Loading…

Effort/reward imbalance and sedentary lifestyle: an observational study in a large occupational cohort

Objectives: To investigate the association between effort/reward imbalance (ERI) at work and sedentary lifestyle. Methods: Cross sectional data from the ongoing Finnish Public Sector Study related to 30 433 women and 7718 men aged 17–64 were used (n = 35 918 after exclusion of participants with miss...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England) England), 2006-06, Vol.63 (6), p.422-427
Main Authors: Kouvonen, A, Kivimäki, M, Elovainio, M, Pentti, J, Linna, A, Virtanen, M, Vahtera, J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-1f879797825e50660ad89ad8c7e85ace1969d1f62cd3c076652786f5b00dacd53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-1f879797825e50660ad89ad8c7e85ace1969d1f62cd3c076652786f5b00dacd53
container_end_page 427
container_issue 6
container_start_page 422
container_title Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)
container_volume 63
creator Kouvonen, A
Kivimäki, M
Elovainio, M
Pentti, J
Linna, A
Virtanen, M
Vahtera, J
description Objectives: To investigate the association between effort/reward imbalance (ERI) at work and sedentary lifestyle. Methods: Cross sectional data from the ongoing Finnish Public Sector Study related to 30 433 women and 7718 men aged 17–64 were used (n = 35 918 after exclusion of participants with missing values in covariates). From the responses to a questionnaire, an aggregated mean score for ERI in a work unit was assigned to each participant. The outcome was sedentary lifestyle defined as
doi_str_mv 10.1136/oem.2005.020974
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2078103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27732752</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27732752</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-1f879797825e50660ad89ad8c7e85ace1969d1f62cd3c076652786f5b00dacd53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkttrFDEYxQdRbK0--6QERB-E2c1lkkx8EGSprVIqFC_gS8jk0s46M1mTmer-935l1q36IiEkcH455OSkKB4TvCCEiWX0_YJizBeYYiWrO8UhqSQupaLiLuwZJyWWhBwUD3JeY0yYZPR-cUBEpWTNq8MiHIcQ07hM_odJDrV9YzozWI_M4FD2zg-jSVvUtcHncdv5VyCg2GSfrs3YxsF0KI-T26J2QAZ1Jl16FK2dNr9VG6_A_2FxL5gu-0e79aj49Pb44-q0PPtw8m715qxseFWNJQm1VDBqyj3HQmDjagXTSl9zYz1RQjkSBLWOWSyF4FTWIvAGY2es4-yoeD37bqam987C9ZPp9Ca1PcTQ0bT6b2Vor_RlvNYUy5pgBgYvdgYpfp8gs-7bbH0Hj-LjlLWQShEsCIDP_gHXcUqQOGsCVlQSjjFQy5myKeacfNhfhWB906CGBvVNg3puEE48_TPBLb-rDIDnO8Bka7qQoK4233JSypqxGrgnM7fOY0x7nUr4ApJT0MtZb_Pof-51k75BSCa5Pv-80ur04v3Xk_Mv-gL4lzPf9Ov_pvgFOWHLjw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781271500</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effort/reward imbalance and sedentary lifestyle: an observational study in a large occupational cohort</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kouvonen, A ; Kivimäki, M ; Elovainio, M ; Pentti, J ; Linna, A ; Virtanen, M ; Vahtera, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Kouvonen, A ; Kivimäki, M ; Elovainio, M ; Pentti, J ; Linna, A ; Virtanen, M ; Vahtera, J</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: To investigate the association between effort/reward imbalance (ERI) at work and sedentary lifestyle. Methods: Cross sectional data from the ongoing Finnish Public Sector Study related to 30 433 women and 7718 men aged 17–64 were used (n = 35 918 after exclusion of participants with missing values in covariates). From the responses to a questionnaire, an aggregated mean score for ERI in a work unit was assigned to each participant. The outcome was sedentary lifestyle defined as &lt;2.00 metabolic equivalent task (MET) hours/day. Logistic regression with generalised estimating equations was used as an analysis method to include both individual and work unit level predictors in the models. Adjustments were made for age, marital status, occupational status, job contract, smoking, and heavy drinking. Results: Twenty five per cent of women and 27% of men had a sedentary lifestyle. High individual level ERI was associated with a higher likelihood of sedentary lifestyle both among women (odds ratio (OR) = 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.16) and men (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.33). These associations were not explained by relevant confounders and they were also independent of work unit level job strain measured as a ratio of job demands and control. Conclusions: A mismatch between high occupational effort spent and low reward received in turn seems to be associated with an increased risk of sedentary lifestyle, although this association is relatively weak.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1351-0711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-7926</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/oem.2005.020974</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16497854</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age ; Behavior ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body mass index ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; effort reward imbalance ; ERI ; Exercise ; Exercise - physiology ; Female ; Finland ; Humans ; Lack of exercise ; Legislation. Organization ; Leisure ; Leisure Activities ; Leisure time ; Life Style ; Lifestyles ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Men ; MET ; Metabolic equivalent ; metabolic equivalent task ; Middle Aged ; Modeling ; Observational studies ; Occupational health ; Occupational Health - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Occupational medicine ; Occupational stress ; Original ; physical activity ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Public sector ; Questionnaires ; Regression Analysis ; Reward ; Scope of employment ; Sedentary behavior ; sedentary lifestyle ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Studies ; work stress ; Working conditions ; Working women</subject><ispartof>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England), 2006-06, Vol.63 (6), p.422-427</ispartof><rights>Occupational and Environmental Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright 2006 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 2006 (c) Occupational and Environmental Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-1f879797825e50660ad89ad8c7e85ace1969d1f62cd3c076652786f5b00dacd53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-1f879797825e50660ad89ad8c7e85ace1969d1f62cd3c076652786f5b00dacd53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://oem.bmj.com/content/63/6/422.