Loading…
Is there a role for the intravenous urogram in the 21st century?
Over the last two decades, there have been major advances in methods of medical imaging that have brought great benefits to patients both for diagnosis and for treatment. There has been an increasing tendency for some of these new imaging modalities to be dependent on highly sophisticated technology...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 2006-01, Vol.88 (1), p.62-65 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-5f79a7c8008b61606b83e307be2384c65b3feef536e0c3c963d0151bdc9a3c263 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-5f79a7c8008b61606b83e307be2384c65b3feef536e0c3c963d0151bdc9a3c263 |
container_end_page | 65 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 62 |
container_title | Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England |
container_volume | 88 |
creator | Whitfield, A H N Whitfield, H N |
description | Over the last two decades, there have been major advances in methods of medical imaging that have brought great benefits to patients both for diagnosis and for treatment. There has been an increasing tendency for some of these new imaging modalities to be dependent on highly sophisticated technology. The belief has developed amongst doctors who use these techniques that newer is necessarily better. Just as patients (and some doctors) now often believe that anything done with a laser represents the best that can be offered, so there is a tendency to demand that newer techniques in imaging should always be offered as the preferred option. In urological practice that philosophy is questionable. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1308/003588406X83168 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1963625</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2207989906</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-5f79a7c8008b61606b83e307be2384c65b3feef536e0c3c963d0151bdc9a3c263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUMtqwzAQFKWlSdOeeyuGnt3sem1ZuvRB6AsCvbTQm5AVOQ8SK5XsQP6-dhP6Oi3MzM4Mw9g5whUSiCEAZUKkwN8FIRcHrI9pLuIcBB2yfsfGLU09dhLCAgBlLvCY9ZCnHHiKfXb7HKJ6Zr2NdOTd0kal8x0Qzava642tXBOixrup16sW-6ISDHVkbFU3fntzyo5KvQz2bH8H7O3h_nX0FI9fHp9Hd-PYpCjrOCtzqXMjAETBsQ0vBFmCvLAJidTwrKDS2jIjbsGQkZwmgBkWEyM1mYTTgF3vfNdNsbKTLt7rpVr7-Ur7rXJ6rv4y1Xympm6jsPXiSdYaXO4NvPtobKjVwjW-ajurJIFcCimhixnuVMa7ELwtvxMQVDe5-jd5-3Hxu9iPfr8xfQLXX3sn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2207989906</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is there a role for the intravenous urogram in the 21st century?</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Whitfield, A H N ; Whitfield, H N</creator><creatorcontrib>Whitfield, A H N ; Whitfield, H N</creatorcontrib><description>Over the last two decades, there have been major advances in methods of medical imaging that have brought great benefits to patients both for diagnosis and for treatment. There has been an increasing tendency for some of these new imaging modalities to be dependent on highly sophisticated technology. The belief has developed amongst doctors who use these techniques that newer is necessarily better. Just as patients (and some doctors) now often believe that anything done with a laser represents the best that can be offered, so there is a tendency to demand that newer techniques in imaging should always be offered as the preferred option. In urological practice that philosophy is questionable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-8843</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-7083</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1308/003588406X83168</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16460641</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Colic - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Kidney Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Kidney stones ; Medical imaging ; Pain ; Pathology ; Radiation Dosage ; Tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ureteral Obstruction - diagnostic imaging ; Urogenital system ; Urography - trends ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2006-01, Vol.88 (1), p.62-65</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal College of Surgeons of England Jan 2006</rights><rights>Copyright © 2006 by the Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-5f79a7c8008b61606b83e307be2384c65b3feef536e0c3c963d0151bdc9a3c263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-5f79a7c8008b61606b83e307be2384c65b3feef536e0c3c963d0151bdc9a3c263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1963625/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1963625/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16460641$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Whitfield, A H N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitfield, H N</creatorcontrib><title>Is there a role for the intravenous urogram in the 21st century?