Loading…

A blinded, randomised, controlled trial of stapled versus tissue glue closure of neck surgery incisions

Cosmetic acceptability of scar and neck mobility are important outcomes after collar line incision for neck surgery. This randomised, controlled trial compares these parameters in closures using tissue glue (Dermabond, Ethicon, UK) and skin staples. Patients requiring a collar line incision were ran...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 2007-04, Vol.89 (3), p.242-246
Main Authors: Ridgway, D M, Mahmood, F, Moore, L, Bramley, D, Moore, P J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-85f7482ba0864f64fd3886e759b6f031e759b2e8f230081c4d5b7e06a2cc6fc63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-85f7482ba0864f64fd3886e759b6f031e759b2e8f230081c4d5b7e06a2cc6fc63
container_end_page 246
container_issue 3
container_start_page 242
container_title Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
container_volume 89
creator Ridgway, D M
Mahmood, F
Moore, L
Bramley, D
Moore, P J
description Cosmetic acceptability of scar and neck mobility are important outcomes after collar line incision for neck surgery. This randomised, controlled trial compares these parameters in closures using tissue glue (Dermabond, Ethicon, UK) and skin staples. Patients requiring a collar line incision were randomised to receiving tissue glue or staples for skin closure. Time for closure to be completed was recorded. Mobility of the neck was assessed using a visual analogue scale at 48 h and 1 week after surgery. At 6 weeks, cosmetic appearance was assessed using a linear 1-10 visual analogue scale by the patient, surgeon and an independent blinded assessor. Results were compared using appropriate statistical tests. Glued (n = 14) and stapled (n = 15) closures were performed for hemithyroidectomy (n = 8 versus 6), sub-total thyroidectomy (n = 2 versus 4), total thyroidectomy (n = 1 versus 4) and parathyroidectomy (n = 3 versus 1). Closure with tissue glue took significantly longer than with staples (mean, 95 versus 28 s; P < 0.001). Neck mobility scores were comparable at 48 h and 1 week (mean, 4.8 versus 4.4; P = 0.552: and 2.7 versus 2.6; P = 0.886). Cosmetic appearance at 6 weeks was comparable when patient (mean, 1.7 versus 1.8; P = 0.898), surgeon (mean, 2.6 versus 2.3; P = 0.633) and independent assessment (mean, 1.4 versus 1.9; P = 0.365) was performed. The use of glued skin closure may increase the duration of surgery but acceptable neck mobility and wound cosmesis can be achieved by the more rapid application of stapled skin closure in cervicotomy incisions.
doi_str_mv 10.1308/003588407X179062
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1964725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70320453</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-85f7482ba0864f64fd3886e759b6f031e759b2e8f230081c4d5b7e06a2cc6fc63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUU1rHSEUldLSvHzsswpCIatMc_0YdTaFEJK2EMgmge7EcZxXU5--6kwg_75O80jTgOjVc-7hHg9CxwQ-EwbqHIC1SnGQP4jsQNB3aEW4VI0Exd6j1QI3FWd7aL-UBwDSSUU-oj0iWcclyBVaX-A--Di44QxnE4e08WWpbYpTTiG4AU_Zm4DTiMtktsvDo8tlLnjypcwOr0PdbEhlzm5hRWd_4XpZu_yEfbS--BTLIfowmlDc0e48QPfXV3eX35qb26_fLy9uGsu5nBrVjpIr2htQgo91DUwp4WTb9WIERv5W1KmRMgBFLB_aXjoQhlorRivYAfryrLud-40brKs2TNDb7DcmP-lkvP4fif6nXqdHTTrBJW2rwOlOIKffsyuTrj9iXQgmujQXLYFR4C2rxE9viA9pzrGa05SC7ASjHa0seGbZnErJbnwZhYBeMtRvM6wtJ68t_GvYhcb-AC-8mGU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2207963292</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A blinded, randomised, controlled trial of stapled versus tissue glue closure of neck surgery incisions</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ridgway, D M ; Mahmood, F ; Moore, L ; Bramley, D ; Moore, P J</creator><creatorcontrib>Ridgway, D M ; Mahmood, F ; Moore, L ; Bramley, D ; Moore, P J</creatorcontrib><description>Cosmetic acceptability of scar and neck mobility are important outcomes after collar line incision for neck surgery. This randomised, controlled trial compares these parameters in closures using tissue glue (Dermabond, Ethicon, UK) and skin staples. Patients requiring a collar line incision were randomised to receiving tissue glue or staples for skin closure. Time for closure to be completed was recorded. Mobility of the neck was assessed using a visual analogue scale at 48 h and 1 week after surgery. At 6 weeks, cosmetic appearance was assessed using a linear 1-10 visual analogue scale by the patient, surgeon and an independent blinded assessor. Results were compared using appropriate statistical tests. Glued (n = 14) and stapled (n = 15) closures were performed for hemithyroidectomy (n = 8 versus 6), sub-total thyroidectomy (n = 2 versus 4), total thyroidectomy (n = 1 versus 4) and parathyroidectomy (n = 3 versus 1). Closure with tissue glue took significantly longer than with staples (mean, 95 versus 28 s; P &lt; 0.001). Neck mobility scores were comparable at 48 h and 1 week (mean, 4.8 versus 4.4; P = 0.552: and 2.7 versus 2.6; P = 0.886). Cosmetic appearance at 6 weeks was comparable when patient (mean, 1.7 versus 1.8; P = 0.898), surgeon (mean, 2.6 versus 2.3; P = 0.633) and independent assessment (mean, 1.4 versus 1.9; P = 0.365) was performed. The use of glued skin closure may increase the duration of surgery but acceptable neck mobility and wound cosmesis can be achieved by the more rapid application of stapled skin closure in cervicotomy incisions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-8843</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-7083</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1308/003588407X179062</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17394707</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Adhesives ; Cicatrix - etiology ; Cyanoacrylates - therapeutic use ; Double-Blind Method ; Head and Neck ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Neck - surgery ; Patient Satisfaction ; Patients ; Skin ; Surgery ; Surgical Stapling ; Suture Techniques ; Thyroid Diseases - surgery ; Thyroid gland ; Thyroidectomy - methods ; Tissue Adhesives - therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; Wound Healing - physiology</subject><ispartof>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2007-04, Vol.89 (3), p.242-246</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal College of Surgeons of England Apr 2007</rights><rights>Copyright © 2007 by the Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-85f7482ba0864f64fd3886e759b6f031e759b2e8f230081c4d5b7e06a2cc6fc63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-85f7482ba0864f64fd3886e759b6f031e759b2e8f230081c4d5b7e06a2cc6fc63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1964725/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1964725/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17394707$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ridgway, D M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmood, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bramley, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, P J</creatorcontrib><title>A blinded, randomised, controlled trial of stapled versus tissue glue closure of neck surgery incisions</title><title>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</title><addtitle>Ann R Coll Surg Engl</addtitle><description>Cosmetic acceptability of scar and neck mobility are important outcomes after collar line incision for neck surgery. This randomised, controlled trial compares these parameters in closures using tissue glue (Dermabond, Ethicon, UK) and skin staples. Patients requiring a collar line incision were randomised to receiving tissue glue or staples for skin closure. Time for closure to be completed was recorded. Mobility of the neck was assessed using a visual analogue scale at 48 h and 1 week after surgery. At 6 weeks, cosmetic appearance was assessed using a linear 1-10 visual analogue scale by the patient, surgeon and an independent blinded assessor. Results were compared using appropriate statistical tests. Glued (n = 14) and stapled (n = 15) closures were performed for hemithyroidectomy (n = 8 versus 6), sub-total thyroidectomy (n = 2 versus 4), total thyroidectomy (n = 1 versus 4) and parathyroidectomy (n = 3 versus 1). Closure with tissue glue took significantly longer than with staples (mean, 95 versus 28 s; P &lt; 0.001). Neck mobility scores were comparable at 48 h and 1 week (mean, 4.8 versus 4.4; P = 0.552: and 2.7 versus 2.6; P = 0.886). Cosmetic appearance at 6 weeks was comparable when patient (mean, 1.7 versus 1.8; P = 0.898), surgeon (mean, 2.6 versus 2.3; P = 0.633) and independent assessment (mean, 1.4 versus 1.9; P = 0.365) was performed. The use of glued skin closure may increase the duration of surgery but acceptable neck mobility and wound cosmesis can be achieved by the more rapid application of stapled skin closure in cervicotomy incisions.</description><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>Cicatrix - etiology</subject><subject>Cyanoacrylates - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Head and Neck</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Neck - surgery</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Stapling</subject><subject>Suture Techniques</subject><subject>Thyroid Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Thyroid gland</subject><subject>Thyroidectomy - methods</subject><subject>Tissue Adhesives - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Wound Healing - physiology</subject><issn>0035-8843</issn><issn>1478-7083</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdUU1rHSEUldLSvHzsswpCIatMc_0YdTaFEJK2EMgmge7EcZxXU5--6kwg_75O80jTgOjVc-7hHg9CxwQ-EwbqHIC1SnGQP4jsQNB3aEW4VI0Exd6j1QI3FWd7aL-UBwDSSUU-oj0iWcclyBVaX-A--Di44QxnE4e08WWpbYpTTiG4AU_Zm4DTiMtktsvDo8tlLnjypcwOr0PdbEhlzm5hRWd_4XpZu_yEfbS--BTLIfowmlDc0e48QPfXV3eX35qb26_fLy9uGsu5nBrVjpIr2htQgo91DUwp4WTb9WIERv5W1KmRMgBFLB_aXjoQhlorRivYAfryrLud-40brKs2TNDb7DcmP-lkvP4fif6nXqdHTTrBJW2rwOlOIKffsyuTrj9iXQgmujQXLYFR4C2rxE9viA9pzrGa05SC7ASjHa0seGbZnErJbnwZhYBeMtRvM6wtJ68t_GvYhcb-AC-8mGU</recordid><startdate>20070401</startdate><enddate>20070401</enddate><creator>Ridgway, D M</creator><creator>Mahmood, F</creator><creator>Moore, L</creator><creator>Bramley, D</creator><creator>Moore, P J</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>The Royal College of Surgeons of England</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070401</creationdate><title>A blinded, randomised, controlled trial of stapled versus tissue glue closure of neck surgery incisions</title><author>Ridgway, D M ; Mahmood, F ; Moore, L ; Bramley, D ; Moore, P J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-85f7482ba0864f64fd3886e759b6f031e759b2e8f230081c4d5b7e06a2cc6fc63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>Cicatrix - etiology</topic><topic>Cyanoacrylates - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Head and Neck</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Neck - surgery</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Stapling</topic><topic>Suture Techniques</topic><topic>Thyroid Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Thyroid gland</topic><topic>Thyroidectomy - methods</topic><topic>Tissue Adhesives - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Wound Healing - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ridgway, D M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmood, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bramley, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, P J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>UK &amp; Ireland Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ridgway, D M</au><au>Mahmood, F</au><au>Moore, L</au><au>Bramley, D</au><au>Moore, P J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A blinded, randomised, controlled trial of stapled versus tissue glue closure of neck surgery incisions</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</jtitle><addtitle>Ann R Coll Surg Engl</addtitle><date>2007-04-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>242</spage><epage>246</epage><pages>242-246</pages><issn>0035-8843</issn><eissn>1478-7083</eissn><abstract>Cosmetic acceptability of scar and neck mobility are important outcomes after collar line incision for neck surgery. This randomised, controlled trial compares these parameters in closures using tissue glue (Dermabond, Ethicon, UK) and skin staples. Patients requiring a collar line incision were randomised to receiving tissue glue or staples for skin closure. Time for closure to be completed was recorded. Mobility of the neck was assessed using a visual analogue scale at 48 h and 1 week after surgery. At 6 weeks, cosmetic appearance was assessed using a linear 1-10 visual analogue scale by the patient, surgeon and an independent blinded assessor. Results were compared using appropriate statistical tests. Glued (n = 14) and stapled (n = 15) closures were performed for hemithyroidectomy (n = 8 versus 6), sub-total thyroidectomy (n = 2 versus 4), total thyroidectomy (n = 1 versus 4) and parathyroidectomy (n = 3 versus 1). Closure with tissue glue took significantly longer than with staples (mean, 95 versus 28 s; P &lt; 0.001). Neck mobility scores were comparable at 48 h and 1 week (mean, 4.8 versus 4.4; P = 0.552: and 2.7 versus 2.6; P = 0.886). Cosmetic appearance at 6 weeks was comparable when patient (mean, 1.7 versus 1.8; P = 0.898), surgeon (mean, 2.6 versus 2.3; P = 0.633) and independent assessment (mean, 1.4 versus 1.9; P = 0.365) was performed. The use of glued skin closure may increase the duration of surgery but acceptable neck mobility and wound cosmesis can be achieved by the more rapid application of stapled skin closure in cervicotomy incisions.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>17394707</pmid><doi>10.1308/003588407X179062</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0035-8843
ispartof Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2007-04, Vol.89 (3), p.242-246
issn 0035-8843
1478-7083
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1964725
source PubMed Central
subjects Adhesives
Cicatrix - etiology
Cyanoacrylates - therapeutic use
Double-Blind Method
Head and Neck
Hospitals
Humans
Neck - surgery
Patient Satisfaction
Patients
Skin
Surgery
Surgical Stapling
Suture Techniques
Thyroid Diseases - surgery
Thyroid gland
Thyroidectomy - methods
Tissue Adhesives - therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome
Wound Healing - physiology
title A blinded, randomised, controlled trial of stapled versus tissue glue closure of neck surgery incisions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A33%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20blinded,%20randomised,%20controlled%20trial%20of%20stapled%20versus%20tissue%20glue%20closure%20of%20neck%20surgery%20incisions&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20Royal%20College%20of%20Surgeons%20of%20England&rft.au=Ridgway,%20D%20M&rft.date=2007-04-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=242&rft.epage=246&rft.pages=242-246&rft.issn=0035-8843&rft.eissn=1478-7083&rft_id=info:doi/10.1308/003588407X179062&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70320453%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-85f7482ba0864f64fd3886e759b6f031e759b2e8f230081c4d5b7e06a2cc6fc63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2207963292&rft_id=info:pmid/17394707&rfr_iscdi=true