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://oem.bmj.com/content/63/6/422.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,314,727,780,784,885,3196,23571,27924,27925,53791,53793,58238,58471,77472,77503</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17778338$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16497854$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kouvonen, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kivimäki, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elovainio, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pentti, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linna, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virtanen, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vahtera, J</creatorcontrib><title>Effort/reward imbalance and sedentary lifestyle: an observational study in a large occupational cohort</title><title>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)</title><addtitle>Occup Environ Med</addtitle><description>Objectives: To investigate the association between effort/reward imbalance (ERI) at work and sedentary lifestyle. Methods: Cross sectional data from the ongoing Finnish Public Sector Study related to 30 433 women and 7718 men aged 17–64 were used (n = 35 918 after exclusion of participants with missing values in covariates). From the responses to a questionnaire, an aggregated mean score for ERI in a work unit was assigned to each participant. The outcome was sedentary lifestyle defined as &lt;2.00 metabolic equivalent task (MET) hours/day. Logistic regression with generalised estimating equations was used as an analysis method to include both individual and work unit level predictors in the models. Adjustments were made for age, marital status, occupational status, job contract, smoking, and heavy drinking. Results: Twenty five per cent of women and 27% of men had a sedentary lifestyle. High individual level ERI was associated with a higher likelihood of sedentary lifestyle both among women (odds ratio (OR) = 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.16) and men (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.33). These associations were not explained by relevant confounders and they were also independent of work unit level job strain measured as a ratio of job demands and control. Conclusions: A mismatch between high occupational effort spent and low reward received in turn seems to be associated with an increased risk of sedentary lifestyle, although this association is relatively weak.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>effort reward imbalance</subject><subject>ERI</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Finland</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lack of exercise</subject><subject>Legislation. Organization</subject><subject>Leisure</subject><subject>Leisure Activities</subject><subject>Leisure time</subject><subject>Life Style</subject><subject>Lifestyles</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>MET</subject><subject>Metabolic equivalent</subject><subject>metabolic equivalent task</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Occupational Health - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Occupational medicine</subject><subject>Occupational stress</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>physical activity</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Public sector</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Reward</subject><subject>Scope of employment</subject><subject>Sedentary behavior</subject><subject>sedentary lifestyle</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>work stress</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><subject>Working women</subject><issn>1351-0711</issn><issn>1470-7926</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkttrFDEYxQdRbK0--6QERB-E2c1lkkx8EGSprVIqFC_gS8jk0s46M1mTmer-935l1q36IiEkcH455OSkKB4TvCCEiWX0_YJizBeYYiWrO8UhqSQupaLiLuwZJyWWhBwUD3JeY0yYZPR-cUBEpWTNq8MiHIcQ07hM_odJDrV9YzozWI_M4FD2zg-jSVvUtcHncdv5VyCg2GSfrs3YxsF0KI-T26J2QAZ1Jl16FK2dNr9VG6_A_2FxL5gu-0e79aj49Pb44-q0PPtw8m715qxseFWNJQm1VDBqyj3HQmDjagXTSl9zYz1RQjkSBLWOWSyF4FTWIvAGY2es4-yoeD37bqam987C9ZPp9Ca1PcTQ0bT6b2Vor_RlvNYUy5pgBgYvdgYpfp8gs-7bbH0Hj-LjlLWQShEsCIDP_gHXcUqQOGsCVlQSjjFQy5myKeacfNhfhWB906CGBvVNg3puEE48_TPBLb-rDIDnO8Bka7qQoK4233JSypqxGrgnM7fOY0x7nUr4ApJT0MtZb_Pof-51k75BSCa5Pv-80ur04v3Xk_Mv-gL4lzPf9Ov_pvgFOWHLjw</recordid><startdate>20060601</startdate><enddate>20060601</enddate><creator>Kouvonen, A</creator><creator>Kivimäki, M</creator><creator>Elovainio, M</creator><creator>Pentti, J</creator><creator>Linna, A</creator><creator>Virtanen, M</creator><creator>Vahtera, J</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Group</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060601</creationdate><title>Effort/reward imbalance and sedentary lifestyle: an observational study in a large occupational cohort</title><author>Kouvonen, A ; Kivimäki, M ; Elovainio, M ; Pentti, J ; Linna, A ; Virtanen, M ; Vahtera, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-1f879797825e50660ad89ad8c7e85ace1969d1f62cd3c076652786f5b00dacd53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>effort reward