Comparing the quality of oral anticoagulant management by anticoagulation clinics and by family physicians: a randomized controlled trial

• Published in: Canadian Medical Association journal 2003-08, Vol.169 (4), p.293-298
• Main Authors: Wilson, S. Jo-Anne, Wells, Philip S, Kovacs, Michael J, Lewis, Geoffrey M, Martin, Janet, Burton, Erica, Anderson, David R
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Ambulatory Care Facilities - statistics & numerical data; Anticoagulants; Anticoagulants - therapeutic use; Cardiovascular Diseases - drug therapy; Confidence Intervals; Endpoint Determination; Family physicians; Female; Health care; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Management; Middle Aged; Physicians, Family; Physiological aspects; Prospective Studies; Quality of Health Care; Thromboembolism - drug therapy; Thromboembolism - prevention & control; Thrombosis; Treatment; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin - therapeutic use
• ISSN: 0008-4409; 0820-3946; 1488-2329

There is growing evidence that better outcomes are achieved when anticoagulation is managed by anticoagulation clinics rather than by family physicians. We carried out a randomized controlled trial to evaluate these 2 models of anticoagulant care. We randomly allocated patients who were expected to require warfarin sodium for 3 months either to anticoagulation clinics located in 3 Canadian tertiary hospitals or to their family physician practices. We evaluated the quality of oral anticoagulant management by comparing the proportion of time that the international normalized ratio (INR) of patients receiving warfarin sodium was within the target therapeutic range +/- 0.2 INR units (expanded therapeutic range) while they were managed in anticoagulation clinics as opposed to family physicians' care over 3 months. We measured the rates of thromboembolic and major hemorrhagic events and patient satisfaction in the 2 groups. Of the 221 patients enrolled, 112 were randomly assigned to anticoagulation clinics and 109 to family physicians. The INR values of patients who were managed by anticoagulation clinics were within the expanded therapeutic range 82% of the time versus 76% of the time for those managed by family physicians (p = 0.034). High-risk INR values (defined as being < 1.5 or > 5.0) were more commonly observed in patients managed by family physicians (40%) than in patients managed by anticoagulation clinics (30%, p = 0.005). More INR measurements were performed by family physicians than by anticoagulation clinics (13 v. 11, p = 0.001). Major bleeding events (2 [2%] v. 1 [1%]), thromboembolic events (1 [1%] v. 2 [2%]) and deaths (5 [4%] v. 6 [6%]) occurred at a similar frequency in the anticoagulation clinic and family physician groups respectively. Of the 170 (77%) patients who completed the patient satisfaction questionnaire, more were satisfied when their anticoagulant management was managed through anticoagulation clinics than by their family physicians (p = 0.001). Anticoagulation clinics provided better oral anticoagulant management than family physicians, but the differences were relatively modest.