Loading…
High-dose etoposide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells: efficacy and toxicity at three dose levels
High-dose etoposide (2.0-2.4 g m(-2)) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is an effective strategy to mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs), although in some patients this is associated with significant toxicity. Sixty-three patients with malignancy were enrolled into thi...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of cancer 1998-10, Vol.78 (7), p.928-932 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-912eba7a8f0107e7e607bd0bb44b55bee58a201414494e24c840238f92bde7863 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 932 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 928 |
container_title | British journal of cancer |
container_volume | 78 |
creator | Kanfer, EJ McGuigan, D Samson, D Abboudi, Z Abrahamson, G Apperley, JF Chilcott, S Craddock, C Davis, J MacDonald, C Macdonald, D Olavarria, E Philpott, N Rustin, GJ Seckl, MJ Sekhar, M Stern, S Newlands, ES |
description | High-dose etoposide (2.0-2.4 g m(-2)) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is an effective strategy to mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs), although in some patients this is associated with significant toxicity. Sixty-three patients with malignancy were enrolled into this non-randomized sequential study. The majority (55/63, 87%) had received at least two prior regimens of chemotherapy, and seven patients had previously failed to mobilize following high-dose cyclophosphamide with G-CSF. Consecutive patient groups received etoposide at three dose levels [2.0 g m(-2) (n = 22), 1.8 g m(-2) (n = 20) and 1.6 g m(-2) (n = 21)] followed by daily G-CSF. Subsequent leukaphereses were assayed for CD34+ cell content, with a target total collection of 2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells kg(-1). Toxicity was assessed by the development of significant mucositis, the requirement for parenteral antibiotics or blood component support and rehospitalization incidence. Ten patients (16%) had less than the minimum target yield collected. Median collections in the three groups were 4.7 (2 g m(-2)), 5.7 (1.8 g m(-2)) and 6.5 (1.6 g m(-2)) x 10(6) CD34+ cells kg(-1). Five of the seven patients who had previously failed cyclophosphamide mobilization achieved more than the target yield. Rehospitalization incidence was significantly lower in patients receiving 1.6 g m(-2) etoposide than in those receiving 2.0 g m(-2) (P = 0.03). These data suggest that high-dose etoposide with G-CSF is an efficient mobilization regimen in the majority of heavily pretreated patients, including those who have previously failed on high-dose cyclophosphamide with G-CSF. An etoposide dose of 1.6 g m(-2) appears to be as effective as higher doses but less toxic. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/bjc.1998.603 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2063139</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>9764585</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-912eba7a8f0107e7e607bd0bb44b55bee58a201414494e24c840238f92bde7863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc2OFCEUhYnRjO3ozq0JC5dWC1XUDy5MzEQdk0nc6JoAdammQ0MFqBnbp_FRpexORxcuCLmcj3MvHIReUrKlpBneqr3eUs6HbUeaR2hD26au6FD3j9GGENJXhNfkKXqW0r6UnAz9Fbrifcfaod2gX7d22lVjSIAhhzkkOwJ-sHmHpyj94oI-ZsA6uOCPVcr2sDiZrZ-wkTqHiE1Zh6Cssz_LefA4GDxDtPMOonRYuRBGPMcwgbcrr8G59A6DMVZLfcTSjziHH1bbXIqM8y4C4D_zOLgHl56jJ0a6BC_O-zX6_unjt5vb6u7r5y83H-4qzXqaK05rULKXgyGU9NBDR3o1EqUYU22rANpB1oQyyhhnUDM9MFI3g-G1GqEfuuYavT_5zos6wKjB5_IAMUd7kPEogrTiX8XbnZjCvahJ19CGF4M3JwMdQ0oRzOUuJWINSpSgxBqUKEEV_NXf_S7wOZmivz7rMmnpTElD23TByuwtb9eu1QlLRfETRLEPS_Tlp_7XFp94L_MS4eJXoJVZkd9gLbs1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>High-dose etoposide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells: efficacy and toxicity at three dose levels</title><source>PubMed Central (Open Access)</source><creator>Kanfer, EJ ; McGuigan, D ; Samson, D ; Abboudi, Z ; Abrahamson, G ; Apperley, JF ; Chilcott, S ; Craddock, C ; Davis, J ; MacDonald, C ; Macdonald, D ; Olavarria, E ; Philpott, N ; Rustin, GJ ; Seckl, MJ ; Sekhar, M ; Stern, S ; Newlands, ES</creator><creatorcontrib>Kanfer, EJ ; McGuigan, D ; Samson, D ; Abboudi, Z ; Abrahamson, G ; Apperley, JF ; Chilcott, S ; Craddock, C ; Davis, J ; MacDonald, C ; Macdonald, D ; Olavarria, E ; Philpott, N ; Rustin, GJ ; Seckl, MJ ; Sekhar, M ; Stern, S ; Newlands, ES</creatorcontrib><description>High-dose etoposide (2.0-2.4 g m(-2)) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is an effective strategy to mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs), although in some patients this is associated with significant toxicity. Sixty-three patients with malignancy were enrolled into this non-randomized sequential study. The majority (55/63, 87%) had received at least two prior regimens of chemotherapy, and seven patients had previously failed to mobilize following high-dose cyclophosphamide