</title><title>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</title><addtitle>Ann R Coll Surg Engl</addtitle><description>Over the last two decades, there have been major advances in methods of medical imaging that have brought great benefits to patients both for diagnosis and for treatment. There has been an increasing tendency for some of these new imaging modalities to be dependent on highly sophisticated technology. The belief has developed amongst doctors who use these techniques that newer is necessarily better. Just as patients (and some doctors) now often believe that anything done with a laser represents the best that can be offered, so there is a tendency to demand that newer techniques in imaging should always be offered as the preferred option. In urological practice that philosophy is questionable.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Colic - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Kidney stones</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ureteral Obstruction - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Urogenital system</subject><subject>Urography - trends</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0035-8843</issn><issn>1478-7083</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdUMtqwzAQFKWlSdOeeyuGnt3sem1ZuvRB6AsCvbTQm5AVOQ8SK5XsQP6-dhP6Oi3MzM4Mw9g5whUSiCEAZUKkwN8FIRcHrI9pLuIcBB2yfsfGLU09dhLCAgBlLvCY9ZCnHHiKfXb7HKJ6Zr2NdOTd0kal8x0Qzava642tXBOixrup16sW-6ISDHVkbFU3fntzyo5KvQz2bH8H7O3h_nX0FI9fHp9Hd-PYpCjrOCtzqXMjAETBsQ0vBFmCvLAJidTwrKDS2jIjbsGQkZwmgBkWEyM1mYTTgF3vfNdNsbKTLt7rpVr7-Ur7rXJ6rv4y1Xympm6jsPXiSdYaXO4NvPtobKjVwjW-ajurJIFcCimhixnuVMa7ELwtvxMQVDe5-jd5-3Hxu9iPfr8xfQLXX3sn</recordid><startdate>200601</startdate><enddate>200601</enddate><creator>Whitfield, A H N</creator><creator>Whitfield, H N</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>The Royal College of Surgeons of England</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200601</creationdate><title>Is there a role for the intravenous urogram in the 21st century?</title><author>Whitfield, A H N ; Whitfield, H N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-5f79a7c8008b61606b83e307be2384c65b3feef536e0c3c963d0151bdc9a3c263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Colic - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Kidney stones</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ureteral Obstruction - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Urogenital system</topic><topic>Urography - trends</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Whitfield, A H N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitfield, H N</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>UK & Ireland Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Whitfield, A H N</au><au>Whitfield, H N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is there a role for the intravenous urogram in the 21st century?</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</jtitle><addtitle>Ann R Coll Surg Engl</addtitle><date>2006-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>62</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>62-65</pages><issn>0035-8843</issn><eissn>1478-7083</eissn><abstract>Over the last two decades, there have been major advances in methods of medical imaging that have brought great benefits to patients both for diagnosis and for treatment. There has been an increasing tendency for some of these new imaging modalities to be dependent on highly sophisticated technology. The belief has developed amongst doctors who use these techniques that newer is necessarily better. Just as patients (and some doctors) now often believe that anything done with a laser represents the best that can be offered, so there is a tendency to demand that newer techniques in imaging should always be offered as the preferred option. In urological practice that philosophy is questionable.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>16460641</pmid><doi>10.1308/003588406X83168</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0035-8843 |
ispartof | Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2006-01, Vol.88 (1), p.62-65 |
issn | 0035-8843 1478-7083 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1963625 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | Abdomen Colic - diagnostic imaging Humans Kidney Diseases - diagnostic imaging Kidney stones Medical imaging Pain Pathology Radiation Dosage Tomography Tomography, X-Ray Computed Ultrasonic imaging Ureteral Obstruction - diagnostic imaging Urogenital system Urography - trends Urology |
title | Is there a role for the intravenous urogram in the 21st century? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A48%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20there%20a%20role%20for%20the%20intravenous%20urogram%20in%20the%2021st%20century?&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20Royal%20College%20of%20Surgeons%20of%20England&rft.au=Whitfield,%20A%20H%20N&rft.date=2006-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=62&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=62-65&rft.issn=0035-8843&rft.eissn=1478-7083&rft_id=info:doi/10.1308/003588406X83168&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2207989906%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-5f79a7c8008b61606b83e307be2384c65b3feef536e0c3c963d0151bdc9a3c263%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2207989906&rft_id=info:pmid/16460641&rfr_iscdi=true |