Loading…

Herb–drug interactions: Review and assessment of report reliability

Aims  The aim of this systematic review was to assess the published clinical evidence on interactions between herbal and conventional drugs. Methods  Four electronic databases were searched for case reports, case series or clinical trials of such interactions. The data were extracted and validated u...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of clinical pharmacology 2001-11, Vol.52 (5), p.587-595
Main Authors: Fugh‐Berman, Adriane, Ernst, E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aims  The aim of this systematic review was to assess the published clinical evidence on interactions between herbal and conventional drugs. Methods  Four electronic databases were searched for case reports, case series or clinical trials of such interactions. The data were extracted and validated using a scoring system for interaction probability. Results  One hundred and eight cases of suspected interactions were found. 68.5% were classified as ‘unable to be evaluated’, 13% as ‘well‐documented’ and 18.5% as ‘possible’ interactions. Warfarin was the most common drug (18 cases) and St John's wort the most common herb (54 cases) involved. Conclusion  Herb–drug interactions undoubtedly do occur and may put individuals at risk. However our present knowledge is incomplete and more research is urgently needed.
ISSN:0306-5251
1365-2125
DOI:10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01469.x