Loading…
Effort/reward imbalance and sedentary lifestyle: an observational study in a large occupational cohort
Objectives: To investigate the association between effort/reward imbalance (ERI) at work and sedentary lifestyle. Methods: Cross sectional data from the ongoing Finnish Public Sector Study related to 30 433 women and 7718 men aged 17–64 were used (n = 35 918 after exclusion of participants with miss...
Saved in:
Published in: | Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England) England), 2006-06, Vol.63 (6), p.422-427 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-1f879797825e50660ad89ad8c7e85ace1969d1f62cd3c076652786f5b00dacd53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-1f879797825e50660ad89ad8c7e85ace1969d1f62cd3c076652786f5b00dacd53 |
container_end_page | 427 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 422 |
container_title | Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England) |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Kouvonen, A Kivimäki, M Elovainio, M Pentti, J Linna, A Virtanen, M Vahtera, J |
description | Objectives: To investigate the association between effort/reward imbalance (ERI) at work and sedentary lifestyle. Methods: Cross sectional data from the ongoing Finnish Public Sector Study related to 30 433 women and 7718 men aged 17–64 were used (n = 35 918 after exclusion of participants with missing values in covariates). From the responses to a questionnaire, an aggregated mean score for ERI in a work unit was assigned to each participant. The outcome was sedentary lifestyle defined as |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/oem.2005.020974 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2078103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27732752</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27732752</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-1f879797825e50660ad89ad8c7e85ace1969d1f62cd3c076652786f5b00dacd53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkttrFDEYxQdRbK0--6QERB-E2c1lkkx8EGSprVIqFC_gS8jk0s46M1mTmer-935l1q36IiEkcH455OSkKB4TvCCEiWX0_YJizBeYYiWrO8UhqSQupaLiLuwZJyWWhBwUD3JeY0yYZPR-cUBEpWTNq8MiHIcQ07hM_odJDrV9YzozWI_M4FD2zg-jSVvUtcHncdv5VyCg2GSfrs3YxsF0KI-T26J2QAZ1Jl16FK2dNr9VG6_A_2FxL5gu-0e79aj49Pb44-q0PPtw8m715qxseFWNJQm1VDBqyj3HQmDjagXTSl9zYz1RQjkSBLWOWSyF4FTWIvAGY2es4-yoeD37bqam987C9ZPp9Ca1PcTQ0bT6b2Vor_RlvNYUy5pgBgYvdgYpfp8gs-7bbH0Hj-LjlLWQShEsCIDP_gHXcUqQOGsCVlQSjjFQy5myKeacfNhfhWB906CGBvVNg3puEE48_TPBLb-rDIDnO8Bka7qQoK4233JSypqxGrgnM7fOY0x7nUr4ApJT0MtZb_Pof-51k75BSCa5Pv-80ur04v3Xk_Mv-gL4lzPf9Ov_pvgFOWHLjw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781271500</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effort/reward imbalance and sedentary lifestyle: an observational study in a large occupational cohort</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kouvonen, A ; Kivimäki, M ; Elovainio, M ; Pentti, J ; Linna, A ; Virtanen, M ; Vahtera, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Kouvonen, A ; Kivimäki, M ; Elovainio, M ; Pentti, J ; Linna, A ; Virtanen, M ; Vahtera, J</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: To investigate the association between effort/reward imbalance (ERI) at work and sedentary lifestyle. Methods: Cross sectional data from the ongoing Finnish Public Sector Study related to 30 433 women and 7718 men aged 17–64 were used (n = 35 918 after exclusion of participants with missing values in covariates). From the responses to a questionnaire, an aggregated mean score for ERI in a work unit was assigned to each participant. The outcome was sedentary lifestyle defined as <2.00 metabolic equivalent task (MET) hours/day. Logistic regression with generalised estimating equations was used as an analysis method to include both individual and work unit level predictors in the models. Adjustments were made for age, marital status, occupational status, job contract, smoking, and heavy drinking. Results: Twenty five per cent of women and 27% of men had a sedentary lifestyle. High individual level ERI was associated with a higher likelihood of sedentary lifestyle both among women (odds ratio (OR) = 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.16) and men (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.33). These associations were not explained by relevant confounders and they were also independent of work unit level job strain measured as a ratio of job demands and control. Conclusions: A mismatch between high occupational effort spent and low reward received in turn seems to be associated with an increased risk of sedentary lifestyle, although this association is relatively weak.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1351-0711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-7926</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/oem.2005.020974</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16497854</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age ; Behavior ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body mass index ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; effort reward imbalance ; ERI ; Exercise ; Exercise - physiology ; Female ; Finland ; Humans ; Lack of exercise ; Legislation. Organization ; Leisure ; Leisure Activities ; Leisure time ; Life Style ; Lifestyles ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Men ; MET ; Metabolic equivalent ; metabolic equivalent task ; Middle Aged ; Modeling ; Observational studies ; Occupational health ; Occupational Health - statistics & numerical data ; Occupational medicine ; Occupational stress ; Original ; physical activity ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Public sector ; Questionnaires ; Regression Analysis ; Reward ; Scope of employment ; Sedentary behavior ; sedentary lifestyle ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Studies ; work stress ; Working conditions ; Working women</subject><ispartof>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England), 2006-06, Vol.63 (6), p.422-427</ispartof><rights>Occupational and Environmental Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright 2006 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 2006 (c) Occupational and Environmental Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-1f879797825e50660ad89ad8c7e85ace1969d1f62cd3c076652786f5b00dacd53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-1f879797825e50660ad89ad8c7e85ace1969d1f62cd3c076652786f5b00dacd53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://oem.bmj.com/content/63/6/422.