Loading…

The Influence of Protonation States on the Dynamics of the NhaA Antiporter from Escherichia coli

The crystal structure of NhaA Na +/H + antiporter of Escherichia coli has provided a basis to explore the mechanism of Na + and H + exchange and its regulation by pH. However, the dynamics and nature of the pH-induced changes in the proteins remained unknown. Using molecular mechanics methods, we st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biophysical journal 2007-06, Vol.92 (11), p.3784-3791
Main Authors: Olkhova, Elena, Padan, Etana, Michel, Hartmut
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The crystal structure of NhaA Na +/H + antiporter of Escherichia coli has provided a basis to explore the mechanism of Na + and H + exchange and its regulation by pH. However, the dynamics and nature of the pH-induced changes in the proteins remained unknown. Using molecular mechanics methods, we studied the dynamic behavior of the hydrogen-bonded network in NhaA on shifting the pH from 4 to 8. The helical regions preserved the general architecture of NhaA throughout the pH change. In contrast, large conformational drifts occurred at pH 8 in the loop regions, and an increased flexibility of helix IVp was observed on the pH shift. A remarkable pH-induced conformational reorganization was found: at acidic pH helix X is slightly curved, whereas at alkaline pH, it is kinked around residue Lys 300. The barrier that exists between the cytoplasmic and periplasmic funnels at low pH is removed, and the two funnels are bridged by hydrogen bonds between water molecules and residues located in the TMSs IV/XI assembly and helix X at alkaline pH. In the variant Gly 338Ser that lost pH control, a hydrogen-bonded chain between Ser 338 and Lys 300 was found to block the pH-induced conformational reorganization of helix X.
ISSN:0006-3495
1542-0086
DOI:10.1529/biophysj.106.098269