Removal of nonnative fish results in population expansion of a declining amphibian (mountain yellow-legged frog, Rana muscosa)

• Published in: Biological conservation 2007-02, Vol.135 (1), p.11-20
• Main Authors: Knapp, Roland A., Boiano, Daniel M., Vredenburg, Vance T.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agnatha. Pisces; Alpine lakes; Amphibian decline; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Applied ecology; Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis; Biological and medical sciences; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife; Fish eradication; Freshwater; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Introduced species; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking; Rana muscosa; Restoration; Sierra Nevada; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution
• ISSN: 0006-3207; 1873-2917
• DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.09.013

The mountain yellow-legged frog ( Rana muscosa) was once a common inhabitant of the Sierra Nevada (California, USA), but has declined precipitously during the past century due in part to the introduction of nonnative fish into naturally fishless habitats. The objectives of the current study were to describe (1) the effect of fish removal from three lakes (located in two watersheds) on the small, remnant R. muscosa populations inhabiting those lakes, and (2) the initial development of metapopulation structure in each watershed as R. muscosa from expanding populations in fish-removal lakes dispersed to adjacent habitats. At all three fish-removal lakes, R. muscosa population densities increased significantly following the removal of predatory fish. The magnitude of these increases was significantly greater than that observed over the same time period in R. muscosa populations inhabiting control lakes that remained in their natural fishless condition. Following these population increases, R. muscosa dispersed to adjacent suitable (but unoccupied) sites, moving between 200 and 900 m along streams or across dry land. Together, these results suggest that large-scale removal of introduced fish could result in at least partial reversal of the decline of R. muscosa. Continued monitoring of R. muscosa at the fish-removal sites will be necessary to determine whether the positive effects of fish eradication are sustained over the long-term, especially in light of the increasingly important role played by an emerging infectious disease (chytridiomycosis, caused by Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis) in influencing R. muscosa populations.