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://oem.bmj.com/content/63/6/422.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,314,727,780,784,885,3196,23571,27924,27925,53791,53793,58238,58471,77472,77503</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17778338$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16497854$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kouvonen, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kivimäki, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elovainio, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pentti, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linna, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virtanen, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vahtera, J</creatorcontrib><title>Effort/reward imbalance and sedentary lifestyle: an observational study in a large occupational cohort</title><title>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)</title><addtitle>Occup Environ Med</addtitle><description>Objectives: To investigate the association between effort/reward imbalance (ERI) at work and sedentary lifestyle. Methods: Cross sectional data from the ongoing Finnish Public Sector Study related to 30 433 women and 7718 men aged 17–64 were used (n = 35 918 after exclusion of participants with missing values in covariates). From the responses to a questionnaire, an aggregated mean score for ERI in a work unit was assigned to each participant. The outcome was sedentary lifestyle defined as <2.00 metabolic equivalent task (MET) hours/day. Logistic regression with generalised estimating equations was used as an analysis method to include both individual and work unit level predictors in the models. Adjustments were made for age, marital status, occupational status, job contract, smoking, and heavy drinking. Results: Twenty five per cent of women and 27% of men had a sedentary lifestyle. High individual level ERI was associated with a higher likelihood of sedentary lifestyle both among women (odds ratio (OR) = 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.16) and men (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.33). These associations were not explained by relevant confounders and they were also independent of work unit level job strain measured as a ratio of job demands and control. Conclusions: A mismatch between high occupational effort spent and low reward received in turn seems to be associated with an increased risk of sedentary lifestyle, although this association is relatively weak.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>effort reward imbalance</subject><subject>ERI</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Finland</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lack of exercise</subject><subject>Legislation. Organization</subject><subject>Leisure</subject><subject>Leisure Activities</subject><subject>Leisure time</subject><subject>Life Style</subject><subject>Lifestyles</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>MET</subject><subject>Metabolic equivalent</subject><subject>metabolic equivalent task</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Occupational Health - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Occupational medicine</subject><subject>Occupational stress</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>physical activity</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Public sector</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Reward</subject><subject>Scope of employment</subject><subject>Sedentary behavior</subject><subject>sedentary lifestyle</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>work stress</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><subject>Working women</subject><issn>1351-0711</issn><issn>1470-7926</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkttrFDEYxQdRbK0--6QERB-E2c1lkkx8EGSprVIqFC_gS8jk0s46M1mTmer-935l1q36IiEkcH455OSkKB4TvCCEiWX0_YJizBeYYiWrO8UhqSQupaLiLuwZJyWWhBwUD3JeY0yYZPR-cUBEpWTNq8MiHIcQ07hM_odJDrV9YzozWI_M4FD2zg-jSVvUtcHncdv5VyCg2GSfrs3YxsF0KI-T26J2QAZ1Jl16FK2dNr9VG6_A_2FxL5gu-0e79aj49Pb44-q0PPtw8m715qxseFWNJQm1VDBqyj3HQmDjagXTSl9zYz1RQjkSBLWOWSyF4FTWIvAGY2es4-yoeD37bqam987C9ZPp9Ca1PcTQ0bT6b2Vor_RlvNYUy5pgBgYvdgYpfp8gs-7bbH0Hj-LjlLWQShEsCIDP_gHXcUqQOGsCVlQSjjFQy5myKeacfNhfhWB906CGBvVNg3puEE48_TPBLb-rDIDnO8Bka7qQoK4233JSypqxGrgnM7fOY0x7nUr4ApJT0MtZb_Pof-51k75BSCa5Pv-80ur04v3Xk_Mv-gL4lzPf9Ov_pvgFOWHLjw</recordid><startdate>20060601</startdate><enddate>20060601</enddate><creator>Kouvonen, A</creator><creator>Kivimäki, M</creator><creator>Elovainio, M</creator><creator>Pentti, J</creator><creator>Linna, A</creator><creator>Virtanen, M</creator><creator>Vahtera, J</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Group</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060601</creationdate><title>Effort/reward imbalance and sedentary lifestyle: an observational study in a large occupational cohort</title><author>Kouvonen, A ; Kivimäki, M ; Elovainio, M ; Pentti, J ; Linna, A ; Virtanen, M ; Vahtera, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-1f879797825e50660ad89ad8c7e85ace1969d1f62cd3c076652786f5b00dacd53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>effort reward