with G-CSF. Consecutive patient groups received etoposide at three dose levels [2.0 g m(-2) (n = 22), 1.8 g m(-2) (n = 20) and 1.6 g m(-2) (n = 21)] followed by daily G-CSF. Subsequent leukaphereses were assayed for CD34+ cell content, with a target total collection of 2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells kg(-1). Toxicity was assessed by the development of significant mucositis, the requirement for parenteral antibiotics or blood component support and rehospitalization incidence. Ten patients (16%) had less than the minimum target yield collected. Median collections in the three groups were 4.7 (2 g m(-2)), 5.7 (1.8 g m(-2)) and 6.5 (1.6 g m(-2)) x 10(6) CD34+ cells kg(-1). Five of the seven patients who had previously failed cyclophosphamide mobilization achieved more than the target yield. Rehospitalization incidence was significantly lower in patients receiving 1.6 g m(-2) etoposide than in those receiving 2.0 g m(-2) (P = 0.03). These data suggest that high-dose etoposide with G-CSF is an efficient mobilization regimen in the majority of heavily pretreated patients, including those who have previously failed on high-dose cyclophosphamide with G-CSF. An etoposide dose of 1.6 g m(-2) appears to be as effective as higher doses but less toxic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1827</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.603</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9764585</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJCAAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Acute Disease ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic agents ; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic - administration & dosage ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Cancer Research ; Chemotherapy ; Choriocarcinoma - therapy ; clinical-oncology ; Drug Resistance ; Epidemiology ; Etoposide - administration & dosage ; Female ; Germinoma - therapy ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor - administration & dosage ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization - methods ; Hodgkin Disease - therapy ; Humans ; Leukemia - therapy ; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin - therapy ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Molecular Medicine ; Multiple Myeloma - therapy ; Neoplasms - therapy ; Oncology ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><ispartof>British journal of cancer, 1998-10, Vol.78 (7), p.928-932</ispartof><rights>Cancer Research Campaign 1998</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-912eba7a8f0107e7e607bd0bb44b55bee58a201414494e24c840238f92bde7863</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2063139/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2063139/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27915,27916,53782,53784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2385959$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9764585$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kanfer, EJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuigan, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samson, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abboudi, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrahamson, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apperley, JF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chilcott, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craddock, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macdonald, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olavarria, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philpott, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rustin, GJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seckl, MJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekhar, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newlands, ES</creatorcontrib><title>High-dose etoposide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells: efficacy and toxicity at three dose levels</title><title>British journal of cancer</title><addtitle>Br J Cancer</addtitle><addtitle>Br J Cancer</addtitle><description>High-dose etoposide (2.0-2.4 g m(-2)) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is an effective strategy to mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs), although in some patients this is associated with significant toxicity. Sixty-three patients with malignancy were enrolled into this non-randomized sequential study. The majority (55/63, 87%) had received at least two prior regimens of chemotherapy, and seven patients had previously failed to mobilize following high-dose cyclophosphamide with G-CSF. Consecutive patient groups received etoposide at three dose levels [2.0 g m(-2) (n = 22), 1.8 g m(-2) (n = 20) and 1.6 g m(-2) (n = 21)] followed by daily G-CSF. Subsequent leukaphereses were assayed for CD34+ cell content, with a target total collection of 2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells kg(-1). Toxicity was assessed