Loading…

Safety and reactogenicity of an MSP-1 malaria vaccine candidate: a randomized phase Ib dose-escalation trial in Kenyan children

Our aim was to evaluate the safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of an investigational malaria vaccine. This was an age-stratified phase Ib, double-blind, randomized, controlled, dose-escalation trial. Children were recruited into one of three cohorts (dosage groups) and randomized in 2:1 fash...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLoS clinical trials 2006-11, Vol.1 (7), p.e32-e32
Main Authors: Withers, Mark R, McKinney, Denise, Ogutu, Bernhards R, Waitumbi, John N, Milman, Jessica B, Apollo, Odika J, Allen, Otieno G, Tucker, Kathryn, Soisson, Lorraine A, Diggs, Carter, Leach, Amanda, Wittes, Janet, Dubovsky, Filip, Stewart, V Ann, Remich, Shon A, Cohen, Joe, Ballou, W Ripley, Holland, Carolyn A, Lyon, Jeffrey A, Angov, Evelina, Stoute, José A, Martin, Samuel K, Heppner, Jr, D Gray
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Our aim was to evaluate the safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of an investigational malaria vaccine. This was an age-stratified phase Ib, double-blind, randomized, controlled, dose-escalation trial. Children were recruited into one of three cohorts (dosage groups) and randomized in 2:1 fashion to receive either the test product or a comparator. The study was conducted in a rural population in Kombewa Division, western Kenya. Subjects were 135 children, aged 12-47 mo. Subjects received 10, 25, or 50 microg of falciparum malaria protein 1 (FMP1) formulated in 100, 250, and 500 microL, respectively, of AS02A, or they received a comparator (Imovax (rabies vaccine). We performed safety and reactogenicity parameters and assessment of adverse events during solicited (7 d) and unsolicited (30 d) periods after each vaccination. Serious adverse events were monitored for 6 mo after the last vaccination. Both vaccines were safe and well tolerated. FMP1/AS02A recipients experienced significantly more pain and injection-site swelling with a dose-effect relationship. Systemic reactogenicity was low at all dose levels. Hemoglobin levels remained stable and similar across arms. Baseline geometric mean titers were comparable in all groups. Anti-FMP1 antibody titers increased in a dose-dependent manner in subjects receiving FMP1/AS02A; no increase in anti-FMP1 titers occurred in subjects who received the comparator. By study end, subjects who received either 25 or 50 microg of FMP1 had similar antibody levels, which remained significantly higher than that of those who received the comparator or 10 microg of FMP1. A longitudinal mixed effects model showed a statistically significant effect of dosage level on immune response (F(3,1047) = 10.78, or F(3, 995) = 11.22, p < 0.001); however, the comparison of 25 microg and 50 microg recipients indicated no significant difference (F(1,1047) = 0.05; p = 0.82). The FMP1/AS02A vaccine was safe and immunogenic in malaria-exposed 12- to 47-mo-old children and the magnitude of immune response of the 25 and 50 microg doses was superior to that of the 10 microg dose.
ISSN:1555-5887
1555-5887
DOI:10.1371/journal.pctr.0010032