imbalance</topic><topic>ERI</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Finland</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lack of exercise</topic><topic>Legislation. Organization</topic><topic>Leisure</topic><topic>Leisure Activities</topic><topic>Leisure time</topic><topic>Life Style</topic><topic>Lifestyles</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>MET</topic><topic>Metabolic equivalent</topic><topic>metabolic equivalent task</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Occupational Health - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Occupational medicine</topic><topic>Occupational stress</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>physical activity</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Public sector</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Reward</topic><topic>Scope of employment</topic><topic>Sedentary behavior</topic><topic>sedentary lifestyle</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>work stress</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><topic>Working women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kouvonen, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kivimäki, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elovainio, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pentti, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linna, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virtanen, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vahtera, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kouvonen, A</au><au>Kivimäki, M</au><au>Elovainio, M</au><au>Pentti, J</au><au>Linna, A</au><au>Virtanen, M</au><au>Vahtera, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effort/reward imbalance and sedentary lifestyle: an observational study in a large occupational cohort</atitle><jtitle>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Occup Environ Med</addtitle><date>2006-06-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>422</spage><epage>427</epage><pages>422-427</pages><issn>1351-0711</issn><eissn>1470-7926</eissn><abstract>Objectives: To investigate the association between effort/reward imbalance (ERI) at work and sedentary lifestyle. Methods: Cross sectional data from the ongoing Finnish Public Sector Study related to 30 433 women and 7718 men aged 17–64 were used (n = 35 918 after exclusion of participants with missing values in covariates). From the responses to a questionnaire, an aggregated mean score for ERI in a work unit was assigned to each participant. The outcome was sedentary lifestyle defined as &lt;2.00 metabolic equivalent task (MET) hours/day. Logistic regression with generalised estimating equations was used as an analysis method to include both individual and work unit level predictors in the models. Adjustments were made for age, marital status, occupational status, job contract, smoking, and heavy drinking. Results: Twenty five per cent of women and 27% of men had a sedentary lifestyle. High individual level ERI was associated with a higher likelihood of sedentary lifestyle both among women (odds ratio (OR) = 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.16) and men (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.33). These associations were not explained by relevant confounders and they were also independent of work unit level job strain measured as a ratio of job demands and control. Conclusions: A mismatch between high occupational effort spent and low reward received in turn seems to be associated with an increased risk of sedentary lifestyle, although this association is relatively weak.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>16497854</pmid><doi>10.1136/oem.2005.020974</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1351-0711
ispartof Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England), 2006-06, Vol.63 (6), p.422-427
issn 1351-0711
1470-7926
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2078103
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; BMJ Journals - NESLi2; PubMed Central
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Age
Behavior
Biological and medical sciences
Body mass index
Cross-Sectional Studies
effort reward imbalance
ERI
Exercise
Exercise - physiology
Female
Finland
Humans
Lack of exercise
Legislation. Organization
Leisure
Leisure Activities
Leisure time
Life Style
Lifestyles
Male
Medical sciences
Men
MET
Metabolic equivalent
metabolic equivalent task
Middle Aged
Modeling
Observational studies
Occupational health
Occupational Health - statistics & numerical data
Occupational medicine
Occupational stress
Original
physical activity
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Public sector
Questionnaires
Regression Analysis
Reward
Scope of employment
Sedentary behavior
sedentary lifestyle
Socioeconomic Factors
Studies
work stress
Working conditions
Working women
title Effort/reward imbalance and sedentary lifestyle: an observational study in a large occupational cohort
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A13%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effort/reward%20imbalance%20and%20sedentary%20lifestyle:%20an%20observational%20study%20in%20a%20large%20occupational%20cohort&rft.jtitle=Occupational%20and%20environmental%20medicine%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Kouvonen,%20A&rft.date=2006-06-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=422&rft.epage=427&rft.pages=422-427&rft.issn=1351-0711&rft.eissn=1470-7926&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/oem.2005.020974&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E27732752%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-1f879797825e50660ad89ad8c7e85ace1969d1f62cd3c076652786f5b00dacd53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781271500&rft_id=info:pmid/16497854&rft_jstor_id=27732752&rfr_iscdi=true