imbalance</topic><topic>ERI</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Finland</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lack of exercise</topic><topic>Legislation. Organization</topic><topic>Leisure</topic><topic>Leisure Activities</topic><topic>Leisure time</topic><topic>Life Style</topic><topic>Lifestyles</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>MET</topic><topic>Metabolic equivalent</topic><topic>metabolic equivalent task</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Occupational Health - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Occupational medicine</topic><topic>Occupational stress</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>physical activity</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Public sector</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Reward</topic><topic>Scope of employment</topic><topic>Sedentary behavior</topic><topic>sedentary lifestyle</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>work stress</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><topic>Working women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kouvonen, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kivimäki, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elovainio, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pentti, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linna, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virtanen, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vahtera, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kouvonen, A</au><au>Kivimäki, M</au><au>Elovainio, M</au><au>Pentti, J</au><au>Linna, A</au><au>Virtanen, M</au><au>Vahtera, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effort/reward imbalance and sedentary lifestyle: an observational study in a large occupational cohort</atitle><jtitle>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Occup Environ Med</addtitle><date>2006-06-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>422</spage><epage>427</epage><pages>422-427</pages><issn>1351-0711</issn><eissn>1470-7926</eissn><abstract>Objectives: To investigate the association between effort/reward imbalance (ERI) at work and sedentary lifestyle. Methods: Cross sectional data from the ongoing Finnish Public Sector Study related to 30 433 women and 7718 men aged 17–64 were used (n = 35 918 after exclusion of participants with missing values in covariates). From the responses to a questionnaire, an aggregated mean score for ERI in a work unit was assigned to each participant. The outcome was sedentary lifestyle defined as <2.00 metabolic equivalent task (MET) hours/day. Logistic regression with generalised estimating equations was used as an analysis method to include both individual and work unit level predictors in the models. Adjustments were made for age, marital status, occupational status, job contract, smoking, and heavy drinking. Results: Twenty five per cent of women and 27% of men had a sedentary lifestyle. High individual level ERI was associated with a higher likelihood of sedentary lifestyle both among women (odds ratio (OR) = 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.16) and men (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.33). These associations were not explained by relevant confounders and they were also independent of work unit level job strain measured as a ratio of job demands and control. Conclusions: A mismatch between high occupational effort spent and low reward received in turn seems to be associated with an increased risk of sedentary lifestyle, although this association is relatively weak.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>16497854</pmid><doi>10.1136/oem.2005.020974</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1351-0711 |
ispartof | Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England), 2006-06, Vol.63 (6), p.422-427 |
issn | 1351-0711 1470-7926 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2078103 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; BMJ Journals - NESLi2; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Age Behavior Biological and medical sciences Body mass index Cross-Sectional Studies effort reward imbalance ERI Exercise Exercise - physiology Female Finland Humans Lack of exercise Legislation. Organization Leisure Leisure Activities Leisure time Life Style Lifestyles Male Medical sciences Men MET Metabolic equivalent metabolic equivalent task Middle Aged Modeling Observational studies Occupational health Occupational Health - statistics & numerical data Occupational medicine Occupational stress Original physical activity Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Public sector Questionnaires Regression Analysis Reward Scope of employment Sedentary behavior sedentary lifestyle Socioeconomic Factors Studies work stress Working conditions Working women |
title | Effort/reward imbalance and sedentary lifestyle: an observational study in a large occupational cohort |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A13%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effort/reward%20imbalance%20and%20sedentary%20lifestyle:%20an%20observational%20study%20in%20a%20large%20occupational%20cohort&rft.jtitle=Occupational%20and%20environmental%20medicine%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Kouvonen,%20A&rft.date=2006-06-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=422&rft.epage=427&rft.pages=422-427&rft.issn=1351-0711&rft.eissn=1470-7926&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/oem.2005.020974&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E27732752%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-1f879797825e50660ad89ad8c7e85ace1969d1f62cd3c076652786f5b00dacd53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781271500&rft_id=info:pmid/16497854&rft_jstor_id=27732752&rfr_iscdi=true |