by the development of significant mucositis, the requirement for parenteral antibiotics or blood component support and rehospitalization incidence. Ten patients (16%) had less than the minimum target yield collected. Median collections in the three groups were 4.7 (2 g m(-2)), 5.7 (1.8 g m(-2)) and 6.5 (1.6 g m(-2)) x 10(6) CD34+ cells kg(-1). Five of the seven patients who had previously failed cyclophosphamide mobilization achieved more than the target yield. Rehospitalization incidence was significantly lower in patients receiving 1.6 g m(-2) etoposide than in those receiving 2.0 g m(-2) (P = 0.03). These data suggest that high-dose etoposide with G-CSF is an efficient mobilization regimen in the majority of heavily pretreated patients, including those who have previously failed on high-dose cyclophosphamide with G-CSF. An etoposide dose of 1.6 g m(-2) appears to be as effective as higher doses but less toxic.</description><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antineoplastic agents</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Choriocarcinoma - therapy</subject><subject>clinical-oncology</subject><subject>Drug Resistance</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Etoposide - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germinoma - therapy</subject><subject>Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization - methods</subject><subject>Hodgkin Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leukemia - therapy</subject><subject>Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Molecular Medicine</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - therapy</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><issn>0007-0920</issn><issn>1532-1827</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc2OFCEUhYnRjO3ozq0JC5dWC1XUDy5MzEQdk0nc6JoAdammQ0MFqBnbp_FRpexORxcuCLmcj3MvHIReUrKlpBneqr3eUs6HbUeaR2hD26au6FD3j9GGENJXhNfkKXqW0r6UnAz9Fbrifcfaod2gX7d22lVjSIAhhzkkOwJ-sHmHpyj94oI-ZsA6uOCPVcr2sDiZrZ-wkTqHiE1Zh6Cssz_LefA4GDxDtPMOonRYuRBGPMcwgbcrr8G59A6DMVZLfcTSjziHH1bbXIqM8y4C4D_zOLgHl56jJ0a6BC_O-zX6_unjt5vb6u7r5y83H-4qzXqaK05rULKXgyGU9NBDR3o1EqUYU22rANpB1oQyyhhnUDM9MFI3g-G1GqEfuuYavT_5zos6wKjB5_IAMUd7kPEogrTiX8XbnZjCvahJ19CGF4M3JwMdQ0oRzOUuJWINSpSgxBqUKEEV_NXf_S7wOZmivz7rMmnpTElD23TByuwtb9eu1QlLRfETRLEPS_Tlp_7XFp94L_MS4eJXoJVZkd9gLbs1</recordid><startdate>19981001</startdate><enddate>19981001</enddate><creator>Kanfer, EJ</creator><creator>McGuigan, D</creator><creator>Samson, D</creator><creator>Abboudi, Z</creator><creator>Abrahamson, G</creator><creator>Apperley, JF</creator><creator>Chilcott, S</creator><creator>Craddock, C</creator><creator>Davis, J</creator><creator>MacDonald, C</creator><creator>Macdonald, D</creator><creator>Olavarria, E</creator><creator>Philpott, N</creator><creator>Rustin, GJ</creator><creator>Seckl, MJ</creator><creator>Sekhar, M</creator><creator>Stern, S</creator><creator>Newlands, ES</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><general>Nature Publishing Group|1</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19981001</creationdate><title>High-dose etoposide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells: efficacy and toxicity at three dose levels</title><author>Kanfer, EJ ; McGuigan, D ; Samson, D ; Abboudi, Z ; Abrahamson, G ; Apperley, JF ; Chilcott, S ; Craddock, C ; Davis, J ; MacDonald, C ; Macdonald, D ; Olavarria, E ; Philpott, N ; Rustin, GJ ; Seckl, MJ ; Sekhar, M ; Stern, S ; Newlands, ES</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-912eba7a8f0107e7e607bd0bb44b55bee58a201414494e24c840238f92bde7863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antineoplastic agents</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Choriocarcinoma - therapy</topic><topic>clinical-oncology</topic><topic>Drug Resistance</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Etoposide - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germinoma - therapy</topic><topic>Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization - methods</topic><topic>Hodgkin Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leukemia - therapy</topic><topic>Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Molecular Medicine</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - therapy</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kanfer, EJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuigan, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samson, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abboudi, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrahamson, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apperley, JF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chilcott, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craddock, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macdonald, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olavarria, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philpott, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rustin, GJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seckl, MJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekhar, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newlands, ES</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kanfer, EJ</au><au>McGuigan, D</au><au>Samson, D</au><au>Abboudi, Z</au><au>Abrahamson, G</au><au>Apperley, JF</au><au>Chilcott, S</au><au>Craddock, C</au><au>Davis, J</au><au>MacDonald, C</au><au>Macdonald, D</au><au>Olavarria, E</au><au>Philpott, N</au><au>Rustin, GJ</au><au>Seckl, MJ</au><au>Sekhar, M</au><au>Stern, S</au><au>Newlands, ES</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>High-dose etoposide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells: efficacy and toxicity at three dose levels</atitle><jtitle>British journal of cancer</jtitle><stitle>Br J Cancer</stitle><addtitle>Br J Cancer</addtitle><date>1998-10-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>928</spage><epage>932</epage><pages>928-932</pages><issn>0007-0920</issn><eissn>1532-1827</eissn><coden>BJCAAI</coden><abstract>High-dose etoposide (2.0-2.4 g m(-2)) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is an effective strategy to mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs), although in some patients this is associated with significant toxicity. Sixty-three patients with malignancy were enrolled into this non-randomized sequential study. The majority (55/63, 87%) had received at least two prior regimens of chemotherapy, and seven patients had previously failed to mobilize following high-dose cyclophosphamide with G-CSF. Consecutive patient groups received etoposide at three dose levels [2.0 g m(-2) (n = 22), 1.8 g m(-2) (n = 20) and 1.6 g m(-2) (n = 21)] followed by daily G-CSF. Subsequent leukaphereses were assayed for CD34+ cell content, with a target total collection of 2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells kg(-1). Toxicity was assessed by the development of significant mucositis, the requirement for parenteral antibiotics or blood component support and rehospitalization incidence. Ten patients (16%) had less than the minimum target yield collected. Median collections in the three groups were 4.7 (2 g m(-2)), 5.7 (1.8 g m(-2)) and 6.5 (1.6 g m(-2)) x 10(6) CD34+ cells kg(-1). Five of the seven patients who had previously failed cyclophosphamide mobilization achieved more than the target yield. Rehospitalization incidence was significantly lower in patients receiving 1.6 g m(-2) etoposide than in those receiving 2.0 g m(-2) (P = 0.03). These data suggest that high-dose etoposide with G-CSF is an efficient mobilization regimen in the majority of heavily pretreated patients, including those who have previously failed on high-dose cyclophosphamide with G-CSF. An etoposide dose of 1.6 g m(-2) appears to be as effective as higher doses but less toxic.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>9764585</pmid><doi>10.1038/bjc.1998.603</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-0920 |
ispartof | British journal of cancer, 1998-10, Vol.78 (7), p.928-932 |
issn | 0007-0920 1532-1827 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2063139 |
source | PubMed Central (Open Access) |
subjects | Acute Disease Adolescent Adult Aged Antineoplastic agents Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic - administration & dosage Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use Biological and medical sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Cancer Research Chemotherapy Choriocarcinoma - therapy clinical-oncology Drug Resistance Epidemiology Etoposide - administration & dosage Female Germinoma - therapy Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor - administration & dosage Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization - methods Hodgkin Disease - therapy Humans Leukemia - therapy Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin - therapy Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Molecular Medicine Multiple Myeloma - therapy Neoplasms - therapy Oncology Pharmacology. Drug treatments |
title | High-dose etoposide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells: efficacy and toxicity at three dose levels |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T00%3A30%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High-dose%20etoposide%20with%20granulocyte%20colony-stimulating%20factor%20for%20mobilization%20of%20peripheral%20blood%20progenitor%20cells:%20efficacy%20and%20toxicity%20at%20three%20dose%20levels&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20cancer&rft.au=Kanfer,%20EJ&rft.date=1998-10-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=928&rft.epage=932&rft.pages=928-932&rft.issn=0007-0920&rft.eissn=1532-1827&rft.coden=BJCAAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/bjc.1998.603&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E9764585%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-912eba7a8f0107e7e607bd0bb44b55bee58a201414494e24c840238f92bde7863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/9764585&rfr_iscdi=true |