946-4eab12e74a922dfcc50203c9200226fa707f40701737d79a80012a891b8b04f43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |