Loading…
A blinded, randomised, controlled trial of stapled versus tissue glue closure of neck surgery incisions
Cosmetic acceptability of scar and neck mobility are important outcomes after collar line incision for neck surgery. This randomised, controlled trial compares these parameters in closures using tissue glue (Dermabond, Ethicon, UK) and skin staples. Patients requiring a collar line incision were ran...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 2007-04, Vol.89 (3), p.242-246 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-85f7482ba0864f64fd3886e759b6f031e759b2e8f230081c4d5b7e06a2cc6fc63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-85f7482ba0864f64fd3886e759b6f031e759b2e8f230081c4d5b7e06a2cc6fc63 |
container_end_page | 246 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 242 |
container_title | Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England |
container_volume | 89 |
creator | Ridgway, D M Mahmood, F Moore, L Bramley, D Moore, P J |
description | Cosmetic acceptability of scar and neck mobility are important outcomes after collar line incision for neck surgery. This randomised, controlled trial compares these parameters in closures using tissue glue (Dermabond, Ethicon, UK) and skin staples.
Patients requiring a collar line incision were randomised to receiving tissue glue or staples for skin closure. Time for closure to be completed was recorded. Mobility of the neck was assessed using a visual analogue scale at 48 h and 1 week after surgery. At 6 weeks, cosmetic appearance was assessed using a linear 1-10 visual analogue scale by the patient, surgeon and an independent blinded assessor. Results were compared using appropriate statistical tests.
Glued (n = 14) and stapled (n = 15) closures were performed for hemithyroidectomy (n = 8 versus 6), sub-total thyroidectomy (n = 2 versus 4), total thyroidectomy (n = 1 versus 4) and parathyroidectomy (n = 3 versus 1). Closure with tissue glue took significantly longer than with staples (mean, 95 versus 28 s; P < 0.001). Neck mobility scores were comparable at 48 h and 1 week (mean, 4.8 versus 4.4; P = 0.552: and 2.7 versus 2.6; P = 0.886). Cosmetic appearance at 6 weeks was comparable when patient (mean, 1.7 versus 1.8; P = 0.898), surgeon (mean, 2.6 versus 2.3; P = 0.633) and independent assessment (mean, 1.4 versus 1.9; P = 0.365) was performed.
The use of glued skin closure may increase the duration of surgery but acceptable neck mobility and wound cosmesis can be achieved by the more rapid application of stapled skin closure in cervicotomy incisions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1308/003588407X179062 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1964725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70320453</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-85f7482ba0864f64fd3886e759b6f031e759b2e8f230081c4d5b7e06a2cc6fc63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUU1rHSEUldLSvHzsswpCIatMc_0YdTaFEJK2EMgmge7EcZxXU5--6kwg_75O80jTgOjVc-7hHg9CxwQ-EwbqHIC1SnGQP4jsQNB3aEW4VI0Exd6j1QI3FWd7aL-UBwDSSUU-oj0iWcclyBVaX-A--Di44QxnE4e08WWpbYpTTiG4AU_Zm4DTiMtktsvDo8tlLnjypcwOr0PdbEhlzm5hRWd_4XpZu_yEfbS--BTLIfowmlDc0e48QPfXV3eX35qb26_fLy9uGsu5nBrVjpIr2htQgo91DUwp4WTb9WIERv5W1KmRMgBFLB_aXjoQhlorRivYAfryrLud-40brKs2TNDb7DcmP-lkvP4fif6nXqdHTTrBJW2rwOlOIKffsyuTrj9iXQgmujQXLYFR4C2rxE9viA9pzrGa05SC7ASjHa0seGbZnErJbnwZhYBeMtRvM6wtJ68t_GvYhcb-AC-8mGU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2207963292</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A blinded, randomised, controlled trial of stapled versus tissue glue closure of neck surgery incisions</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ridgway, D M ; Mahmood, F ; Moore, L ; Bramley, D ; Moore, P J</creator><creatorcontrib>Ridgway, D M ; Mahmood, F ; Moore, L ; Bramley, D ; Moore, P J</creatorcontrib><description>Cosmetic acceptability of scar and neck mobility are important outcomes after collar line incision for neck surgery. This randomised, controlled trial compares these parameters in closures using tissue glue (Dermabond, Ethicon, UK) and skin staples.
Patients requiring a collar line incision were randomised to receiving tissue glue or staples for skin closure. Time for closure to be completed was recorded. Mobility of the neck was assessed using a visual analogue scale at 48 h and 1 week after surgery. At 6 weeks, cosmetic appearance was assessed using a linear 1-10 visual analogue scale by the patient, surgeon and an independent blinded assessor. Results were compared using appropriate statistical tests.
Glued (n = 14) and stapled (n = 15) closures were performed for hemithyroidectomy (n = 8 versus 6), sub-total thyroidectomy (n = 2 versus 4), total thyroidectomy (n = 1 versus 4) and parathyroidectomy (n = 3 versus 1). Closure with tissue glue took significantly longer than with staples (mean, 95 versus 28 s; P < 0.001). Neck mobility scores were comparable at 48 h and 1 week (mean, 4.8 versus 4.4; P = 0.552: and 2.7 versus 2.6; P = 0.886). Cosmetic appearance at 6 weeks was comparable when patient (mean, 1.7 versus 1.8; P = 0.898), surgeon (mean, 2.6 versus 2.3; P = 0.633) and independent assessment (mean, 1.4 versus 1.9; P = 0.365) was performed.
The use of glued skin closure may increase the duration of surgery but acceptable neck mobility and wound cosmesis can be achieved by the more rapid application of stapled skin closure in cervicotomy incisions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-8843</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-7083</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1308/003588407X179062</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17394707</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Adhesives ; Cicatrix - etiology ; Cyanoacrylates - therapeutic use ; Double-Blind Method ; Head and Neck ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Neck - surgery ; Patient Satisfaction ; Patients ; Skin ; Surgery ; Surgical Stapling ; Suture Techniques ; Thyroid Diseases - surgery ; Thyroid gland ; Thyroidectomy - methods ; Tissue Adhesives - therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; Wound Healing - physiology</subject><ispartof>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2007-04, Vol.89 (3), p.242-246</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal College of Surgeons of England Apr 2007</rights><rights>Copyright © 2007 by the Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-85f7482ba0864f64fd3886e759b6f031e759b2e8f230081c4d5b7e06a2cc6fc63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-85f7482ba0864f64fd3886e759b6f031e759b2e8f230081c4d5b7e06a2cc6fc63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1964725/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1964725/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17394707$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ridgway, D M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmood, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bramley, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, P J</creatorcontrib><title>A blinded, randomised, controlled trial of stapled versus tissue glue closure of neck surgery incisions</title><title>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</title><addtitle>Ann R Coll Surg Engl</addtitle><description>Cosmetic acceptability of scar and neck mobility are important outcomes after collar line incision for neck surgery. This randomised, controlled trial compares these parameters in closures using tissue glue (Dermabond, Ethicon, UK) and skin staples.
Patients requiring a collar line incision were randomised to receiving tissue glue or staples for skin closure. Time for closure to be completed was recorded. Mobility of the neck was assessed using a visual analogue scale at 48 h and 1 week after surgery. At 6 weeks, cosmetic appearance was assessed using a linear 1-10 visual analogue scale by the patient, surgeon and an independent blinded assessor. Results were compared using appropriate statistical tests.
Glued (n = 14) and stapled (n = 15) closures were performed for hemithyroidectomy (n = 8 versus 6), sub-total thyroidectomy (n = 2 versus 4), total thyroidectomy (n = 1 versus 4) and parathyroidectomy (n = 3 versus 1). Closure with tissue glue took significantly longer than with staples (mean, 95 versus 28 s; P < 0.001). Neck mobility scores were comparable at 48 h and 1 week (mean, 4.8 versus 4.4; P = 0.552: and 2.7 versus 2.6; P = 0.886). Cosmetic appearance at 6 weeks was comparable when patient (mean, 1.7 versus 1.8; P = 0.898), surgeon (mean, 2.6 versus 2.3; P = 0.633) and independent assessment (mean, 1.4 versus 1.9; P = 0.365) was performed.
The use of glued skin closure may increase the duration of surgery but acceptable neck mobility and wound cosmesis can be achieved by the more rapid application of stapled skin closure in cervicotomy incisions.</description><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>Cicatrix - etiology</subject><subject>Cyanoacrylates - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Head and Neck</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Neck - surgery</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Stapling</subject><subject>Suture Techniques</subject><subject>Thyroid Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Thyroid gland</subject><subject>Thyroidectomy - methods</subject><subject>Tissue Adhesives - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Wound Healing - physiology</subject><issn>0035-8843</issn><issn>1478-7083</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdUU1rHSEUldLSvHzsswpCIatMc_0YdTaFEJK2EMgmge7EcZxXU5--6kwg_75O80jTgOjVc-7hHg9CxwQ-EwbqHIC1SnGQP4jsQNB3aEW4VI0Exd6j1QI3FWd7aL-UBwDSSUU-oj0iWcclyBVaX-A--Di44QxnE4e08WWpbYpTTiG4AU_Zm4DTiMtktsvDo8tlLnjypcwOr0PdbEhlzm5hRWd_4XpZu_yEfbS--BTLIfowmlDc0e48QPfXV3eX35qb26_fLy9uGsu5nBrVjpIr2htQgo91DUwp4WTb9WIERv5W1KmRMgBFLB_aXjoQhlorRivYAfryrLud-40brKs2TNDb7DcmP-lkvP4fif6nXqdHTTrBJW2rwOlOIKffsyuTrj9iXQgmujQXLYFR4C2rxE9viA9pzrGa05SC7ASjHa0seGbZnErJbnwZhYBeMtRvM6wtJ68t_GvYhcb-AC-8mGU</recordid><startdate>20070401</startdate><enddate>20070401</enddate><creator>Ridgway, D M</creator><creator>Mahmood, F</creator><creator>Moore, L</creator><creator>Bramley, D</creator><creator>Moore, P J</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>The Royal College of Surgeons of England</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070401</creationdate><title>A blinded, randomised, controlled trial of stapled versus tissue glue closure of neck surgery incisions</title><author>Ridgway, D M ; Mahmood, F ; Moore, L ; Bramley, D ; Moore, P J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-85f7482ba0864f64fd3886e759b6f031e759b2e8f230081c4d5b7e06a2cc6fc63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>Cicatrix - etiology</topic><topic>Cyanoacrylates - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Head and Neck</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Neck - surgery</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Stapling</topic><topic>Suture Techniques</topic><topic>Thyroid Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Thyroid gland</topic><topic>Thyroidectomy - methods</topic><topic>Tissue Adhesives - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Wound Healing - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ridgway, D M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmood, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bramley, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, P J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>UK & Ireland Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ridgway, D M</au><au>Mahmood, F</au><au>Moore, L</au><au>Bramley, D</au><au>Moore, P J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A blinded, randomised, controlled trial of stapled versus tissue glue closure of neck surgery incisions</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</jtitle><addtitle>Ann R Coll Surg Engl</addtitle><date>2007-04-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>242</spage><epage>246</epage><pages>242-246</pages><issn>0035-8843</issn><eissn>1478-7083</eissn><abstract>Cosmetic acceptability of scar and neck mobility are important outcomes after collar line incision for neck surgery. This randomised, controlled trial compares these parameters in closures using tissue glue (Dermabond, Ethicon, UK) and skin staples.
Patients requiring a collar line incision were randomised to receiving tissue glue or staples for skin closure. Time for closure to be completed was recorded. Mobility of the neck was assessed using a visual analogue scale at 48 h and 1 week after surgery. At 6 weeks, cosmetic appearance was assessed using a linear 1-10 visual analogue scale by the patient, surgeon and an independent blinded assessor. Results were compared using appropriate statistical tests.
Glued (n = 14) and stapled (n = 15) closures were performed for hemithyroidectomy (n = 8 versus 6), sub-total thyroidectomy (n = 2 versus 4), total thyroidectomy (n = 1 versus 4) and parathyroidectomy (n = 3 versus 1). Closure with tissue glue took significantly longer than with staples (mean, 95 versus 28 s; P < 0.001). Neck mobility scores were comparable at 48 h and 1 week (mean, 4.8 versus 4.4; P = 0.552: and 2.7 versus 2.6; P = 0.886). Cosmetic appearance at 6 weeks was comparable when patient (mean, 1.7 versus 1.8; P = 0.898), surgeon (mean, 2.6 versus 2.3; P = 0.633) and independent assessment (mean, 1.4 versus 1.9; P = 0.365) was performed.
The use of glued skin closure may increase the duration of surgery but acceptable neck mobility and wound cosmesis can be achieved by the more rapid application of stapled skin closure in cervicotomy incisions.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>17394707</pmid><doi>10.1308/003588407X179062</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0035-8843 |
ispartof | Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2007-04, Vol.89 (3), p.242-246 |
issn | 0035-8843 1478-7083 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1964725 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | Adhesives Cicatrix - etiology Cyanoacrylates - therapeutic use Double-Blind Method Head and Neck Hospitals Humans Neck - surgery Patient Satisfaction Patients Skin Surgery Surgical Stapling Suture Techniques Thyroid Diseases - surgery Thyroid gland Thyroidectomy - methods Tissue Adhesives - therapeutic use Treatment Outcome Wound Healing - physiology |
title | A blinded, randomised, controlled trial of stapled versus tissue glue closure of neck surgery incisions |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A33%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20blinded,%20randomised,%20controlled%20trial%20of%20stapled%20versus%20tissue%20glue%20closure%20of%20neck%20surgery%20incisions&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20Royal%20College%20of%20Surgeons%20of%20England&rft.au=Ridgway,%20D%20M&rft.date=2007-04-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=242&rft.epage=246&rft.pages=242-246&rft.issn=0035-8843&rft.eissn=1478-7083&rft_id=info:doi/10.1308/003588407X179062&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70320453%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-85f7482ba0864f64fd3886e759b6f031e759b2e8f230081c4d5b7e06a2cc6fc63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2207963292&rft_id=info:pmid/17394707&rfr_iscdi=true |